Slashdot Mirror


H-1B Visa Use Soared Last Year At Major Tech Firms (phys.org)

"Even as the White House began cracking down on U.S. work visas, major Silicon Valley technology firms last year dramatically ramped up hiring of workers under the controversial H-1B visa program," reports the Mercury News. Menlo Park-based Facebook in 2017 received 720 H-1B approvals, a 53 percent increase over 2016, according to the National Foundation for American Policy, which obtained federal government data. Mountain View's Google received 1,213 H-1B approvals, a 31 percent increase. The number of H-1B approvals at Intel in Santa Clara rose 19 percent and Cupertino-based Apple received 673, a 7 percent increase.... [E]xperts say the data doesn't show how many additional H-1B contractors tech companies may get from staffing agencies or outsourcing companies. In response to this news organization's inquiries, Facebook said it does not publicly discuss its use of H-1B workers or contractors. Google, Apple and Intel did not respond to requests for information about their use of H-1B workers or contractors....

Amazon chalked up the largest increase in H-1B approvals, with 2,515 in 2017, a 78 percent leap. Microsoft received 1,479 approvals, an increase of 29 percent. Neither company responded to a request for comment.

A distinguished fellow at Carnegie Mellon's School of Engineering at Silicon Valley believes that the threat of a U.S. crackdown on H-1B visas may simply have prompted companies to secure as many visas as possible while they could.

41 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. STEM, it's a job machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Right???

    1. Re:STEM, it's a job machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Been gainfully employed in my field for two decades. Watched humanities major friends work service jobs unrelated to their fields.

      Good for You!

      I've watched my sister-in-law with her art degree and then MBA in Marketing get an executive job in Marketing get an awesome job and get five figure bonuses on top of her six figure income.

      While the company she works for send jobs over-seas. So, who's the smart one now?

      Oh! BTW, most of the techies are Indians at her company.

      Java programing is a commodity. FYI.

    2. Re:STEM, it's a job machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Compared to the humanities... yep, it sure the hell is.

      Been gainfully employed in my field for two decades. Watched humanities major friends work service jobs unrelated to their fields.

      STEM creates jobs. The entire mobile device industry employs vast numbers of people in highly paid jobs, and that's just one small corner.

      Also Been employed in STEM fields for two decades. Got a humanities degree and used the skills and experience to teach myself how to program.

      When STEM is tapped out due to oversupply of labor and outsourcing, I will jump to the next emerging field thanks to my generalized education.

      Good luck to all you one-trick-ponies in you effort to prevent the world from changing.

    3. Re:STEM, it's a job machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Java programing is a commodity. FYI.

      Most STEM jobs are a commodity. The skills are increasingly ubiquitous, so the only way to compete is on price.

      The only future in STEM is for those knowledgeable and talented enough to build the coming generations of tools that automate away the bulk of STEM jobs and turn their tasks into idiot-proof services.

      Most newly minted STEM prospects are “educated” in applying templates and snapping together components. They are just a stopgap.

    4. Re:STEM, it's a job machine by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      The skills are increasingly ubiquitous

      Script kiddy skills are. Deep programming skills aren't, and are unlikely to ever be. Automation will take them before they could ever become a commodity, barring a truly radical change in programming technology.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  2. "threat of a U.S. crackdown on H-1B visas" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well duh.

  3. Get 'um while you can! by lionchild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get 'um while they're still "cheap" and while you can!

    This is a loop hole should have been tightened up long, long ago. It should be a tool used to encourage companies to invenst in their own employees, re-tooling them with the skills the company needs; not used as a reason to go looking to effectively off-shore work.

    At best, it should be a stop-gap measure while you train up local talent to fill the position long-term.

    This is a numbers game, currently, to corporations. If these numbers become less and less appealing, then they'll turn to other solutions that include increasing local skills and building local talen.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  4. Misleading title? by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Informative

    H1B use isn't up: there is an annual cap on H1B visas.

    What's changed is that "Major tech firms" are getting the visas which must have reduced the number of H1B visas that were assigned to the outsourcing companies such as Tata, HCL, Infosys, etc..

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Misleading title? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      I should note that this is a good thing. Those major firms are less likely to be engaged in visa fraud and are more likely to pay real comparable wages.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Misleading title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL, OK

    3. Re:Misleading title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've on the right track, but you've got cause and effect backwards.

      The number of H-1B's is fixed, as you've said.

      With the recent changes, it's much harder for outsourcing companies and others who were abusing the system to get their applications approved. As a result, they get less of the fixed (well, capped) number of visas.

      This leaves more to go to others, which means that Facebook, Google, etc - who's applications will all fit well within the requires - see a higher percentage of their applications approved. What the article fails to mention is the number of applications each of these companies made, which while it might have been higher than past years, almost certainly wasn't as large an increase as their number of accepted applications.

      As for a labor shortage, there is not generally a shortage of tech people in the bay area. However there absolutely IS a shortage of skilled tech people, especially in certain fields. It's easy to ignore that distinction. Getting 100 (or 1000) resumes for a job isn't helpful if none of them are qualified...

    4. Re:Misleading title? by Zakharevich1988 · · Score: 1

      Unicorns are hard to find. But somehow we can always find them overseas ;)

      For these companies? Nope. The factor here is the interviewing process of SV companies. Recently I was told to pick a date for Microsoft in September for my onsite interviews. I was told that the technical interviews would go all day and I had to give between 4-5 technical interviews, before and after lunch. These interviews are hard and split into multiple stages right from 2-3 rounds of phone screens/online tests and then an entire day of onsite interviews. This eliminates most of the candidates, so they need more people to make the hiring numbers. Where do they get these numbers from after they're done interviewing Americans? H1B's.

    5. Re:Misleading title? by Zakharevich1988 · · Score: 1

      Go to websites like /r/cscareerquestions on Reddit and see the salaries entry level engineers are getting at FB outta college. I have seen interns who got return offers get 110-120K$ base, 40K $ stocks, and at times anywhere from 15-50K$ as signing bonus, bringing up the comp to a total of 160K$+ each year. Compare this to Infosys that pays 65K$ and you can see the difference.

    6. Re: Misleading title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sadly, those interviews all too often fall into trivia traps. What syntax does this API call use? How about that one? Fine if you are hiring a single discipline specialist, but absurd if you are looking for a multidiscipline integrator. I'm not gong to spend a month going through the cracking the coding interview book to memorize those "correct" answers. That just makes me waste memory space on specific implementations instead of general concepts. I don't cate how memalloc works, just that it does when called by the tool that I call to allocate a GB of cache.

      I had one interview, for a system engineering role, where I was given those kinds of esoteric questions on both an obfuscated assembly code memory overflow and expected output from a netcat regex command. The position was billed as a SQL heavy server admin role when I applied...

      Sure, I could figure out the netcat, but the right way to do that is run the commands in a non production VM one at a time while building the regex, so you are sure. And the obfuscated ASM is something I hadn't touched in a dozen years. Neither of which has anything to do with the rile I was applying for...

      Waste of time all around.

    7. Re: Misleading title? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      And they still live on ramen in a RV down by the tent city.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re: Misleading title? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Being a unicorn really only means you can do different jobs...but no more than one at a time. Most of the time a company can't pull thier head out of their ass long enough to keep me busy on one thing let alone exploit all of my talents. It is nice that when I get bored I can coordinate my next move behind the scenes because so many people are willing to bring me in on thier team.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:Misleading title? by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      I doubt those company file for H1B if they're not 99% sure to get it. They have better to do than wasting their time and money on visa applications, so they pour a lot of money to get H1Bs and they need to be sure they'll get it.

      Quite the opposite of consulting firms which business model *is* to flood the application system and get as many lambda person approved as they can. Those don't care who gets the visa, it's a matter of numbers only.

      So finally H1Bs are used for their original purpose : get skilled workers. As much as I hate Trump's hate strategy, that might be a positive outcome.

    10. Re:Misleading title? by DarkKaplah · · Score: 1

      I always hear about the shortage of skilled technical people, but I've witnessed the opposite being true. A number of people have IT related skills but cannot find a job because companies are often looking for rare skillsets. When I say rare I mean tools that were developed in house and not commercially available. If you don't have 10 years experience with their internal process they want nothing to do with you. They then claim they couldn't find anyone and try to find a H1B or H2B visa holder.

      The side of the coin I'm on is I have 15 years of PLM experience. I work a full time position for good pay, and I've had the following experiences in the last two years.
      -I get 5-10 calls a week for positions that are short term contracts of 3-6 months for pay less than I make on my salary.
      -I've been flown out for a interview with a company in California for a job that was supposed to be in Michigan. After the interview they met my salary
      requirements, but told me they were closing their Michigan location and the job would be in the Bay area. What would have been a nice career move turned into a major downgrade. I refused and suddenly the job was made available for an H1B position.

      For rare skills sure there is a shortage of people, but that's because no one is hiring at the entry level and training up. I know a lot of engineers who have had a degree for 10 years or more who have not had engineering positions and instead work retail. The people are out there. It's a HR problem, not a supply problem.

      --
      Coffee: The lifeblood of intelligence in civilization.
  5. Re:But... but... TRUMP ! by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    Are you seriously complaining about the lowest unemployment rate in decades?

  6. Re:It is good if domestic companies hire bigly, by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    especially if they hire the low-paid, low-quality, dog-eat-dog mentality substitutes for those uppity Democrat-voting athiest liebrul haters in Silicone Valley.

    Google doesn't want to miss anymore China opportunities because of some shitty opinionated fucks in their offices.

    And neither does Zuckerberg.

    You should probably seek some help for your anger issues. This is not normal. You'll find life is really great when you stop believing the BS you've been shoveling.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  7. They were all blonde by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I guess.

  8. As a former H-1B and current Green Card holder by grahamwest · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was always paid the prevailing rate, and the other H-1Bs I've worked with get the same. Put it this way, they're able to get on the housing ladder in Silicon Valley. They're also really smart! Indian, German, Chinese, Canadian, British (like me), they've all been good colleagues. There may well be plenty of poor quality H-1Bs at outsourcing companies, but I've never worked anywhere that used them.

    I've given enough job interviews in my time and have always recommended people by merit. If there were more qualified Americans applying for these jobs, they'd be getting hired. I recommended plenty of Americans and they usually worked out well. Sponsoring H-1Bs is expensive and a pain in the ass. Companies don't do that unless they have to. They also have to keep dealing with it because the time to get a green card has grown from about 3 years (when I did it 15 years ago) to over a decade in many cases.

    And don't give me that ageism thing. I'm 45 and have no trouble getting hired, and neither did the older candidates I recommended. When you're growing fast you want all kinds of people, and the varied experience and attitudes they bring make everyone more productive.

    --
    Graham
    1. Re:As a former H-1B and current Green Card holder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Australian E3 now on a green card. My experience is the same. I was imported into a good tech company and paid the same wage as a local.

    2. Re:As a former H-1B and current Green Card holder by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't your country be better off with you at home, contributing to their prosperity? Instead, you're contributing to the one country on the planet that doesn't need it. It's super-wealthy already. Your own people badly need talents like yourself and with you deserting them, how are they ever going to get ahead?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:As a former H-1B and current Green Card holder by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, why do other old Americans and I cannot get IT jobs then?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  9. Re: It is good if domestic companies hire bigly, by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Tesla sells shorts now? What type? straight cut booty shorts, super cheeky, Daisy Dukes, Daisy Ducks (Daisy Dukes made from white jeans)?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  10. Re:Regardless, H1B was used for CHEAP employees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Canucks can get TN-1 VISAs, part of NAFTA. $50 application fee, 1 hour wait at the border, must have a 3+ year degree + 3 years experience, and a letter from the employer is essentially enough.

    This is indeed a good thing, because those Canucks aren't tied to a company, and therefore can't be abused, and therefore won't cause wages to drive down compared to an H1B visa which chains the employee to a firm, and can allow for forced overtime/reduced wages/threats of "you're outta here!".

    If a TN-1 applicant gets canned, there's no lottery, and another application at the next job takes -- 1 hour. In fact, you can have multiple ones, meaning you can apply for new job, before leaving old job.

    Or, work part time for 3 or 4 corps at once.

    Same works in reverse, there are loads of Americans working in Canada using the same system.

  11. We get that by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but you're still lowering market rates. Supply and demand dictate that. Your presence in the market increases supply, lowering demand. It also discourages training and investment in local talent.

    In more left leaning states like Canada and Germany that's not so bad. Your contributions to the economy are spread around in the form of public infrastructure, education and single payer healthcare.

    The trouble with us here in America is that very, very little of our tax dollars make it back to us. More than half of them is just wars and servicing the debt from those wars. We aren't gaurnteed health care or an education for ourselves or our children. What's more since employers can access well trained people like yourself without paying the taxes to maintain higher education systems we've been cutting public college funding for 2 decades now, resulting in massive debt burdens. But you don't have a choice but to take on that burden because if you don't have an advanced degree the companies can and will hire an H1-B instead so they don't have to train...

    The problem with America is that every single aspect of our lives is predicated on the quality of our jobs. Anything that gets in the way of that is a disaster for us. No, it shouldn't be that way, but it is. So that for the average American bringing in foreign labor hurts us because none of what you bring make it down to us here in the trenches. There's folks who want to change that, but so far they're in the minority.

    It's an irrational system, but if you're forced to live in an irrational system then you do what can only be called rational irrational things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:We get that by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      but you're still lowering market rates. Supply and demand dictate that. Your presence in the market increases supply, lowering demand. It also discourages training and investment in local talent.

      Labour markets don't work like that, you can't compare skilled employees to commodities.

      I've recently accepted a job overseas. The company couldn't find anyone locally and is paying me above market rate. Because they have filled that key role they can now employ even more people to do related jobs, from unskilled labour right up to electrical engineering and even marketing.

      The alternative to employing me is not training and investing in local talent. That would mean delaying new products and falling behind in the industry. For that reason they have been contracting the work out to other European companies. Now that I'm there they can take on junior engineers who are gaining experience and working their way up to my level.

      Of course, the company I used to work for in my home country has lost a valuable employee and is now struggling to find a replacement (it took them nearly a year to get me). Worse still they won't take on non-EU nationals because the visa situation is so bad, so they may have to go back to over-priced and under-performing contracting again.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:We get that by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      People use hospital emergency rooms as their doctors when they get sick or have minor problems.

      You fail to ask yourself, "Why do people do this?"

      The answer is that it's too expensive to get general and pre-emptive care.

      And it is these high prices that private insurance companies have to deal with.

      You've got it exactly backwards: The high prices are caused by private insurance companies extracting their profits from the flows between patients and health care providers.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  12. Herein lies the problem by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    H1-B is, at its core, a mechanism for re-distributing wealth from richer countries to poorer ones. Which doesn't sound like a bad thing, until I look more closely. Then I see the companies that are importing cheap labour, are simultaneously taking advantage of tax breaks, concessions, and taxation-funded infrastructure. So to a fairly large extent, the companies aren't re-distributing their own wealth - they're exporting money that taxpayers legitimately expect to be spent in their own jurisdictions and for their own interests.

    There should be two classes of corporations. Those that oink away at the public tax trough, should be required to hire locally. Those who DON'T get tax breaks and other government subsidies, can hire whomever they want from wherever they want. I can't think of a single major corporation that falls into that second category - and I'm pretty sure that category would remain empty even if my 'two classes' idea was actually implemented and enforced. So why aren't we forcing corporations to hire locally? I guess it's because government isn't "by the people, and for the people". That needs to change.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Herein lies the problem by m00sh · · Score: 1

      H1-B is, at its core, a mechanism for re-distributing wealth from richer countries to poorer ones. Which doesn't sound like a bad thing, until I look more closely. Then I see the companies that are importing cheap labour, are simultaneously taking advantage of tax breaks, concessions, and taxation-funded infrastructure. So to a fairly large extent, the companies aren't re-distributing their own wealth - they're exporting money that taxpayers legitimately expect to be spent in their own jurisdictions and for their own interests.

      There should be two classes of corporations. Those that oink away at the public tax trough, should be required to hire locally. Those who DON'T get tax breaks and other government subsidies, can hire whomever they want from wherever they want. I can't think of a single major corporation that falls into that second category - and I'm pretty sure that category would remain empty even if my 'two classes' idea was actually implemented and enforced. So why aren't we forcing corporations to hire locally? I guess it's because government isn't "by the people, and for the people". That needs to change.

      If you really think about it, it is actually the opposite.

      A foreign country's tax payers bears all the costs of raising a child, 15+ years of education and then US just swoops in and gets to use the most productive years of the engineer. On top of that, US gets to choose the most best engineers of those who want to come.

      H1Bs also have to pay taxes. Also have to spend money on housing, transportation, health care that goes into the local economy. On top of that, they cannot be displacing an American employee.

      Actually H1B is a movement of wealth from a poorer country to a richer country.

      What you've said is corporations not paying taxes which is different than hiring H1Bs. They could hire Americans and not pay taxes.

      There is a hidden tax in hiring H1Bs which is lawyer costs and H1B fees to the government. So, there is a clear incentive to hire local.

  13. Trump? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    I thought Trump was going to fix this. It was his one redeeming quality for me.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  14. Crackdown on H1B factories like Infosys and Wipro by PenguinOpus · · Score: 1

    If you crackdown on the bogus H1B companies, that leaves a lot more for the legitimate (high-paying) companies that really are trying to bring in the best of the rest of the world.

  15. For the top end you're right by rsilvergun · · Score: 3

    but most of what I see are code monkeys. Those are trainable skills. There was a time when a 3-6 month stint in a community college could net you a decent salary writing code. There was a time when a company would give you on the job training to do the same. The guys I know who remember that time are in their 50s and 60s. Now you need a college degree to reboot windows PCs and occasionally troubleshoot a TCP/IP issue.

    As a worker I don't really care if my country falls behind because my country's success doesn't belong to me. The companies use offshore tax havens to hide any of the benefits and monopolize the profits. We gave up on any sort of social contact here in America went all in on "supply side" economics, aka trickle down.

    Again, the issue here is that the interests of the American ruling and working classes are no completely at odds with each other. This is less true in Europe & Canada where the ruling class is still held to some standard of a social contract. Here it's every man for himself. Your presence in my economy benefits the upper class, but it actively hurts the working class. Baring a huge shift in my countries politics that's not going to change. I'm well aware that's a completely messed up situation, but I have no idea how to change it. At least not on a time scale that matters to me and my family.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: For the top end you're right by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "Now you need a college degree to reboot windows PCs and occasionally troubleshoot a TCP/IP issue."

      I'm laughing cause I have seen this a lot. Literally tens of thousands of people with $50k of student loan debt who reboot servers or admin Office 365 for a living. They will be paying on that shit for twenty years.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  16. Re: just like ins co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which is why single payer is a better solution. We all pay in and can access the system when we need it. See Medicare.

  17. Should not be allowed to be contracted out by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    H1Bs should not be allowed to be contracted out, or to work on contracts. Basically, it should be for a company to do the work local, and later, if the work is sent back to said contractors home, then the company should be denied future H1Bs or any form of immigration work. If we are going to keep H1B, It is time for us to enforce the laws on this.

    Note that this means that if a company like tata wants to hire H1Bs here, then it can only be for their own local work, not for work brought in-house. The same for IBM, etc.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Re:Crackdown on H1B factories like Infosys and Wip by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Do not crack down on tata, wipro, etc. Simply enforce the rules with denying companies future immigrants if they do not obey them. In addition, we need to add rules such as saying that if a company brings over an H1B and then sends the work back with the person (disney comes to mind), they will also be denied anymore immigrants of any kind.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  19. Yeah, it's going to be a disaster by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    those kids aren't starting families (they can't afford to). That means fewer kids and more need for immigrants to keep the economy going. And don't think they haven't noticed. They're angry. Real angry. A few are demanding a new social contract with guarantees for food, shelter, healthcare, etc. But the bulk aren't. There's centuries of puritanical culture that make that a bitter pill for Americans to swallow (e.g. "If you don't work you don't eat").

    If this keeps up they're going to find themselves a dictator and start wars. That's what happens when you've got a ton of angry men with no wives and no future. It's going to get real ugly...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/