Slashdot Mirror


'Americans Own Less Stuff, and That's Reason To Be Nervous' (bloomberg.com)

Bloomberg's Tyler Cowen writes about "the erosion of personal ownership and what that will mean for our loyalties to traditional American concepts of capitalism and private property." An anonymous Slashdot reader shares the report: The main culprits for the change are software and the internet. For instance, Amazon's Kindle and other methods of online reading have revolutionized how Americans consume text. Fifteen years ago, people typically owned the books and magazines they were reading. Much less so now. If you look at the fine print, it turns out that you do not own the books on your Kindle. Amazon.com Inc. does. I do not consider this much of a practical problem. Although Amazon could obliterate the books on my Kindle, this has happened only in a very small number of cases, typically involving account abuse. Still, this licensing of e-books, instead of stacking books on a shelf, has altered our psychological sense of how we connect to what we read -- it is no longer truly "ours."

The change in our relationship with physical objects does not stop there. We used to buy DVDs or video cassettes; now viewers stream movies or TV shows with Netflix. Even the company's disc-mailing service is falling out of favor. Music lovers used to buy compact discs; now Spotify and YouTube are more commonly used to hear our favorite tunes. Each of these changes is beneficial, yet I worry that Americans are, slowly but surely, losing their connection to the idea of private ownership. The nation was based on the notion that property ownership gives individuals a stake in the system. It set Americans apart from feudal peasants, taught us how property rights and incentives operate, and was a kind of training for future entrepreneurship. We're hardly at a point where American property has been abolished, but I am still nervous that we are finding ownership to be so inconvenient.

11 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Hardly by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " I worry that Americans are, slowly but surely, losing their connection to the idea of private ownership. The nation was based on the notion that property ownership gives individuals a stake in the system. "

    Hardly. It made us into a bunch of hoarders.

    I know I don't own my kindle books, I'm using Kindleunlimited for a couple of bucks a month and I read a book almost every day. (I'm retired) Much cheaper than buying them.
    After my first kindle (I'm on my 6th) I donated almost 5000 books to a local library and now I got a full new room I can use.
    I also got rid of my music tapes, my music cassettes, my music vinyl, my music CDs, my super8 films, my betamax, Video2000 and VHS tapes, my Laser-disks, DVDs and blurays,Ditto for my photo albums.

    A small server does all that now.

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It made us into a bunch of hoarders.

      Same here. When they stopped selling things I could legally play, I simply stopped buying. That doesn't mean I switched to rentals, though. And I don't abstain, either.

      Netflix didn't kill owned media. DRM killed owned media. It changed the most reasonable consumer approach from buying to pirating.

      You should pirate too. You. The person reading this. Stop paying money until they are willing to sell you something that you are allowed to play.

      Your life will be easier, have almost no ads at all, you'll have massively more selection, and shit is just overall all-around nicer. You also might save a little money too, if that matters.

    2. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You make good points. But the OP left out on important thing - take for example pieces of history than can (and have) been altered over time such that changes are made en-mass to all know copies at the touch of a button. Recently "little house" has original has fallen out of favor because of certain language. All CURRENT copies have been edited. The only way to read the original is if you find it in a REAL book.

      To your point, I do find it more convenient, but future generations may pay dearly for that convenience when history as _THIS_GENERATION_ knows is ceases to exist and is replaced by whatever the content holders wish.

      Need another example - Original version of Star Wars where Han shoots first. Can you stream that anywhere (legally)? didn't think so - the story has been altered, and future generations are none the wiser.

    3. Re:Hardly by Jetstream · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I may be wrong (or old-fashioned), but isn't it the possession of those actual CDs & cassettes that give you the license to listen to the content on them? Once you pass those on to someone else, aren't you technically also giving away the license to listen to the content? (Not that anyone's going to be knocking on your door to check that all the content on your server is properly licensed. ......... probably.....)

    4. Re:Hardly by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It didn't take an EMP to destroy the Library of Alexandria.

  2. Re: Millennial murder spree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their parants overconsumed is all.

    100 years you didnt have all of these entertainment options to waste your money on and probably felt it was more important to save for a rainy day

  3. Re: Millennial murder spree! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading books is much more important than owning them. EBooks eliminates waste.

    Owning DVDs doesn't strike me as an important thing in life.

    Still, despite these two things, I own a crapload of stuff.

  4. Re:Having less junk around sounds good to me by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of the new Millennial hipster types don't even own their house or car.

    I feel like that has more to do with the ballooning price of new cars and homes verses the stagnant growth in wages the last few decades than anything.

  5. Re: Millennial murder spree! by cas2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When Social Security "runs out of money," retirees will be paid from the General Fund. If that doesn't happen, there is no place on Earth that the Senators and Representatives can hide to escape the wrath of the retirees.

    no place on earth? of course there is. it's called "outside the concentration camp walls" - because a concentration camp is where the outraged pensioners will end up if they don't shut the fuck up to avoid getting labelled "terrorist".

    what, you thought all those fascist "anti-terror" laws were about suicide bombers and angry white men with guns? get real! it's preparation for when the general public finally realise how badly we're all being fucked over by the corporate kleptocrats and their servant politicians.

  6. Re: Millennial murder spree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The SSI trust is backed by the full faith and power of the US Federal government, if it goes bust, then we're going to have much bigger problems than the loss of our entire retirement savings. We likely won't have a functioning military or law enforcement either.

    And yes, I mean entire retirement savings as those stocks and bonds, assuming that one is lucky enough to have any, will also lost nearly their entire value.

    The real issue is that the government, especially under GOP administrations, likes to borrow from the trust with no particular intention of paying the money back and when those tax bills come due, it's going to result in significant inflation as you know damn well that neither party is committed to doing the things that are necessary to make it work, namely increasing the ceiling on social security tax collection and taxing the wealthiest individuals and corporations, the ones that got rich in part by stiffing employees on pay and retirement benefits.

  7. Re: Millennial murder spree! by MartinG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Retaining access to books in a form that :

    1) Can't later be withdrawn by the owner.
    2) Guarantees the contents can't later be revised after publication.
    3) It's possible to give to or share with others in future.
    4) Reading can't be monitored or controlled by others.

    These things are not often important, but sometimes they can be _very_ important.

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu