Slashdot Mirror


Quantum Computing Is Almost Ready For Business, Startup Says (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fast Company: Today the [Berkeley-based startup Rigetti] launched a project in the mold of Amazon Web Services (AWS) called Quantum Cloud Services. "What this platform achieves for the very first time is an integrated computing system that is the first quantum cloud services architecture," says Chad Rigetti, founder and CEO of his namesake company. The dozen initial users Rigetti has announced include biotech and chemistry companies harnessing quantum technology to study complex molecules in order to develop new drugs. The particular operations that the quantum end of the system can do, while still limited and error-prone, are nearly good enough to boost the performance of traditional computers beyond what they could do on their own -- a coming milestone called quantum advantage. "My guess is this could happen anytime from six to 36 months out," says Rigetti.

So-called hybrid algorithms leveraging both systems are able to spot and correct some errors. And even imperfect results from quantum computers can be good enough in many cases, either flat-out exceeding what traditional computer technology can do, or producing results faster or cheaper. Rigetti has been playing this angle, creating a software development kit called Forest (because it's an ecosystem, says Chad) that allows programmers to access hybrid systems. Like other companies such as IBM, Rigetti has been allowing developers to access small-scale quantum computers online to essentially start working out how to program for them. [...] Rigetti is now inviting customers to apply for free access to these systems, toward the goal of developing a real-world application that achieves quantum advantage. As an extra incentive, the first to make it wins a $1 million prize.

24 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. So basically quantum business computing is ready.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and it is not?

  2. New era by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    This, plus the recent breakthroughs in AI, will usher in a new period of computing.

    1. Re:New era by klingens · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's right, it's a new era when the terms on the bullshitbingo cards need to be changed.

    2. Re:New era by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I have mod points but I'm more interested in this subject.

      I agree with you!

      It's like Apple shaping the market for iPhones by producing different coloured cases.

      I mean, goddam!

      Seriously?

      And "hybrid," is a hazy place to hide.

      How much "hy," and how much "brid?"

      As for the fucking "prize" model, just who in Sam Hill in this industry isn't bilingual and knows full well the translation:

      Invent it for us.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  3. Just A Million? by UperPoti · · Score: 1

    Literal "challenge" killer app: break the bank account encryption and take all the money. Am I only one who is getting peeved with poorly thought up "challenges" that are too vague to even attempt that are just thinly veiled advertising? I mean where is the end date or am I missing something?

    1. Re: Just A Million? by niftydude · · Score: 2

      Quantum computing allows the use of Shor's algorithm. Have a read here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... The upshot is that you no longer have to traditionally brute force encryption keys in the way you are thinking, you can find the prime numbers that will allow you to break the encryption quite trivially when using a true quantum computer.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    2. Re: Just A Million? by pezezin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shor's algorithm is only applicable to asymmetric encryption algorithms like RSA and ECC. It would absolutely destroy them, rendering them useless.

      However, for symmetric ciphers like AES you are limited to Grover's algorithm ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), that merely reduces the key length in half, so just moving from AES-128 to AES-256 would make us safe again.

  4. Re:"traditional computers" already have a "boost" by sheramil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notice no tech company want to use this quantum bullshit? Could it be that anyone with a tech background knows it fucking sucks?

    I don't think this particular grade of bullshit is aimed at people with a tech background. It's aimed at investors who have money to toss into the wishing well and who are dazzled by technobabble.

    The description could have worked in the phrases "blockchain", "AI", "nanotech" and, oh, why not, "artisinal" and "homeopathic". They could possibly even have squeezed in a couple of Goop's jade vaginal eggs. Why not?

  5. This is very much a lie by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Realistically, QCs that are worth anything are > 30 years out and very likely will not materialize at all, due to extremely bad scaling. That some startup promises the world to deliver nothing is nothing new though.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:This is very much a lie by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The singularity is utter and complete nonsense, dreamed up by people without a clue how things work. Yes, that includes Marvin "the Moron" Minsky.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:This is very much a lie by Spamalope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shush! Artisinal blockchain based AI hosted on nanotech QC cloud platforms are the future of business computing! (did I miss a buzzword)

      So, is this marketing BS or an attempt to get free developer effort to promote the platform? Or both?

    3. Re:This is very much a lie by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, indeed

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:This is very much a lie by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      As QC gains moving parts, the Uncertainty Principle causes the unpredictability to rise exponentially.

      I'm studying this field (see what I did there) and it's WAY too early.

      Hell, anyone can grab some YouTubes where experts discuss the state of the art and they specifically verbalize your 30-year timeline and, in fact, concede that we may never fabricate a QC beyond 100 qubits.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:This is very much a lie by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Your product is OK, but ours includes "push technology," and "automatic fine tuning," with Bluetooth compatibility, and wireless charging.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  6. Just in time! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I'll use it to run the new Duke Nukem release.

    1. Re:Just in time! by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Then all the baddies you shoot will be both dead and not dead. Presumably Zombies.

    2. Re:Just in time! by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Don't you get bored playing old games?

    3. Re:Just in time! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be a joke about "almost there" releases.

    4. Re:Just in time! by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you need to update your jokes, ol' timer.

  7. Teleporters are also almost ready for business by ffkom · · Score: 1

    I mean there is a theory how they could work, some researchers have already claimed to have teleported some "quantum states", and lots of SciFi has been written on the topic. What could possibly go wrong investing in this right now? Let's sell tickets already, like Branson does for his touristic space flights...

  8. Re:"traditional computers" already have a "boost" by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Precisely.

    It's rick-rolled Nigerian prince scam.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  9. almost here.... by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    It's almost ready!!! WOW!
    Like AI, Like Self driving cars, like a useful- secure - affordable purpose for blockchain!!!

  10. Similar experience ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... happened when I was in this man's Navy, NAS JAX, ca. 1967.

    A popular item was a device that claimed to increase the power of the spark plugs in vehicles by using "embedded transistor."

    You removed the wire from the center of the distributor and placed a doohicky between it and the socket, and plugged it back in.

    Cool.

    But I'm thinking (being an electronics technician), "So, a transistor, which has three leads, is in series with a single wire. How could a transistor possible provide amplification that way?"

    So, I was driving over to Naval Station Mayport and saw one of these bitches on the side of the road.

    Later, I tore it apart.

    It was, literally, "with embedded transistor." I found one in solution in the tar that surrounded the goddam straight wire from input to output.

    --

    That's similar to this story.

    The ad says, "hybrid."

    So, some QC and some classical.

    How much of each?

    Even then, is the idea to do the heavy lifting with QC and pass the grunt work off to the classical?

    This is fucking bullshit.

    Although, the classical computer does have embedded transistors.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Similar experience ... by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      +1 and a good laugh!

      --
      nothing to see here - move along