Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Stock Plunges After Senior Execs Leave, Musk Smokes Weed During Interview (arstechnica.com)

Today, we have learned that two executives have left Tesla. According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tesla's newly hired chief accounting officer Dave Morton decided to resign because "the level of public attention placed on the company as well as the pace within the company have exceeded [his] expectations." He added: "I want to be clear that I believe strongly in Tesla, its mission, and its future prospects, and I have no disagreements with Tesla's leadership or financial reporting." Tesla's human resources chief Gaby Toledano also announced that should would be leaving the company after taking a leave of absence last month. CEO Elon Musk wrote that Toledo "has been on leave for a few months to spend more time with her family and has decided to continue doing so for personal reasons. She's been amazing and I'm very grateful for everything she's done for Tesla."

These departures certainly have had an impact on Tesla's stock, which is down more than six percent to $262, but an interview Elon Musk conducted with Joe Rogan may have caused the most damage. While discussing a wide range of topics including his tweeting behavior, his Boring Company's flamethrowers, and "neuralink" devices, the Tesla CEO openly smoked a mixed tobacco and marijuana cigarette, sending the internet into a frenzy. Ars Technica reports: Morton joined Tesla on August 6, one day before Musk's infamous tweet claiming that he had "funding secured" to take Tesla private. Musk was forced to abandon the plan a couple of weeks later. Not only did Musk not have any kind of written funding deal, many Tesla investors saw little upside in approving a deal that would reduce Tesla's transparency and the liquidity of Tesla stock. Morton didn't explicitly mention last month's buyout saga in his statement explaining his departure. But a lot of the "public attention" Tesla received during Morton's brief tenure was focused on the possibility of Tesla going private. It's safe to assume that members of Tesla's finance team were working overtime on issues related to the proposal during Morton's month at Tesla. It's worth noting that marijuana is legal in California (and several other states) if you are 21 or older, but the federal government still strictly prohibits the Schedule 1 substance.

UPDATE: You can watch/listen to the nearly three-hour-long interview here. Rogan manages to pick Musk's brain in great detail and in a refreshingly laid-back manner. We highly recommend a listen if you want to learn more about Musk's ambitions and thought process.

13 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. Still... a good interview. by internet-redstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still a good interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Still... a good interview. by Wolfrider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      --Dude seriously needs to take a couple of weeks vacation somewhere private and calm down from the stress. But he's rich enough that it's difficult for his friends and family to call him on his shit.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re: Still... a good interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The shitty quality of misleading articles in general is getting worse and worse.

      I've been coming to Slashdot daily for 19 years now and the only reason I bother the last few years is because it's like watching a train crash in slow motion, you know it's coming but you can't help but stare.

    3. Re:Still... a good interview. by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But of course, that doesn't make for a clickbait headline, now does it?

      Human nature is often very nasty.

      There are and will always be those who, for a variety of reasons from the psychological;/emotional (envy, jealousy, obsession/fixation, etc) to the political/ideological, will try to bring down & destroy those who are successful and/or visionaries, probably even more-so regarding visionaries. Musk being both paints a double-sized target on his back for "nay-saying nabobs of negativity".

      Human nature is why we can't have nice things.

      Seriously.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    4. Re:Still... a good interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Musk is doing himself in, via his own poor choices with respect to how he behaves in public. It is revealing how you choose to ignore that and instead attempt to claim that "ugly human nature" is somehow to blame for Musk's various problems. No one forced Musk to call someone a pedophile, no one forced Musk to make the various remarks he made about taking Tesla private, no one forced Musk to try smoking that pot in public. It's all Musk . Your ability to reason is called into question if you cannot discern that Musk's behavior is not the fault of some other person.

    5. Re:Still... a good interview. by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      smoking the weed has nothing to do with being years late from profitability. you can only run a company only on your public image for so long. only tweet extravagant ideas lifted from ancient popular mechanics for so long.

      the stock tanked due to persons privvy to the books running out like the house was on fire. the big thing people want and need to know out of those books is if they're getting money into the company from making and selling the model 3's. that they don't sell the cheapo model because it wouldn't make money doesn't really put that much confidence into it.

      anyhow, for some funnies you can watch some investment advice youtube channels from few days back.

      the cars are good/okay yes - but whats that got to do with the company making money or not?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. Fucking hell! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AstroTurf somewhere else. The “most damaging” thing has nothing to do with pot. We have a “blue chip” stock that is run like a startup.

  3. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually he took one hit, said he didn't like it, never got high, and stated that he didn't feel it would be conducive to productivity. Everyone making a big issue of this is an idiot, especially the two idiots that stepped down over it.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  4. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, plus Morton was known as a job hopper. He only worked 23 years at his last job at Seagate (a public company). He just took another job at a pre-IPO company today. I don't know why he didn't stick around. TSLA is going to $4000 and his options would have been worth billions. I guess he just isn't interested in money.

  5. Re:but it is pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suppose you would call Richard Feynman a failure as a physicist as well? I bet you never even tried it. Just because your siblings are losers doesn't automatically imply other people who smoke weed are in the same category. I'd say Musk is doing a pretty fucking amazing job of changing the world around him.

  6. Re:Plunges? No by ooloorie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tend to agree. EVs, batteries, solar and green energy are the future.

    They are. But so far, the company has benefited from tax breaks and subsidies and never operated in a competitive environment. It's questionable whether they will actually be able to deliver a competitive product once the subsidies go away and these technologies become mainstream.

  7. That would be a European country, not a company by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $4,000 / would be sixteen times the size of the largest car companies in the world.

    Here's the reality:
    Volkwagen revenue S$268 billion
    Toyota revenue $261 billion
    Daimler revenue $164 billion
    General Motors revenue $146 billion
    Toyota revenue $138 billion
    Telsa revenue $11 billion

    Tesla would need to grow ten times larger just to become a significant car company (though still not in the top 5). If they are phenemonally successful, it will justify a stock price of $80.

  8. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by mlyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look dude, it's clear you're a true believer-- I don't know what degree to which the things you're saying are deliberate spin, and what aren't. I am neither long nor short TSLA (am investigating perhaps buying convertible notes & hedging with shorting the stock, but that would be a mostly-long position).

    1. David Morton wasn't brought in to take TSLA private-- or shouldn't have been, as that's not his expertise. Sure, he did a transaction like that as a junior financial executive-- 16 years ago, but has been a CFO of a public company for the past 3 years and now went to Anaplan which is working on going public. It's believed that he was being positioned to take the reins as TSLA's CFO before his departure. I can sure understand shitting a brick and polishing your resume if you go somewhere to be a public CFO, and your first day, the chairman/CEO tweets about privatization without talking to you.

    2. It's never good, with this degree of scrutiny, to do the kind of stupid shit that has gone down the past month.

    3. TSLA needs more capital. It is difficult to fund significant growth from operations, and practically impossible with TSLA's degree of debt loading. While it may be possible to survive Q1's debt payment requirements (or even rally the stock and convert the notes), that doesn't leave extensive funds for capital expansion.
      That said, with TSLA's prior capitalization it should have been easy to get funding from a small (in share) equity round-- if stupid shit stops capital markets should open back up.

    4. TSLA's valuation is predicated, even now, on making it through this challenging time and significantly growing and maintaining market share. This is never good if you have many market entrants who are willing to sell product at a loss (for regulatory compliance reasons). This is never good if other participants are willing, nay practically required, to enter the market and sell below cost and have greater access to subsidies and favorable trade terms than you.

    TSLA has a better product and has an initial lead in share and a positive brand reputation. In a growing market, that's a wonderful position to be in. But success is predicated on strong execution, access to capital, and not doing stupid stuff.