Slashdot Mirror


Many Google Services on Android Devices and iPhones Store Location Data, Even if Location Sharing is Disabled From Privacy Settings: AP (apnews.com)

Google wants to know where you go so badly that it records your movements even when you explicitly tell it not to. An Associated Press investigation found that many Google services on Android devices and iPhones store your location data even if you've used privacy settings that say they will prevent it from doing so. The Associated Press reports that it has confirmed its findings with computer science researchers at Princeton. From the report: For the most part, Google is upfront about asking permission to use your location information. An app like Google Maps will remind you to allow access to location if you use it for navigating. If you agree to let it record your location over time, Google Maps will display that history for you in a "timeline" that maps out your daily movements. Storing your minute-by-minute travels carries privacy risks and has been used by police to determine the location of suspects -- such as a warrant that police in Raleigh, North Carolina, served on Google last year to find devices near a murder scene. So the company will let you "pause" a setting called Location History. Google says that will prevent the company from remembering where you've been. Google's support page on the subject states: "You can turn off Location History at any time. With Location History off, the places you go are no longer stored." That isn't true. Even with Location History paused, some Google apps automatically store time-stamped location data without asking.

For example, Google stores a snapshot of where you are when you merely open its Maps app. Automatic daily weather updates on Android phones pinpoint roughly where you are. And some searches that have nothing to do with location, like "chocolate chip cookies," or "kids science kits," pinpoint your precise latitude and longitude -- accurate to the square foot -- and save it to your Google account. The privacy issue affects some two billion users of devices that run Google's Android operating software and hundreds of millions of worldwide iPhone users who rely on Google for maps or search. Storing location data in violation of a user's preferences is wrong, said Jonathan Mayer, a Princeton computer scientist and former chief technologist for the Federal Communications Commission's enforcement bureau.

13 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its not only wrong but clearly illegal (at least in Europe). Cue Google sanctions in 3 2 ...

    1. Re:Illegal by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was thinking that, if they do something like this in Europe, I could foresee the highest EVER fine imposed on anyone worldwide brewing.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Illegal by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

      It doesn't matter Google does this, as long as they are fully inclusive about how they do it, and sufficiently apologetic about their privilege of doing it.

    3. Re:Illegal by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everything is illegal in Europe.

      Europe is making laws to protect users privacy, like the recent GDPR. What's wrong with that?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Illegal by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Worth keeping in mind that the GDPR fines against revenue, not the profit or net income after all the financial shell games to avoid taxes have been played out. Assuming the worst case fine under the GDPR, 4% of global revenue, and based on the figures Google declared for 2017 that would wipe out approximately one third of of their net income for the year. They'd still be in the black, but that's hardly a minor cost of doing business, and also before you take into account potential fines from all of the other legal jurisdictions they're operating in.

      I expect them to make the need to tick a box giving permission for them to do this and get them off the potential legal hook fairly promptly, and maybe even act apologetic about the "accidental oversight" or some such. The implications of actually ticking that box will also be about as clear as mud, of course.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  2. Don't be Evil by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Funny

    But if you are going to be evil, make sure you stamp the location of each act of evilness.

  3. Punitive regulation by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is very clear to me that big players like Google, Facebook, and Twitter are not going to voluntarily allow people to retain their privacy. This story is an example of a large company intentionally misleading and gathering data despite user explicitly telling them not to. It is likely that such brazen violation is not even against the law.

    The law must change. Call for punitive regulation, it is the only way the learn.

    1. Re:Punitive regulation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to ask you guys a question: why do you think these companies are providing these "free" services? Are they altruistic?

      What free services (we're talking about Android here). People pay actual money for android phones and to get the ones with all the google services the phone manufacturers have to pay google.

      These are not free services. These are services customers are paying for when they buy the phones.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Shocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always said, when you disable location on Android it's more likely that you're just toggling your own ability to see the location data that Google is collecting. Just because now your phone won't show you your current location doesn't mean it isn't being recorded, it just means your phone won't share it with you.

    1. Re:Shocker by larryjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've always said, when you disable location on Android it's more likely that you're just toggling your own ability to see the location data that Google is collecting. Just because now your phone won't show you your current location doesn't mean it isn't being recorded, it just means your phone won't share it with you.

      I always disable location on my phone, but not because I believe that Google isn't still tracking me. I do it to save battery usage. At least in previous versions of Android, enabling location seemed to trigger background processes. Since these the activities of these processes were largely related to ads and other things that had no direct benefit to me, I turned off location. The battery savings was always immediately noticeable.

      The amount of personal, private information that Google has collected and calculated is staggering. Think of the US government having that information but with no semblance of legal checks (no required warrants, no FOIA requests, no need to get Congress to allow data collection, no voting disagreeable people out of office, etc.) on the use/abuse of that information, and that is the current situation with Google. The only comfort users have is the assurance that Google will do no evil.

  5. No F*cking Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have tried hard for ages to lock google down, I have so many privacy addons that I need 3 browsers just to surf the net.
    I only go to sites I trust on my phone and I have everything turned off

    then the other week, I was walking past a train station and bingo, I got a message from google maps kindly telling when the next train would be.
    It might have been nice if I wanted the message and I opted in but I didn't
    I don't use google maps, it wasn't running google maps (well, at least in the terms that most people would call running, as in I opened it and asked for maps or directions)
    but yep, the perverts at google don't respect my wishes and knew exactly where I was.
    I had turned off location/all history, that only seems to mean they don't tell me what my history is.
    They still keep that data for their own purposes and they are always recording.

    google = Pure perverts - thru and thru

    If I want to find a business near me, I will ask. Other than that piss off and leave me alone.
    If google asked nicely and told me my data would be anonymized and deleted after I reasonable time (as in hours), I would agree to the uploading of my data.
    I am more then prepared to help others with freeway speeds as a payback for seeing what is happening on the freeways. But no, they just record everything and use it for advertising wherever they can. F* you google.
    If I figure out a business is using location for ad's, I boycott them. Its not much but f*ck you Google and companies that support perverts.

    Oh yeah. I know google sucks but seriously, in maps, white roads on a white background just suck - does anyone else remember when google was competent, not just perverts?

  6. Run your own Maps server by DrYak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Run your own map server locally (Sailfish server that works with multiple viewers, Android and iOS also have offline map solution, with MicroG providing several solutions for apps that require the Google Map API)

    For the location service it self, you can have lots of replacement including offline too .

    Fuck online companies.
    ( ^- that has actual very practical implications when you're abroad and have internet roaming or on a hike away from any connection services)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  7. Stupid article by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Disabling "Location History" *IS NOT THE SAME THING* as disabling Location TRACKING.

    "Location History" is a VERY SPECIFIC feature of Google/Android and is used to provide you reccomendations based on places you go and travel patterns. Disabling that DOES NOT disable all location tracking on Android - that is a DIFFERENT SETTING.

    Hell, it is RIGHT IN THE QUICK SHORTCUTS. Unmissable!

    What an idiotic article.