Slashdot Mirror


Google Removes Accounts Tied To Iran-Led Misinformation Campaign (engadget.com)

In a blog post, Google shared an update regarding its efforts to combat state-sponsored phishing attacks and to remove accounts associated with an influence operation linked to Iran. Engadget reports: The company said that in recent months, it has detected and blocked state-sponsored groups from targeting political campaigns, journalists, activists and academics with phishing attempts. Google has also been working with the cybersecurity group FireEye, which has been providing Google with information on an Iran-based misinformation operation. FireEye identified three email accounts, three YouTube channels and three Google+ accounts linked to that operation, which Google subsequently took down.

In conjunction to the intelligence provided by FireEye, Google also investigated other suspicious groups linked to Iran. The company identified and removed 39 YouTube channels, six Blogger blogs and 13 Google+ accounts it believed to be connected to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Relevant videos on the now-terminated YouTube channels had garnered 13,466 views in the U.S.
Facebook and Twitter were also made aware of the Iranian operation. Twitter announced that it suspended 284 accounts believed to have originated from Iran for "engaging in coordinated manipulation." Meanwhile, Facebook said it removed "652 pages that it says were linked to a campaign originating in Iran, as well as an unspecified number of accounts liked to Russian military intelligence services," reports Engadget.

34 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Who judges fake news? by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are told fake news were removed, but we have no sample of the suppressed speech so that we can make up our own mind about it. It looks a lot like censorship.

    1. Re:Who judges fake news? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It is, at least if what Google censored is similar to what Facebook censored, which has more integrity than a lot of legitimate US media.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Why, Google will judge for us, of course. They have all the smart people working for them. We can trust them. And as for censorship? Google just had thousands of employees revolt over complying with China's censorship. Surely they would never agree to what the Western ruling class wants censored. It's not like they're a part of it. They are rebels, loners, fighting the good fight against...the Islamic Republic of Iran? Hmm I thought Islamophobia was a big no-no? Anyway the point is to trust Google and not question their judgment.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Fake news you say? You mean like this?

      On Saturday, dozens of media outlets reported that federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested an illegal alien who was taking his wife to the hospital to deliver their baby - but they conveniently left out one key detail: the man was a wanted murder suspect.

      The timing of the media's latest deception to demonize the Trump administration for political gain comes just two days after more than 350 newspapers wrote op-eds bemoaning President Donald Trump's attacks on the media for inaccurately covering news stories and for sometimes reporting blatantly false information.

      https://www.dailywire.com/news...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      none of all misinformation campaigns coming out from USA are supressed, that should give you a big tip

    5. Re:Who judges fake news? by fredrated · · Score: 1

      The SF Chronicle report I read clearly said he was wanted for murder in Mexico.

    6. Re:Who judges fake news? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Engaging in breathless whataboutism does not reflect particularly well on you or your argument.

    7. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's not whataboutism, it's proof positive fake news exists and is still going strong. Heck, how did all those newspapers collude behind the scenes to produce the same editorial on the same day? WTF? And they claim they don't work together to bias the news!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Who judges fake news? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      We're not smart enough to make up our own minds.

  2. Read the report yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/pdfs/rpt-FireEye-Iranian-IO.pdf

    Seems like the main crime they committed was supporting Palestine, and opposing human rights violations in Saudi Arabia.

    "Multiple regionally focused Liberty Front Press Twitter accounts
    have retweeted content from the original affiliated Twitter
    accounts (@libertyfrontpr and @libertyfrontp) that contained,
    for example, anti-Saudi, anti-Israel, pro-Palestine, and antiTrump
    sentiments."

    Oh no, how ever shall our democracy survive an anti-Saudi tweet! SHUT IT DOWN!

    1. Re:Read the report yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Broadly speaking, the intent behind this activity appears to
      be to promote Iranian political interests, including anti-Saudi,
      anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as to promote
      support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the
      U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). In the context of the U.S.-focused
      activity, this also includes significant anti-Trump messaging
      and the alignment of social media personas with an American
      liberal identity. However, it is important to note that the activity
      does not appear to have been specifically designed to influence
      the 2018 US midterm elections, as it extends well beyond US
      audiences and US politics. "

      Wait, what law does this violate? Hell, what terms of service does it violate?

    2. Re:Read the report yourself... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I have misgivings about approaching state sponsored propaganda efforts in this way, but what you're saying is demonstrably incorrect. YouTube et al hosts plenty of videos with the themes you mention. If the themes were the problem, rather than the source, we wouldn't see that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  3. Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by najajomo · · Score: 1

    How sad to see slashdot reduced to spouting neocon cyber-büll-shít :[

    1. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      I hardly see it as convincing anyone and all it does is put forward the question, are the corporate douche bags censoring US government propaganda in other countries to protect those countries citizens from the mountains of bullshit coming out of the US. Are the winning the censor law, nope, they are just crippling their businesses. They are simply pushing the censorship button as hard as they can until the public react.

      Of course the typical complain but the mug punters will be mislead. Reality is, mug punters don't give much intellectual thought to anything and vote with the dumb gut, for whom ever. The smart campaigns, they involve people who want to be involved and who want to be informed and they drag along the rest. You simply can not censor them over the long term. You only need to fail to censor them once, censor their ability to access the truth, and you lose them forever.

      All Google and Facebook are doing right now is showing how weak they are, how little influence they have in reality. The reality is, it is the people that use Google and Facebook who have the influence, lose them and you lose that influence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Wow the foreign troll shills are out in force in this thread.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  4. South Africa govt says it's true, also ABC News by raymorris · · Score: 2, Informative

    "South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa announced earlier that the ruling political party, the African National Congress, had agreed to a proposal to alter the country's constitution and allow for land expropriation, or seizure by the government, without compensation", reports ABC News.

    The official South Africa government Twitter account added:
    "South Africa will speed up the pace of land reform"

    It seems someone told you some fake news.

  5. Keep the content. Label it. by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of sending all these Facebook/Twitter postings down the memory hole, they should just flag them: "These are posts which we have reason to believe originated with Iranian operatives" (or Russian military, or whatever they think it is). Give people the option to hide these posts, or to browse them, or whatever they want to do. Personally, I'd be curious to look at them, at least briefly. It could perhaps lead me to be better informed about what the various state actors are up to on social media. It would certainly do a lot to raise public awareness of that problem.

    The current solution sucks, since it does nothing to raise awareness of the problem, and raises the possibility that Facebook is engaging in censorship for their own reasons. As others have observed on this thread: it smells a little gamey when Facebook says "We're going to delete all these posts because we think they originated with [x]. No, we're not going to tell you why we think that".

    The solution to speech you don't like is to add more speech of your own. The solution is never to suppress the speech you don't like.

    1. Re: Keep the content. Label it. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am al for blocking these accounts on facebook and twitter. We should go further. Just block people who have a different opinion.

      Before you reply, think if that downside is really one.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  6. Until Google removes accounts to by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    at least one US-lead disinformation campaign, this is censorship on behalf of the US government, and nothing else.

    Remember Iraq having nukular weapons, ready to strike in under 4 hours? Remember "Alkaida operating out of Baghdad"? Remember "Syria chemical weapons facilities bombed", when the said facilities were inspected by OPCW months early and declared clean? Remember Hans Blix?

    All these lies were used as excuses for massive wars, which brought an enormous amount of suffering. In combination, the propaganda and the wars are a crime against humanity.

    But where's the outrage?

    1. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      because they thought Iraq

      Because they made it up, you mean.

    2. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL really? It is the same crap, just amplified many times over. As for Trump, whatever he is to you, around him are the same neocon bunch that put "Mission Accomplished" above Mr. Dubya's round head.

      Are you children learning?

  7. Slashdot is z-ist to the max... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Washington loves the two most depraved states on the Earth equally, Isr-el and Saudi Arabia. And the z-onists and wahhabis are blood brothers. Slashdot is just another media mouthpiece for the one, and thus the other. Every day Slashdot tries to demonise Iran.

    The excuse given by the z-onist owners of Facebook for banning the 'Iran' accounts was that they dared to support the Iran nuclear treaty.

    I'm reminded of when Tony Blair blew up the Serbia equivalent of the BBC HQ (civilian TV centre) because the station dared to run programs criticising Tony Blair's Kosovo War, and dared to show images of the thousands of civilians Blair murdered in Serbia. The actual BBC stated the bombing was justified (many many civilian workers were slaughtered) because the Serbs had no right to tell the truth when it ran against 'british' propaganda interests. Indeed it was a BBC foreign correspondent who phoned back to confirm all the foreign journalists had left the target building for the night, so the RAF could then murder ever civilian Serb who remained in the HQ. Jill Dando- a BBC journalist who fronted the anti-serb war propaganda- was murdered at her home in revenge shortly afetrwards.

    Or perhaps you prefer the example of Loony Tunes cartoons that used nazi-style racist imagery to demonise the people of Japan during WW2.

    In a time of WAR, the 'enemy' is to be denied a voice regardless of truth. The tech giants know the war on Iran has actually begun, and are acting accordingly.

  8. Re:Keep the content. Label it. by greenwow · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I love /.'s -1 moderation. You can still see the posts if you want to, but generally don't have to.

  9. while US based WMD information is allowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    sure..while US based WMD information is endorsed and further propagated

  10. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    helping Trump collude to disenfranchise US voters

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disenfranchise

    so are Republicans ready to admit the fact that Iran is attempting to influence us?

    Everyone tries to "influence" everyone, Russia included. Remember when Obama flew to London to try to "influence" the brexit vote by threatening Britain? Or when Mexico "influenced" every election in living memory by shipping millions of their citizens here to produce millions of voting-legal children? Or when the CIA tried to "influence" dozens of countries since WW2 through everything from media propaganda campaigns to coups to full-blown military invasions?

    (It's hard to keep up with their bullshit platform frankly)

    Because apparently you're only learning about it through third-hand twitter accounts, deranged cable news personalities, and the voices in your head. The "platform" - agreed to by everyone with the psychological capability to look halfway objectively at the evidence, including Comey and, as far as we know, Mueller - is that of course Russia tried to "influence" the election, but that neither Trump nor anyone on his staff had any role in it. Moreover since this "influence" seems to amount to little more than some facebook posts and twitter bots, the fact that anyone even gives a shit is fucking bizarre.

  11. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    No, that's just Putin's wet dream. He knows in his heart of hearts that the UK can kill him by themselves, and they won't be alone in any war. Putin is a scared little man afraid of reality. Putin will die soon, killed by the peasants he robs daily, if not by his own cadre for a bit more money than he pays them.

  12. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He'll sink the UK fleet then they'll be stuck on their little island. Good riddance.

  13. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    I doubt it. The Russians navy is a pitiful little thing! It couldn't even beat the Japanese in 1904-5, losing no less than 2 entire fleets. More recently their top of the line carrier was spotted belching black smoke while it trawled through the Channel, and needed emergency repairs for the tugboat that it brought along to make sure it could finish the trip. Even more recently, a Russian frigate sunk in the Black sea after impacting a small cargo freighter carrying cattle. Cows vs Russians, Cows won too. None of these things exactly inspire dread in anyone, but probably more than a little laughter.

  14. https://www.smoseoservices.in/blog/video-design-co by SmoSeoSem · · Score: 1

    video design company in Kandivali Inventive gives gainful points of interest for kick you off with spreading out and building up your Android versatile application progress. As an Android Application Development gathering, we are steadily examining for the correct congruity between tasteful flawlessness and amazing handiness. video design company in Kandivali Our progress pack have made and moved many best inclining applications in the Google business center, which has helped our customers to discover new clients and additionally to make a more grounded bond with the present client base. We conceptualize to make the best application thoughts for your great position. We also make the application insights that satisfy the present utilitarian criteria. https://www.smoseoservices.in/...

  15. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by dave420 · · Score: 1

    Apart from when Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to stir up controversy (even though eventually nothing damning was found in them), which Trump apparently knew of before the emails were released.

    And as for the CIA, two wrongs don't make a right.

  16. Re: SOMEONE HELP LYING REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS READ? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    I like how you link to more fake news in order to prove that you're not linking to fake news.

    For the record, even using their own statistics, attacks on farmers have INCREASED; it's only resultant deaths which have decreased. This shouldn't be surprising given that farmers have been working for years to improve their security measures and build groups to protect each other. Only a moron would focus on the number of deaths while ignoring an increase in attacks.

    I await your next fake news link with bated breath.

  17. Iran and Infowars at the same rough time? by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

    Poor Iranfowars! Always getting beat up.

    --
    Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
  18. Re:Russia wants to play by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I said, "Ya dirty dog!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  19. Information campaigns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The key points here are 1. differentiating information campaigns and misinformation campaigns and 2. what to do about them.

    Information campaigns should not be stopped, even if they are done on behalf of a government or by government agencies.
    Misinformation campaigns should be labeled so and links to definite proof of why said information is untruthful should be attached.

    Anyone censoring others and claiming it was because it was misinformation is doing exactly what the Chinese government does.