Slashdot Mirror


BBC Wants Microsoft To Expose 'Doctor Who' Leaker (torrentfreak.com)

Last month, the BBC headed to court to track down the person who leaked an incomplete scene featuring Jodie Whittaker's Thirteenth Doctor. New court documents suggest that the British broadcaster has yet to find the perpetrator, and is hoping Microsoft can help. At a federal court in Washington, the BBC requested a DMCA subpoena targeted at a OneDriver user who shared the infringing material online late June. TorrentFreak reports: In an effort to track down the source of the leak the BBC has taken the matter to the U.S. courts. Last month it obtained a DMCA subpoena from a California federal court, ordering the forum tool Tapatalk to identify the source of an infringing post. Whether this resulted in any useful information is unknown, but a few days ago it became clear that BBC is still investigating the matter. In a separate effort, BBC Studios have filed a request for a DMCA subpoena at a Federal court in Washington. This time it's directed at Microsoft. According to the BBC, a user of Microsoft's OneDrive stored and shared a copy of the leaked file, titled "IMG_ l563.TRIM.MOV."

"The infringing material includes, without limitation, an unauthorized copy of copyrighted video content from Season 11, Episode 1 of Doctor Who, for which BBC Worldwide Limited t/a BBC Studios (Distribution) is the exclusive licensee," the BBC writes. According to the BBC, the footage in question was stolen from the studio. Through the subpoena, the company hopes to find out more about the source of this leak, to prevent similar situations going forward. It asks Microsoft to hand over any relevant information that can help to identify the account holder who uploaded the video, which was added to OneDrive back in June. This includes "any name, account name, address, telephone number, email address, birth date, profile photo, device information, browser information, location information, information from others (e.g., Facebook or Google+) and time posted."

5 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Re:WTF? by Faluzeer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is this the level of comments nowadays?

    These days? It has been like for quite some time, certainly over a decade. This actually looks better than normal, so far there is very little spam.

  2. Re: Can I really hate Bill Clinton now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You've been allowed to hate Bill Clinton for decades now, your thoughts, such as they are, are free.

    Wouldn't have been any different under Dukaksis or Tsongas though*, the law was passed by bipartisan margins in the House and with unanimous consent in the Senate, and it hasn't been significantly changed in any way since despite decades of opportunity.

    The corporations got what they wanted from WIPO. They had enough politicians in their pocket across the world that blaming Bill Clinton is like blaming Mrs. O'Leary's cow.

    (*maybe Perot, but who knows what that nut job would have done? It isn't like he wouldn't kowtow to his corporate masters himself.)

  3. Re:The Cost? by Shimbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, the BBC is asking Microsoft to do a deep-dive search across ALL OneDrive user accounts looking for a single file?

      BS

    No. They want Microsoft to identify who posted the linked file: see the TF article.

  4. Re:British TV by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Informative

    Am I the only one wondering why a British TV series was having production work done in the US?

    A lot of American film has work done in British studios. A lot of British film has work done in American studios. The industry has been internationalized for decades. Americans have been using Pinewood studios since the early days of TV and the British have been taking advantage of expertise in Hollywood- if you pay attention to closing credits; lots of Hollywood blockbusters have European centres involved. It's nothing new.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. No difference between this and the physical world. by MasseKid · · Score: 3, Informative

    A company has something stolen from it. They traces it to a storage locker, proves to a judge it is in the storage locker, and requests information on the owner so they can purse legal action. This is all this case is. The fact the storage locker is digital and the goods are digital doesn't matter.