Slashdot Mirror


Marshall Islands Warned Against Adopting Digital Currency (bbc.com)

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is warning the Republic of the Marshall Islands to "seriously reconsider" the idea of adopting a digital currency as a second form of legal tender. As it stands, the U.S. dollar is the only legal tender in the islands. The BBC reports: A law to adopt a digital currency named "Sovereign" alongside the dollar was passed in February. The first virtual coins are due to be issued to members of the public via an initial coin offering (ICO) later this year. However, IMF directors said the potential benefits of the move were much smaller than the potential costs of "economic, reputational and governance risks." "[Marshall Island] authorities should seriously reconsider the issuance of the digital currency as legal tender," wrote the directors in their report, which was first spotted by Coindesk.

There is just one domestic commercial bank in the country and it is at risk of losing its only correspondent banking relationship with another bank in the U.S. That relationship allows the Islands to transfer dollars in and out of the country. It highlighted the Marshall Islands' dependence on foreign aid, and the fact that the country is vulnerable to natural disasters as well as sea level rise linked to climate change. Adopting a digital currency as an official form of legal tender would threaten both financial integrity and the nation's key relationship with the U.S. bank. The result could be disruption to foreign aid, according to the IMF.

2 of 71 comments (clear)

  1. If you control the currency... by snemiro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you control the country..... Bankers don't like the idea of a gov't managed currency... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  2. Re:$5 Wrench by IcyWolfy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would mean that the argument that cryptocurrency is a commodity will no longer be blindly valid, as the only arguments currently remaining against declaring it a currency equivalent, is that cryptocurrency is not recogninzed by any state as a currency, is not issued by any central bank, nor is in common use as a currency in any locale. This will break those remaining arguments.

    And then, I can see people in the US suing the IRS to reclassify cryptocurrencies as a currency, and not as property.