Slashdot Mirror


Traders Are Talking Up Cryptocurrencies, Then Dumping Them, Costing Others Millions (wsj.com)

Dozens of trading groups are manipulating the price of cryptocurrencies on some of the largest online exchanges, generating at least $825 million in trading activity over the past six months -- and hundreds of millions in losses for those caught on the wrong side, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis. From a report: In a review of trading data and online communications among traders between January and the end of July, the Journal identified 175 "pump and dump" schemes involving 121 different digital coins, which show a sudden rise in price and an equally sudden fall minutes later.

A pump-and-dump scheme is one of the oldest types of market fraud: Traders talk up the price of an asset before dumping it for a profit and leaving fooled investors with shrunken shares. The Securities and Exchange Commission regularly brings civil cases alleging pump and dumps using publicly traded stocks. Manipulations of cryptocurrencies are no different, but regulators have yet to bring a case in the more opaque market for them. The SEC declined to comment.

123 comments

  1. Costing others millions by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, you got it.
    That's how the market works in a capitalist system, comrade.

    1. Re: Costing others millions by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      ^^^ this is well known. There's even an old song called "Bitcoin Baron" that covers this procedure.

    2. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly how the stock market has worked for ~200 years.

    3. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How old are we talkin'? I don't think Jimmy Dean or Merle Travis ever sang about dunning-krugerrands.

    4. Re:Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this the new penny stock craze of the late 90's/ early 00's?

      CAP === 'galloped'

    5. Re:Costing others millions by PseudoThink · · Score: 2

      ...or to reframe the headline: "Speculators are butthurt when the hype they believed isn't true."

    6. Re:Costing others millions by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You first becoming aware of something does not a craze make.

      Penny stocks have been scams forever.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re: Costing others millions by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cryptocurrencies are not stocks. Their raison d'etre is that they are outside the system, and free of government control. Now some speculators bought into the hype, bet the wrong way, and are whining that the government didn't spend my tax dollars to protect them. Why should I care?

    8. Re:Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truthfully, that is exactly the pattern I play on the stock market though I'm not the one writing the articles that manipulate the stocks to create the swings. I just read them and piggyback on their operation.

      I buy highly volatile stocks that have just been dumped due to short sellers having some momentary success in causing a panic (usually with some overblown technical issue after a good quarterly earnings report), wait for the longs to pump it back up, and the I dump when it gets close to the point at which the short sellers are usually able to cause their panic again. My target is about 5% per trade, and I usually beat it with ease because I jump in after a sudden 10% or so drop.

      Anyway, this stuff is the lifeblood of traders. They are just jealous that some of their volatility is being shifted to the crypto.

    9. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government may bring cases selectively, but they do not succeed in controlling it. The issue here is that enough of the money that people get via these trading schemes has moved from the stock market to the crypto market that it is hurting them. So, they are looking for ways to use the system to shift the money back.

      This is like a new mafia moving in on an old one. The old one has established friends in the government and will use the government to attack the interloper. This is the basis of power of the old money.

    10. Re:Costing others millions by sjames · · Score: 1

      Ans according to the SEC, it's a crime. So I guess you're saying the market runs on crime?

    11. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I donâ(TM)t believe you do this with any consistency - you just talk about it. Thereâ(TM)s plenty of people and algorithms smarter than you doing the same thing.

      Consistently & reliably making 5-10% on a trade would take a thousand to a million in like 2-3 months.

      Your post is so stupid I wonder if youâ(TM)re creimer.

    12. Re:Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no, in a real system, you add value for the amount of money you earn. These "currency" speculators aren't adding jack shit for value. They're just playing musical money trading, and every last one of them is hoping some other schlub ends up holding the bag at the end. But the majority of them are going to lose, while the ones who work hard to stoop the lowest take the loot. So, great way to siphon a lot of money into the hands of the insidious few. This new scheme has zero benefit to society.

    13. Re:Costing others millions by hai_Priesty · · Score: 2
      Though unlike those duped into penny stock craze, not all of them are optimistic, gullible investors to Wall Street.

      Many of them were people that are "anti-establishment", other thought themselves as visionaries ahead of their time, while some others are chicken little that thought themselves thought quick-thinking and prudent while more likely just being duped into the equivalent of the"the sky is falling" or some tin-foil hat conspiracies. Look at how bitcoin prices spiked or plunged to every semi-plausible or totally bizzare rumours, and how they overreact to every news including Trump being elected or yet another CEO calling bitcoin a fraud for the umpteenth time.

      Bubbles happen all the time, but the amount of bitcoin-bull intellectual snobs you see online (some will make passionate(?) case on why the USA system will collapse, others make the case of boundless bitcoin potential while ignoring the elephant in the room) seems worse than many other bubbles, perhaps second only to the dot-com bubble if we only count this half-century.

    14. Re:Costing others millions by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      That was my reaction as well. In other news, Water is Wet! Politicians Lie! Prices Increase! The Sun Rises! The Sun Sets! The Sun Crashes!

      All of this brought to you by Capt.Obvious, RSNC.

    15. Re:Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you don't, because the people behind the articles have already moved before the market.

    16. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand. Enough gambling junkies with money have started betting in the cryptomarket, that it has attracted the attention of intelligent people who can separate these fools from their money. They're "bringing it back" to people who know what they're doing.

    17. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryptocurrency, fiat money and gold - which is more attractive and why?

    18. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now some speculators bought into the hype, bet the wrong way, and are whining that the government didn't spend my tax dollars to protect them. Why should I care?

      I can't read the article, but the summary doesn't mention any spectators whining to the government. It only mentions researchers noticing what they believe are signs of pump and dump in the spot prices. As such, I really don't care, but there is no need for you to make up stuff to confirm your world view.

    19. Re: Costing others millions by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      For certain types of investors, those with a particular category of investment strategy. When they have enough cash.

      When they don't have enough cash, they buy lottery tickets instead.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    20. Re: Costing others millions by inking · · Score: 1

      The issue here is that enough of the money that people get via these trading schemes has moved from the stock market to the crypto market that it is hurting them.

      Citation needed. This market is as shallow as people who read fiction and think that it makes them smart.

    21. Re: Costing others millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean slashdotters?

  2. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this need? It's always been the business plan for all cryptocurrencies

  3. Just like stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same pattern that's going on with trading stocks. It's no longer for the long term growth and growing companies.

  4. Shocking truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You lost the money the moment you gave it to someone for cryptocurrencies.

    1. Re: Shocking truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really.

    2. Re:Shocking truth by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Or, as we say in East London: "If you cant tell if you are being robbed, you ARE being robbed".

      (if it is hidden behind a thick black curtain, the curtain is not there by accident).
      and never trust guys wearing balaclavas and carrying guns.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  5. No kidding? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    Not to be overly harsh, but...

        Who could have possibly anticipated that a virtual "monetary system", which has absolutely no controls or laws governing it, by design, could be manipulated in the simplest way possible, just so someone could make a few million dollars?

          I guess the same incredibly naive people who come up with it in the first place, and also, thought that there was absolutely nothing wrong or fishy when valuation increases by thousands of percent *with no actual value being created*. Has absolutely everyone forgotten the years 1999-2002? That's rhetorical, of course.

    1. Re:No kidding? by timholman · · Score: 1

      I guess the same incredibly naive people who come up with it in the first place, and also, thought that there was absolutely nothing wrong or fishy when valuation increases by thousands of percent *with no actual value being created*. Has absolutely everyone forgotten the years 1999-2002? That's rhetorical, of course.

      Also the same people who talk about "investing" in various altcoins as well as BTC. At what point does it occur to them that cryptocurrency is the digital equivalent of the guy down the street printing his own currency, keeping half of it for himself, and then trying to persuade everyone else to use it as money? Does it sink in after they buy into the 10th altcoin? The 20th? The 30th?

      At what point does one realize that he's holding the digital equivalent of Monopoly money?

    2. Re:No kidding? by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > At what point does one realize that he's holding the digital equivalent of Monopoly money?

      Probably not until there's nobody left who is willing to buy it off them for real money.

      =Smidge=

    3. Re:No kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Real money" is the same as Monopoly money. There's no inherent value or physical object associated with it. And the majority of it is digital just like crypto money. The difference is that one is regulated by bankers and the other is not. You think your "real money" is worth more because you trust your banker "firends" to do the right thing and keep the value of your money stable. This is another mistake that you will realize too late.

    4. Re:No kidding? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Not to be overly harsh, but...

      Who could have possibly anticipated that a virtual "monetary system", which has absolutely no controls or laws governing it, by design, could be manipulated in the simplest way possible, just so someone could make a few million dollars?

      Greed. Pure and simple. The greed of the manipulators, married to the greed of their marks.

      The same greed that drives con men and Ponzi schemes. The concept that the mark can make the big bucks.

      If cryptocurrency was so great, then they wouldn't take dollars - or any other currency for it at all, because any currency they would take for it would lose value while the Crypto was increasing in value at incredible rates. Why would the crypto traders want to get currency that is losing value at the same rate CC gains it??

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:No kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out how to write a post without manually copying my username into the body of my post. Everyone else seems to have this figured out but me. Can someone help me understand how to post like a normal person?

      =Smidge=

    6. Re: No kidding? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Nonsense comments like this is why no one takes cryptocurrency fanboys seriously.

      I could try to explain what money is and how it works but it would just be lost on you.

      Under the US system, money is debt. It's that simple. We put up real property and our labor to borrow made-up money, which is owed back to the bank anyway.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  6. Miner Miner Forty-Niner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1849. Relive The Dream. Again. Make 'murika Greedy Again.

    1. Re: Miner Miner Forty-Niner by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      The 1849 boom happened for a different reason. President Polk has just siezed California from Mexico. They needed to rapidly rush a lot of white Americans onto the land to occupy it for the U.S.

  7. As Walter White said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't bullshit the bullshitter.

  8. NEWSFLASH: by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NEWSFLASH: "A fool and his money..."

    1. Re:NEWSFLASH: by njvack · · Score: 2

      Marks being fools doesn't make fraud any more legal.

  9. Yes, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's very well known that thinly traded or illiquid assets are especially vulnerable to market manipulation. There's a reason why stock market pump-and-dumps mostly happen in "penny" stocks.

    This is not an argument for or against cryptocurrencies. It's something that can happen in any market.

    1. Re:Yes, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mistakes happen - BBOX was thought to be headed to zero on July 3rd, was priced as low as $0.70 then news hit that it had a new multi-year contract and it shot to $3. Anyone who rode the whole thing and timed it perfectly could have made over 400%. AWX and GEVO were also some wild ones.

      TSLA's recent 17% climb was a case of a short squeeze - all it takes is a margin call and they have to buy at whatever the cost is. Even large companies can be affected. If sanity hits the market, Amazon may fall as Facebook, Netflix, and Twitter did.

  10. You found out how the stock market works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, all of it. That's its entire point.

    Congratulations!

  11. Amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupid and the rejects were having a toy. And they cry for years that nobody is playing with them. Now the big boys are here. And they are doing things the way big boys do things: without nanny and geek talk about the history and beautiful concepts. And the geeks can't even follow even with the years of advance in the new tech.

  12. I hope you are talking about the entire market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because two guys got the Nobel prize for proving that this is not only a guaranteed effect of a stock market, but that crashes are actually essential to keeping it healthy!

    Because crashes are nothing else than the fools realizing that their stock ain't worth shit because the imaginary worth went so high that it stopped being believable.

    If you prevent that, the result is like putting a plug on a volcano. It enables the pressure to rise until the entire mountain explodes.
    Example: Financial crisis of 2007.

    Now they found even hotter fuel (like cryptocurrencies) and an even bigger plug.

    So have fun with the worth of your income, when that explosion happens. It will make a global geological extinction event look like a school schience fair volcano.

    1. Re:I hope you are talking about the entire market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      schience fair volcano.

      I think you've had enough, buddy. And give me your car keys.

    2. Re:I hope you are talking about the entire market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha...that cracked me up. :)

    3. Re:I hope you are talking about the entire market by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I thought he was speaking Yiddish.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. Growth isn't a good thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like any exponential growth an all of the universe, it destroys everything in its path, and you want to be as far away as possible.

    Like pathogens, explosions, and humans.

  14. This sounds new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Dozens of trading groups are manipulating the price of cryptocurrencies on some of the largest online exchanges

    Not unlike investment banks, wow. Don't people know what caveat emptor mean anymore?

  15. What is Cryptocurrency actually used for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is Cryptocurrency actually used for?
    Very few people actually use cryptocurrency as a means of making purchases.
    From where I sit, the vast majority of people buying cryptocurrencies are speculators. They're buying it now at a particular value in the hope that they can sell it to someone else in the future at a higher value. The cryptocurrency has no inherent value as it's not used for anything else other than speculation. Sooner or later people will wake up to this and the value will plummet. It's like a game of pass the parcel, only you don't want to be the one left holding the parcel when the music stops.

    1. Re:What is Cryptocurrency actually used for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Investment for very smart people. You sound like a retarded lib who was SURE trump would lose. You fucking losers lose all the time and you never learn. Morons.

    2. Re: What is Cryptocurrency actually used for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illegal gambling, buying drugs, human trafficking, money laundering, private donations, etc. If you don't want a 3rd party deciding what you can do with your money then you're limited to cash and crypto.

  16. Traders are scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoot a few .. shoot a few more. Ah peace returns with a full wallet. That's better ....

  17. Profit is merely legalized crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legalized fraud/theft/robbery is the core of the entire problem. Aka: Giving less work for your money than the payer had to work to get it. Or, taking money for your work... nd tehn taking some more, *without* working for it. Aka profit. When the same work should be worth the same.

    Oh wait, with banks, stock, or imaginary property, you don't have to work at all!

    It's not capitalist. It's not "free market". It's just a crime. Period.

    1. Re:Profit is merely legalized crime. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Troll

      Legalized fraud/theft/robbery is the core of the entire problem.

      Except in this case, the "victims" volunteered to be robbed.

      When the same work should be worth the same.

      Compensation should be proportional to the value produced, not the effort expended.

    2. Re:Profit is merely legalized crime. by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah! If those old ladies didn't wanna be mugged, what were they doing in the park?

    3. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Informative

      Voluntary exchanges and park muggings are totally the same. The people who made these trades were not coerced and if they value crypto currencies improperly that is their own fault. Would you feel any remorse for them over this or any other investment that turned out a loss through natural shifts in the market?

      If people are buying into crypto currencies as a long term investment, this small dip should matter little in the long run. If these people were trying to make short term flips to make money, they are not so different from the people who scammed them. In your analogy they are just other muggers in the park who were themselves mugged.

    4. Re:Profit is merely legalized crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the park requires you to sign a clearly explained document that any money you have on you (and that you're welcome to put your money safely in a bank before you enter if you don't want to bring any) is forfeit the minute you enter the park, your example is exactly like stocks. Well, assuming the muggers ask nicely and the person capitulates, because you don't often hear about people beating each other up over a stock certificate.

    5. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you consider fraud to be just another voluntary exchange? Because pump and dump is a form of fraud.

    6. Re:Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Legalized fraud/theft/robbery is the core of the entire problem.

      Except in this case, the "victims" volunteered to be robbed.

      No one volunteers to be robbed. There is fraud involved here. Surely you don't advocate lying and deception as a normal part of doing business.

      When the same work should be worth the same.

      Compensation should be proportional to the value produced, not the effort expended.

      I would question how much value is really produced by pump and dump schemes. If I tell you that I am long on a security when I'm actually short, and convince you to join me in a long term investment, and then sell as soon as you make your investment, causing the price to drop, what value is produced?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      Voluntary exchanges and park muggings are totally the same. The people who made these trades were not coerced and if they value crypto currencies improperly that is their own fault. Would you feel any remorse for them over this or any other investment that turned out a loss through natural shifts in the market?

      They were not coerced, but they were lied to. Fraud is illegal for a reason, and is not something to be defended just because someone didn't know they were being lied to.

      If people are buying into crypto currencies as a long term investment, this small dip should matter little in the long run. If these people were trying to make short term flips to make money, they are not so different from the people who scammed them. In your analogy they are just other muggers in the park who were themselves mugged.

      Being short on a security does not imply fraud or a scam. So no, they were not the same as the people who scammed them, just because they had a short term investment.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    8. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Would you consider fraud to be just another voluntary exchange? Because pump and dump is a form of fraud.

      No kidding. Apparently, to some on this board, being a "sophisticated investor" means being able to discern all fraud and dishonesty.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    9. Re:Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      If the park requires you to sign a clearly explained document that any money you have on you (and that you're welcome to put your money safely in a bank before you enter if you don't want to bring any) is forfeit the minute you enter the park, your example is exactly like stocks. Well, assuming the muggers ask nicely and the person capitulates, because you don't often hear about people beating each other up over a stock certificate.

      So, are we now openly acknowledging that Wall Street is full of criminals and frauds? I mean, I'm cool with that; it means I don't have to tiptoe around the issue anymore. But I'm not sure everyone knows that you should expect to be fleeced when you invest your money. Quite a market we have, eh?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    10. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of you don't know what shorting security means. Is not a short term investment.

    11. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A market is like anything else in life, jump into the sea without knowing how to swim and you'll drown.

    12. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Most of you don't know what shorting security means. Is not a short term investment.

      Shorting a security means borrowing shares now and selling them at a high price, hoping the price will come down by the time you have to pay for the shares you borrowed, so you can net the difference. Does that sound right? While this does not have to be a short-term investment, it usually is, because there is a set time by which you have to cover the shares you borrowed.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    13. Re: Profit is merely legalized crime. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      A market is like anything else in life, jump into the sea without knowing how to swim and you'll drown.

      So, yes? Is part of knowing how to swim in this analogy knowing that there are a lot of dishonest people in the investment industry?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  18. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How so? A rigged market manipulated behind the scenes is not "free" in any sense.

  19. False. Bitcoin is a secure investment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This article is light on details and makes all sorts of false and misleading claims. Of course is comes from WSJ.com which is lame stream media interested in pushing Windows for desktops, and see all that liberal politics full of Trump derangement syndrome? This won't fool insightful investors like us who know better and buy bitcoin as often as possible because we know it will be worth BILLIONS very soon as the ecomony takes off and America soars the future. Real truth is that Bitcoin as an investment strategy is %100 SECURE. Many many smart investers say way more secure than gold or any Fiat currentcy. I know this and sites like Slashdot.Org have published countless stories CONFIRMING it. So what are you waiting for? Buy more Bitcoin today!

    1. Re: False. Bitcoin is a secure investment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus three funny

  20. Re:Free market by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just who exactly do you think these "investors" are who are BILKING others? That's right. Bankers, or those in banker adjacent industries.

    Regulation exists because an industry has proven themselves UNTRUSTWORTHY.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  21. I've got a few friends dabbling in it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and when pressed they'll admit it's basically gambling that they can get out of the market and leave someone else holding the bag.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I've got a few friends dabbling in it by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      and when pressed they'll admit it's basically gambling that they can get out of the market and leave someone else holding the bag.

      Oh, I'm certain they will. Or maybe not. There is a well known phenomenon there of investment greed based optimism. Problem is those who invest in CC are likely to be marks. Regular stock market dilettantes get hit a lot. Buy because it's going grazy, then refuse to sell at the first sign of a drop-off, then ride it the whole way to the bottom. Buy high and sell low is a real phenomenon.

      It's not like some folks got together and decided on a scheme for people to give them their money then after they get the money, crash the funny money in a few hours and then have the real money for themselves.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  22. It's quite the opposite by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the housing crash was caused by deregulation. Clinton (Bill) repealed a bunch of laws meant to prevent Mainstreet and Wallstreet banks from intermingling. That's how you got Credit Derivative Swaps that let them hide their losses.

    Also, most of the houses foreclosed during the crash were investment properties. Besides a few high profile cases touted in the media there wasn't a lot of folks borrowing outside their means for their main domicile. Again, a lack of regulation made this possible as there was no regulatory oversight when people were borrowing for these investment properties. Banks weren't required to check ability to pay much or at all, which further inflated the bubble.

    Donald Trump & the Republican lead Congress (with a bit of help from the right wing Dems) have further deregulated the banks and given them license to go back to the kind of lending and over-extending that caused the 2008 crash. On the plus side for Trump & Co he'll likely be out of office by the time the effects take place, just like how the Bush/Clinton deregulation got handed off to Obama to fix.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      BS about the investment properties. I worked the foreclosures. I also worked on the massive documentation project going over those loans. Our system has codes as to whether a property was a borrower's primary residence, a second home, or an investment property. Oddly enough, the coding was 1, 2 and 3. Very direct. Although I saw 3s from time to time, the vast majority, across all states, was 1, primary residence. Florida and California had a higher portion, but not even 10% in those states.

      So, unless you've worked at a bank that truly had more investment properties being foreclosed than primary residences, please shut the heck up. Indeed, please provide a legitimate source for your statement that "most of the houses foreclosed during the crash were investment properties."

    2. Re:It's quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump is getting re-elected in 2020.

    3. Re:It's quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GLBA, is it was known, was signed off by Clinton, but written by Republicans ... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act

    4. Re:It's quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're effing kidding me. The people hardest hit by the crash were the poor, especially the minority poor--in huge part because the problem was caused by regulations going into place that created perverse incentives to give them loans that they typically could barely afford, then banks got allowed to repackage it into the sausage of the investment world...with the regulators pretty much not showing much interest in checking to make sure that the financial products made from the loans were as reported.

      A huge amount of this could accurately be described as enabling banks to take advantage of the poor--that the banks got hit is pretty much entirely the result of them having gotten the silly idea that this bubble would (somehow) not burst...and it was a horrible mistake to bail them out without forcing breakups. (That would at least have left them with less ability to influence politics and regulators, and hopefully serve as some incentive to not want the state to haul their asses out of the fire. Besides, too big to fail is too big.)

    5. Re:It's quite the opposite by dehachel12 · · Score: 0

      please research fractional reserve banking

    6. Re:It's quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job not actually responding to his post.

    7. Re:It's quite the opposite by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      please research fractional reserve banking

      What? The concept that if you want the bank to pay you interest on deposits the bank has to do something productive with the money such as lend a significant proportion of it out in order to collect at least that amount of interest upon it? There's your research.

      Non-fractional reserve banking is called a safe deposit box. You can't write negotiable instruments against it or use an ATM card to access it, and you'll pay a substantial monthly fee, but anything that you put into it is pretty much guaranteed to be there until you yourself remove it.

      Fractional reserve banking also has very little to do with whether loans are made against residences vs investment properties, so no, researching it won't contradict the GPs information.

    8. Re:It's quite the opposite by dehachel12 · · Score: 1

      >a significant proportion of it out
      it is lend out 10 to 50 times.

    9. Re:It's quite the opposite by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      it is lend out 10 to 50 times.

      Ironically from someone who demands that others research things, you've provided no support in addition to being totally wrong.

      You're taking the reciprocal of the required reserve and treating it as if that applies to all the money deposited in the bank.

      If I have $100 and lend you $95 for 6 months, I've reserved 5% of the money and given you 19x the money I held in reserve. But I've still only lent out 95% of the money. I still have $5, and you still have $95. I'll very likely get that $95 back -- plus interest -- after 6 months, so even if it came from Bill's 1 year Certificate of Deposit, there was no need to keep his $100 locked in a safe deposit box. That's why I'm willing to pay Bill interest instead of charging him $5 to guard his $100 for the year.

      Thanks for playing "you're bad a math."

  23. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, the poor are using their millions to manipulate the market. A real stable genius you are.

  24. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the answer to being fucked over by big players in (under)regulated markets is to switch to being fucked over by big players in unregulated markets.

    Not only is this great personal advice, it's ridiculously insightful as to the order of the world, bravo!

  25. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're free to not click buy, and to not be a gullible retard

  26. Welcome by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Welcome to crypto currency trading. Enjoy your stay.

    1. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, ... it's gone. (with apologies to South Park.)

  27. Dumb money taken = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupid money loses, smart money wins. This is how efficient markets work. When you have zero interest rate policy (zirp) for so long, you protect the stupid. A bailoout-free blowup weeds out the fat morons believing in unicorns. We need more real market dynamics in so-called regulated markets.

  28. Welcome to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prestige gambling.
    c/o le stock exchange.

  29. This has nothing to do with Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has nothing to do with Bitcoin. All digital Tokens are derived from ethereum smart contracts and most all of them are created to take advantage of the greater fool theory.

    Untrustworthy digital tokens are inexcusable in this new era of automated trust when it is possible to programmatically link the token to the performance of the company or some other valuable asset.

    1. Re:This has nothing to do with Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You are aware that there are ICOs on other blockchains, right?

      Besides, projects like OmiseGo were not created to take advantage of "greater fool theory". There are some worthless ERC20s out there. Don't lump them all into the same category.

  30. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just who exactly do you think these "investors" are who are BILKING others? That's right. Bankers, or those in banker adjacent industries.

    Regulation exists because an industry has proven themselves UNTRUSTWORTHY.

    You are clearly not an American. If you were American you'd be busy boring us with a long lecture about how something like this would not happen in a completely unregulated market in a society where government and laws have been eradicated.

  31. Is this not how the gold market works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgive me if I am mistaken, but I believe this type of pump up the price system is pretty much the entire bases of how the gold market works, no?

  32. It's all play-money anyway. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cry me a virtual river. One group of people stupidly buy that which doesn't even objectively exist, hoping to make money out of nothing, and then whine when they get ripped off.

    These people were trying to create wealth out of nothing, evolving from action that really serves no one, helps no one, and accomplishes nothing. Bitcoin speculation is like you gambling on what number I'm thinking of, when you have to tell me what your guess was, before I tell you whether or not you were right, and unsurpisingly, you always lose. You can never prove what number I either was, or wasn't thinking of, and I have an interest (being the person you're betting against,) in picking a different number from the one you state.

    If lotteries are taxes on people who are bad at math, then losses from speculating on Bitcoin (and any other so-called "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency,") are taxes on idiocy. Despite being a relatively new thing, there are old quotes that apply perfectly to this situation, including such classics as "there's a fool born every minute," and "a fool and his money are soon parted..." and probably others but you get the idea.

    Or maybe you don't get the idea, because you're the sort of person who is holding Bitcoins. I wish I could help but, besides pointing out the painfully obvious, I don't know how. Bitcoins are a poor investment because you're gambling on something that doesn't really exist.

    The really sad part is the amount of environmental damage done by all the waste-heat from all the computers of all the morons trying to, for all intents and purposes, pray their way into wealth, and the amount of e-waste generated on computers that will never be put to any real, constructive purpose, and will likely ultimately end up in scrapheaps leaching toxic compounds into the world around them.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:It's all play-money anyway. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, not more stupid than lottery, odds and the amount of money recoverable are still better than gambling.

    2. Re:It's all play-money anyway. by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Bitcoins are a poor investment because you're gambling on something that doesn't really exist.

      If Bitcoins don't exist, then how are people holding and trading them? I bought in at $450, it's been a fucking great investment!

      And don't give me any of this "no intrinsic value" bullshit. There's a lot of intrinsic value in being able to keep and move money outside of the current banking system.

    3. Re:It's all play-money anyway. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      ...

      What is the mass, in grams, (or milligrams or micrograms or nanograms or ...etc.) of one Bitcoin? Does it have any mass, or take up space? It is imaginary, and the scarcity is based on something like a given sequence of numbers being either in, or not in, the "blockchain," or whatever, right? Something like that?

      It does not possess objective reality. Also, while you could argue that any money (such as dollars) not directly exchangeable for some hard, tangible thing of worth by the issuing agency, i.e., gold or silver, is also imaginary*, at least you CAN pay your taxes with them. When you can pay ALL your taxes in Bitcoin, federal, state, and local, wherever you are, then we'll talk. In the meantime, it's not worth (far as I'm concerned,) the paper it's NOT printed on.

      See, you could sell a necklace of silver and/or gold, for example, even if they stop being traded as money. You might not get much for them, but they're still metals, still shiny, and to many people's way of thinking, still pretty. But no one has any need to buy "701923486..." because any of us can produce that simply by writing, typing, or saying "7," followed by "0," followed by "1," etc. This is the difference between objective existence and being imaginary. Once Pythagoras (or whoever) publicized the observation that the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is always about 22 to 7, they didn't really need his 2s, nor his 7 anymore, to be able to work out how many cubits of cloth would be needed to go around a circle if its diameter was known.

      Here's the thing though. As an admitted trader of Bitcoins, you have a vested interest in other people (such as anyone reading this,) being convinced that they not only exist, but that they're worth a LOT of money, and that their value will only go up and up and up. I , on the other hand, have NO interest either way, not owning Bitcoins and having no intention either ever TO buy, sell, OR own any. So of the two of us, I am the one NOT trying to sell anyone anything here.

      But it seems we'll just have to agree to disagree on the matter. I doubt anything I can write will convince you, and you're not going to convince me, so we seem to have reached a rhetorical impasse. But the good and gentle readers of slashdot will have to decide which of us is right, and good luck to them too.

      In summary, to each his own. Enjoy trading and investing in your imaginary currency, and best of luck to you.

      *Some HAVE made the argument about dollars being fundamentally worthless since they're no longer exchangeable for precious metals by the government, I personally don't, but that's not relevant to the case. You can use them to pay your taxes, they are legal tender, and in other places, whatever THEIR local currency is, you can, again, pay taxes THERE if any taxes you must, using THEIR local currency. Gold and silver fluctuate in value and while both have little intrinsic value (sorry, it's germane to the conversation and a perfectly valid point,) compared to their assigned value due to scarcity and difficulty forging or producing either artificially. But even if people STOP trading them, they don't suddenly turn to smoke and drift away on the breeze. You can still make stuff out of them. Art of various kinds can be made with silver and gold, for example. Plus there are other uses, such as in electronics and biology and medicine, BESIDES as money for them, and others, like copper.

      If (or rather when) people stop trading Bitcoin, it doesn't matter how many you have. They are UTTERLY worthless, and on that day they will become meaningless strings of numbers, and no one will ever pay you even a penny for them.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  33. Doesn't sound like a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbasses Are Buying Up Cryptocurrencies, Costing Themselves Millions.

    This seems to be self correcting since they are likely to either run out of money, or learn, or perhaps both.

  34. They'll bounce back by martinX · · Score: 1

    Shutup, man. Stop trying to talk the market down. Given enough time, they'll bounce back. I'll ride this out and be rich. You'll see. You'll all see!

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:They'll bounce back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably will, but you'll have to wait for the CFTC to release its findings on the Tether mess. Then the market will crash, after which outside money will pour in (perhaps slowly) to bring about recovery.

      Until then, expect a slow and painful decline.

  35. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go hide behind your regulatory regime that seems to be making all the bankers rich ...

    Because it's simply impossible for bankers to reap extreme profits in under-regulated financial markets.

  36. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually build compliance engine for trading systems. I know first hand how 1940 Act is supposed to work and what investment banks do to avoid complying. The problem isn't the old regulations that had a firewall between savings and investment banks. The problem wasn't diversification laws like 1940Act. The problem is that politicians systematically neutered the SEC and stripped them of power. The problem is the ivy league schools worked closely with Wall Street to write a bunch of papers stating "regulations is expensive and anti-competition." As a result, the politicians had the bogus papers for ammunition. They kept chipping away at the regulations starting with Reagan. Bush, Clinton and Bush all deregulated and made things worse. As a result, everyone lost 30-40% from their retirement, pension, 401K. You want it to be fair, vote in regular middle class people instead of millionaires. Vote for term limits. Vote for free air time for all candidates and give the media outlets a tax break for the air time. Reverse citizens united. Ban superpacs. Far too many US voters are apathetic and foolish. You get the government you deserve, not the government you want. The founders of the US understood this basic fact. The government you get is the result of the effort you put into it. If 80% of the voters don't give a shit, the 1% that have the money and power will gladly speak for everyone else with their money.

  37. Comedy gold by inking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Step 1: Buy a non-productive asset.

    Step 2: Somehow miss the point that the asset is not productive and the any wealth gain one may receive is an equal wealth loss for someone else.

    Step 3: Be surprised that sophisticated investors are wiping the floor with your HODL BEFORE I SODL nonsense.

  38. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually that scheme making the bankers rich and everyone else poor is IDENTICAL to this scheme. Those with market knowledge and the power to manipulate the market will always fuck over the poor and uneducated. All this really shows is cryptocurrencies have the exact same failings as many of the penny stocks but without the regulators watching the pump and dumps as closely.

  39. SEC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should SEC intervene? After all, cryptocurrencies were created with the idea to avoid interference from SEC and other like it. People wanted freedom of money transactions, let them enjoy that freedom.

    And by the way, these "investors" in cryptocurrencies are not investors at all. They're gamblers and adrenaline junkies.

  40. pfff.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    If it's that easy to manipulate the system, then there's something wrong with the system..

  41. HarÃmbe will put an end to that shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His death was faked. You read it here first.

  42. and this is different... how? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    isn't this what traders do? it's just that they now added cryptocurrencies to their playbook.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  43. And Tomorrow... by dcw3 · · Score: 2

    And tomorrow the sun will rise at dawn.

    This isn't anything new. This is what's been done on Wall St. for decades. Why would anyone be surprised that it's now being done on something else that's traded???

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  44. No PUMP N DUMP with APKoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Subject: APKoin is better than all other cyypto coin guarantee to not loose value

    Get APKoin by spreading the word of "LORD of HOSTS" to all conrners of teh internet

    Get APKoin by "Kick stomping heart" FAKE name slashdot l[users] who dare defy brilliant APK

    Redeemable for ultra premium moose dik you can suck or take in ass

    Premium rewards like suk my MEGA MAN PENIS or lick my gaint ballz

    APK

    P.S.=> The Soros and ROTHSCHILD backed jew bankers want to destroy CRYPTO COIN because it can derail their plans to enslave great american worker. Trump was the first major disruption to they plans APKoins is the next... apk

    1. Re:No PUMP N DUMP with APKoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moose dik you can suck or take in ass

      Putting the pump in your dump

  45. Pump & dump? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Y'know, I understand there are criminal laws against pump & dump. You read about them when people talk about penny stocks (and all the freakin' spam we get to pump).

    Wonder when someone's going to hit the traders with those charges?

    1. Re:Pump & dump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those laws typically only apply to securities. Cryptocoins are not securities - they are property.

    2. Re:Pump & dump? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what pump and dump? Maybe it's just a lousy, volatile and illiquid investment vehicle (to say the least)? Bitcoin plummetted today because the ETF exchange the bitctards were all chubbed up for didn't happen.

      But no, it's those eeeeeveeel pump and dumpers who are the fault of it going from $20K to $6.2K, not the fact that it was overhyped?

  46. So this is something new? by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    This practice goes way back... see Proverbs 20:14.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Re:Well duh by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    What do you mean, the experts say Bitcoin is now poised to test $8,500....

    waaaah???!!!! Bitcoin plummetting to $6.2K today! Oh noes, my kid's college! my retirement!

    oh wait, I don't own any of that crap