Slashdot Mirror
GlobalFoundries Stops All 7nm Development: Opts To Focus on Specialized Processes (anandtech.com)
GlobalFoundries has made a major strategy shift announcement. The contract maker of semiconductors says it is ceasing development of bleeding edge manufacturing technologies and stop all work on its 7LP (7 nm) fabrication processes, which will not be used for any client. From a report: Instead, the company will focus on specialized process technologies for clients in emerging high-growth markets. These technologies will initially be based on the company's 14LPP/12LP platform and will include RF, embedded memory, and low power features. Because of the strategy shift, GF will cut 5% of its staff as well as renegotiate its WSA and IP-related deals with AMD and IBM.
GlobalFoundries was on track to tape out its clients' first chips made using its 7 nm process technology in the fourth quarter of this year, but "a few weeks ago" the company decided to take a drastic strategical turn, says Gary Patton. The CTO stressed that the decision was made not based on technical issues that the company faced, but on a careful consideration of business opportunities the company had with its 7LP platform as well as financial concerns. On the heels of this announcement, AMD said today that it will move all of its 7nm production on both CPUs and GPUs to TSMC.
GlobalFoundries was on track to tape out its clients' first chips made using its 7 nm process technology in the fourth quarter of this year, but "a few weeks ago" the company decided to take a drastic strategical turn, says Gary Patton. The CTO stressed that the decision was made not based on technical issues that the company faced, but on a careful consideration of business opportunities the company had with its 7LP platform as well as financial concerns. On the heels of this announcement, AMD said today that it will move all of its 7nm production on both CPUs and GPUs to TSMC.
Could it be that Intel wired a large sum to GlobalFoundries just to trip AMD's roadmap?
I don't know!
Isn't 7 nautical miles a bit big for semiconductor features?
'Not based on technical issues' but based on...lots of bullshit...as well as financial concerns.
'Financial concerns' like a 10% yield, or some other technical disaster, so full of shit.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Whom? Trump? EVERYTHING is bad news for Trump!
Did Moore's law just end? Intel said they thought it had...maybe this is confirmation.
www.sjbaker.org
INTELs slippery little fingers are all over this
In the finals: Samsung vs TSMC.
Wow. Much drastical. Very strategical.
When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
Apparently GloFo has been bleeding money for years, and they're not big enough to compete with Samsung and TSMC on the latest nodes and remain profitable. So instead of chasing the latest process shrink, they're targeting niches that are more profitable and less served by the other companies. Despite what the summary implies, they were still pretty far away from volume production of 7nm, for which they're using standard lithography tech at this point. EUV 7nm would come later and require $billions more to get up and running, and it's predicted it won't pay off for them to do this.
Seems GlobalFoundries is owned by Abu Dhabi, didn't know that.
Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
*** ACHTUNG!!! ***
I hate nigg3rs jews and spics.
*** ACHTUNG!!! ***
Smart move. There is just too much bleeding edge science and engineering at 7nm, this is a physical reality. Stick with profitable, mature fab tech and iteratively improve it. Get into 7nm when some of the horrible EUV issues have well known solutions, which should carry on to 5nm.
Meanwhile, the big Asian fabs are said to be ramping 7nm production, but as far as I know, nobody has seen actual parts arrive beyond samples. Certainly not enough to have a good idea about yields. Definitely a believe it when you see it situation. Of course, I hope that Samsung and TSMC have actually overtaken Intel at this transition, and given the economics of the situation it seems inevitable, but we do not have proof it has actually happened yet.
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
Si is dead. Dead dead dead. Moore's law died years ago. We're now down to just 3 high end chip foundries, and Intel doesn't sell to competitors. Any chip advancement via silicon will soon be impossible.
Instead of continuing to spend tens of billions of dollars on what is inevitably going to be an ultra costly dead end is just one of these companies spent it on replacing Si with something like graphene they could have probably have it ready in 5 years or so. The advantages of dozens or hundreds or thousands of times the clock speed at lower power than Si would be impossible to overcome. But instead they plow money into hole so investors can have guaranteed quarterly results.
We have to start facing the fact, that profit is not something that improves humanity or any of our lives.
Profit has become circular reasoning. Instead of earning money, we started making money, and instead of acquiring money to achieve some improvement, we just acquired money for the sake of getting more money.
I'm going to be blunt here: That needs to be criminalized. ... without even a single attempt at weaseling their way out, using newspeak to spin things, or whatever else a psychopath would come up with ... and if they waste it, they get to go to their own island (I suggest one requiring hard actual life-improving work to make it into a comfortable home), get an intense therapy, or leave this planet. "Their" money will lose its value in the process, except for the amount of man-hours of work where they actually improved the world. (Like an internship at a good organization.)
Give such cancerous enterprises a fair chance to change their ways, and start improving humanity
No harming anyone, BUT, and that is key, no them harming anyone either!
IBM's fab in Vermont was sold to GF, and believe it continued to be defense-rated for (nobody's talking) type chips. so folks doing things they shouldn't in places they are not supposed to be are going to be scampering for product nobody should know about. look for Intel to suddenly get its 7nm act together.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
the fab side of AMD was always looking for another buck. nothing has changed.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
What if this multi-patterned low yielding stuff is wasteful?
Samsung and TSMC will still make them at great expense and throw away millions of dead iPhone chips. Billions dollars spent just so that the youngest generation masturbate to porn they watch on their phone.
You didn't make it clear how this relates to the story and what you want GlobalFoundries to do. Do you really want them to keep throwing good money after bad when they can't afford to fund the new 7nm node all the way to production? Is the world really better off having them do 7nm when a few other companies expect to be able to do it better?
Profit in the wide sense means that you gain from your actions. If you profit on nothing, you die -- soon.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
7nm is hard, heck, 14, 10nm are hard, even 28nm is hard.
Many more effects, OCV, double, tripple, or quad patterning, not to mention new STA models, fault models, transistor models, extraction models, DRC, ERC and LVS models, all of these cost money.
phones will likely stay on the 28nm process node for a long long time, and unless you plan to charge $600 for a cpu, it's unlikely that even intel or AMD will go to that node for the consumer level stuff.
the ROI just isn't there.
And that's good. Little pilot fish on Slashdot can fret and pump out righteous comments. That's fine. It doesn't matter.
And have us pursue things, that actually improve your and my life.
Not communism or something like that. But an economy driven by global wealth. Where wealth is real happiness (as opposed to the delusional or drug-based one) and all those material things, plus humanity getting off this rock as the long term goal.
GF can do quite a lot to help this effort. Like not making profit at all, not being a stock-traded company, paying its employees based on actual work done, and paying that actual work fairly.
Of course that implies that all the other companies do the same. Othewise GF would be dead by tomorrow. That's obviously implied.
But I want you and me to help enforce the law that makes it illegal to do the opposite. And hence illegal for those other companies to kill GF.
Yeah, "they" might call me an idealist or a dreamer.
But never forget that the ONLY thing stopping it from happening, is them calling it unrealistic and not helping the effort, precisely because they argue others will call it unrealistic and not help the effort... by which they mean *them*. So it does not happen because they don’t make it happen with the argument that they won’t make it happen. Circular reasoning. Which means, *they* are to blame.
What motivation would there be for people to take risk? Profit drives innovation and risk taking. It spurs creativity. You don't see a lot of innovation coming from countries that are socialistic. There's a reason for that.
The cost of the foundaries has been rising exponentially. While circuit density has been doubling every 18 months, foundary cost has been doubling every 36 months. When Moore's law was proposed the engineering was the main limiting factor in increasing density, it has been shifting though to a financing problem. The result has been few and few foundaries on the bleeding edge. I can't imagine things continuing for another 9 years (3 more doublings). Even if there was only one foundary left at that point it probably wouldn't be economical. There just wouldn't be enough of a market. The other problem is R&D as a percentage of revenue. Basically to stay on top a foundary is now spending 20% of revenue on R&D. Margins aren't going up only volume
This brings up another dilemma about the last 20 years of economic growth. Much of the recent economic growth has been driven by increases in market size. Companies make more and more specialized widgets for lower and lower costs but are only able to do this because the market size has increased. I can sell to all of North America, then Europe, China and now India. The environment can't even support the 3.5 billion people in the world economy today. Even if we do double that number we can only double one more time.
This is just another case of separating the sinking barge from the ship, so employees don’t have to be compensated for being fired. That’s all it is. Psychopath-sneak-level mass-firing.
most likely. China is far ahead in terms of reliability and production scale, and will probably push below 7nm long before GlobalFoundries can, and possibly other American manufacturers. That's the issue I think.
AMD has been somewhat hamstrung by their Wafer Supply Agreement (WSA) with GF for years. It's already well-known that TSMC was ahead of GF in the race to 7nm; in fact, I think TSMC is already in early production of 7nm products.
In order for AMD to utilize GF's 7nmLP for any of their future products (notably: Zen 2, Vega Refresh, Navi), they would have had to wait months just to get a working node. Meanwhile, TSMC is ready to go.
AMD had already been using TSMC for some GPUs, and it was generally considered reality that AMD would be forced to use TSMC's 7nm process for Vega Refresh and Navi due to capacity constraints. GF's 7nm delays potentially threatened a timely launch for Zen 2, which should come out in March/April 2019 if they intend to maintain their cadence for Zen products (March 2017 Zen; April 2018 Zen+). There's already talk that AMD has chosen to fab some/all future EPYC processors at TSMC (note that there are no future EPYCs slated for GF 12nm), so it is likely that they already have the design work done on CCXs for GF 7nm done and ready to ship. Adapting their existing work to desktop Ryzen products should be relatively simple, which is why AMD went with their common CCX design for Zen in the first place.
The only thing that concerns me is that GF's 7nmLP was reportedly capable of higher clocks than TSMC's current 7nm offerings. The hope for 5 GHz 8c/16t Ryzen 3 may be dead. Might be clock limited to 4.4-4.6 GHz.
Actually, at these scales of under 100nm, semiconductors have already hit the point of diminishing returns. After all, what are the reasons to do a die shrink, rather than just run a chip production off a fab that's already been up and running, and probably written down? It's cost, and at today's level, things like power consumption and speed are distant followers. But when it costs $10B to build a fab that can do one of these, then going from, say, a 30nm to a 14nm would not give a manufacturer the cost savings they were hoping for.
Time to tell people downstream who buy these things that the era of continuous price drops is over! In fact, it ended some 10 years ago
For faster fabrication:
1-core 64-bit RISC-V + 7nm process + smaller die + decent larger caches.