Slashdot Mirror


Waymo Self-driving Cars Are Having Problems Turning Around Corners (siliconangle.com)

Alphabet's Waymo has long been regarded as the leader in autonomous vehicle development and technology, but all might not be as well as it seems at the company, according to a report published Tuesday. From a report: The Information quoted a number of unnamed Waymo insiders who claim the vehicles being used in the Arizona ride-hailing test have numerous problems. The test, which launched in November, is meant to be converted to a full commercial service later this year. The report claimed that the autonomous Chrysler Pacifica struggles to handle a number of driving tasks and even goes as far as annoying human drivers around them. Top among the problems is an apparent issue with turning left. "The Waymo vans have trouble with many unprotected left turns and with merging into heavy traffic in the Phoenix area, especially on highways," the report noted. "Sometimes, the vans don't understand basic road features, such as metered red and green lights that regulate the pace of cars merging onto freeways." If having problems turning left isn't bad enough, they also apparently on occasion have problems turning right. One woman claimed that she almost hit a Waymo vehicle as it suddenly stopped while trying to make a right turn.

4 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Surprise -- there are a few bugs by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK ... So we have several problems

      First the Waymo software is likely a bit buggy. No surprise there. It'll take several years to work through that Wait til they encounter some of the blinking red and yellow arrows recently installed on traffic signals around here. I don't have the slightest idea what they really mean. Neither does anyone else.. Neither, I'll bet, will Waymo. On top of which at some times on some days, the sensors trying to read the signals will be looking directly into the sun.

    Second, the Waymo cars try to drive safely and legally. Whereas human drivers generally try to drive as quickly as possible without being delayed by accidents or police traffic stops.

    Third, I expect, is that autonomous vehicles in general are likely going to have trouble with some forms of bad weather -- especially heavy snow which humans who like to stay out o0f ditches handle by driving quite slowly and keeping moving. This is likely not going to be apparent in testing in Sunnyvale or Phoenix.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    1. Re:Surprise -- there are a few bugs by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are still so far from self driving that it should be called a better cruise control.

      Waymo has fully autonomous vehicles driving in Phoenix with no human drivers, which although buggy and reluctant to turn left have not caused massive carnage. Set a vehicle on cruise control with nobody in it and see how long it goes before there's an accident.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  2. Stopping suddenly by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ”One woman claimed that she almost hit a Waymo vehicle as it suddenly stopped while trying to make a right turn.”

    If you almost hit someone because they stopped suddenly... that’s on you, not the other driver.

    Don’t drive like an idiot.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  3. Re:Autonomous Dreams by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The onus is on Waymo to drive in a predictable fashion here.

    No, it really isn't. Unless Waymo is trying to cause a collision, the onus is on the following driver to watch out for irrational behavior. Humans are often irrational. Often, when following one driver, I see them do literally a dozen different irrational things in the space of a couple of blocks. They speed up, they slow down, they drift lanes, they start a lane change and then stop it for no reason... If I assumed they would be driving rationally and predictably, I would hit them. I don't, so I don't. The law is quite clear that if I run up their ass, I'm at fault.

    Is the driver that is following too closely at fault in a specific accident? Sure. But should Waymo identify this as a factor in proper defensive driving and have their cars do it as well? Absolutely.

    Yes, of course they should. And they will, because unnecessary stops are undesirable for a variety of reasons. What I take objection to is all the people who want to let the following driver off the hook because the Waymo car shouldn't have stopped. Human drivers do things they aren't supposed to do all damned day, and the rest of us are expected to account for that. Why would other drivers' inattention or poor practice suddenly become acceptable because they are behind an AV?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"