The Tech Industry Has Contributed To an 'Attention Crisis', Google Researchers Say (washingtonpost.com)
A new paper written by Google's user experience researchers delves into the reasons that we can't put down our phones, and starts to explore what companies can do about it. It also calls on the technology industry to reexamine the way it ties engagement to success -- noting that capturing people's attention is not necessarily the best way to measure whether they're satisfied with a product. From a report: For its study, Google focused on a small group of smartphone users and kept tabs on how they used their smartphone throughout a normal day. It also dug into 112 interviews from previous research to evaluate how people felt about their phone use. Researchers Julie Aranda and Safia Baig of Google presented the paper at mobile conference Tuesday in Barcelona. Google used the results of this study to help design its "Digital Wellbeing" tools, which are a part of the company's newest Android operating system and designed to help people curb their smartphone use. The paper provides an overall picture of the reasons people feel they have to be in constant contact with their phones -- though it stops short of evaluating the best ways to combat that.
It does, however, take aim at the basic way that Internet companies -- including Google -- have elevated engagement as the best metric to measure success, creating an economy where attention becomes the most important currency. "We feel that the technology industry's focus on engagement metrics is core to this attention crisis that users are facing," the paper says. "... It's important to consider alternative metrics to indicate success, relating to user satisfaction and quality of time spent."
It does, however, take aim at the basic way that Internet companies -- including Google -- have elevated engagement as the best metric to measure success, creating an economy where attention becomes the most important currency. "We feel that the technology industry's focus on engagement metrics is core to this attention crisis that users are facing," the paper says. "... It's important to consider alternative metrics to indicate success, relating to user satisfaction and quality of time spent."
That marketeers have four seconds to catch somone's attention before they move on to — Squirrel!
You lost me.
See subj.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
as example; .. the commercials tell the 'story'? lots of smoking, guns,,,
https://archive.org/details/1957TheNightAmericaTrembledH.G.WellsWarOfTheWorlds
"... It's important to consider alternative metrics to indicate success, relating to user satisfaction and quality of time spent."
When at work, I observe some of my colleagues. I have one conclusion:
One will easily conclude that these folks are mentally ill just by the way they interact with their devices...mostly FB.
The weak minded will always attach themselves to things, be it their phones or anything else. :(
They are simply to easy to manipulate and thus get addicted to mostly anything.
To fix this we must raise the critical thinking skills of the entire world. Not that tptb will ever willingly do that though
Class action in 3,2..
And television. Naysayers think that everyone but themselves is responsible.
We evolved as hunter-gatherers, and it would be rather fatal for us to stay fixated on one thing at a time.
Technology makes us slaves to the system.
I think a major part of the issue is that the amount of notifications people get daily are very high. App developers generate notifications based on what's best for the developer, rather than the end user. No mobile game has ever needed notifications (I *might* make an exception for asynchronous turn-based games), but all of them push you to let their game send notifications. The F2P games do the whole "new daily special" sort of thing where logging in needs to be habitual in order to get in-game bonuses. CNN pushes notifications basically every time Donald Trump tweets...also, Twitter has incessant notifications. Instagram and Snapchat remind users of expiring stories, a purely artificial need for them. And through all of this noise, there are the texts and e-mails and Whatsapp messages for which a notification is legitimately warranted.
The notifications drawer is the new inbox, and like e-mail before it, it's in need of a spam filter.
The trouble with the creation of a spam filter is a matter of who writes the rules for it. If end users are responsible for their spam filters, then app devs will simply constantly nag or bump their incentives to be whitelisted, and nothing changes. If Apple and Google do it, they are then going to find themselves on very shaky ground if the Fox News app gets to display three notifications but MSNBC only gets two. If a third party like Barracuda or Scrollout makes a utility for notification filtering, not only do they end up with the same problem (albeit with a bit more leeway than Apple or Google would since it wouldn't be default/integrated behavior), Apple/Google would have to make some sort of a special API for them that wouldn't be available to regular devs in order to avoid those devs using the same APIs to make an end run around the filters, which now starts causing other issues about what sort of lower-level APIs should be available and who gets to be a notification filter, and so forth.
So yes, let's solve this problem. However, assigning responsibility to somebody is the first step.
I have literally found myself in this situation: TV on, Netflix streaming, Big Brother livestream running, game (Warcraft) idling running, and surfing on a web site.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
An advertising company worrying about the "Attention Crisis". The whole point of advertising is to distract you...
When I worked at Google, a lot of people took it as a badge of pride how much email and chat and crap like that that they "managed". A lot of feature proposals for things like gmail are geared towards somehow helping you manage the flood. Basically, the first assumption is that email is good and more is better, and that assumption is probably right at first, but certainly wrong once you can't keep up. Just like it's good for you to directly interact with tens of people in a day, but directly interacting with thousands of people in a day destroys you.
You know what I'd really like to see? I'd like to see a way for my computing systems to realize that a mailing list I'm on is useless, that I never engage with it, or that I engage with it in only negative ways - and then suggest that I unsubscribe from it, or skip it past my inbox to a folder for later. I'd like to be able to tell gmail to hold new content for an hour, so that I can triage what I have without having to deal with new items popping in and distracting me. [You can kinda-sorta fake that by processing using labels.] I'd like to be able to tag a few apps as being useful for a particular project, then as the computer notices I'm using something else, it can ask "Is this helping or hindering your project?", and then I could ask to put that app in a timeout if needed.
Basically, it would be nice if instead of providing tools to magnify my ability to focus on more things, the computer could provide tools to excise irrelevant things from my focus, allowing me to more effectively use what I have.
You need to be at least to manage partial concentration on something for periods of time, else the fish gets away. You don't want to concentrate so much the bear which also wants fish eats you instead. But then that's why you have fishing buddies - one to look out for the bears. Or that is what you tell your wife when loading the beer into the fishing tackle bag along with the rod and bait.
Personally, I'm perfectly capable of figuring out that I'm looking at a useless mailing list. What I want is for my computing systems to stop giving me impertinent suggestions as to how to spend my life....
And no, I do not feel ANY obligation to read an email, just because it appeared in my inbox....
"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
"We're not the customer, we are the product..."
At least it would have been if I had been paying attention
What phones did you buy that only last 2 years?
I had my iPhone 3GS till I got my iPhone 6s+....that was a long time and it worked great.
I don't plan to ditch my 6s+ for quite awhile, nothing so compelling that I feel the need to upgrade...and I'll get a free battery replacement here in a month or so....
Ok, I'll go with you on this one...and I guess its because I'm a bit older, but I've never had a social media account. No FB, no twitter, etc. I never joined due to privacy issues, and frankly, if you work any jobs with security requirements, I think it helps NOT to have connections to people you may not really know.
But aside from the fact that I have a large swath of friends, long term ones....I'm constantly in touch with them via text, email, voice...and *GASP* getting together with them in real meat space!!!
I use my phone for listening to music in the car, actual texts/calls....and really that's about it.
Im kinda baffled at people purported to have their noses stuck in a phone 24/7....I guess that explains a sad date I observed not long back, a young couple, and rather than talk, interact and get to know each other, they had their noses stuck in their phones.
I thought that was a bit sad.
Are there that many people out there that are so hooked on their phones that it occupies that much of their daily lives?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
Don't get me wrong, they are a useful and powerful tool. But for most people it is more of an addiction and distraction that they simply can not stop. Like a cigarette using a certain brand appears hip. Like a cigarette it's addiction can lead to problems, and like a cigarette user these addicts can be seen as annoying in public, in movie theaters, etc. Sometimes dangerously so (use while driving). Also like a cigarette the manufacturers know of and encourage addictive tendencies.
I'll never match with my soulmate!
zazen contributes to an attention awakening - so it's up to you to choose what you give your attention to - one person's crisis is another person's opportunity
As the saying goes, "I don't have to out run the bear, I only have to out run you."
the first assumption is that email is good and more is better
Hhahahaha. No.
(i) The number of emails I get and (ii) the likelihood of me reading your email are inversely proportional.
So I went back to using a dumbphone. It will last much longer than two years, it costs a tenth as much as a smart phone, and it does not pull me in to some sort of Attention Crisis.
It's great that that works for you, but for many people, me included, not having a smartphone means having to carry a whole bunch of other devices as well. A PDA for calendaring and contact management, a GPS receiver for navigation, a camera, an ebook reader, an MP3 player, a portable game console, a fitness tracker, etc. I used to actually carry all of the above (not all the time; I had to pick and choose what to take when and often didn't have the device I wanted), and besides the proliferation of things to carry, most of them didn't do their job as well as my smartphone does. Calendaring and contact management is much better when the data is synced to the cloud. GPS navigation is much better with live traffic and regular (free!) map updates. And so on.
People don't buy smartphones because they think they are better phones. People buy smartphones because they do a whole bunch of things that dumbphones don't.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Have you looked into Google Inbox? It some of the distraction-reduction things you ask for. Bundle related emails together and then have the bundle appear only once per day or once per week. Snooze emails that you can't address right now to a later date.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Are there that many people out there that are so hooked on their phones that it occupies that much of their daily lives?
Are you kidding me? It's ridiculous.
Took my kid to his gymnastics class (YMCA), and while sitting in the waiting/observation room, with huge glass windows, out of perhaps 40+ parents there was only one other parent actually paying attention to their child. I went over and sat down next to her and had a very nice conversation. Every other parent in the room had their face buried in a goddamn smartphone and was totally ignoring their child.
I'm a bit of a paradoxical Luddite. I own an ISP, but refuse to purchase a smart phone. I have a table for when I must use the internet for some important purpose.. But other than that, I carry a normal flip phone (that I had to special order, because the idiots at the wireless store looked at me like I was insane when I said I didn't want a smart phone).
I don't blame the smart phones themselves. I do acknowledge that they can be super important and beneficial for some people. But for most folks they are a distraction and, I think, impart a seriously negative impact on their lives.
I have family members (who shall remain nameless) who can't drive down the fucking road without checking their phones.
It's great that that works for you, but for many people, me included, not having a smartphone means having to carry a whole bunch of other devices as well. A PDA for calendaring and contact management, a GPS receiver for navigation, a camera, an ebook reader, an MP3 player, a portable game console, a fitness tracker, etc.
Oh bullshit... I have a tablet that has every single function you just named. ONE DEVICE. But, I don't carry it in my pocket. It's not a constant distraction. Normally it's sitting on the passenger seat and, if I need it, I can retrieve it quickly. I carry a flip phone for phone calls.
I'm not saying that works for you.. I'm simply saying that every function you just described can be accommodated without a smart phone and without multiple devices.
...ooo! Shiny!
It's great that that works for you, but for many people, me included, not having a smartphone means having to carry a whole bunch of other devices as well. A PDA for calendaring and contact management, a GPS receiver for navigation, a camera, an ebook reader, an MP3 player, a portable game console, a fitness tracker, etc.
Oh bullshit... I have a tablet that has every single function you just named. ONE DEVICE. But, I don't carry it in my pocket. It's not a constant distraction. Normally it's sitting on the passenger seat and, if I need it, I can retrieve it quickly. I carry a flip phone for phone calls.
I'm not saying that works for you.. I'm simply saying that every function you just described can be accommodated without a smart phone and without multiple devices.
So you carry a phone and a tablet. How is that not "multiple devices"?
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
How do you think people hunt? Have you ever hunted? Ever watch a cat hunt? You don't think there is fixation going on there? Jesus... I can watch my cat not move a muscle for 20 mins while he's perched outside a gopher hole, just waiting for that dumb bastard to pop his head up.
Believe me, there is all sorts of single focus fixation going on there.
Prey has to be wary. Hunters do not.
You have some pretty serious issues, dude...
Okay. I wasn't clear.. I'll give you that..
You listed a half dozen devices as if they all needed to be separate devices.. I was saying that the LIST could be accommodated by one device. So... okay.. 2 devices.. But not 8.
Sure. But if you take one more step you get to one device. One small enough to fit in a pocket. And all of your non-phone functionality has a data connection even when Wifi is unavailable -- unlike your tablet, unless the tablet has a cellular modem and you pay for service for it.
Of course, I'm not trying to tell you that your solution is bad. If it works for you, great. But the AC above was trying to say that people are stupid for wanting a smartphone when a dumbphone is all you need. My point was that a dumbphone is not all many of us need. Which you agree with, because you augment your dumbphone with another device that fills all of those other niches.
Whether you let your smartphone take over your life, making you check your Facebook feed every two minutes, is a separate issue.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
That is not a "dude", per se, It's a bot. It posts this exact same copy paste article in every thread on here, usually twice. Been doing it ever since t-dog got elected.
My husband was so smooth at hiding his infidelity so I had no proof for months, I was referred to some hacker and decided to give him a try.. the result was incredible because all my cheating husband's text messages, whatsapp, facebook and even phone conversations was wired directly to my cellphone. He helped me put a round-the-clock monitoring on him and I got concrete evidence of his escapades ,if your spouse is an expert at hiding his cheating adventures ... contact him via:
Email:E N R I Q U E H A C K D E M O N 11 @ G M A I L . C O M
WHATS-APP: + 1 ( 4 0 9 ) 9 9 9 - 3 4 7 7 .
Call/Text: + 1 ( 4 0 9 ) 9 9 9 - 3 4 7 7 .
Website: W W W.WORLDINVESTIGATIONSERVICE . COM
A new paper written by Google's user experi
TL;DR LOL.
Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Peron, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above.
Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud.
This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):
Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier):
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen