Slashdot Mirror


Google's Data Collection is Hard To Escape, Study Claims (cnn.com)

Citing a report [PDF] published on Tuesday by Digital Content Next and Vanderbilt University, CNN writes that "short of chucking your phone into the river, shunning the internet, and learning to read paper maps again, there's not much you can do to keep Google from collecting data about you." From the report: So says a Vanderbilt University computer scientist who led an analysis of Google's data collection practices. His report, released Tuesday, outlines a myriad ways the company amasses information about the billions of people who use the world's leading search engine, web browser, and mobile operating system, not to mention products like Gmail, platforms like YouTube, and products like Nest. Although the report doesn't contain any bombshells, it presents an overview of Google's efforts to learn as much as possible about people.

[...] Google collects far more data than Facebook, according to the report, and it is the world's largest digital advertising company. Its vast portfolio of services, from Android to Google Search to Chrome to Google Pay, create a firehose of data. Professor Douglas Schmidt and his team intercepted data as it was transmitted from Android smartphones to Google servers. They also examined the information Google provides users in its My Activity and Google Takeout tools, as well as the company's privacy polices and previous research on the topic. The researchers claims that almost every move you make online is collected and collated, from your morning routine (such as music tastes, route to work, and news preferences) to errands (including calendar appointments, webpages visited, and purchases made). "At the end of the day, Google identified user interests with remarkable accuracy," the report states.
In a statement, Google said, "This report is commissioned by a professional DC lobbyist group, and written by a witness for Oracle in their ongoing copyright litigation with Google. So, it's no surprise that it contains wildly misleading information."

100 comments

  1. Google responds... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Google: No it's not!

    Everyone: Well how did you know about the article then?

    Google: No comment.

    1. Re:Google responds... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's telling that they attack the messenger instead of pointing out any of the supposed errors. I mean the problems of the messenger may be valid but if it just turns out to rest on the ad hominem against a lengthy report, then there's not much weight to their response.

    2. Re:Google responds... by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      I think it's telling that they attack the messenger instead of pointing out any of the supposed errors. I mean the problems of the messenger may be valid but if it just turns out to rest on the ad hominem against a lengthy report, then there's not much weight to their response.

      Wish I had mod points left jeff. But then I might be character assigned as being a lefty pinko. As I post this Google just updated the slashdot side panel add with suggestions about which vehicle I might trade for the gas guzzling piece of shit I use to tow my camper. Not to worry though for me financially it is really Canadian softwood lumber that is causing the wild fires in California. NOT my gas guzzling POS that spews more carbon per kilometer driven than 3 of the ones Google just advised me to look into purchasing.

      Let the flame wars begin I am going fishing!!!...QUACK I can't go fishing on the west coast any more this year because of the Canadian softwood lumber industry causing wild fires and I am pissed at them not the fossil fuel industry or the auto industry and our stupidity of falling for bullshit mileage claims. I am looking into purchasing a flying saucer that floats but Google is not helping very much in that quest quite yet.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    3. Re:Google responds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you avoid all of Google's services, Android, Chrome, Chromebook, avoid Google's DNS, etc., many website developers will still make sure Google sees what you're doing.

      You'll be left with the choice of bypassing interacting with many companies or unblocking Google.

      A few examples I've seen, after blocking Google: can't open an account or log into retail store sites, can't open apartment rent payment sites, can't order DNA tests, can't complete orders for SSL certificates. I imagine there are many more cases for those that have a greater online experience.

      To block significant amounts of Google traffic as you browse, use the "squid" proxy between you and the Internet. Add something like this in squid.conf :

      acl blockedsites url_regex "/usr/local/squid/etc/blockedsites.txt"
      http_access deny blockedsites

      Beyond blocking Google, it's a good, free ad blocker that you control.

      But, then, there's traffic from servers to Google that aren't directed to browsers that you can't block.

      And if you avoid Gmail, run your own email server, you'll still have interactions with too many that use Gmail.

      IMO, there's something very wrong with surveillance capitalism.

  2. Wait a minute, what about GDPR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how is it not a violation of GDPR to not give me all the location data they supposedly have? Either they are lying about having the data to make themselves seem more all powerful, or they are violating GDPR.

    1. Re: Wait a minute, what about GDPR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, they are just ignoring GDPR because it is trivially easy to get around. Honestly, it is more neutered than Bruce Jenner

    2. Re:Wait a minute, what about GDPR? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      Well, since Google goes out of its way to hide any contact info for its Data Protection Officer and/or Company Secretary you can get a good idea of their likely level of concern.

      For a company built on finding data they are very keen not to reveal their own details (unlike most other responsible companies) -- a real insight into their ethics -- plenty of protection for us but none for you.

  3. Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you just use an iPhone, and anonymize your searches with something like DuckDuckGo?

    1. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just accept that Google's Black-ops elves know everything about you. You can't even browse the internet these days without running half a dozen Google scripts in the background. They're making a list, they've checked it twice, they know if you've been naughty or nice.

    2. Re:Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even easier is to just not have a Google account. I've been using Android since 2013, and have never had a Google account.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuk; apple. No thanks.

    4. Re:Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DuckDuckGo is run by the NSA

    5. Re: Doesn't sound right by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Does that mean Google is Santa Claus?

    6. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means I get no presents.

    7. Re:Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well so long as they don't give the data back to Google, then mission accomplished.

    8. Re: Doesn't sound right by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      "We're not saying your Christmas gifts were made by enslaved loved ones. They're mostly strangers."

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, without the apps, Android is like that windows smart phone.

    10. Re:Doesn't sound right by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Can't you just use an iPhone, and anonymize your searches with something like DuckDuckGo?

      Does your iPhone have ad blocking? Have you disabled all Javascript, or can you block at least the following domains on your iPhone (in all HTTP clients, including RSS readers etc.):
      - *.google.com
      - *.googleapis.com
      - *.google-analytics.com
      - *.googleadservices.com
      - *.googlesyndication.com
      - *.googleapis.com
      - *.doubleclick.com
      - *.doubleclick.de
      - *.doubleclick.net
      - *.adsensecustomsearchads.com

      If not, you're out of luck. Many websites use Google for advertising revenue, which means you are tracked. Many websites which are too lazy to implement their own stats/metrics use Google analytics. All of these feed Google enough information about your device and Geo-IP based location and sites you have visited that even if you don't directly use any Google services, Google knows more about you than anyone else (except Facebook, if you have Facebook on your iPhone).

    11. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically you can. Using Noscript or a browser that allows to manipulate (read deactivate/block) individual scripts. Or disabling JavaScript altogether. Is it convenient? probably not. Does it help your privacy? absolutely yes. You can still be singled out as "the guy with JS turned off", tho. However, the more people doing it, the harder is to single users out (impossible I would say?).

    12. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, without the apps, Android is like that windows smart phone.

      If only there was an alternative to the play store...

    13. Re:Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you just use an iPhone, and anonymize your searches with something like DuckDuckGo?

      Does your iPhone have ad blocking? Have you disabled all Javascript, or can you block at least the following domains on your iPhone (in all HTTP clients, including RSS readers etc.):
      - *.google.com
      - *.googleapis.com
      - *.google-analytics.com
      - *.googleadservices.com
      - *.googlesyndication.com
      - *.googleapis.com
      - *.doubleclick.com
      - *.doubleclick.de
      - *.doubleclick.net
      - *.adsensecustomsearchads.com

      If not, you're out of luck. Many websites use Google for advertising revenue, which means you are tracked. Many websites which are too lazy to implement their own stats/metrics use Google analytics. All of these feed Google enough information about your device and Geo-IP based location and sites you have visited that even if you don't directly use any Google services, Google knows more about you than anyone else (except Facebook, if you have Facebook on your iPhone).

      300,000 domains blocked and counting. Using an obscure Linux distro over vpn. Using an Android phone in someone else's name [the person may or may not exist]. Strip out Android phone sits permanently on a desk, on the same spot, not used as mobile.

      I know that google doesn't know anything about me,

    14. Re: Doesn't sound right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides that, you can still get all of the gratis Play Store apps you want.

  4. Widely misleading and missing oxford comma by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

    By widely misleading, Google is referring to a missing Oxford comma on page 78 of the report. Everything else is spot-on.

  5. Google is an advertising company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From their own mouth (Alphabet Inc 2016 SEC 10-K filing)

    Our innovations in areas like search and advertising have made our services widely used, and our brand one of the most recognized in the world. We generate revenues primarily by delivering online advertising that consumers find relevant and that advertisers find cost-effective.

    Just look at page 24 and you will see that in 2016 Google had $90B in revenue... $79B of which was advertising revenue.

  6. Trump will hang for treason either way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google find his tax returns while we get the gallows ready, this traitor is going to hang.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. The perfect is the enemy of the good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    there's not much you can do to keep Google from collecting data about you."

    But that doesn't mean you can't block most of it. It does not mean you should not try.

    You can go a long, long ways to avoid data collection by Google.

    Do not use Android.

    Do not use GMail, or the google search engine.

    Do not use Google Maps.

    Block their web scripts from loading, and use DecentralEyes instead.

    Given Google's reach and breadth it is almost certain they will still gather some data about you, but you absolutely can minimize it.

    Let surveillance capitalism die the death it should die. There are alternatives out there. Support them.

    The researchers claims that almost every move you make online is collected and collated, from your morning routine (such as music tastes, route to work, and news preferences) to errands (including calendar appointments, webpages visited, and purchases made)

    Google does not know my morning routine, my route to work, my news preferences, my calendar appointments, or my errands. They would only know that if I let them harvest that data.

    Stop giving them a window into your life to peek through.

    1. Re:The perfect is the enemy of the good by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Block their web scripts from loading, and use DecentralEyes instead.

      My immediate thought was, they're collecting the data on you instead. You'd have to go a long way to prove that they're not.

    2. Re: The perfect is the enemy of the good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google knows that already, unless you never email anyone that uses Gmail, or android, or chrome.. And are never forwarded or interacting with anyone they interact with that does.

      Maybe you host your own mail on your own server in your own DC, and don't email anyone else. I'm guessing not.

    3. Re:The perfect is the enemy of the good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a Pi-hole and block all that at the DNS level. Possible. I do it.

    4. Re: The perfect is the enemy of the good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If two people switch their email away from Gmail and mail to each other, that is one less pair of people Google can harvest email from.

      If three do, then there is yet another.

      Not everyone has to switch at once. If people do it one by one, then Google gets less and less data over time.

  9. Re:Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans screw over the world as a matter of their intelligence services' practice. It's time they ate some of their own shit.

  10. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world functioned just fine before the advent of the smartphone and I would proffer that it was a better place.

    "Ernest Hemingway once wrote: 'the world is a fine place and worth fighting for.' I agree with the second part." - Detective William Somerset, Se7en

  11. Don't Like? DON'T USE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh! Nanny-need much! Be a damn man so BE A TRUMP and full torpedo between spread legs ahead! Oh, and #METHREE paedo bitch!

  12. When Pollution is Good For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can't opt out of modern surveillance capitalism unless you opt out of society, go full Kazcynisky and live in a hut.

    But you can take advantage of the pervasive surveillance in order to feed them bad information. Create alternate personas and use them for certain things in your life. Don't just reserve them for the weird stuff, give them regular things too. You can start with a pre-paid phone and use that phone# to sign up for shit like web mail, grocery loyalty cards, etc. For example, If you do all your grocery shopping as Joe Blow, but never do anything else with Joe Blow then these digital stalkers will have a hard time connecting your food consumption with your real identity.

    If you do screw up and accidentally give them the info to link a fake persona with your real identity, just stop using it and get a new persona. At least you firewall the damage.

    Its imperfect and it is kinda fragile. But you can't look at this stuff as black and white, you evaluate the risks and the costs and you take precautions that match your requirements. Its better than just giving up all your privacy or living out the boonies and never getting laid.

    1. Re:When Pollution is Good For You by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Oh look another lazy-ass coward who won't even bother to try. You must like being sodomized.

    2. Re:When Pollution is Good For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use foreign services like Yandex, Fastmail. I would avoid Chinese services, but Yandex, while Russian, is perfectly legitimate and millions use it. I somehow doubt Google have their hooks into Yandex. If you also use a Raspberry Pi and Pi-hole, you can block all of Google's crap at the DNS level and keep it off your network. Using uBlock Origin and other add-ons can block all of the other stuff. There are sites online where you can learn of Google's IP ranges and just block everything on those IPs. I tend to use foreign search engines anyway who don't use Google even as a back end. Google search has mind share only. It's gone downhill quite bit and can never be trusted. Use an iPhone. Convince friends and family to switch to Fastmail or Yandex or ProtonMail. Pay for your immediate family to use these things.

    3. Re:When Pollution is Good For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country you'll need to show or prove ID for your SIM card. Game over.

    4. Re:When Pollution is Good For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lolwut? Either your name really is "Rick Schumann" in which case you are totally self-sodomizing. Or its a fake name and you are doing exactly the kind of data pollution via alternate personas that I described and are thus a massive hypocrite. Either way, you are just being a fuckalope.

    5. Re:When Pollution is Good For You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off back to 4chan

  13. Wildly Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The conclusion of the report was: Google's Data Collection is Hard to Escape.

    If this conclusion is wildly misleading, then it must NOT be hard to escape.

    If this is the case (as Google asserts) perhaps they care to explain how to fully escape it?

  14. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh for pete's sake, just buy a flip phone/feature phone and call it a day.

    That's not enough - google has an enormous footprint when it comes to webpage tracking, not to mention maps and ajax libraries. Lots of webpages won't work at all if you block google.

    Plus, there is all of your friends & colleagues who entered info about you into their phones and then they share all their contacts info with google.

  15. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by ediron2 · · Score: 1

    > I would proffer that it was a better place.
    Positive props for proper 'proffer' parlance in your prose. Pure poetry. Provokes punters pausing, too.

  16. "Oh it's TOO HARD why bother trying?" by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    "short of chucking your phone into the river, shunning the internet, and learning to read paper maps again, there's not much you can do to keep Google from collecting data about you."

    Don't own a smartphone, use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, use tracking protection, delete unnecessary cookies, use NoScript and a good adblocker like Ubox, and use OpenStreetMaps instead of Google maps. There, was that so hard?

    Lazy and cowards will now say: "Oh they probably can still track you and collect data on you so why bother trying it's useless"

    You're a bad example, no one should listen to you. Take back your privacy, even SOME of it, and take back at least SOME of your life.

    1. Re:"Oh it's TOO HARD why bother trying?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      startpage.com is a good choice for secure browsing. Keeping a 'crippled' browser is useful: no cookies, no java/j-script, no image autoload; there's also a full-function browser for the few times I need it. AND there's the Tor browser too. every little bit helps.

  17. Several things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. If they disabled a lot of these features, then people would complain all their fancy apps no longer work, or were less useful.

    2. You agree to all these things when you buy the phone AND DON'T BOTHER TO READ THE TERMS OF SERVICE.

    3. YOU OF COURSE READ THE TERMS OF SERVICE RIGHT?

    4. Don't blame Google for your own laziness.

    5. Buy an old school phone. Their are plenty available.

  18. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Se7en

    How is that pronounced? Seten? Sesevenen?

  19. Newsflash! by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Google can track you on the intarwebs!
    Water is wet!
    Pope catholic!

    News brought to you by CORI - Captain Obvious Research Institute

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  20. Wildly Misleading my ASS by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    Google needs to allow people to opt out of more stuff. Period.

    1. Re:Wildly Misleading my ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What services does google have that you can actually truly opt out of? Sure, if you twiddle some settings then google won't SHOW you the data any more but they are still collecting it.

  21. On a PC it's cake via... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux & BSD h t t p : / / a p k . i t - m a t e . c o . u k / A P K H o s t s F i l e E n g i n e F o r L i n u x . z i p

    Yields more security/speed/reliability/anonymity vs. any 1 solution (99% of threats use hostnames vs. IP address most firewalls use) more efficiently/FASTER + NATIVELY 4 less!

    Vs. "Bolt on 'MoAr' illogic-logic" slowing you hosts speed u up 2 ways: Adblocks + Hardcode fav. sites u spend most time @ vs. competition loaded w/ security bugs (DNS/AntiVir) + overheads slowing u (messagepass 'souled-out' to advertisers easily detected & blocked addons + firewall filtering drivers) & their complexity leads to exploitation!

    * ONLY 1 of its kind in GUI 4 Linux/BSD!

    (Better vs. Windows model in speed/efficiency/merge)

    APK

    P.S.=> Protects vs. script trackers/ads/DNS request tracking + redirect poisoned or downed DNS/botnets/malware downloads/malcript/email malicious payloads... apk

  22. What about doing the opposite? by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    How do people feel about addons like trackmenot which attempt to drown the telemetrics in noise?

    1. Re:What about doing the opposite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Flood them with shit, useless data. Track Me Not isn't perfect, though.
      What would be better is if it periodically revisited many things to build up false interest. Random one-off noise is trivial to eliminate with a simple threshold measurement. (hell, the commenting system here works like that)

      Or even just root your phone and outright block all of Googles servers. Every one of them.
      Problem solved.
      If you need any profiles (Youtube), keep it separate from general viewing. Have a profile sandboxed for every Google service you use. Proxy / VPN all of them.
      Use variations of your name, if not pseudonyms. Variations are just as good as false names.

    2. Re:What about doing the opposite? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced that there's no way to identify the auto-generated queries that make trackmenot useless. I used a double negative, but basically I assume that either now or in the future Google et al will identify the queries... to at least a reasonable degree.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  23. 30 registered /.ers reviews of windows model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Alternatives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't feel particularly threatened by what my Windows Phone might be doing behind my back, and frankly it provides the same useful items an Android-based phone would do while out on the road.

  25. Re:Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I resent this statement, because as an American, I myself have never participated of my own free will in the coup of a foreign state, the assassination a politically important person, or the funding and operation of drug/gun/human trafficking.

    And, as an American, I don't condone or support the actions taken by the intelligence agencies.

  26. I block everything Google and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using a Raspberry Pi ad Pi-hole. I block them at the DNS level, so their dreck never even hits my network. Each machine also has uBlock Origin, Token Tracking Stripper, Neat URL, Decentraleyes, Privacy Badger... all tunes to remove tracking, but especially Google and Microsoft as well as miners, etc.

  27. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From experience: You can block everything Google (and Facebook, and ...) almost everywhere without losing much. You won't see embedded maps, but you can look up the addresses on osm.org or a proprietary maps service. There's also no need to buy a feature phone. Just make sure the phone is supported by Lineage, don't install the Google app package and use F-Droid for apps. You can't change that other people will put info about you into Google's apps and services, but you don't have to give Google a constant activity stream.

  28. Time to update that idiom ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Nothing is certain except death and taxes -- and Google data collection.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  29. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"Oh for pete's sake, just buy a flip phone/feature phone and call it a day."

    And the phone companies will still:

    * Track your every move using very accurate cellular triangulation methods
    * Store all that location data from above
    * Filter/track/store all your text messages
    * Track/store all your meta data (who you called, when, where)

    So yeah, it will at least cut Google out of the picture, but tracking is still there. If you are using an Android phone, the best you can do is register under a pseudonym, turn off all the tracking features, don't use their client software (use a third party, traditional SMS, use an alternative search engine, use an alternative browser, etc) and never attach ANYTHING on it to a real address, phone number, credit card number, bank account, or Email address. You can get a maximally "private" smart device (as much as can be expected) although at the cost of it being a degraded "experience".

    You can have more privacy or more convenience.... but probably not both.

  30. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear.

  31. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    * Turn your phone off or put it in Airplane Mode when you're not actively using it
    * The above makes 'storage' irrelevant
    * Don't use SMS messages for anything important or personal, save that for in-person conversations
    * Phone companies have been doing that since there were phone companies so what's the point, how else do they bill you?
    There was that so hard?

    Honestly you can dump wireless entirely and get a landline instead if you want your privacy back. What everyone is doing, as usual, is trading their privacy for 'convenience'. You don't have to, it's all a matter of how important your privacy is to you.

  32. "Nothing you can do, so may as well just give up!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, the guy who wrote this is somehow affiliated with google and/or profits from their data collection

  33. Re:Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, piece of shit: If the U.S. goes down, the rest of the Free World goes down with it. You want to live in PutinLand instead? Or have the world turn into a shithole like Libya or Syria? That's what awaits you if the U.S. falls apart. Say goodbye to civilization and hello to an extinction-level event of humanitys making. You poor dumb shit.

    Somebody that understands!

  34. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finally had to give up my flip phone for a small smartphone. It was over 10 years old. The only flip phones on the market (in the US) are relatively huge, apparently designed for really old people. Seriously, I could not find a single provider with a flip phone that wasn't significantly larger and more cheaply built than what I was replacing. I'm hoping I'll get some use out of the features the smartphone offers, but so far, about the only positive thing I can say is, well, nothing, really.

  35. Not so smart by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Google may be well informed, but its reactions are not that smart. Advertising keeps focusing on goods I already purchased and I am not interested to buy for a while. Youtube even keeps recommending the videos I saw an hour ago.

    1. Re:Not so smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI tries to lull you into a false sense of security. And it's working.

  36. Re:Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that happens, that will be because the US will actively try to take us down with them. If they fail then good riddance. It's the US that caused Libya and Syria, so it's silly to threaten us with that fate when the US/UK/FR elites masturbate above the dead bodies and emaciated children and eject their cum load when another $10 billion of weapon contracts are signed or they're cashing their $250,000 public speaking fee.
    I can't wait for the US ships to get sunk in the Gulf this November.

  37. Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a phone running Lineage, no Google/Apple/MS crap.

    What I would love is a phone running only GNU/Linux but nothing seems to be doing that natively.

    1. Re: Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purism librem 5 next year!

    2. Re: Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no apps...

    3. Re: Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      define apps.

      It comes with browser, email, calendar, calculator, maps, pictures, music/video player... what do people need?

      Do you mean something like the ability to run octave in your smartphone or edit presentations/code in your phone? no, probably not (being linux, probably yes actually, but that's besides the point).

    4. Re:Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Gemini PDA

      Gemini PDA runs 5 Linux distros, Debian, Ubuntu, Sailfish, Android, unlocked bootloader, open source
        Gemini PDA

      Official site of the manufacturer

    5. Re:Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gemini PDA
      Gemini PDA runs 5 Linux distros, Debian, Ubuntu, Sailfish, Android, unlocked bootloader, open source

    6. Re: Or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no apps...

      Fine for me. I'll make my apps.

  38. CNN Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says there is nothing you can do to stop Google tracking you short of throwing your phone in a river. Then it goes on to say using an IOS device and not using Google products/visiting sites with Google trackers pretty much stops them tracking you. CNN delivers another shit "news" article.

  39. Re: Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is Tasker called on f-droid?

  40. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Back to showing people our penises in person, are we?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  41. Huh? by rodia · · Score: 1

    Lineage OS with minimal Gapps
    FDroid app store
    DuckDuckGo for searches
    OsmAnd for navigation with OpenStreetMap
    K9-Mail
    ...
    Unless the Android system itself leaks data to Google (which the XDA dev crowd would probably have noticed), I don't see a problem. The setup is less comfortable than standard Android, but if that's not acceptable, there are apparently ways to install apps from the play store on it.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the same setup + Yalp (from FDroid) for PlayStore apps. Of course, those apps might track you, but you make a conscious choice here and Lineage OS helps with restricting their access.

  42. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    It's not enough. Every e-mail you send to a person using GMail gets scanned by Google. Every SMS and phone call you make to an Android user gets sent to them (the metadata, at least --- I hope they don't actually record your calls). The only way to avoid them is stopping communicating with people completely.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  43. Re: Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Go by houghi · · Score: 1

    The fact that they could not collect data from you does not mean it is not happening and it is not wrong. Basically you are blaming the rape victim for asking for it by dressing sexy.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  44. Re: Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tasker is not available through F-Droid, but you can get it directly from the author's web site. There's Easer on F-Droid, if you want to try a free open source alternative.

  45. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh for pete's sake, just buy a flip phone/feature phone and call it a day.

    Not everyone needs a "smart" phone. I can't wait to get rid of my corporately owned/operated device, which I am required to have.

    The world functioned just fine before the advent of the smartphone and I would proffer that it was a better place.

    Agreed... and most smartphones are just iPhoneX copies now anyway.. utterly useless ugly fashion bling... nothing more

  46. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > From experience: You can block everything Google (and Facebook, and ...) almost everywhere without losing much.

    Not my experience. Especially ajax.googleapis.com are used by more sites than it should be. Also captchas mostly come from Google.

    Run UBO in medium mode or even hard mode and you'll find out pretty quickly, just how reliant most websites are on third-party resources and at least 2/3rd's are using something from Google.

  47. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it depends on the sites you visit. I block all scripts and all third party content by default. Third party script libraries are on the decline. Googletagmanager.com is everywhere, but blocking it almost never breaks a site. I am used to reloading after whitelisting a CDN domain, but many sites still work mostly right without Javascript. I don't need filler pictures and I don't frequent sites that require me to solve captchas.

  48. Stop giving it to them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The researchers claims that almost every move you make online is collected and collated, from your morning routine (such as music tastes, route to work, and news preferences) to errands (including calendar appointments, webpages visited, and purchases made). "At the end of the day, Google identified user interests with remarkable accuracy," the report states.

    If you conduct your entire life online using a smartphone whose primary function is to collect data about you, this shit will happen.

    Google has no way of knowing my morning routine, my favourite music, or my purchases ... because none of this involves digital technology Google has any access to.

    Yes, I use gmail, read Google news,and use Google Calendar ... so I know they get to see a fair bit about me.

    I don't tether myself to a smartphone (I have one for work, it gets used for minimal things like checking my email). My online presence is down to about zero except for LinkedIn, and that I use minimally (though I bet most people don't realise there is a web-bug on every Slashdot page from them, which means Microsoft is tracking you on Slashdot). I also ruthlessly block ad and analytics sites, and pretty much don't have accounts ... well, on any website really. I don't use any form of social media at all (because, really, it's all little different from ICQ and the other stuff we all played with 20+ years ago).

    Stop living your life on-line, and sharing all of this information with these companies. Every one of these services has a primary function to scrape your information, collate it, and then either directly sell you ads, or sell it to someone else to track you and sell you ads.

    It really is time to either stop using much of the internet, or to start building in better privacy tools to block this shit.

  49. Widely misleading? I think not! by Slimgin · · Score: 1

    So you don't like the amount of "snooping" Google is doing on "your data", here are some alternatives:
    Replace your Android phone with another brand, perhaps a flip phone.
    Use Duck-Duck-Go for all your internet searches - https://duckduckgo.com/
    Change your email provider, or encrypt all your emails - Heres my PGP Key ID - DCFB8830
    Use another map provider, like Maps for iOS or your in-vehicle navigation system. People use Google because it works! Plain and simple. If you don't want a company to have your data, don't give that company your data. Lastly, I quoted "snooping" and "your data" for a reason. If you use a companies infrastructure for email, searching, etc, the data you post or receive does not belong to you any longer because you do not own the infrastructure. So Google is not snooping when they collect certain metrics from the data you willingly give them, and since you like the service they provide, usually free of course, you are going to continue to hand over your data.

  50. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are using GMail? Why FFS?

  51. Re: Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh right because Libya and Syria were bastions of freedom and goodness before obama and Hillary super fucked them both.

  52. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

    I'm not. But each mail I send to a recipient who uses Gmail gets in the hands of Big G.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  53. Re:Trump won't escape Mueller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, piece of shit: If the U.S. goes down, the rest of the Free World goes down with it. You want to live in PutinLand instead? Or have the world turn into a shithole like Libya or Syria? That's what awaits you if the U.S. falls apart. Say goodbye to civilization and hello to an extinction-level event of humanitys making. You poor dumb shit.

    Somebody that understands!

    I second that!

    Sig. Another third unrelated AC

  54. Re:Get a feature phone if you don't like Apple/Goo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Turn your phone off or put it in Airplane Mode when you're not actively using it

    Location still recorded in background and phoned home on turn-on.

  55. APK lies, never trust what he says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK always lies and never backs up his statements, never trust what he says.
    Like how he claims the Chinese copied him but can't produce any evidence to support that claim and even admits that there isn't any.
    How about when he states that hosts does port filtering but again can't backup his statement which was shown to be false.
    There is also his list of "experts" who support him but it turns out they don't say what he is claiming.
    This also ignores his out of context quotes he uses to lie by omission that are frequently spammed.
    The problem with APK is that his entire reputation is built upon the lie he told years ago that hosts is an effective security solution. It has been exposed numerous times as being a lie and when exposed APK fails to argue logically and instead will try to deflect criticism, change the subject, move the goal posts, return to a previously disproven statement, demand you prove you did better than his file concatenator, or just call people names. He will continue to lie by stating that he won or "dusted" you while failing to refute anything you said, will never provide real evidence, and generally try to dodge the issue.

    Face it APK is one of the most detested individuals here for good reason. When ever his poor behavior, awful logic, over statements, and horrendous writing are called out he has a fit and has done so for years across the internet. He is a spammer, and is an abusive insecure little man who is washed up and never amounted to anything. Until he produces actual verifiable facts supporting his case nothing he says should be taken seriously.

  56. Only evidence I need & nobody trusts you.. apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who did it 1st: China or me? I did - dates are my proof http://theregister.co.uk/2017/... w/ the FACT China rampantly STEALS U.S. Intellectual properties & military secrets!

    * See subject: NOBODY TRUSTS YOU as you STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous - real "trustworthy" you are, lol (not)!

    When you've done BETTER than I have in a ware that protects & speeds folks up online?

    THEN, they might (you never will though & you KNOW it JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie").

    (BOTH Arstechnica + Thor SCHMUCK got BLOWN away by me years ago & I laugh about it to this very day (they did what you do & got burnt for it)).

    APK

    P.S.=> TONS of security experts KNOW blacklists work (no questions asked) & 3 things show I do it right:

    1st = User praise my hosts engine https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... (so much for ME being "detested" but I'm not here to win a popularity contest - just here to WIN so everyone does).

    2nd "ATTACKS" I GET (from UNIDENTIFIABLE ac as Elon Musk got https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... )

    3rd BEING IMITATED = "Imitation = sincerest form of flattery" https://linux.slashdot.org/com... JUST LIKE CHINA DID ME TOO... apk