Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Says He's Considering Taking Tesla Private; Tesla Suspends Shares As It is Expected To Make an Announcement (cnn.com)

Elon Musk said he's thinking about taking Tesla private. More specifically, he said he may buy back the company for $71.3 billion (at a share price of $420), and already has the funding to do so. From a report: Musk, the CEO and largest shareholder of the electric car maker, said on Twitter on Tuesday that he has secured funding from a private buyer. He implied that the funding values the company at $420 a share. The stock had been worth about $342 a share before Musk's tweet, and shares quickly jumped as high as $371. The stock had climbed slightly earlier in the day after the Financial Times reported that Saudi Arabia has quietly built a big stake in Tesla. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. About an hour and 20 minutes after the Musk tweet, trading in Tesla stock was suspended because the company was expected to release news. TechCrunch: Musk's hope, he later tweeted, is that "all current investors remain with Tesla even if we're private. Would create special purpose fund enabling anyone to stay with Tesla. Already do this with Fidelity's SpaceX investment." Musk, who said he would stay on as CEO, also seems willing to have a provision for retail investors, who have held Tesla shares prior to Dec. 31, 2016, to convert their shares into private shares. Musk, in response to a tweet, said he's "super appreciative of Tesla shareholders" and "will ensure their prosperity in any scenario." Musk has publicly mused about taking Tesla private before, saying in a 2017 Rolling Stone profile: "I wish we could be private with Tesla," Musk murmurs as they exit. "It actually makes us less efficient to be a public company."

Analysts speaking to Reuters said they believe Musk is serious. George Galliers of Evercore ISI, said, "I can't believe this is something to bluff or make fun of. Given his historic frustration with short sellers, analysts and certain parts of the press, it is perhaps also not surprising that he has given consideration to taking the company private."

Update: Elon Musk sent an email to employees on Tuesday to explain his rationale behind the move. He wrote: Earlier today, I announced that I'm considering taking Tesla private at a price of $420/share. I wanted to let you know my rationale for this, and why I think this is the best path forward. First, a final decision has not yet been made, but the reason for doing this is all about creating the environment for Tesla to operate best. As a public company, we are subject to wild swings in our stock price that can be a major distraction for everyone working at Tesla, all of whom are shareholders. Being public also subjects us to the quarterly earnings cycle that puts enormous pressure on Tesla to make decisions that may be right for a given quarter, but not necessarily right for the long-term. Finally, as the most shorted stock in the history of the stock market, being public means that there are large numbers of people who have the incentive to attack the company. I fundamentally believe that we are at our best when everyone is focused on executing, when we can remain focused on our long-term mission, and when there are not perverse incentives for people to try to harm what we're all trying to achieve. This is especially true for a company like Tesla that has a long-term, forward-looking mission. SpaceX is a perfect example: it is far more operationally efficient, and that is largely due to the fact that it is privately held. This is not to say that it will make sense for Tesla to be private over the long-term. In the future, once Tesla enters a phase of slower, more predictable growth, it will likely make sense to return to the public markets. In a tweet moments ago, Musk said, "Investor support is confirmed. Only reason why this is not certain is that it's contingent on a shareholder vote."

12 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. Hey! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, he's doing a Dell.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Hey! by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those apologies during last week's earnings call must have left him with a really bad taste in his mouth.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re: Hey! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Informative

      GM lies about their faulty ignition switches and killed people.

      Honda continued to ship faulty airbags, and testified before Congress about it. People probably died from that too.

      Toyota denied faulty throttles and cruise control on the Prius that could result in unintended acceleration. Nope, that's perfectly safe.

      Name one car company that never had anyone crash and die, or had a safety recall of any kind. While you come up with nothing, nobody will hold their breath and wait.

      Don't be a fucking idiot.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  2. Do it by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am sick of the trolls that are trying to destroy Tesla.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re: Do it by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They want their money in control. Like China, Saudi Arabia is investing in a number of western companies. Smart.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Do it by Major+Blud · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am sick of the trolls that are trying to destroy Tesla.

      Unfortunately, here on Slashdot, a troll is defined as anyone who points out that they are burning through cash faster than they can earn it. Yes, they've hit their production goals with the Model 3, and that takes investment...but time will tell if that investment pays off. They may not have enough time with their current burn rate.
      https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/...

      Look, many of us like electric cars and most everyone will probably end up driving them in the very near future, but odds are Tesla may not be around that long. I'm wondering if part of taking this private is so that their quarterly balances won't be so public.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re: Do it by barc0001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Saudis have their mitts in a number of things you wouldn't expect, and which will give them reach for decades to come, for example, they own 50.1% of the Canadian Wheat Board:

      https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/us-saudi-firms-to-buy-former-canadian-wheat-board/article23966156/

      In light of the recent 9/11 style threat made against Canada by a Saudi State controlled twitter account:

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/saudi-arabian-group-apologizes-for-posting-image-appearing-to-threaten-canada-with-9-11-style-attack-1.4775509

      The Canadian government should look strongly at foreign ownership of things like our Wheat Board as that's not in our nation's best interests from a food security standpoint.

    4. Re: Do it by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, I suspect that issues over financing/gaap/etc is a huge part of it. But musk has multiple problems. The first is the shorters like chanos are manipulating the market. Then you have multiple lawsuits from ppl that are also trying BS. Add in the union garbage, and CA's playing with regulations, well, it might mean a private Tesla can make lots of changes with little issues.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Do it by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They may not have enough time with their current burn rate.

      The problem with burn rate is it's an extrapolation. It ignores the plan to reduce the burn rate.

      I'm wondering if part of taking this private is so that their quarterly balances won't be so public.

      No doubt this is part of it.

      Wall Street wants information that Tesla simply can't disclose because it would lose it's competitive edge. What are the cost targets per vehicle? How will the company reach those targets? If Tesla gives up that information, it would be valuable information for competitors.

      At the end of the day, an investment in Tesla is an investment in Musk. Do you trust his planning? Do you trust his ability to overcome obstacles along the way? Some people think he is a liar and a cheat. However, I look at the success of SpaceX and conclude that Musk is entirely capable of leading Tesla to the same success.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  3. Time to rethink public corporations by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not surprised Mr. Musk is doing this, he is clearly fed up with Wall Street and trying to meet their quarterly expectations rather develop the company and the products for the long term. I would think that dealing with analysts/quarterly statements and their (potential) fallout to be essentially overwhelming as well as causing the executive suite to try and maintain a positive outlook every twelve weeks.

    Going private doesn't mean that the stress of creating the best product and making a profit goes away, just that more focus can be put on the company and its products which should result in better products and a better ROI for the company's owners at the end of the day.

    I would expect other companies with long lead time products (Boeing, Ford, etc.) will consider finding private investors and taking themselves out of the exchanges so they can focus on their businesses and not making Wall Street investors happy.

  4. He only pays for shareholders selling by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it seems as if it would be more prudent to use that kind of funding to accelerate production and research.

    Free of noise and short manipulation he'll have a lot more time and funds free to go into R&D.

    Once could also argue this move is a massive marketing expenditure as without short backing, negative Tesla news stories will dry up like dust in the wind, and sales should soar ever higher...

    Remember, he only has to actually spend money on people wanting to sell shares - the large majority of Tesla investors (like myself) would not be selling at $420, we'd continue to be private shareholders, so that would be part of the funding not spent that could be used further on R&D. So while he has $84 billion in funding to take TSLA private, he probably will only have to spend about 20$ of that on share buybacks and can put the rest into other efforts.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. There is a line though by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see what you are getting at and I don't exactly care either, I too mostly say let people do what they want.

    However in the case of Tesla it's gone a lot further than that, and into the realm of there being so many shorts and some of vast size, they were trying desperately to manipulate and lower the stock price, trying to drive the company out of business.

    When you cross the line from "Well I'll bet the company will fold", to actually trying to cause a company with tens of thousands of employees to fail, then I get pissed off. You are affecting those who bet the company would not fail, but worse you are affecting the lives of a lot of people with jobs there.

    You are going to see a remarkable shift in Tesla coverage over the coming years with nothing more to gain from short sellers, probably a few vindictive "I sat at thee from the depths of hell" level articles from those poor shorts who believed the lie the industrial short sellers were peddling than Elon would fail...

    So I do feel a little sorry for shorts that were too small to actually affect public stock and news. But not too sorry because the mindset it takes to invest via shorts is a feel a fundamentally bad moral choice, and I would never use that myself - if I don't like a company I just don't buy from them, I don't actively bet on failure. It's really unhealthy to build any aspect of your life around negative mindsets, it bleeds into other aspects of your life and makes you an unpleasant person.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley