Slashdot Mirror


An Autonomous Sailboat Successfully Crosses Atlantic Ocean (digitaltrends.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Digital Trends: The first unmanned and autonomous sailboat has successfully crossed the Atlantic Ocean, completing the journey between Newfoundland, Canada, and Ireland. The 1,800 mile journey took two and a half months. It was part of the Microtransat Challenge for robotic boats, and bolsters the possibility of unmanned boats being used for long-haul missions. This could include everything from ocean research to surveillance. "This has never been done before," David Peddie, CEO of Norwegian-based Offshore Sensing AS, which built the vessel, told Digital Trends. "The Sailbuoy [robotic boat] crossed this distance all by itself without incident. The significance of this is that it proves that one can use unmanned surface vehicles to explore the oceans for extended periods and distance. This greatly reduces the cost of exploring the oceans, and therefore enables a much more detailed knowledge of the oceans than is possible using conventional manned technology."

According to Peddie, the journey was surprisingly uneventful when it came to dealing with major challenges. That's a significant departure from the 20 previous unsuccessful efforts made by teams trying to complete the challenge since it started in 2010. "We had to wait a while for the right wind conditions to deploy safely; otherwise, the crossing has been normal with not too much wind and waves," he said. "We had to avoid some oil platforms, but this is not unusual since we test in the North Sea." He also noted that an effort was made to stay away from other ships, since there was a risk that the boat may have been picked up by passing traffic. Sailbuoy ships cost $175,000 each and are powered by on-board solar panels. They send constant GPS data to reveal exactly where they are located.

59 comments

  1. Not impressed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not like an autonomous sailboat has to worry about traffic or pedestrians. Let's see if it can safely dock in a busy Ft Lauderdale marina.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Not impressed by dj245 · · Score: 1

      It's not like an autonomous sailboat has to worry about traffic or pedestrians. Let's see if it can safely dock in a busy Ft Lauderdale marina.

      Or speed. 24 miles per day is a very slow boat indeed.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    2. Re:Not impressed by RandomFactor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or salvage...if it is unmanned, isn't it fair game for anyone to claim?

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    3. Re:Not impressed by dissy · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not like an autonomous sailboat has to worry about traffic or pedestrians.

      That's only because for some strange reason it is still frowned upon to dump traffic and pedestrians into the middle of the Atlantic.

      But never fear, I can only presume our government is currently hard at work trying to remove those regulations, as clearly additional testing is needed. For science!

    4. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Obviously...you're not a golfer.

      As an IT professional, amateur roboticist, and sailor living aboard for some time, I'm impressed. Mooring in a busy port is a completely different set of skills. I've thought about ways to automate this and that, even the whole thing driving itself, and it's not easy. It's certainly not cheap. Not saying I have $175k to throw at a prototype that I'm going to send off across the Atlantic without me being onboard because I'm that hardcore a scientist, but I'm cognizant of how insanely cheap that is for an object capable of doing that. Sailing across the Atlantic, particularly the North Atlantic, is neither easy nor trivial, even ignoring the human aspects of the difficulty like how computers don't care about getting the necessary amount of protein, coffee, and cigarettes that i would require. Not so bad in summer as in winter, but still, it takes a special dedication bordering on insanity that I don't have to do a North Atlantic crossing. As someone who appreciates the art and achievement, I'm very much impressed and I think it's telling that it took humanity until 2018 to achieve it.

      Tell you what. You pick out a (combustion) powered boat of comparable size and displacement (say, 50-200%), and achieve the same thing for the same cost, and I'll even give you the fuel for free. I will be almost as impressed.

    5. Re:Not impressed by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or speed. 24 miles per day is a very slow boat indeed.

      It was WAY faster than that. This sailboat crossed the Atlantic on Sept 6th, and now has done it again in only THREE DAYS.

    6. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or speed. 24 miles per day is a very slow boat indeed.

      It was WAY faster than that. This sailboat crossed the Atlantic on Sept 6th, and now has done it again in only THREE DAYS.

      Second time is always easier!

    7. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not like an autonomous sailboat has to worry about traffic or pedestrians

      No, it just has to worry about wind, waves, navigation, storms, icebergs, and all of the ways the open ocean tries to kill you.

      Sailing across an ocean is a non-trivial thing even with a skilled crew, and it takes literally years of experience to become an open water yachtsman.

      This is a lot more impressive than armchair sailors on Slashdot realize.

    8. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously...you're not a golfer.

      Obviously...you're not a cephalopod.

      I mean .. what? Did you banana the wrong word?

    9. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear that, guys? Go ahead and shut it all down. Some guy on the Internet isn't impressed.

    10. Re:Not impressed by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      AC wrote :

      it just has to worry about wind, waves, navigation, storms, icebergs, and all of the ways the open ocean tries to kill you .... This is a lot more impressive than armchair sailors on Slashdot realize.

      No it isn't all that impressive, and I have been a professional sailor. TFA says that they waited until the wind and waves were favourable. It says :-

      That's a significant departure from the 20 previous unsuccessful efforts made by teams.... "We had to wait a while for the right wind conditions to deploy safely; otherwise, the crossing has been normal with not too much wind and waves"

      Sounds like I could have made it across on a pedalo at the time, and that some of the previous 20 attempts did meet some real wind and waves.

    11. Re:Not impressed by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      That could NEVER happen. It has a sign on the sail that says "Keep Clear!" https://www.microtransat.org/2... /s

  2. Hard to believe... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... that the drug cartels haven't been doing this for years now. It can't possibly be that hard, especially with the amount of funding they can bring to bear.

    1. Re:Hard to believe... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile they build submarines :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Hard to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking the same thing. If I had to fathom a guess it is probably why they have not been interdicting submersibles in recent years. I'd imagine now they are using much smaller remote controlled submersibles. When interdiction happens it's probably of vessels that don't have any drugs on board and so nothing is found. Rather those vessels are probably following closely in front of or behind the drugs instead. It's actually a really great idea and wonder how much of that is already going on in terms of transporting drugs. I could very well imagine well camouflaged drones being used to transport drugs as well. 5.5lbs of drugs could be transported across the country with just 120 take offs and landings for gas. That is with a $5,500 gas powered drone.

    3. Re:Hard to believe... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it's because a sailboat is not ideal. If it has any kind of cargo capacity it's going to stick out on radar and take a long time to get where it's going to go.

      Drug dealers have used robotic cigarette boats, and even built narco-submarines.

      Maybe for smuggling fentanyl, which on a per gram basis with worth nearly ten thousand times as much as cocaine.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Hard to believe... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I know if I were in that business, I'd definitely be putting money into developing drones. The US coast guard probably can't even detect a small naval drone carrying a 5-10 kilos of product. And if the drones had solar panels and GPS they could travel large distances, even up river inlets to be picked up. Good luck trying to stop that.

    5. Re:Hard to believe... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Well, in the future a wall will clearly stop all these drones flying in. Problem solved.

    6. Re:Hard to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Narcs aren't exactly the brightest bulbs in a batch.

    7. Re:Hard to believe... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Space Force plans to expand the space elevator concept into a space wall. It'll enclose the USA and provide cheap access to orbital weapons platforms at the same time. (The outward-facing sides of the wall will be covered in oil to make sure they're slippery enough to not be climbable by foreign space agencies / drug smugglers.)

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    8. Re:Hard to believe... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, the human cost to smuggling is a small rounding error.. Why risk losing a shipment, or having the DEA crack the software, if you don't have to.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Hard to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised. Have you seen the subs they've been using for a while?

  3. And now the jokes begin... by Jharish · · Score: 1

    "I Rowboat"

    1. Re:And now the jokes begin... by Jharish · · Score: 1

      I posted the link to the Onion editorial of the same name the last time they posted it but because Slashdot is lazy about submissions that this has shown up twice, I'm too lazy to paste it in again.

    2. Re:And now the jokes begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted the link to the Onion editorial of the same name the last time they posted it but because Slashdot is lazy about submissions that this has shown up twice, I'm too lazy to paste it in again.

      Or maybe, just possibly, you and your preferences are not nearly as special or important as you might have thought. In fact, it's quite possible that no one cares at all.

      Perhaps you are lazy about taking an honest appraisal about yourself and your place in the world?

      Would a participation trophy assuage the butt-hurt?

  4. Is this a different boat... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Is this a different boat... by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Is this a different boat... ... than this?

      No. Why do you ask?

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  5. Speedy Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1800 miles in 75 days -- about 1 knot, or 24 nm per day. Regular cargo ships cruise at around 12 knots, so there is considerable room for improvement. Then, there is navigating around tropical storms and hurricanes moving at 8-10 kt themselves.

    Slow delivery of non-urgent, non-perishable cargo is not a very big market.

    1. Re: Speedy Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But scientific monitoring and surveillance on the other hand and perhaps one day in the far distant future they'll learn how to make them, you know, bigger.

    2. Re:Speedy Delivery by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The top speed of a two-meter vessel is necessarily going to be very limited by waves. Things like robotic sailboats could be feasible in the future at much higher speeds.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  6. Are We Running Out of Stories? by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

    msmash posted a story about this same boat and its voyage three days ago. Come on guys get your act together! Quit posting the same stuff over and over.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    1. Re:Are We Running Out of Stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They always do this, the editors are garbage.

    2. Re:Are We Running Out of Stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no editors and this is the weekend when the inmates run the asylum anyway.

    3. Re:Are We Running Out of Stories? by dissy · · Score: 1

      msmash posted a story about this same boat and its voyage three days ago.

      Hey now, that's a significant improvement in the editor AI from a decade or two ago, once per three days over three to four times a day.

      As the editors are all 100kloc perl programs, that's pretty fantastic all things considered!

  7. Container ships are the real problem to sailboats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all fun and games till you are run down at night by a container ship or holed by a container as they often float just barely submersed.

  8. Saildrone has been doing more than this for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Saildrone have been operating for the last 5 years, are far faster on average, have already clocked up the equivalent of 8x round the world and in fact will send a couple of drones around the world this year, and are in the process of scaling up hugely
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-05-15/this-man-is-building-an-armada-of-saildrones-to-conquer-the-ocean

  9. A Robotic Cheered by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Meh.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  10. these guys did it so it cant be that hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/what-can-28000-rubber-duckies-lost-at-sea-teach-us-about

  11. you should be.. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Because somehow they managed to make these toys cost $175k each.
    I can only assume that they are planning to get the government on the hook somehow, because even the cartels are likely to baulk at that price.

    I mean really, $175k each.. is there ANY conceivable use that would not make that price just a joke?
    Of course it is noy even distantly TRUE, but thats the story they are trying to spin.. so...

    1. Re:you should be.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I mean really, $175k each..

      That is likely 95% NRE. So one boat costs $175k, and each additional boat costs $5k.

    2. Re:you should be.. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Rich people who can't be assed to learn how to sail but want to brag about having a sailing boat, too?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:you should be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sailboat autopilot systems that control sails and rudder based on GPS have been around for a while now. I went around the Chesapeake Bay in one a bit back around 2003.

    4. Re:you should be.. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sailing is WAY more complicated than putting rudders and sails at the proper position.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. By most measures, its still a failure by Slugster · · Score: 2

    Sure it got where it was supposed to go--but it cost $175K, was only ~7 feet long, only averaged ~1 mph, and--last but not least--it has nowhere for busty vixens to tan their ta-tas and sip wine coolers.

  13. Re: Saildrone has been doing more than this for ye by batukhan · · Score: 1

    This. Its a complete publicity stunt by the Norwegians saying this hasn't been done before. While technically may be correct, there is no way they didn't know about Saildrone and what they have been doing for years

  14. Use case by DrYak · · Score: 2

    re-read the summary.

    The potential use case aren't sailing huge container ships around. (For that, we already have human, and given that the human crew's is a tiny rounding error on the scale of the money involved in such maritime transportations, nobody is in a hurry to replace those soon. - That's partially the reason why there is so few roboats development).

    The potential use case mentioned in the summary is ocean research to surveillance.

    i.e.: use cases where getting in and out of the port isn't important (you might as well drop such a research platform in the ocean from a mothership), but where successfully surviving and sailing around the ocean for extended amount of time is important. (but isn't currently researched a lot, due to lack of strong economic incentive mentionned above).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  15. Toy Boats? $175k? by zenasprime · · Score: 1

    Why do these toy boats (from the videos it's obvious that they are barely a couple of feet long) cost anywhere close to $175000. WTF?

  16. Did it cross it again already? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure we saw this story on Friday or Saturday.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. Very old news by houghi · · Score: 1

    This has been done for a Very Long Time

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  18. Catching up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This autonomous sailboat is a bit behind the times.
    A wave powered boat already crossed the pacific (14700Km) 5 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_Robotics
    Combining wind and wave power might enable higher speeds.

  19. Unmanned but not autonomous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It competed in the "unmanned" category, which allows communications that can change the course of the boat.

  20. Maybe The Pirate Bay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe The Pirate Bay is the market for this. Or maybe the RIAA/MPAA and other content NAZI's find there are easily sunk.