Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Stock Plunges After Senior Execs Leave, Musk Smokes Weed During Interview (arstechnica.com)

Today, we have learned that two executives have left Tesla. According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tesla's newly hired chief accounting officer Dave Morton decided to resign because "the level of public attention placed on the company as well as the pace within the company have exceeded [his] expectations." He added: "I want to be clear that I believe strongly in Tesla, its mission, and its future prospects, and I have no disagreements with Tesla's leadership or financial reporting." Tesla's human resources chief Gaby Toledano also announced that should would be leaving the company after taking a leave of absence last month. CEO Elon Musk wrote that Toledo "has been on leave for a few months to spend more time with her family and has decided to continue doing so for personal reasons. She's been amazing and I'm very grateful for everything she's done for Tesla."

These departures certainly have had an impact on Tesla's stock, which is down more than six percent to $262, but an interview Elon Musk conducted with Joe Rogan may have caused the most damage. While discussing a wide range of topics including his tweeting behavior, his Boring Company's flamethrowers, and "neuralink" devices, the Tesla CEO openly smoked a mixed tobacco and marijuana cigarette, sending the internet into a frenzy. Ars Technica reports: Morton joined Tesla on August 6, one day before Musk's infamous tweet claiming that he had "funding secured" to take Tesla private. Musk was forced to abandon the plan a couple of weeks later. Not only did Musk not have any kind of written funding deal, many Tesla investors saw little upside in approving a deal that would reduce Tesla's transparency and the liquidity of Tesla stock. Morton didn't explicitly mention last month's buyout saga in his statement explaining his departure. But a lot of the "public attention" Tesla received during Morton's brief tenure was focused on the possibility of Tesla going private. It's safe to assume that members of Tesla's finance team were working overtime on issues related to the proposal during Morton's month at Tesla. It's worth noting that marijuana is legal in California (and several other states) if you are 21 or older, but the federal government still strictly prohibits the Schedule 1 substance.

UPDATE: You can watch/listen to the nearly three-hour-long interview here. Rogan manages to pick Musk's brain in great detail and in a refreshingly laid-back manner. We highly recommend a listen if you want to learn more about Musk's ambitions and thought process.

18 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. Still... a good interview. by internet-redstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still a good interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Still... a good interview. by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Still a good interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Agreed.

      It must be very difficult for Elon to deal with the pressures of the business side of his genius; especially since he seems to be cursed with control issues, making it difficult for him to delegate tasks, including the appointment of another CEO or two at his flagship companies.

      Has he made some miscalculations recently? Sure. Can he rebound from this? Certainly. It's simply clear he has to prioritize time for what he's great at (inspiration and innovation) and learn to hand off to others what he can afford to delegate (daily business stress and decisions).

      Personally, I hope he gets it together... there is a worldwide scarcity of visionaries who stand to make the earth a better place.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Still... a good interview. by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      It actually was. And anyone criticizing it for the "OMG Elon Is A Pothead Promoting Drug Usage!" notion clearly never watched it. It's practically an anti-pot ad. Musk is offered a joint (which he has to ask if it's a joint), takes one puff, doesn't even inhale, looks at it, shakes his head no, passes it back - then later on they discuss marijuana, and Musk says that he doesn't like it because it inhibits his ability to get things done and have a meaningful effect on the world.

      But of course, that doesn't make for a clickbait headline, now does it?

      Seriously, this Slashdot "summary" is one of the clickbatiest, most misleading summaries I've seen in ages. Also poorly copyedited - starting to talk about marijuana, then acting like it's going into a summary about pot, but instead going back to Morton. Naturally, their quoting of Morton cuts out before his line, "I want to be clear that I believe strongly in Tesla, its mission, and its future prospects, and I have no disagreements with Tesla’s leadership or its financial reporting." - because, hey, why bother to mention a trivial thing like that when you have a hit piece to right?

      And of course, there's no mention of the in-detail reporting on why Morton left. Specifically, Morton was brought in because his background was privatizations. But he felt like nobody appreciated his ideas as Tesla and he was being ignored. His ignored ideas included, and I quote, "advice about capitalizing the company through other means rather than going private". Had Morton bothered to listen to a single earnings call, they would have heard the Tesla executive team repeatedly and strongly ruling out capital raises from equity; instead that their capital expenditures going forth are to be from profit and debt. He seems to have misunderstood that privatization wasn't a means, it was a goal: to eliminate short-sellers, and thus the financial incentive to FUD the company - as well as to eliminate the end-of-quarter rush and allow the company to stay more long-term strategically focused.

      By the way, as for executives leaving in general: Tesla has 23 people at the VP level or higher - we're not even counting department heads here. The average stay of a high level executive is around 4 years, and less in Silicon Valley. Executive departures will happen. Get used to it.

      Of course, Slashdot concludes with a paragraph that is an epic smear, curiously sourced from some random person commenting on some other site's message board (is that a first here?):

      It's now obvious that everything Elon tweeted that manipulated the market was a lie.

      Meanwhile, in the universe that we live in, there were multiple entities competing to buy Tesla. Including, among others, multiple sovereign wealth funds (not just the Saudis), and Volkswagen. The terms however were more painful to Tesla than staying public, including various combinations of loss of control, requirements to build large local production facilities and so forth. It also became clear that the best their advisers could do for allowing retail investors to remain in (which was part of the plan, to minimize the size of the buyout) was an exotic trust structure that would have had a low chance of being approved by regulators.

      But naaaaaah - who cares about actual investigative reporting when you can base articles on "Megatrex from the comment section of Ars Technica"? FUD away everyone! It's a lot more fun!

      --
      They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
    3. Re:Still... a good interview. by Wolfrider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      --Dude seriously needs to take a couple of weeks vacation somewhere private and calm down from the stress. But he's rich enough that it's difficult for his friends and family to call him on his shit.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    4. Re: Still... a good interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The shitty quality of misleading articles in general is getting worse and worse.

      I've been coming to Slashdot daily for 19 years now and the only reason I bother the last few years is because it's like watching a train crash in slow motion, you know it's coming but you can't help but stare.

    5. Re:Still... a good interview. by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But of course, that doesn't make for a clickbait headline, now does it?

      Human nature is often very nasty.

      There are and will always be those who, for a variety of reasons from the psychological;/emotional (envy, jealousy, obsession/fixation, etc) to the political/ideological, will try to bring down & destroy those who are successful and/or visionaries, probably even more-so regarding visionaries. Musk being both paints a double-sized target on his back for "nay-saying nabobs of negativity".

      Human nature is why we can't have nice things.

      Seriously.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    6. Re:Still... a good interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Musk is doing himself in, via his own poor choices with respect to how he behaves in public. It is revealing how you choose to ignore that and instead attempt to claim that "ugly human nature" is somehow to blame for Musk's various problems. No one forced Musk to call someone a pedophile, no one forced Musk to make the various remarks he made about taking Tesla private, no one forced Musk to try smoking that pot in public. It's all Musk . Your ability to reason is called into question if you cannot discern that Musk's behavior is not the fault of some other person.

    7. Re:Still... a good interview. by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "No matter how gifted you are, do yourself a gigantic favor, and resist the temptation to surround yourself with yes-men... everyone benefits from a critical viewpoint now and then."

      Well, from a cynical point of view, I'm not so sure it benefits "everyone"...

      On one hand, the other "yes-men": they are there usually because they lack other talents, so having someone different on board *and* having the leader listening to him, most probably would end the other ones' career in the company or, at least, their ability to stay with the "grown-ups". Yes, in the long term the company folds, so they go to the unemployment queue, but in the meantime...

      On the other hand, the leader himself, he's usually the sociopathic and narcissitic kind that always land on his feet, so he takes pleasure from their current yes-men and will just take the hit and start again with a different idea and a different group of yes-men to support him.

      I've been there... twice, specially one of them it was so exemplary it could make into an encyclopedia entry. Both times I was fired because not being "a team guy", both times I went out telling others when exactly the company would fold within a three months margin and both times I was right. The only advantage? Since I was fired relatively early in the going nowhere process, I took all my benefits; the others that stayed to the bitter end, not so much.

    8. Re:Still... a good interview. by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      smoking the weed has nothing to do with being years late from profitability. you can only run a company only on your public image for so long. only tweet extravagant ideas lifted from ancient popular mechanics for so long.

      the stock tanked due to persons privvy to the books running out like the house was on fire. the big thing people want and need to know out of those books is if they're getting money into the company from making and selling the model 3's. that they don't sell the cheapo model because it wouldn't make money doesn't really put that much confidence into it.

      anyhow, for some funnies you can watch some investment advice youtube channels from few days back.

      the cars are good/okay yes - but whats that got to do with the company making money or not?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. Fucking hell! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AstroTurf somewhere else. The “most damaging” thing has nothing to do with pot. We have a “blue chip” stock that is run like a startup.

  3. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually he took one hit, said he didn't like it, never got high, and stated that he didn't feel it would be conducive to productivity. Everyone making a big issue of this is an idiot, especially the two idiots that stepped down over it.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  4. Re:The end is nigh. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Watch the stock sink even quicker for Telsa and go bust by the end of this year?

    Or watch the stock dive 'way down, watch Elon buy much of it up with the money he's already cashed out, and end up with a LOT less of the company owned by others.

    Is he crazy like The Mad Hatter, or like a fox?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  5. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nobody stepped down over it. Morton left because he was a privatization expert for a company no longer looking at going private, and felt nobody cared about his privatization ideas anyway. Toledano has been on a leave of absence for over a month. The fun thing about Toledano is that people got to FUD Tesla twice - once when she went on leave, and again when it was confirmed that she wouldn't be returning. Two for one - what a deal!

    Even if you assume that her "personal reasons" and "family" is PR speak (and not literally what it says on the tin), the simple matter is that - as a company which has nearly two dozen people at the VP level or higher (not even counting department heads) - executive departures will happen at regular intervals. Just like they do at all companies (but particularly in Silicon Valley, where average executive stays are shorter than average). The main difference is that people don't have a giant FUD blitz every time, say, some VP in Kraft Foods leaves.

    --
    They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
  6. Re:By Neruos by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    Model 3 does not use 18650s ("laptop batteries"), it uses 2170s. And S & X's 18650s, while a standard format, have a chemistry and structure engineered for battery packs, on a line that only produces them for the S & X.

    SpaceX has taken over the lion's share of the entire planet's commercial launch industry. But "meh", right?

    --
    They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
  7. Re:Security clearance by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sometimes I don't know if you shorts get things wrong through deliberate FUD, or just a really bad game of telephone. Because your (incorrect) initial rumour was "The Air Force is considering revoking Musk's security clearance", but that's apparently already morphed to "has just revoked his security clearance and canceled all contracts". The latter BTW having nothing to do with Musk's security clearance regardless.

    But for those who actually care? Even the initial claim was wrong. "Reports that Musk security clearance under review are inaccurate: U.S. Air Force".

    --
    They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
  8. Re:Who cares.. Seriously? by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

    "hen the stock hits $4000 as it is expected to do."

    That's after the 420:1 reverse split.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  9. That would be a European country, not a company by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $4,000 / would be sixteen times the size of the largest car companies in the world.

    Here's the reality:
    Volkwagen revenue S$268 billion
    Toyota revenue $261 billion
    Daimler revenue $164 billion
    General Motors revenue $146 billion
    Toyota revenue $138 billion
    Telsa revenue $11 billion

    Tesla would need to grow ten times larger just to become a significant car company (though still not in the top 5). If they are phenemonally successful, it will justify a stock price of $80.

  10. Re:Eagerly Awaiting by mlyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look dude, it's clear you're a true believer-- I don't know what degree to which the things you're saying are deliberate spin, and what aren't. I am neither long nor short TSLA (am investigating perhaps buying convertible notes & hedging with shorting the stock, but that would be a mostly-long position).

    1. David Morton wasn't brought in to take TSLA private-- or shouldn't have been, as that's not his expertise. Sure, he did a transaction like that as a junior financial executive-- 16 years ago, but has been a CFO of a public company for the past 3 years and now went to Anaplan which is working on going public. It's believed that he was being positioned to take the reins as TSLA's CFO before his departure. I can sure understand shitting a brick and polishing your resume if you go somewhere to be a public CFO, and your first day, the chairman/CEO tweets about privatization without talking to you.

    2. It's never good, with this degree of scrutiny, to do the kind of stupid shit that has gone down the past month.

    3. TSLA needs more capital. It is difficult to fund significant growth from operations, and practically impossible with TSLA's degree of debt loading. While it may be possible to survive Q1's debt payment requirements (or even rally the stock and convert the notes), that doesn't leave extensive funds for capital expansion.
      That said, with TSLA's prior capitalization it should have been easy to get funding from a small (in share) equity round-- if stupid shit stops capital markets should open back up.

    4. TSLA's valuation is predicated, even now, on making it through this challenging time and significantly growing and maintaining market share. This is never good if you have many market entrants who are willing to sell product at a loss (for regulatory compliance reasons). This is never good if other participants are willing, nay practically required, to enter the market and sell below cost and have greater access to subsidies and favorable trade terms than you.

    TSLA has a better product and has an initial lead in share and a positive brand reputation. In a growing market, that's a wonderful position to be in. But success is predicated on strong execution, access to capital, and not doing stupid stuff.