Slashdot Mirror
NYU Offers Full-Tuition Scholarships for All Medical Students (wsj.com)
New York University said Thursday that it will cover tuition for all its medical students regardless of their financial situation, a first among the nation's major medical schools and an attempt to expand career options for graduates who won't be saddled with six-figure debt [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled]. From a report: School officials worry that rising tuition and soaring loan balances are pushing new doctors into high-paying fields and contributing to a shortage of researchers and primary care physicians. Medical schools nationwide have been conducting aggressive fundraising campaigns to compete for top prospects, alleviate the debt burden and give graduates more career choices. NYU raised more than $450 million of the roughly $600 million it estimates it will need to fund the tuition package in perpetuity, including $100 million from Home Depot founder Kenneth Langone and his wife, Elaine. The school will provide full-tuition scholarships for 92 first-year students -- another 10 are already covered through M.D./PhD programs -- as well as 350 students already partway through the M.D.-only degree program.
We do, but doctors should be making enough money to pay their student loans. What about the other students that are going into areas that don't pay as well, but are also essential? Why should they be subsidizing people going into such high paying professions?
We do, but doctors should be making enough money to pay their student loans.
They should but you hugely overestimate how much money certain specialties like family practice make - not to mention the number of hours they work. Specialists can do much better of course but it's still hard to start off with several hundred thousand in debt (medical school plus undergrad typically) at the beginning of your career. Plus residencies can take 3-8 years and they only get paid something like $40K per year while a resident.
What about the other students that are going into areas that don't pay as well, but are also essential?
A fair question. We used to do this by adequately funding state schools. But people of a certain political persuasion in the US don't like that for ideological/political reasons so the funding has languished and debt has been piled on young people when they are least able to deal with it so that others can get tax cuts they don't really need. Of course even some private schools really don't need to charge what they do. Harvard has a $36 billion endowment so every student who goes there could go there for free if Harvard chose to do that.
Why should they be subsidizing people going into such high paying professions?
A lot of graduate schools are highly subsidized. I got a scholarship to grad school. But pragmatically because we need more of them. Because the job is important. Because that school can do it. The question should be why are we not doing it for more professions rather than why this profession in particular. What you should be asking is which important profession can we help out next.
The problem is that the United States isn't the only jurisdiction trying to grab foreign-trained doctors. A lot of industrialized countries are looking at foreign talent to fill skilled labor pools that, for a variety of reasons, can't be filled by domestic labor supplies. The UK, for instance, has a very large shortage of doctors, and is soaking up talent anywhere it can find it, so right away you start with inter-jurisdictional competition to lure qualified doctors.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Even then, I'm not sure I believe that government should subsidize the costs of medical school. Sure you can argue that the world needs doctors and this will help ensure that the world gets its doctors, but someone else will come along and say that the world needs auto mechanics as well. So we might decide to pay their tuition in full as well, but someone else might point out that no one really needs a car and can just take a bicycle to work and that it's morally wrong to make them pay to subsidize the automotive industry and all the pollution in creates.
We should subsidize both. Society needs skilled mechanics just as it needs skilled doctors, especially modern society. Of course, to do that would mean actually taxing people to pay for education rather than forcing people to take out exorbitant loans or depend on the generosity of those that have money. Because everyone benefits from an educated, trained society it therefore stands to reason that everyone would have a responsibility to help pay for it.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
My sister went to Ross University on Nevis/St. Kitts. Strangely, her graduation ceremony was at Lincoln Center in New York City! They do both human and veterinary medical degrees. They are just slightly easier to get into than the few schools in the states (e.g. U.C. Davis).
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
Libertarian claptrap.
Plenty of instances where government largesse contributed to the economy. Giving railroads free land in the 1860s. Building the US and Interstate Highway systems in the 1920s through 1960s. Basic research that wouldn't otherwise be funded. Military research (unfortunately) with civilian applications -- Internet, telecommunications, nuclear power, etc.
Gender studies majors are maybe 0.1% of the US college student population. Something like this is usually a concentration on a history or poli sci degree, or maybe a double major. And nothing wrong with history or poli sci. If we forget history, don't write about it, don't read about it, and don't view politics through a critical lens, we'll likely trend towards authoritarianism and repeat the mistakes of the past. We need intellectuals to keep our culture honest as well as engineers, doctors, and scientists.