Slashdot Mirror
US Government Seeks Facebook Help To Wiretap Messenger, Report Says (reuters.com)
The U.S. government is trying to force Facebook to break the encryption in its popular Messenger app so law enforcement may listen to a suspect's voice conversations in a criminal probe, Reuters reported Friday, citing three people briefed on the case said, resurrecting the issue of whether companies can be compelled to alter their products to enable surveillance. From the report: The previously unreported case in a federal court in California is proceeding under seal, so no filings are publicly available, but the three people told Reuters that Facebook is contesting the U.S. Department of Justice's demand. The judge in the Messenger case heard arguments on Tuesday on a government motion to hold Facebook in contempt of court for refusing to carry out the surveillance request, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
suck em nerds
4U.
I'll suck your dick
Facebook is a platform that can not be trusted. Everybody needs to know that.
Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
Why can't they investigate like they used to. Its just to easy for them to sit on their ass and expect others to solve their problems for them. Just like most every one else these days.
The courts have the authority to compel people to testify and the authority to come into a place of business and gather evidence. I don't think it would be much of a stretch to force a company to allow government employees to alter code. That could happen and it should be something that is argued strenuously in the courts.
This kind of compulsion goes far beyond any reasonable argument. It's one thing to say the government can gather evidence or even take action in a private company. It's a whole different thing to try to compel a private citizen, or company who employs private citizens, to write software that goes against their best interest. It's really just tyranny, and lazy tyranny at that.
B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
Prevent users from using Facebook Messenger.
Pop up a window saying:
"Due to a request from the US Government to secretly crack the encryption in this app, we are suspending its operation until such time as we deem it safe for our users to continue using.
Please contact your [Congress Person] (click to find yours) if this worries you."
Then watch the government dial that shit back really fast.
Only a fascist, totalitarian, no-good government or the likes would be behind something as reprehensible as this. /s
... but about ten times until a few months ago, every single time that my Facebook Messenger app. updated, Telegram updated at the same time. Could they be the same or at least based on the same code? There is certainly no shortage of apps. that Facebook has bought and integrated.
If Messenger is actually a rebranded Telegram, then unless Facebook has the source code, Telegram has already refused to co-operate with these requests, and has been banned in a few countries (ie Russia and Pakistan) for this. And if Messenger is compromised, then Telegram would become suspect as well.
-- Insert witty one-liner here. --
If this is what it takes to win the war against the biased liberal media than this is what they shuld do. Its obvious to anyone with a brain that the medis is anti-trump so they are probably going to get caught coluding with the Clinton and Soros people which is only reason they oppose this actions.
You're describing exactly what the U.S. population decided they wanted two years ago. They wanted a totalitarian fascist for president, they got one.
43% of republicans said in a survey that they approve giving the POTUS the power to shut down any news outlet he wishes. If you have even a rudimentary knowledge of history, you know that that's how many totalitarian regimes started. Although that would be a clear violation of the 1st amendment, they know it, but they don't care. These republicans no longer care about the constitution, the bill of rights (except their f..king 2nd amendment of course), or even democracy. They would be perfectly fine having a totalitarian regime, as long as it was a conservative totalitarian regime.
The true ennemy of the U.S. is not the press, or Russia, or China, or muslims, illegal immigrants, etc. It is THESE republicans, those who are ready to destroy freedom and democracy. They are traitors to the nation.
What self respecting nefarious type monologues their " evil plan " over Facebook Messenger ?!
( or any online Social Media platform for that matter )
The ultimate shame in the underworld is to get caught and put in prison KNOWING THAT MARK ZUCKERBERG helped make it happen :|
All surveillance requests for Facebook must be routed through the Kremlin for approval.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
So the court is going to hold Facebook in contempt, just like the rest of us. The court is also going to throw 'Facebook' in jail ? Which peon is going to take the fall for the corp ? Can't Facebook just claim the its' 4th amendment right are being violated, or go with the ever popular 5th amendment protection because it might be considered a member of a conspiracy after the fact ?
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
really cannot blame anyone for their lack of security as goes making their personal data available. I will never have a Facebook account, shadow or otherwise. I enter my name in Google or other search engines and I do not appear. This has been carefully cultivated. I saw this coming back in the late 90s as an IT security guy doing pen testing and security audits. I warned people then and no one listened. I tell people all the time, use strong encryption. Hell, use ProtonMail between yourselves. It's easy and you don't have to set anything up. Set your iPhone to delete after 10 tries. Use a 12+ iPhone alphanumeric passcode. Don't post your life online unless you want it to come back to haunt you. Everything you post in your name is there forever. In multiple places.
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I do know of many, many people who have undergone terrible scrutiny for "innocent" things that were posted online. What many people do not know is that for certain jobs, particularly jobs in IT security or anything with a security clearance, they WILL do a background check on Internet habits, to include logs. Yes, this happened to me back in the day when I was going through my initial assessments to determine my trustworthiness to be in the security industry and have access to certain information. I was alarmed at what was included in the background check. Warning: social media is dangerous and stupid. Anything that needs to be said can be said via encrypted text or encrypted email.
So Facebook Messenger which is a shitty app for a shitty privacy-sucking Zuckerberg anus of a social cancer gets jacked. Meanwhile anyone who is planning terror acts or human trafficking or whatever is not going to be using Facebook to communicate about it. If they do, then the only logical conclusion is that they donâ(TM)t mind if their things are public. Kind of like Hollywood retards who take nude pictures of themselves and store them in their iCloud account, and never bother to set a real PIN/password must be cool with them all being published in The Fappening. Otherwise they would have set a password.
And go easy on the wine there, @JenniferLawrence.
We are already sliding down that slippery slope, and we've gone too far to stop the slide. As soon as they convinced us to all carry our wiretaps around with us, voluntarily, it was over.
This is just the final push to control the last few things they can't (yet) tap effectively.
The fears of our youth are now the realities of our daily lives.
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/a3MzOb5_700b.jpg
Hmm, can't make auto link work.
Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
as indicated in the revised TOS
It's why they get caught in the first place. And, to be fair, the knowledge required to discover a secure alternative isn't trivial.
This is the end result of the misguided concept of "Net Neutrality", treating publishing platforms and data networks as telecoms. So much for free as in beer. The tim e to object to all this was long ago, but, hey, that was crazy talk back then. when "Dragnet" cooperation might have seemed reasonable, at least when not coerced. Not so much now with the Chinafication of both the 'net and government in the US. PS. somebody please explain to our well-meaning but sometimes misguided President what freedom of the press actually means. Couch it in terms of "he who pays the piper, etc." Maybe he'll understand then. Meantime the expulsion of "right wing conservative conspiracy theorists" may provide the impetus to push distributed social media into the mainstream, at least until Wall Street and the VCs find a way to monetize it and bring it back into the same fold as the BIg Tech platforms.
When the fuck are you going realize the difference between internet service providers (the hard connection) and content providers (the data traveling over that connection). Net neutrality is all about regulating "service" providers, so that they don't pick and choose other content over your content. All data treated equally over the hard connection.
Facebook is not an ISP. They provide content.
Other than simply not complying you mean ?
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
No, I mean warrants and the use of the All Writs Act are done ex parte so nobody has standing to contest them in court. If the subject (not Facebook) wants to contest them, they have to argue that the evidence should be suppressed later and Facebook is not the one being charged so they cannot do that; Facebook is just a third party.
Instead, in order to gain standing to contest the court order, Facebook *must* be found in contempt which means not following it. Apple had to do the same thing.
Ahh I get what you mean now. Thanks for the info.
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?