Slashdot Mirror


Silicon Valley Has Been Treating Workers 'Miserably' Since the 1970s, Economic Historian Says (recode.net)

Don't blame Uber for the problems of the gig economy -- they didn't start it, economic historian Louis Hyman says. Recode: "Uber is the waste product of the service economy," Hyman said on the latest episode of Recode Decode, a podcast. "It relies on a bunch of people who don't have an alternative." Hyman told Recode that the number of people who have to rely on temporary, freelance or other "alternative work arrangements" has been growing since the 1970s, when the era of bloated corporations gave way to businesses that optimized for short-term profits and began treating workers as disposable. "The alternative to driving for Uber is not a good job in a factory with a union wage or working in a stable office job, it's slinging coffee at a Starbucks where you may or may not get the hours you need," he said. "That is what people are shoring up. They're shoring up getting enough hours, trying to make ends meet. Oftentimes, people talk about the gig economy as 'supplementary income' ... It's not supplemental if you need it to pay for your kids' braces, or food, or rent." Hyman argued that this phenomenon could be traced back to the legions of undocumented migrant laborers who built early computers, before those manufacturing jobs moved overseas.

153 comments

  1. Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People will accept inhumane working conditions to be in on the ground floor of something big. It's too bad that 99.9999% of companies never turn out to be that "something big."

    1. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you really think some slob with a soldering iron in his hand for 12 hours a day thought he was "in on the ground floor of something big"? Do you really?

    2. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by pedz · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that only white collar workers get misled?

    3. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot harder to con someone into thinking they're really important when you pay them jack shit. Show the money or shut the fuck up.

    4. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh ya, some people do think that, I've seen them. They see examples of other companies striking it big, even if rare, and think it will happen to them. The probably need to get to gambler's anonymous though. But they don't often think that even when the company strikes it big that most employees aren't necessarily becoming independently wealthy. You gotta compare how many stocks you have to the total outstanding, and what class of shares you have (first in line vs the grubby ones for people who use a soldering iron). The investors have the vast majority of the stock, and the highest execs have the vast majority of the options, and everyone else will basically just get a nice happy bonus if things go well (not enough to retire on, but enough maybe to finish off the mortgage).

      But I have seen the people who don't do that math, even if they otherwise are a smart person. And a large fraction of those people I have noticed also love to gamble.

    5. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I would ask the Woz.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Entrepreneurship is a powerful drug by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Not so difficult.
      For a new start up company if you are getting paid little and so is the owner with all the money going to the business. You would feel like you are the Next Wozniak or Paul Allen. Where once the product kicks off you will believe that the boss will properly compensate you for your sacrifice as well.
      Where what will happen when the product kicks off, you keep your job, and they hire more qualified people at the higher pay to continue on.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Make up your mind already. by Snufu · · Score: 4, Funny

    California is a communist welfare state that suffocates business with regulation, taxes, and worker rights.

    California is a corporate welfare state that exploits workers to feed big business.

    1. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      California has extremely high worker mobility and that is key to success.

      Non-competes are illegal. (This is key. Noncompetes murdered the 'silicon valley' of other states right in the cradle. Being able to hop jobs promotes the sharing of ideas and enables employees to advocate for what's in their own best interest)

      SV companies are largely union free (Unions aren't all pro-labor. They're mostly pro-incumbent-labor and are detrimental to worker mobility.)

      California is generally pro immigration, and that labor supply is key to growth.

      California is an at-will employment state (Employers can let you go with no notice, for any reason other than reasons that are illegal under labor law) which further increases worker mobility. (Companies don't have to hold on to employees they don't need or want and are free to hire ones they do)

      Lefties tend to see immagrant labor is exploitative of the worker, when in reality these people are simply more free to fill the labor demand as the market needs. This leads to growth and California's huge economy is proof. Restrictions on labor distort the market and harm workers because demand is not met.

      The far-right tends to see immigrant labor as labor being stolen from natives, when in fact the extra labor is needed to fill demand. If the native workforce was able to fill demand importing labor would not be necessary. Restrictions on labor distort the market and harm workers because demand is not met.

      California is not a lefty paradise/hellhole as many portray. It's a healthy centrist combination of pro-labor and pro-business that's made the region one of the largest economies in the world.

    2. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual situation is this:

      1. The government of California is being used as a tool for forcing others to pay money. To generalize: all governments are being used as money tools.

      2. Fools don't realize this: they naively think the government is fulfilling its legitimate purpose. Hucksters do realize the inherent money-tool possibilities-- and then try to use it for their own purposes.

      3. Huckster group A gets control and uses the money tool (government) to force everyone else to give money to them.

      4. Huckster group B gets upset and rallies the fools by lying to them and uses their support to take the money tool away from huckster group A-- ostensibly to "fix" things...

      5. Huckster group B then starts using the money tool to force everyone else to give them money just like huckster group A did. Nothing actually changes, just the branding and the sound bytes.

      6. This goes on and on all while the naive are duped into thinking that their votes are actually having an impact and that if they don't vote right then Bad Things Will Happen and only by the skillful application of the apparatus of Government has everyone been saved from certain doom.

      7. Eventually some people realize that something funny is going on because for some reason these "problems" just never seem to get solved. Fools think that it's just a little political disagreement and that if only the correct groups were given the power that things would finally start to work out. Wiser people understand that to some extent it's all a little bit corrupt but it's still better than anarchy. Those who're wiser still realize the sham for what it is: a show so that fools don't realize they're being used as slave labor and really the reason things are progressing is because of the culture and aggregate labor of the nation in spite of the hucksters and their sham not because of it.

      If you're not in power and gaining money from the money tool then you're one of the sheep being sheered.

      They allow us to keep some money so that we don't realize we're being taken advantage of and we shut up and don't revolt.

      They're smart, see? Used to be they just outright enslaved people and took all of the proceeds of their labor. But they've realized over the millennia that slave revolts cut into the profits. So instead they keep the boat from rocking and maintain the bread and circuses and the money keeps flowing through the money tool-- why do you think the governments get involved in financing arenas and sports stadiums? It's called bread and circuses, people!

    3. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is a communist welfare state that suffocates business with regulation, taxes, and worker rights.

      California is a corporate welfare state that exploits workers to feed big business.

      Regulation, taxes and worker rights hurt small businesses more than the big ones that can afford it. Hurting small businesses disproportionately is a net gain for the big ones.

    4. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigrants, illegal or not, are just doing what makes sense to them.
      What doesn't make sense is paying your natives not to work.

    5. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another layer on the tin foil hat buddy.

    6. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what never made sense to me. They punish the immigrants, but not the companies that hire them.

    7. Re:Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I see job insecurity called "labor mobility", my BS meter goes up. You pegged it and then smoke started coming out!

    8. Re:Make up your mind already. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, it can be both, provided that the political leadership doesn't have any principles other than getting elected.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies are self-interested and are able to influence lawmakers because they're powerful.

      The other reality is that restricting immigrant labor is largely theater to please nativists. It does not make economic sense.

      Undocumented immigrant labor continues because it's filling a natural economic demand. Native voters refuse to acknowledge that reality and refuse to allow labor and immigration reform.

    10. Re:Make up your mind already. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a lack of job insecurity. A lot of the jobs that people have today didn't exist 100 years ago and there are loads of jobs from 100 years ago that people aren't doing anymore. About the only time you see good job security is when someone has a monopoly and the rest of the market is captive to their business whether they like it or not. Since those are generally bad for consumers, we're going to have to accept that businesses will rise and fall and the labor force with them.

      You're not going to cry over the lack of job security for the horse and buggy whip makers, so please tell me why the workers of today are special. If they were all secure in their jobs we'd have loads of wasted labor sitting around doing things that are no productive. The world doesn't owe anyone a job, let alone one that they can feel secure and comfortable in.

    11. Re: Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the bad statement about California. I work in heavy equipment design. Often the goal is not how to make a better machine, but how to make a machine that doesnâ(TM)t require union operators. Ex. Diesel engines less than 50 hp requiring more equipment per jobsite to get the job done and remote operation so a general labor pool guy can run a machine rather than a union guy as required if the machine has a seat installed. The savings by bypassing California unions is thousands of dollars a week in labor. End result - more smaller pieces of equipment consuming more resources per job then otherwise required just to bypass protectionist labor laws.

    12. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labor mobility is a serious subject and is a critical measure of a country's economic health and the freedom of it's citizens. 30 seconds of googling will yield dozens of credible papers on this subject alone.

      Labor mobility is ultimately about freedom.

      Why are you entitled to job when someone else might be able to do it better? What gives you that right?

      Why should a company force you to not work for a competitor that can pay you better? What gives them that right?

    13. Re:Make up your mind already. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      California is a communist welfare state that suffocates business with regulation, taxes, and worker rights.

      California is a corporate welfare state that exploits workers to feed big business.

      Surely it has to "be" both, to justify continuing crisis response and ever increasing regulation?

      It's still Sinclair's jungle out there! Has to be ...

    14. Re:Make up your mind already. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Funny

      The far-right tends to see immigrant labor as labor being stolen from natives, when in fact the extra labor is needed to fill demand.

      This is called Schrödinger's Immigrant.

      Simultaneously doing nothing but collecting welfare and stealing your job at the same time.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another set of blinders for you and your ilk.

    16. Re:Make up your mind already. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the native workforce was able to fill demand importing labor would not be necessary.

      The native workforce is able to fill demand; many employers do not want to pay them American wages to do so.

      Imported people are used to artificially change the market and depress wages.

    17. Re: Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      human rights

    18. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a solid pair of blinders for you.

    19. Re:Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It wasn't that long ago when the common expectation was that you would graduate, then get a job you would be at until you retired. It wasn't that uncommon that jobs becoming obsolete would be vacated mostly through attrition or the workers would be retrained to fill another position at the same company. Many employers felt a duty to their loyal employees.

      That was the social contract.

      These days, it's not that uncommon to be laid off and end up doing the same job somewhere else.

      As long as the world won't let me plow my yard for cropland and go hunting in the neighborhood, it does, in fact, owe me an alternative.

    20. Re:Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 2

      Labor mobility is the ability to move to another job. Being forced to move to another job is employment insecurity.

      Kind of like the ease with which a person can end up on skid row is technically social mobility, calling it that is very much BS newspeak.

    21. Re:Make up your mind already. by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      Labor mobility is ultimately about freedom.

      Who's freedom?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    22. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The far-right tends to see immigrant labor as labor being stolen from natives, when in fact the extra labor is needed to fill demand.

      This is called Schrödinger's Immigrant.

      Simultaneously doing nothing but collecting welfare and stealing your job at the same time.

      You're joking but this is actually what happens when taxes go up reducing your employers cash-flow

    23. Re:Make up your mind already. by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I am not sure to what extent staying at a firm from cradle to gave was, apart from around 1945-80, outside agriculture. My father managed to stay in the same job and employer, but his father changed careers once, and his father had three separate careers. One of my father's brothers stayed with the same employer, his other two did not. My mother's father had three different major types of career including coal mining, brick laying and driving a train. My mother had jobs as diverse as being a seamstress, making inductors, machining parts for aircraft engines, a baker, cleaning houses, and picking items for mail order. One of her brothers largely stayed with the same employer (himself), and the other worked in several major different careers, including nursing, software develoment, hospitality, and as a statistician.

    24. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worlds owe nothing, but legally protected business owes whatever the law demands ... or the union can mafia. Power fattens a workers wallet. Tit and tat ... big and bat ... lean and fat. Get the stroke, folk ?

    25. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horse and buggy has nothing to do with basic stuff like having to give proper notice if you are going to be let go and to have to do it through proper channels.

      I've worked in a UK company that got taken over by a US company (it was EA), they did let almost everyone go, however they had to go through the proper channels - they had to say they were letting the jobs go, not the people (even though they were actually moving the same ones to the china).

      They had to give us proper notice, pay some sort of redundancy (OK, only a months extra wages and any holiday owed).

      In the US offices everyone was just told to go on the day.

      This mean the people in the UK office had a lot more freedom to search for jobs as we had the time to do it, so our better protection == more mobility.

    26. Re: Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can you not you grow your own food and hunt? I donâ(TM)t think self reliance is illegal quite yet, but I am sure they are working on it.

    27. Re:Make up your mind already. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

      As long as the world won't let me plow my yard for cropland and go hunting in the neighborhood, it does, in fact, owe me an alternative.

      The neighbor's kids probably aren't very good anyways.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    28. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first is what they tell people to facilitate the second.

    29. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AGain with this Uber lies. I have take Uber dozens of times, have friend who drives for UBer. They ALL love it. They make their own hours. treat it like a cool video game, and are happy with UBER. I guess the SJW's can stand it though. Happy workers with a free market.

    30. Re: Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Many if not most suburban areas have restrictions on what you can do with your own yard and restrictions on hunting.

    31. Re:Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 1

      According to official figures today, 4.6 years i now the median time one spends at a job. That would suggest more than 8 jobs in a career.

    32. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're emphasizing the macro economic forces of the labor market. Where this argument always falls apart is in the impersonal nature of macro economics to the very personal nature of a job to every one of the individual players, the laborer. The wealth of a region like California can also be attested to the growth of personal income through both housing and some savings and investment in opportunity, which requires stability for the individual players. Macroeconomic analysis is always weak when it glosses over the micro-level experience, particularly in the labor market.

      It is impossible to attribute the wealth of California solely to labor mobility. Geography always plays a role in the wealth of a region, and California is the gateway to Asia for the US, where Asia is historically the center of the world, due to having the highest centers of population and the highest economic output, with the 20th and 21st centuries being an anomaly. The nearness to Asia generates economic opportunities that has led to a constant migration West from the East Coast; historically California's population has grown steadily as a result of this migration. I am a 6th generation Californian, and I am a rarity just having been born here; the majority of people I know moved here.

      Also, the decision to decentralize the populace by focusing on freeways vs. rail for population transportation led to a massive growth of suburban communities rather than urban centers, allowing workers in cities to own their homes and build wealth; labor mobility between companies would still leave workers in the dust if they have no way to put their earnings towards asset generation. Suburban growth generates individual wealth, which in turn generates capital to start more businesses and build more assets, businesses that exist because of the constant migration and nearness to Asia.

      To me, worker mobility is a byproduct of the dynamic nature of California's economy due primarily to it's position across the Pacific from Asia, which led to immigration, worker mobility and a dynamic economy. It is the natural state of this region simply due to geography.

    33. Re:Make up your mind already. by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      If they're not immigrating because it makes sense to them, why are they? To troll right-wingers?

    34. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a strong Libertarian streak running through Silicon Valley executive suites and boardrooms.

      Rich lefties get the attention, rich Libertarians and Libertarian leaning folks use dark money, so you don't see them.

    35. Re:Make up your mind already. by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      That's ~8 jobs, but not more than 8 careers.

      from Australia (first relevant link I found but I forgot to copy the link - doh)

      "More than half (57 per cent) of Aussies surveyed by job site SEEK have thrown caution to the wind and pursued a new path and one in five did so in the past 12 months.

      Of people who have made a career change, most (38 per cent) have made just one but more than a quarter (29 per cent) have made two and 33 per cent have made three or more."

      Those statistics seem a bit mixed and maybe contradictory without more detail, though. (With more detail there might be no contradiction).

    36. Re:Make up your mind already. by outlander · · Score: 1

      Anatole France famously noted that “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

      Failure to have a safety net or bottom to fall to makes the world more like India and less like a civilized society. In India, if you fall through the cracks, you're done.

      In civilized Western countries - most of them European - the social safety net is a chance to recover from adversity and become productive once again.

      In the US, our safety net's been shredded along with worker protections, so low-skill workers whose jobs have been offshore are not retraining and recovering, for the most part - they're so freaked out by the loss of their former hegemony that they turn to drugs and belief in political movements that promise to return their economic hegemony.

      We're headed for being India, not Western Europe. That's a HUGE waste - it treats people as disposable and discards them, when they could, if trained, be working or entrepreneurial. I'd rather see enough of a safety net to enable workers to succeed - and by that I mean solid critical-thinking-based education through uni level (not the religious twaddle peddled by the evangelical Right), some economic support for displaced workers, some serious attempts at retraining, and a medical system that isn't more about corporate profit than individual health.

      I do not care whether these things are provided by public or private entities as long as the focus is on benefiting the great mass of the working public more than the interests of the rentier few. I'd prefer public, as the US and the rest of the world have proven that these systems can run effectively run by public entities, but the key ingredient is laser-like focus on worker well-being.

      Because when people are secure in their jobs bc they're qualified and stable and healthy, they're better workers....and they're massively entrepreneurial, too, because they have both the leisure time, the knowledge, and the economic confidence to take risks that otherwise would land 'em in the gutter.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    37. Re:Make up your mind already. by sjames · · Score: 1

      And what I was talking about was JOBS.

    38. Re:Make up your mind already. by Gamer_2k4 · · Score: 1

      The far-right tends to see immigrant labor as labor being stolen from natives, when in fact the extra labor is needed to fill demand.

      This is called Schrödinger's Immigrant.

      Simultaneously doing nothing but collecting welfare and stealing your job at the same time.

      Does anyone actually complain about immigrants stealing jobs these days? If memory serves, that was the talking point in the Clinton era, when the left was against illegal immigration because they thought it benefitted big corporations. Of course, now that immigration has become a social justice issue, their stance has completely flipped.

    39. Re:Make up your mind already. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Does anyone actually complain about immigrants stealing jobs these days? If memory serves, that was the talking point in the Clinton era, when the left was against illegal immigration because they thought it benefitted big corporations. Of course, now that immigration has become a social justice issue, their stance has completely flipped.

      There is a lot of different opinions, but yes, some do https://www.usatoday.com/story...

      You don't hear as much about it these days because (I suspect) that as immigrants are kickd out, many of the low skilled american born low skilled citizens are kind of worried that the may be asked to take those jerbs that they bitched about imgrunts stealing. from them. Sometimes the worst thing you can get is what you asked for.

      The problems to me are twofold.

      Want to stop immigrant workers? Catch one, and imprison the person running the company a year for each illegal immigrant. Not a popular idea, because the owners of those company pay their baksheesh to the politicians.

      the next issue is a little more complex. The bckground is that typically, the first generation of immigrants usually take menial jobs as a way to provide a better life for their children. The children move a rung up the ladder, and rinse and repeat. As an example, My grandparents immigrated from eastern Europe, and worked as miners. they had children, and many of them move a notch or two up the ladder. My grandfather worked and was killed in the mines. My father first worked construction, then had a career as a low-mid level office worker. I became a professional in the science field. Upward mobility.

      Some of the relatives didn't move up, and they are the people of interest.

      We aren't supposed to do several generations of menial labor. And many people for one reason or another have either tried to.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re: Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyâ(TM)re immigrating because the societies theyâ(TM)re coming from are horrible.

    41. Re:Make up your mind already. by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I know. I was simply contrasting.

    42. Re: Make up your mind already. by locketine · · Score: 1

      This "nearness to Asia" theory of economic prosperity seems fairly unique. Have you any statistics that support this idea? Why has the rest of the American West coast not been similarly affected? Sure, the coasts are generally more prosperous than the rest of America, but California, Florida and New York have the greatest concentrations of wealth in the U.S.. The Asian influence in New York is especially pronounced but that example goes directly against your theory.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    43. Re:Make up your mind already. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Freedom of big capital to more fully exploit laboring people.

    44. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't hear as much about it these days because (I suspect) that as immigrants are kickd out, many of the low skilled american born low skilled citizens are kind of worried that the may be asked to take those jerbs that they bitched about imgrunts stealing. from them. Sometimes the worst thing you can get is what you asked for.

      Go to hell you despicable running dog. American working people WANT the jobs that were stolen from them to fatten the wallets of contemptible shitlords like you.

      The only reasons you don't hear about this issue all day every day is are A) you don't associate with a single working class person, because you consider them below yourself; and B) you willingly indoctrinate yourself with semi-official propaganda, and the resulting myopia you call enlightenment.

    45. Re:Make up your mind already. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Go to hell you despicable running dog. American working people WANT the jobs that were stolen from them to fatten the wallets of contemptible shitlords like you.

      The only reasons you don't hear about this issue all day every day is are A) you don't associate with a single working class person, because you consider them below yourself; and B) you willingly indoctrinate yourself with semi-official propaganda, and the resulting myopia you call enlightenment.

      Ohhhh, you are just adorable!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    46. Re:Make up your mind already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the guy who moved to a backwater se asian country in order to sexually exploit children.

  3. And Seattle too by greenwow · · Score: 1

    I think I first heard the term "Seattle Hundreds" about twenty years ago.

    1. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got fired Friday from my job because of my "bad" attitude. I got tired of working seven days a week, 80+ hours a week with no vacation. Too many companies in Seattle require that for devs. I interviewed at two places this week, and the guy that would be my boss had an airmatress in his office. At the other place, I asked about required weekend work, and the CTO said it's required every weekend before a release. They have a two week release cycle.

    2. Re:And Seattle too by snapsnap · · Score: 1

      We've required 16 hour days for nearly two years since we hand-off to a team in India at night and have to attend scrum that's at the start of our day and the end of their day. Also, that means we're expected to be in the office on Sunday nights for their Monday mornings, but of course we can't leave early on Friday nights to compensate.

      I'd quit and try finding another job, but most of my friends in my field here in Seattle are also working long hours so I'm not confident of finding a better job.

    3. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you man, I want to be somebody and I can't do that in the Midwest. I have to do it here in Seattle...if I can make it here, then I can make it anywhere...

    4. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > so I'm not confident of finding a better job.

      You should quit anyway, if only to send them a message. We went about five years working a required 80 hours and had to be in the office at 7am every morning for scrum with our team in Ukraine and earlier for longer meetings like sprint grooming, retrospectives, and planning. Imagine working with a bunch of sleepy and cranky engineers every single day. Conditions finally improved when nearly half of us signed a letter threatening to quit.

    5. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you got fired, but there's a chance you'll find somewhere better. That was no chance before that happened.

      In addition to air mattresses, also look for pillows and blankets. Also, ask in the interview about expected hours. For the first twenty years of my career, I was too shy to ask and screwed myself over several times. Of course, asking doesn't always work. Last place I interviewed, I noted that the parking lot was almost full during the day and when I drove back by at 8pm about half of the cars were still in the office. I dodged a bullet.

    6. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a moron and move. Seattle fucking sucks.

    7. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does. It's not so bad during the winter when it gets dark every day at 4pm and since it's cold and usually raining, working late isn't that depressing. It gets really depressing after working all winter looking forward to the nice summers here and then still having to work the same hours.

    8. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to be somebody and I can't do that in the Midwest.

      Hey, buddy, some guy's at my door. Says he's a plumber in Iowa, knocking down 82 a year in a business he built out of the back of his van. Says he wants to beat hell out of you for defamation. Can I give him your address?

    9. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked where Facebook HQ's is now. My office was a machine room in the centre of the building with no windows. In winter, I'd arrive at work in the dark. At night, I'd go home in the dark. For those months, I never saw daylight except during the weekends.

    10. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least half of the cars got to go home.

    11. Re: And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never believed you people were so spineless. Quite common over seas to quit abysmal conditions, of course after highlighting through all channels first. Sometimes even through media for the deserving cunts!

    12. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunlight causes cancer, so that was probably good for your health.

    13. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of details to look for. If the company is pinching pennies where it does not really matter, you know for sure that they will do it where it matters as well. Do they have an office manager that has the time and budget to keep the office clean, groomed and appealing or is the office a mess with card boxes and pilled up items all over? Of course adapt your expectations to the stage of the company and how much money was raised, but there are things that are acceptable for a 15 people startup in stealth mode that are just plain red flags for a 100 people startup that has raised tens of millions. For the software projects inquire about their release cycles, release days, and how things get escalated when there are issues. How are postmortems performed, what was the biggest learning from the most recent big outage and how it is being addressed, will it happen again? If this shows that their strategy is based on churning as many features as possible and skip on best practices and hope that things will be bug-free and stable ... red flag. This means that troubleshooting, debugging, refactoring, will not be budgeted during feature development but that you'll have to deal with it after hours and on weekends while the CEO breathes down your neck to deliver a feature promised for tomorrow but that he told you about the day before.

    14. Re:And Seattle too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are like 95% of the users of this site. Only you leave your mom's basement?

    15. Re: And Seattle too by locketine · · Score: 1

      Take a vacation to job search. I guarantee you'll find a job with much better conditions. It's pretty easy to get the sense of work hours during an interview as well.

      The reason bad work conditions exist is because people like yourself put up with them. You could also try forming a union but that's riskier than quitting.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
  4. Re:Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, asshole. Trumps idea of fixing things is "viva la corporate America, and fuck workers in the ass, they don't matter". Shove a kilo of C4 up your ass and detonate it.

  5. Re:Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, asshole. Trumps idea of fixing things is "viva la corporate America, and fuck workers in the ass, they don't matter". Shove a kilo of C4 up your ass and detonate it.

    America uses imperial units, you ignorant clod.

  6. Open borders! by alternative_right · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Industry loves an unending flow of people too inexperienced to know that they are being taken advantage of. It wants people age 25-35 that it can grind up, spit out, and roll right over. Instead of focusing on working smarter, our industry has become a mill into which we pour youngsters and out of which fall cynical outsiders.

    1. Re:Open borders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industry loves an unending flow of people too inexperienced to know that they are being taken advantage of.

      Yes and the great iriony is you espouse the very ideology that allows it to happen, workers rational interests are not in line with capitalists, you americans really love capitalism as a religion and thats why you are so abused. You guys have stockholme syndrome.

      https://medical-dictionary.the...

    2. Re:Open borders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea that ideas can be racist is dumbfounding.

    3. Re:Open borders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like Hollywood which is in California too

    4. Re:Open borders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not capitalism. This is some shit dreamt up by socialist and fascists working in tandem to destroy the middle class.

  7. Fuck them back by barrywalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You either learn how to gain the upper hand in negotiation, or you become some employer's bitch. It's that simple.

    If you have an in-demand skill, I recommend you learn how to use the word "no" until the people you're negotiating with tack on enough zeros. As sad as it is, it's a dog-eat-dog world, and you definitely want to be the dog with a full belly.

    If you don't have in-demand skills, you'd better get on it or you'll continue to get shit on.

    1. Re:Fuck them back by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So a person shouldn't care that their kids are starving while they are busy saying no? Good advice.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why any responsible person will postpone having kids until they have saved some money.

    3. Re:Fuck them back by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems that you're living in that Conservative SimplisticFantasyLand where workers can easily acquire new skills while at the same time living decently, raising a family, negotiating with bosses who actually give a bubbly fart about investing in their own employees....Keep reading that Ayn Rand crap, but it fails the Reality World test...BIGLY!

    4. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And 90% of Americans don't have enough cash to pay for a major medical event, a major home repair, or even a major car repair via savings.

      The real problem here is when you look at CTO, CEO, et-cetera salaries and compare with inflation. Some of those guys are only hitting middle class.

      Poverty is moving up the food chain, and if we don't find something to do about it well. Game over.

      If the CTO has a mattress in their office, ask them when they intend to install barracks, a cafeteria, and force work in shifts like the chinese. If they get angry, ask them why they are living like a homeless person at the office.

    5. Re:Fuck them back by barrywalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems that you're living in that Conservative SimplisticFantasyLand where workers can easily acquire new skills while at the same time living decently, raising a family, negotiating with bosses who actually give a bubbly fart about investing in their own employees....Keep reading that Ayn Rand crap, but it fails the Reality World test...BIGLY!

      Nope. Just thought and planned ahead. You do know that kids and families are preventable, right?

    6. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90%? Citation?

    7. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Poverty is moving up the food chain, and if we don't find something to do about it well. Game over.

      Solution: create your own company that is successful AND pays your workers a fair wage to the detriment of your own (and therefore your family's) income. Surely with your dedication to the welfare of your workers and the epic salaries you will pay, your competition will be toast.

      You know what's going on? That wealth redistribution that people cry about so much? It's working excellent. The problem is it works best in countries where there's large amounts of poverty. Countries that already have large and expensive workforces will regretably stagnate until a middleground is reached.

    8. Re:Fuck them back by fluffernutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ..says the person without a biological clock.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Abort your fetuses, fuck with plastic on your dick, take hormones that make you crazy, or even have your doctor do some shenanigans to your vas deferens.

      You tell em barrywalker.

    10. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays the narration is that women think that "biological clock" is a patriarchy vision to keep them under control, so you may pass as a misogynist, even if woman. So be careful!

    11. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that kids and families are preventable, right?

      You do know that if everyone follows that advice, there won't be more workers in a next generation, right?

    12. Re:Fuck them back by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      In other words, the rich give the poor the choice between either breeding or survive, presentig it as if it was part of a fair game, or part of nature. How smart they are, learning from the turkish mistake with the armanians. Instead of making a group of people extinct directly, just prevent them from breeding.

    13. Re:Fuck them back by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      I'm not talking about women necessarily. Some people have an instinct to be parents, and unless you want to be running around after little ones at 65 there is a time limit on that. You are the one who should be careful.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    14. Re:Fuck them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poverty is not moving up the food chain. It is wealth being stolen. Thanks Obamacare, ... had I been smarter, I would have bought Aetna stock or Anthem... fascist handouts to those connected.

    15. Re:Fuck them back by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Here we go with the 'people should be robots, not biological' Slashdot bullshit.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  8. Miserable, or just not paying very well? by ITRambo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see an Uber or Lyft driver as having a miserable life. A coal miner breathing in toxic dust has a miserable life. Diamond mine workers in Africa have a miserable life. Chinese factories workers outside of the biggest areas have a miserable life. Uber drivers can always find a new job. There's no forced labor here, in spite of low wages and long hours.

    1. Re:Miserable, or just not paying very well? by sjames · · Score: 1

      You apparently flunked reality. Must have job to live. Only job available is crappy gig economy job. So YES, forced to be an Uber driver.

    2. Re:Miserable, or just not paying very well? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      You apparently flunked reality. Must have job to live.

      So those are zombies I see hanging on the corners?

      Granted, some of them maybe ...

    3. Re:Miserable, or just not paying very well? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Am I just imagining the police that run them off because it's not really legal to be homeless? Have you SEEN the death rate among the homeless as compared to the general population?

  9. Re:Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come a democrats rebuttal to anything is "go kill yourself?" This is why Trump is going get reelected.

  10. Re:Is today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can't all (hire a politician to) steal from our neighbors' paycheck.

    No, but you can vote for Orangutang to steal it for you.

    Nearly 63M of you did exactly that.

  11. Re:Is today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump gave us some of our money back, you clueless child.

  12. Silicon Valley vs USSR by js290 · · Score: 1

    - living five adults to a two room apartment

    - being told you are constructing utopia while the system crumbles around you

    — Anton Troynikov (@atroyn) July 5, 2018

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
  13. Re:B-O-O H-O-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "everyone be exclusive" is an oxymoron

    "everyone go get a big slice of the pie" might be a more palatable frame, since you're five

  14. Re:B-O-O H-O-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice punctuation, brainlet. Keep flipping those burgers. It's honest work.

  15. That is just white man talking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 1950s only white people had it good. Black people could not vote and were forced to pick cotton in the california plantations. Thanks to the democrats, it is not just black people who are treated like shit. It is an equal opportunity shit sandwich that we should all embrace to not be a racist.

      Before the husband had to work long hours doing meaningless work to support a family. Now thanks to womens liberation we have both sexes working insane hours performing meaningless tasks to make money for bosses.

    Progress

    1. Re: That is just white man talking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid idiot. It was the silicon valley plantations that owned slaves and forced blacks to pick cotton untill the 1970s. Most of California, being progressive, outlawed slavery in the 1946.

      You must have been educated in a place like Texas where they still encourage slavery

    2. Re:That is just white man talking by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Wrong fool.
      There were UNIONS protecting workers
      It was republican'ts who eliminated the protectors

  16. Not surprising to me by GerryGilmore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I joined the industry in 1976, starting as a depot-level tech at Data General gate-banging CPU boards, disk controller boards, etc. that had been swapped out in the field. At that time, every single part of every computer (except the core stack on core memory cards) was made here in America. Everything from the castings for the disk drive frames, through the manufacture and chip-stuffing of every single PCB used, to the special lights used on some disks for positioning to the discrete components (resistors, caps, etc).....EVERYTHING was made here, and those businesses - and associated suppliers - employed millions of people.
    Today, other than some special mil-spec companies, ZERO electronics are made here. THIS is what brought us to this point: that either you're an app-appy developer or a low-tier drone with no room to grow. Basically, we've squeezed the piss out of the entire industry's middle with most of the rewards going to the Squillionaires and the rest of us left fighting over - Yes! As Pelosi said - "the crumbs".
    I'm glad I got the chance to ride the wave long enough, but the tide has been going out for decades.

    1. Re:Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ROHS made this inevitable. It wasn't CA - It was Europe and the regulation is absolutely required. In Europe the soil is acidic. This means you cannot bury rubbish, it will be dissolved over decades and poison the groundwater. Much of the waste is burned instead in incinerators. As a consequence, heavy metals in the waste stream is a big no for health reasons.

      Therefore, the EU doesn't import lead in electronics and hasn't for a long time (ROHS). Companies for about a decade have very much preferred lead free electronics, as they can be sold to Europe and don't require a second "lead free" product.

      It makes sense to ban lead in CA. It has been banned for a long time elsewhere.

      Regulation isn't the problem you think it is.

    2. Re:Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you've had a long tech career in Seattle. Yet you keep working for people who can't keep the lights on and now you network POS systems and manage a sharepoint server.

      Have you considered that you might be a loser??????????

    3. Re:Not surprising to me by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

      You're full of shit. All of this happened LONG before RoHS regulations, but you just wanted to make a point about how regulations suck. Instead, it shows how your thinking sucks.

    4. Re:Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. What's your point? Is this supposed to be a bad thing?

      Today I can buy a handheld computer with tens of thousands of times more cpu power, memory, and storage that entire DG mainframes. And it's connected to a global world-wide network used by everyone. Wirelessly.

      And it costs less than pretty much any part of said mainframe.

      I'd do it all over again at twice the price.

    5. Re: Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that multicore beast locks up for several seconds at random when trying to load a goddamn web page. Stutter... stutter...

    6. Re:Not surprising to me by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Today, other than some special mil-spec companies, ZERO electronics are made here.

      Not a lot that you see, but certainly not zero. At my previous job, the product was largely made in the USA. The circuit boards were made there (I believe--that was subcontracted), the boards were populated, the cases finished and assembled and then everything packaged up into the final packaging all in Texas.

      I visited the factory of course and they seemed to be making a fair amount of stuff. What doesn't get done is the huge volume, cheap consumer stuff with razor thin margins.

      What does get done is the higher margin more specialised stuff. But little to none of that is consumer facing, so if you're not in the particular industry then you'll never see it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re: Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1976 lololol hey granpa you diaper is full hahaha

    8. Re:Not surprising to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should think about writing a book about your time with the industry. you seem to have a way with words and good writing style. could be a good book there

  17. Hidden Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with Uber is the number of people suckered into driving for them. People who aren't savvy enough to calculate the the true costs in terms of gas, insurance, depreciation, maintenance and traffic tickets that significantly eat into their wages. If less people were willing to work at these rates they would be forced to pay more. (If you are a student and Mom and/or Dad have paid for your car these costs are even less apparent. )

  18. This article is manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not Uber's fault that there are a lot of shitty jobs out there. Uber might not be perfect, but it's clearly better for some.

  19. Re:Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, he probably will. Even if the Dems have a non-idiot running or planning the strategy, the walkaway thing seems to be getting some real traction. If the economy doesn't implode (thanks to the Fed and the prior three Presidents before Trump) it's likely already too late for the Dems.

    Can we go back to shitting on systemd? I miss those days.

  20. Grossly understates the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Employers Have Been Treating Workers 'Miserably' For Much Longer Than That, Better Historian Says.

    Capcha: pinhead

  21. Re:Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because I hate the democratic party doesn't mean I won't probably vote for their candidate. Especially against trump
    It just means I denounce SJWs, spastic, and attention whores. Which is essentially what trump is he's an authoritarian(SJW's for Rs), he's a fucking idiot, and he actually has a personal twitter account that he uses and cares about.

    Trump is everything I hate about the democrats and I honestly believe they're getting worse in an effort to emulate republicans.

  22. Re:B-O-O H-O-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said all the hard ways to get ahead.
    Cheat Code: Identify people who are dumber and lazier than you and yet have better careers. Observe them. Do whatever you think has helped them.

    Hard work of any kind should always be your last option. You'll never amount to anything with that bootlicking attitude.

  23. Very long time by guygo · · Score: 2

    The Grand Minds hsve long made the lion's share while crumbs go to the people who actually do the work. It is not exclusive to nor invented by Silicon Valley. Who knows the names of the team that put together the first Mazda? But we all know the name Edison.

  24. Re:Is today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, he gave it to CORPORATIONS, you fucking retarded treasonous faggot liar.

  25. binary by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    "It relies on a bunch of people who don't have an alternative."

    Surely that's not binary? There's a continuum?

    Surely it's also not new?

  26. MinMaxing ppl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are coders / sociopaths and probably high level psychopaths they don't understand about what other ppl want nor do they understand how ppl work...

    They will just MinMax all of the assets and that includes PPL, according to current rule-set.. It's not their problem nor their issue if the rules are what they are...

    How are we even accusing them. Accuse the ppl who made the rules.. ouh wait it's the voters lol =D

  27. The best description of Uber and Lyft I ever heard by waspleg · · Score: 1

    was driving for them is taking out a pay day loan against your car. I know people who do this. Hyman or whatever is dead on.

    Most people aren't doing this because they want to, they do it because they have no other options and are lucky enough to have a car (often one their parents bought them).

  28. Re: Trump is trying to fix it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump was a Democrat for many years. Most recently he switched to blue while his arch nemesis was the senator of his state.

  29. Extremely misleading by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Actual tech employees are treated much better in Sillicon Valley than tech or non tech employees anywhere else. Granted you have to be not stupid enough to work for Apple. But in most places, there are smart managers who care more about your long term potential than making you slog on a given weekend. As for Uber drivers, you may want to consider their options before Uber. Why are they doing that job if they have something better lined up?

  30. Thought I was left, but Cali isn't for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I when younger thought I was left but honestly I just was more anti-religion and the right were a bunch of "Do-as-i-say" hypocritical types which turned me off of their doctrine.

    However as a talented programmer and gearhead, I just couldn't bring myself to move to California after reading about all the problems people who mod their cars have with the CARB rules. I literally avoided *numerous* jobs in the state because I couldn't spend the newly acquired cash to modify the hell out of a big V8 and drive that around. I love cars too much to have anything "different" be illegal so I often turned down job offer after job offer.

    Ended up in Michigan happily making big money and wrenching on all my cars. I lived in Manhattan for awhile and did the whole "no car" thing and that was miserable so I came back. Wall Street paid well though for my C++ optimization skills, over double what MI pays me but I live 10 times better.

    I realized it's easier to just stay away from the big city if you have chops and instead woo a small business who wants those skilled big-city types. I have a big house, many cars, on a lake, with a job I barely show up for while making north of 200K. I don't really want to go trudge through downtown parking or shuttles or any of that again. I would just rather make that money living the medium-town life instead.

    In my opinion, Michigan is where it's at..... Blue collar everywhere so you don't feel as poor as NYC seeing Lambo's and Ferrari's every block plus their rich children. Small business everywhere supporting the auto industry with deep pockets, and a lack of talent since they all run to CA or NY to make big bucks. No smog checking so you can drive and modify whatever you want. And real crime from Detroit keeping the Police busy (read not bored and ticketing like crazy).

    It's perfect here, especially if you have AI or Machine Learning experience as business is paying $$$ for that talent right now.

  31. Boy, Asian workers are way better off than us... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    Yes, you are right, we should have invested in hi-tech manufacturing so we could have a few companies here that run on razor thing margins, employ a scant few people at high salaries, and are rapidly replacing every step of the manufacturing process with automated machinery. We would be far better off, indeed.

    Look, it doesn't matter what you are manufacturing or what part of the world you are in. Manual labor jobs are 20th century jobs, and its all going away.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  32. Industry anthropomorphization by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Industry loves to be collectively anthropomorphized? Industry isn't a being. It doesn't have feelings. Your line certainly has a 'Hollywood oppressed masses' romance about it, but saying that all Industry (perhaps you mean capitalists?) is just out to exploit workers is like saying all black people are lazy. It is just a sloppy generalization that doesn't hold much water.

    Pick out specific bad actors and focus your attention there, ex: "Walmart is an exploitative company that deserves to burn in hell for all its shitty dealings with its workers."

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re: Industry anthropomorphization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a pervasive behavior from industrialists to exploit the naive. Sure, some industrialists are good actors but they're quite rare in the U.S..

      Comparing the remark to racism is disingenuous unless you want to include the fact that they're almost exclusively white men.

  33. How the *bleep* are unions detrimental to worker? by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never once seen a Union care if a worker quits. If anything the higher wages they bargain for benefit worker mobility. One of the key things that hurts worker mobility is that in the modern economy if you're an hourly worker your experience doesn't count for anything. When you quit you're starting over from scratch.

    Right now we're seeing something never before: near full employment but wages are declining. Economists have mostly agreed this is caused by two things: Low wage jobs replacing high wages ones (factory jobs replaced with fast food & Walmart) and the end of collective bargaining reducing workers ability to negotiate better wages. Notice I didn't use the "U" word there. Neither do they. There's been a non-stop anti-Union propaganda campaign from the mega corporations (which, let's be real, own the mass media). So much so that you're not generally allowed to say anything as simple as "Wages are down because one guy on his own can't negotiate the same rates as half a million workers".

    You don't have to take my word for it, just google what Walmart does everytime their employees try to Unionize. Or look at Disney, where the workers just got bumped to $15/hr because they organized. No Man is an Island. Collective bargaining works.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. California poverty rate by cpm99352 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "This week, State Assembly Republican Leader Chad Mayes called poverty California’s No. 1 priority during a forum of legislative leaders in Sacramento. Mayes, who represents parts of San Bernardino and Riverside counties, claimed the state’s poverty rate is higher than any state in the nation when considering factors such as cost-of-living."

    We decided to fact-check whether the report Mayes cited really shows that California has the highest poverty rate in the nation.

  35. Trump's Amerika is THE BEST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the BEST for the 1%. The rest of you get the fuck back to work, you fucking peons.

    captcha: monopoly

    1. Re:Trump's Amerika is THE BEST by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Only the BEST for the 1%. The rest of you get the fuck back to work, you fucking peons.

      captcha: monopoly

      Not true. According to the Washington Post the fact that you are an American puts you into the top 1% of the world. This was published in 2016, even more true today. Your life really is awesome compared to the rest of the world. Remember that when you're bitching over nothing. Things can be much worse. If you're one of the ones doing the bitching, in the black outfits? Yea, you're one of the first ones they'll kill.

  36. OK by gDLL · · Score: 1

    then go get yourself one them Corp'rations son

  37. Cpt Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or how about none of the above and think with the big brain instead of the little brain before seeing a dog on the street.

  38. Less workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Speaking objectively, if there are less workers then they get bargaining power. Happend after the black death.

  39. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're treated for what they're worth. Why should a computah weenie expect better treatment than real workers who bust their asses the whole day? Who cares about a bunch of pedo neckbeards. They are shit and they deserved to be treated like shit.

    1. Re:Yawn by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Supply vs Demand.
      In the broad scale (they are exceptions) how much a person gets paid, isn't how hard they work, how smart they are, or how good of a person they are.
      It is based on the number of people with such skill sets and how many other people want these people with the skill sets.

      So if you are working at a fast food place. If you are a Hard Worker, you may get a raise because the supply of hard workers at a fast food place is lower however it is something people want. But it will reach a point, you will not be multi-millionar fast food clerk because you are such a hard worker. Because you are not needed that much.
      For tech employees, there are skills which are harder to find, Back in the 1970's they were much harder to find, by the 1990's they were in high demand. But with the tech bubble back in the late 1990's tech workers became in over supply. When the bubble popped their salaries plummeted, and slowly recovered.

      Check out Slashdot history, back when it started we see people making comments that they will not accept any job less then 6 figures. Then around 2002-2012 we are hearing about people who were just pushing 50k and leaving tech.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  40. Face it, the golden era of tech is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The golden era of tech is behind us. The industry has matured.

    It is no longer run by, nor hires idealistic nerds. It is run by and hires the same type of people as the rest of corporate America: greedy, sociopathic, frat-boys.

  41. Re:How the *bleep* are unions detrimental to worke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedofile wants more money so he can buy more kiddie porn! Boo-hoo your jerb is going to China and never coming back, you deplorable redneck pedo.

    Trump is going to die in prision. And u r going to die right along side him!

  42. Re:Boy, Asian workers are way better off than us.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heil Hitlary!

    Down with the working class! Boohoo your jerbs are never coming back! Long live the oligarchy!

    Heil Hitlary!