Slashdot Mirror
Google Bought Mastercard Data To Link Online Ads To Store Purchases, Says Report (bloomberg.com)
According to Bloomberg, citing people with knowledge of the deal, Google purchased "a stockpile of Mastercard transactions" that allowed Google advertisers to see whether the ads they ran online led to a sale at a physical store in the U.S. This arrangement was never shared with the public. From the report: Alphabet's Google and Mastercard brokered a business partnership during about four years of negotiations. The alliance gave Google an unprecedented asset for measuring retail spending, part of the search giant's strategy to fortify its primary business against onslaughts from Amazon and others. But the deal, which has not been previously reported, could raise broader privacy concerns about how much consumer data technology companies like Google quietly absorb.
Google paid Mastercard millions of dollars for the data [...] and the companies discussed sharing a portion of the ad revenue. A spokeswoman for Google said there is no revenue sharing agreement with its partners. A Google spokeswoman declined to comment on the partnership with Mastercard, but addressed the ads tool. "Before we launched this beta product last year, we built a new, double-blind encryption technology that prevents both Google and our partners from viewing our respective users' personally identifiable information," the company said in a statement. "We do not have access to any personal information from our partners' credit and debit cards, nor do we share any personal information with our partners." The company said people can opt out of ad tracking using Google's "Web and App Activity" online console. Inside Google, multiple people raised objections that the service did not have a more obvious way for cardholders to opt out of the tracking.
Google paid Mastercard millions of dollars for the data [...] and the companies discussed sharing a portion of the ad revenue. A spokeswoman for Google said there is no revenue sharing agreement with its partners. A Google spokeswoman declined to comment on the partnership with Mastercard, but addressed the ads tool. "Before we launched this beta product last year, we built a new, double-blind encryption technology that prevents both Google and our partners from viewing our respective users' personally identifiable information," the company said in a statement. "We do not have access to any personal information from our partners' credit and debit cards, nor do we share any personal information with our partners." The company said people can opt out of ad tracking using Google's "Web and App Activity" online console. Inside Google, multiple people raised objections that the service did not have a more obvious way for cardholders to opt out of the tracking.
I use Visa only. Thankfully, I can rest easy knowing that'd never happen with anything but Mastercard. /s
Is the story here that *MASTERCARD* sells all your financial transaction data around the world to lots of companies (think Cambridge Analytics etc.), or that Google buys them?
It seems to be a Mastercard story dressed up as a Google one.
Financial transactions should be covered by the same level of privacy as banking transactions, which would make this illegal to sell that data in EU, and it use to be USA had similar laws.
But given that they're selling the data, can we buy Trump/Trump family/Trump company/ card data? If he has nothing to hide, and I'm sure that's true because he keeps saying it on twitter, then he has nothing to fear.
It should always be assumed that Google is spying on anything they can, that they will lie about it when feasible, and that they have no shame in doing so. This is not new. It's up to you to protect yourself.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
https://web.archive.org/web/20...
This isn't some new behavior for Google - just an expansion of an already existing program. Google has been collecting your off-line purchases for years now. They're
boasting about it, too.
Here's a relevant quote: ...even if your business doesn't have a large loyalty program, you can still measure store sales by taking advantage of Google's third-party partnerships, which capture approximately 70% of credit and debit card transactions in the United States. So, more than two thirds of your non on-line purchases are tracked by Google and sold to all and sundry.
Of course, as a simple citizen, you get no option or recourse. Even if you haven't ever signed on with Google, even if aren't using any of their properties, or if you tried to opt out of everything, you' still can't escape their stalking. Every breath you take, every move you make, they'll be watching you.
we built a new, double-blind encryption technology that prevents both Google and our partners from viewing our respective users' personally identifiable information
For those who are wondering, here's how it works:
Actually we do have an idea. That is why we hate you and google and Facebook and every other shitty people tracking data wh0ring tech company.
Anyone who works in any capacity for any of those and other well known evil companies that comes on here to whine about Trump or anyone elseâ(TM)s evil is a hypocrite and needs to choke to death on a heaping pile of dog shit. Trump has at most 8 years in office. Google Facebook etc will keep your personal information forever.
get a SWAT team storming into your living room.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/01/new-york-police-terrorism-pressure-cooker
Wrong. Poison their data.
As a statistician, I can tell you that there is something way, way worse you can do than not provide me with data. Provide me with false data that I cannot tell from genuine data. Because that devalues my whole data set. If enough poison is added, all of my data is worthless.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Here it is: TrackMeNot.
Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.
that ads lead to sales. Now they are saying that they do not know this to be true?
Remember, a marketing company's first priority isn't to sell your product, it's to sell theirs.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
Block all ads, all the time, no exceptions. If you have an ad-supported business that runs ethically, too fucking bad. The 99% of other ads ruined it for you.
What, no apologists whining (in the Jim Sterling triple-hey voice) "but that stealing"?
I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
Wasn't there an outcry, not long ago, over iOS location services still recording your location even when disabled?
No, not recently. There was a big bug 7 years ago that led to that, and it was fixed by Apple in the next point release. I think that was iOS 4.0 (we're currently about to get 12).
Also, you must be completely blind to Apple's underhanded practices. The stories abound, so you have to be actively trying to avoid them.
No company is perfect, but Apple is light years better than Google in personal privacy and security. Probably because Apple makes money by selling you secure personal devices, and makes more money the more secure and personal they are. Google gives that part away, and makes more money the better they can track you and sell your information.
If you think you would like Android, try it. It's no worse than iOS and Google is no worse than Apple.
Sure, just be aware of what the people selling you your product do to profit, and expect to be treated accordingly.
Apply some critical thinking: Apple didn't become the richest company in the world on the backs of the smallest market share in the industry by being open and honest.
Apple is perhaps one of the least "open" company in the world, but one of the most honest. The transaction is really simple. Here's the best mobile device in the world, give us money. Here's the best wireless headphones in the world, give us money. Here's the best tablet in the world, give us money. Here's a service that integrates it all, give us money. Their success isn't some secret cabal.
E pluribus unum