Slashdot Mirror


Some Engineers Are Turning Down Tech Recruiters in Silicon Valley Over Concerns About Corporate Value (ieee.org)

Tech companies such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft have faced growing internal unrest from employees who raise ethical concerns about how the companies deploy their high-tech services and products. That chorus of dissent is now growing louder as outside engineers voice their concerns to recruiters working for those tech companies. An anonymous reader shares a report: The protests of tech workers have proven persuasive because Silicon Valley firms compete fiercely to recruit and retain relatively scarce engineering talent. For example, Google's leadership sought to reassure employees by declaring it would not renew its Pentagon contract and by issuing a set of ethical principles for future uses of Google-developed technologies. By the same logic, engineers who are approached by tech recruiters also have leverage. "I might be a one-off example, but it could be different if Amazon gets a lot of people emailing them saying, 'Hey I won't work for you because of this,'" Geiduschek, a software engineer at Dropbox, who declined a job offer from Amazon, says.

Jackie Luo, a software engineer at Square, took a similar stance with a tech recruiter who sought to interest her in a career with Google. The recruiter happened to contact Luo when she was reading about Google's plans to re-enter the Chinese market with a censored version of the company's Internet search engine. [...] Individual engineers such as Luo and Geiduschek seem to be responding to tech recruiters through their own initiative rather than as part of any larger movement. Meanwhile, some tech employees have joined organized efforts, such as the #TechWontBuildIt movement spearheaded by the labor advocacy group Tech Workers Coalition.

13 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds about right by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    would not renew its Pentagon contract

    service used by U.S. government agents to target immigrants for detention and deportation

    Right... Because it is unethical for America — uniquely among the world's nations — to fight its enemies and enforce its borders.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Sounds about right by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To his point, we don't because "follow the money". The US is run by a very big-corporate establishment that puppets most Dems and Republicans, and has a laser focus on "more labor supply = more profits", all across the economic spectrum from the illegal leaf picker to the H1-B with a PhD. Open borders directly drives concentration of wealth at the top.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Sounds about right by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Illegal immigrants — the overwhelmingly vast majority of them from South America...

      This page lists all of South America at 6%. Mexico is 56%, which certainly isn't an "overwhelmingly vast majority", and Central America at 15%.

      ...have killed far more Americans over the years, than the 3000 killed on the day of 9/11.

      Is this the part of the article you're talking about? If so, I've highlighted a couple key points regarding the number.

      In the aggregate, Trump said, immigrants in the country illegally are responsible for tens of thousands of crimes. He pointed to a 2011 study by the Government Accountability Office which estimated undocumented immigrants had committed some 25,000 homicides, 42,000 robberies and nearly 70,000 sex offenses. That estimate was extrapolated from a survey of 1,000 undocumented immigrants held in state and federal prisons. It offered no time frame in which the crimes might have been committed and no basis for comparison with the native-born population.

      The article also cites a study that says that illegal immigrants in Texas were less likely to be convicted of homicide, sexual assault, or larceny than native citizens.

  2. Article is geographically challenged by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The subject's title is, "Engineers Say 'No Thanks' to Silicon Valley Recruiters, Citing Ethical Concerns." And then the article calls out 4 companies: Amazon, Google, Facebook, & Microsoft. 2 of those 4 are headquartered in the Seattle area, not Silicon Valley. How about some simple fact checking?

    --
    My userid is prime!
  3. Why Are You an Engineer? by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you become an engineer to get rich? Engineering pays quite well, but to get rich you're better off in finance.

    Most people become engineers to solve problems. To make life better for everyone. When corporate culture goes against that motive, engineers tend to rebel. This doesn't just apply to Silicon Valley.

    I'm intrigued that engineers in Silicon Valley feel they are empowered enough to make such demands. Most engineers just bitch to management about not doing what's in the customer's best interest and move on.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Why Are You an Engineer? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Engineering pays quite well, but to get rich you're better off being evil.

      FTFY.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  4. Re:Amazon has it's 100 hours a week issues! by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really liked working there, as did pretty much everyone else, and never saw anyone work a 100 hour week or even close. I only left because I found a much shorter commute. All the media coverage about how awful they are is I think completely blown out of proportion. Other than letting new hires show up to work in pajamas, it was a pretty cool place to work.

  5. Believe it or not... by Comboman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Once upon a time, the best and brightest of the engineering, math and science students didn't dream of working in Silicon Valley or Wall Street. They dreamed of NASA, JPL & NOAA. Academia and government service. The reward was working on interesting, important things rather than stock options and snack rooms. Maybe that thinking is starting to come back.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Believe it or not... by organgtool · · Score: 4, Informative

      People stopped dreaming of working at those places because government budgets are shrinking, the work that's left goes to contracting companies that screw over their employees (no raises for many years and continually cutting benefits), and the contracts often require working on "tried and tested" technologies instead of exciting new tech. I don't necessarily disagree with that last point given that a lot of government systems are focused on safety but most people would rather work with cutting edge tech because it's more exciting and it increases their value in the marketplace.

      - Former government contractor

    2. Re:Believe it or not... by organgtool · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Other than the bureaucracy that prevents the use of new technologies, bureaucracy was oddly one of the best parts of government contracting. It guaranteed that the client actually had a decent set of requirements which meant that they had to actually think about what they wanted before development began. Of course the requirements weren't always perfect but they were way better than any of the jobs I've had in the private sector.

  6. Re:Can confirm by theblkadder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the contrary, you just have to have the right politics and/or be high enough up on the hierarchy of oppression to do so.

    --
    Earth is a single point of failure.
  7. Re:Admirable but... by lgw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Morality certainly influenced my most recent job move.

    I had recruiters from both Google and Facebook reaching out to me, but it's clear from their corporate culture that conservatives - even moderates - are not welcome at those companies. I feel the "progressive" movement is the most dangerous and harmful political force since the Wall fell, and I don't want to have on my conscience contributing to that in any way.

    Fortunately, you no longer need to work at the Big 5 to get great pay, at least if you're past mid-career (they probably still pay college hires the best, though I hear MS is falling off).

    Not that the company I landed at isn't quite liberal internally, but they don't inflict it on their customers.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  8. Re:Amazon has it's 100 hours a week issues! by registrations_suck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had a friend that said they worked no more than sixty hours a week while on call 24/7. For programming, that's about the best work/life balance you can expect.

    Only if you're a schmuck. I have never worked those kinds of hours - nor would I any longer than the time it takes me to find another job.