Slashdot Mirror


An Autonomous Sailboat Successfully Crosses Atlantic Ocean (digitaltrends.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Digital Trends: The first unmanned and autonomous sailboat has successfully crossed the Atlantic Ocean, completing the journey between Newfoundland, Canada, and Ireland. The 1,800 mile journey took two and a half months. It was part of the Microtransat Challenge for robotic boats, and bolsters the possibility of unmanned boats being used for long-haul missions. This could include everything from ocean research to surveillance. "This has never been done before," David Peddie, CEO of Norwegian-based Offshore Sensing AS, which built the vessel, told Digital Trends. "The Sailbuoy [robotic boat] crossed this distance all by itself without incident. The significance of this is that it proves that one can use unmanned surface vehicles to explore the oceans for extended periods and distance. This greatly reduces the cost of exploring the oceans, and therefore enables a much more detailed knowledge of the oceans than is possible using conventional manned technology."

According to Peddie, the journey was surprisingly uneventful when it came to dealing with major challenges. That's a significant departure from the 20 previous unsuccessful efforts made by teams trying to complete the challenge since it started in 2010. "We had to wait a while for the right wind conditions to deploy safely; otherwise, the crossing has been normal with not too much wind and waves," he said. "We had to avoid some oil platforms, but this is not unusual since we test in the North Sea." He also noted that an effort was made to stay away from other ships, since there was a risk that the boat may have been picked up by passing traffic. Sailbuoy ships cost $175,000 each and are powered by on-board solar panels. They send constant GPS data to reveal exactly where they are located.

12 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. Not impressed by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not like an autonomous sailboat has to worry about traffic or pedestrians. Let's see if it can safely dock in a busy Ft Lauderdale marina.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Not impressed by RandomFactor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or salvage...if it is unmanned, isn't it fair game for anyone to claim?

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    2. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Obviously...you're not a golfer.

      As an IT professional, amateur roboticist, and sailor living aboard for some time, I'm impressed. Mooring in a busy port is a completely different set of skills. I've thought about ways to automate this and that, even the whole thing driving itself, and it's not easy. It's certainly not cheap. Not saying I have $175k to throw at a prototype that I'm going to send off across the Atlantic without me being onboard because I'm that hardcore a scientist, but I'm cognizant of how insanely cheap that is for an object capable of doing that. Sailing across the Atlantic, particularly the North Atlantic, is neither easy nor trivial, even ignoring the human aspects of the difficulty like how computers don't care about getting the necessary amount of protein, coffee, and cigarettes that i would require. Not so bad in summer as in winter, but still, it takes a special dedication bordering on insanity that I don't have to do a North Atlantic crossing. As someone who appreciates the art and achievement, I'm very much impressed and I think it's telling that it took humanity until 2018 to achieve it.

      Tell you what. You pick out a (combustion) powered boat of comparable size and displacement (say, 50-200%), and achieve the same thing for the same cost, and I'll even give you the fuel for free. I will be almost as impressed.

    3. Re:Not impressed by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or speed. 24 miles per day is a very slow boat indeed.

      It was WAY faster than that. This sailboat crossed the Atlantic on Sept 6th, and now has done it again in only THREE DAYS.

  2. Hard to believe... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... that the drug cartels haven't been doing this for years now. It can't possibly be that hard, especially with the amount of funding they can bring to bear.

    1. Re:Hard to believe... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile they build submarines :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Hard to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking the same thing. If I had to fathom a guess it is probably why they have not been interdicting submersibles in recent years. I'd imagine now they are using much smaller remote controlled submersibles. When interdiction happens it's probably of vessels that don't have any drugs on board and so nothing is found. Rather those vessels are probably following closely in front of or behind the drugs instead. It's actually a really great idea and wonder how much of that is already going on in terms of transporting drugs. I could very well imagine well camouflaged drones being used to transport drugs as well. 5.5lbs of drugs could be transported across the country with just 120 take offs and landings for gas. That is with a $5,500 gas powered drone.

    3. Re:Hard to believe... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it's because a sailboat is not ideal. If it has any kind of cargo capacity it's going to stick out on radar and take a long time to get where it's going to go.

      Drug dealers have used robotic cigarette boats, and even built narco-submarines.

      Maybe for smuggling fentanyl, which on a per gram basis with worth nearly ten thousand times as much as cocaine.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Is this a different boat... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 3, Interesting
  4. Are We Running Out of Stories? by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

    msmash posted a story about this same boat and its voyage three days ago. Come on guys get your act together! Quit posting the same stuff over and over.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  5. By most measures, its still a failure by Slugster · · Score: 2

    Sure it got where it was supposed to go--but it cost $175K, was only ~7 feet long, only averaged ~1 mph, and--last but not least--it has nowhere for busty vixens to tan their ta-tas and sip wine coolers.

  6. Use case by DrYak · · Score: 2

    re-read the summary.

    The potential use case aren't sailing huge container ships around. (For that, we already have human, and given that the human crew's is a tiny rounding error on the scale of the money involved in such maritime transportations, nobody is in a hurry to replace those soon. - That's partially the reason why there is so few roboats development).

    The potential use case mentioned in the summary is ocean research to surveillance.

    i.e.: use cases where getting in and out of the port isn't important (you might as well drop such a research platform in the ocean from a mothership), but where successfully surviving and sailing around the ocean for extended amount of time is important. (but isn't currently researched a lot, due to lack of strong economic incentive mentionned above).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]