Slashdot Mirror


Corporate America Cools On Blockchain. Gartner Sees 'Disconnect Between Hype and Reality' (bloomberg.com)

"Corporate America's love affair with all things blockchain may be cooling," reports Bloomberg. An anonymous reader quotes their report. [Alternate version here.] A number of software projects based on the distributed ledger technology will be wound down this year, according to Forrester Research Inc. And some companies pushing ahead with pilot tests are scaling back their ambitions and timelines. In 90 percent of cases, the experiments will never become part of a company's operations, the firm estimates. Even Nasdaq Inc., a high-profile champion of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, hasn't moved as quickly as hoped. The exchange operator, which talked in 2016 about deploying blockchain for voting in shareholder meetings and private-company stock issuance, isn't using the technology in any widely deployed projects yet...

"The disconnect between the hype and the reality is significant -- I've never seen anything like it," said Rajesh Kandaswamy, an analyst at Gartner Inc. "In terms of actual production use, it's very rare...." Only 1 percent of chief information officers said they had any kind of blockchain adoption in their organizations, and only 8 percent said they were in short-term planning or active experimentation with the technology, according to a Gartner study. Nearly 80 percent of CIOs said they had no interest in the technology. Many companies that previously announced blockchain rollouts have changed plans

Problems include the fact that most blockchains "also can't yet handle a large volume of transactions," and worries about compatibility with other software -- which some hope to address next year with software certification testing. But at least two big tech companies are aggressively pushing blockchain.

"So far, IBM and Microsoft have grabbed 51 percent of the more than $700 million market for blockchain products and services, WinterGreen Research Inc. estimated earlier this year,"

17 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Holy Vapor, Batman by glomph · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because 'blockchain' sounds better than 'redundant distributed database', a term (and technology) that's been around & constantly improved for ages.

    Buzzword bullshit does not create reality, unless you are in the Cult of the Orangutan.

    1. Re:Holy Vapor, Batman by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Blockchain technology is real, and has some interesting applications and uses, but I guess the business folks are figuring out it's not some magic get-rich-quick sauce. I'm fine with the hype cooling off, as now the computer scientists / programmers can settle down and start figuring out how to make use of it for real and fix some of its deficiencies and problem areas, rather than slapping a label on a product or service by less scrupulous folks to manipulate stock prices.

      Dare I hope the same thing happens with "AI" soon? Personally, I just substitute "advanced pattern recognition" anywhere I see the term "AI", which helps, but I'm still getting a bit tired of the hype.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Holy Vapor, Batman by Known+Nutter · · Score: 2

      But imagine a Beowulf Blockchain of these!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    3. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Is it webscale? Can it write to /dev/null for extra performance?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Holy Vapor, Batman by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Please, please, please: list some of these uses. I've asked this question before, and gotten silence in response. What is the use of this "$700 million" technology? What is it good for, other than evading the law?

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    5. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And in countries with high corruption, who is going to set up this system? And who is going to pay for it? And even if you did set it up and get it funded, why would the corrupt government respect it? This is just more "evading the law".

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    6. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2

      If the central government isn't corrupt, then why don't they just keep the property records themselves, in a traditional format? And again, who pays?

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      Sorry,but those are in direct conflict. Anywhere that property records are in concern, that implies the government is the final authority on the record. The entire purpose of block chain is that there is no final authority...the authority is collective. Without that feature of block chain, you just have a public database with checksums and redundancy. You are welcome to make copies of that database if you want, just like you are welcome to keep copies of the public records. If the government is corrupt enough to modify the history of records and the courts to not overrule you contesting the changes, the why do you think they are just going to say "oh, but now its block chain enabled so I guess we just gotta stay honest". And let's look at this from the opposite way. Lets assume the government is 100% honest. What do you think the government is going to do when you refuse to digitally sign off on a legit tax lien be levied against your property, or the property being legitimately foreclosed and resold when you didn't pay your mortgage? Do you think they are just going to say " oh well"? If they have the ability to override your lack of consent, then what was the purpose of this block chain to begin with?

    8. Re:Holy Vapor, Batman by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2

      Anybody else have a legitimate use? *crickets*

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    9. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      You are confusing the block chain with the consensus protocol

      No I'm not. You seem to be confusing the fact that consensus is the ONLY new feature that block chain brings to the table. Every other feature...digital signatures to verify authenticity, hashed history chaining, multi-master redundancy...all of it has existed for decades. Using block chain without the consensus is like chemotherapy without chemicals.

    10. Re: Holy Vapor, Batman by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      Well, its good for making IBM and Microsoft at least $357 million.

  2. Inevitable by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because almost no one in the corporate world even understood what "blockchain" even means. They heard and saw a bunch of hype, they were afraid of missing the bandwagon, so they just reflexively "adopted" it.

    It's very similar to the era where if you "had a website", your lack of a business plan or completely idiotic business plan, everyone jumped because "websites are going to be big!" Nobody know what they were really getting then, either, hence. Pets.com. etc.

  3. Re:Funny by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone writes this article right after corporate America Starbucks (crypto will be first worldwide currency) and microsoft double down on blockchain and nyse owner has a huge announcement to back bitcoin with real purchases for futures. You guys are just funny with the trolls. In five years you will be left in the dust.

    Translation: "I bought bitcoin at $19000 with borrowed money and now it's under $7000. If it will only get back to like $12000, I'll be able to get out and not have to sell my car."

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. I've never seen anything like it, by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2

    "I've never seen anything like it," said Rajesh Kandaswamy, an analyst at Gartner Inc

    And this is why Gartner is full if it. They are part of the hype train. They are part of the constant annoyance of C*O to lower level employees to jump on the train and not address the real issues.

  5. Re:Funny by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blockchain != cryptocurrency, especially in corporate applications. Even those banks who are experimenting with coins like Ripple to manage settlements will come to their senses, and understand that they are completely out of their gourds using a cryptocurrency (of which half is owned by the founders) for this purpose. They may end up using blockchain technology to implement distributed trust and immutability, but they have no need for a coin.

    As for retailers accepting BTC, there is very little upside there for either the merchant or the customer, unless that customer is someone who happens to already hold a decent amount of them. Another more efficient and stable cryptocurrency may eventually rise to become a widely accepted means of payment for the masses, but it won't be BTC and it won't be in the next 5 years. I'm willing to stake a good bottle of Scotch on that.

    I'm not very surprised that corporations are cooling on the notion of "using blockchain". I work on innovation in a reasonably large entity, and if I would have gotten a Dogecoin for every time someone said "we are planning to do an experiment with Blockchain" or "Should we do something with cryptocurrencty?", I'd be able to retire by now. By the way, the best way to silence those idiots is to ask: "What?". What should we do with cryptocurrency, what is your blockchain experiment? No one is able to give a concrete answer to that, or propose something that couldn't be handled just as well or better with a database.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  6. Re:Funny by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    no, while (barely) adequate for cryptocurrency blockchain is a lousy solution for most business processes though, a very bottlenecked architecture. superior solutions exist for other business distributed databases and trust mechanisms.

    as far as saying "it can only go up from here", er, no markets never have that guarantee. bitcoin could have its value sabotaged by government actions, for example.

  7. Re:Funny by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    yes and the market was so overjoyed with the news that BTC went to the moon...

    except today it plummeted below $7K