Slashdot Mirror


Engineering Firm Plans To Tow Icebergs From Antarctica To Parched Dubai (stuff.co.nz)

A Dubai-based engineering firm is planning to tow an iceberg from Antarctica to help provide fresh drinking water to the desert city's rapidly-growing population. Stuff.co.nz reports: The National Advisor Bureau (NABL), a private engineering firm, wants to schlep a glacial iceberg from Antarctica -- weighing approximately 100 million tons -- to Dubai, via an intermediate stop in either Perth, Australia, or Cape Town, South Africa. If the iceberg doesn't melt along the way, the firm will sell the water to Dubai's government. Dubai, which is the most populous city in the United Arab Emirates, is growing so rapidly that a solution to the city's looming water crisis must be found, according to the city's largest English-language newspaper, The Khaleej Times.

The company is beginning a pilot study in November to examine the feasibility of the iceberg-towing project. According to Alshehi, the firm will use satellite imagery to look for a suitable iceberg -- which he says should be between 2000 feet (609 meters) and 7000 feet (2.1 kilometers) long -- and then try and tow it to either Australia or South Africa. Once the iceberg gets to its first stop, it will be towed the rest of the way. Because icebergs are so heavy, the company will need multiple ships to assist with towing, and it will use the ocean's prevailing currents to their advantage. Alshehi told NBC that even if 30 percent of the iceberg melts on the journey, it will still be able to provide between 100 million and 200 million cubic meters of fresh water -- enough for 1 million people to stay hydrated for five years.
Last month, Alshehi told NBC: "If we succeed with this project, it could solve one of the world's biggest problems. So if we show this is viable, it could ultimately help not only the UAE, but all humanity."

9 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. STOP ME IF YOU HAVE HEARD THIS BEFORE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I did. Decades ago.

    1. Re:STOP ME IF YOU HAVE HEARD THIS BEFORE! by careysub · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thanks for being at least one person who is not just opining in complete ignorance like all of other 126 posts here (at this moment).

      This is subject (towing icebergs for water) has been studied to death, anyone can Google dozens of studies done over the last few decades. There is nothing novel about the idea at all. This is the second such scheme posted on /. this year!

      Slashdot should stop posting stories about "plans" to do this, and just post a story about someone who is at least about to actually do it! But then there would be no story to run.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  2. desalination plants on the coast by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    would be not only more cost effective but less risky of an investment

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:desalination plants on the coast by haruchai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the solar potential of that area of the world, they could use solar thermal to power the desal plants, mine the brine for lithium and magnesium and use the sodium & potassium salts for thermal energy storage

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  3. cool, but desalination is better choice by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, I would love to see us move something that large. It would enable a number of other actions. I will say, that it would be best to have a small 1-10MW nuclear reactor to power several electric motors to drive this forward.

    Regardless, desalination is probably the better way. The reason is that multiple sites can be set up along the seas and have multiple continual sources of water vs. batching it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  4. Re:Is this a good idea ? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best way to "green the desert", or at least slow down the browning, is to reduce CO2 emissions.

  5. Re:Is this a good idea ? by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it's done virtually everywhere.

    Although California's almonds get a lot of the bad press, depleting the desert aquifers to grow hay and corn to feed slaughter cattle is similarly wasteful.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  6. Re:Carbon footprint of this? by ghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you want to keep something frozen you want it bigger not smaller. The amount of heat needed to melt something is proportional to its volume but the amount that can actually be added is proportional to the surface area. As things get bigger volume increase much faster than surface area so larger the block of ice more chance it has of reaching Dubai without melting.
    Interestingly this is also why Europeans who evolved for cold climates are larger in size . Heat loss is proportional to Surface area while core heat is proportional to volume so bigger bodies can survive better in cold climates. Of course in hot climates its more efficient to be thin and short.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  7. Re:Is this a good idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Desertification in north Africa is not caused by human civilization. It caused human civilisation. the drying of central north Africa is what drove hominids into the Nile valley.