Slashdot Mirror
Scientists Discover a 'Tuneable' Novel Quantum State of Matter (phys.org)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Phys.Org: An international team of researchers led by Princeton physicist Zahid Hasan has discovered a quantum state of matter that can be "tuned" at will -- and it's 10 times more tuneable than existing theories can explain. This level of manipulability opens enormous possibilities for next-generation nanotechnologies and quantum computing. Hasan and his colleagues, whose research appears in the current issue of Nature, are calling their discovery a "novel" quantum state of matter because it is not explained by existing theories of material properties. The classical phases of matter -- solids, liquids and gases -- arise from interactions between atoms or molecules. In a quantum phase of matter, the interactions take place between electrons, and are much more complex.
[Hasan] and his colleagues arranged atoms on the surface of crystals in many different patterns and watched what happened. They used various materials prepared by collaborating groups in China, Taiwan and Princeton. One particular arrangement, a six-fold honeycomb shape called a "kagome lattice" for its resemblance to a Japanese basket-weaving pattern, led to something startling -- but only when examined under a spectromicroscope in the presence of a strong magnetic field [...]. All the known theories of physics predicted that the electrons would adhere to the six-fold underlying pattern, but instead, the electrons hovering above their atoms decided to march to their own drummer -- in a straight line, with two-fold symmetry. The decoupling between the electrons and the arrangement of atoms was surprising enough, but then the researchers applied a magnetic field and discovered that they could turn that one line in any direction they chose. Without moving the crystal lattice, [one] could rotate the line of electrons just by controlling the magnetic field around them.
[Hasan] and his colleagues arranged atoms on the surface of crystals in many different patterns and watched what happened. They used various materials prepared by collaborating groups in China, Taiwan and Princeton. One particular arrangement, a six-fold honeycomb shape called a "kagome lattice" for its resemblance to a Japanese basket-weaving pattern, led to something startling -- but only when examined under a spectromicroscope in the presence of a strong magnetic field [...]. All the known theories of physics predicted that the electrons would adhere to the six-fold underlying pattern, but instead, the electrons hovering above their atoms decided to march to their own drummer -- in a straight line, with two-fold symmetry. The decoupling between the electrons and the arrangement of atoms was surprising enough, but then the researchers applied a magnetic field and discovered that they could turn that one line in any direction they chose. Without moving the crystal lattice, [one] could rotate the line of electrons just by controlling the magnetic field around them.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!) but “That’s funny ” — Isaac Asimov (OK - Asimov is credit with the quote but it's more a paraphrase of a number of quotes he made)
"Underwater quantum basket weaving" will now be moved from the athletics department to the physics department.
Your bigotry is leaking.
Posting like you do is a weird way to blow off steam, donâ(TM)t you think?
All the known theories of physics predicted that the electrons would adhere to the six-fold underlying pattern, but instead, the electrons hovering above their atoms decided to march to their own drummer -- in a straight line, with two-fold symmetry. The decoupling between the electrons and the arrangement of atoms was surprising enough, but then the researchers applied a magnetic field and discovered that they could turn that one line in any direction they chose. Without moving the crystal lattice, [one] could rotate the line of electrons just by controlling the magnetic field around them.
Sounds classical to me:
- The layout of the substrate produced a planar potential well with no, or very little, difference of energy for electrons being in one position vs. another.
- Provided the average density of the electrons was right, they behaved like a gas of individual particles in a thin container, or marbles on a flat surface.
- The electrons repelled each other, so they tended to spread out evenly. (Spread out too far, though, and they leave some positive-charged substrate behind. So they don't just fly apart and go away.)
- But electrons also have spin, which means they are little magnets. So, with their mutual repulsion largely defeated by forces holding them at a given average spacing, they tend to line up north-pole-to-south-pole in strings (but don't all pile up because coming more than a little closer together under the slight magnetic attraction is balanced by higher repulsion.) The strings are a bit more dense than the average gas, so most of the electrons join one and reduce their total energy.
- So now you have these long magnetic strings, with no preferred orientation driven by irregularities in the substrate. Bring a magnet nearby and they'll line up with its field while spacing out by mutual magnetic AND electrostatic repulsion, much like iron filing lines.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
well that's about the number of people who really understand what all this article is about.
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
This sounds cool but I feel like every time there is a big announcement about something amazing involving Quantum Physics, the first thing everyone mentions is how it'll be useful in nanotechnology and quantum computing. Unfortunately, no one ever really explains how its useful and what the actual application in those fields are, so I'm left wondering if any of this is really that useful or just simply that the reporters have 0 clue and just toss that in to make it seem important.
If have an experiment that current theory can't explain, you most likely have made a mistake somewhere.
This is incredible content!
Thanks, sounds a bit like graphene to me.
If someone has a lab or better understanding than me, can they answer a question?
Send a laser through a sheet of glass at an angle and it bends, (refraction 101). If you cut away the glass either side of the path the laser traces through it, so the laser just travels through the same sliver of glass as before, you find it no longer follows that path, it exits the sides.
i.e. the laser is bent by glass it doesn't actually pass though.
Can someone actually confirm that happens, or have I f*ked up my medium simulation?
on a clear night one could speculate that another one is waving back.. as the spirit moves us.. cease fire stand down,, leave the quarks alone..
Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, anonymous comment posting has temporarily been disabled. You can still login to post. However, if bad posting continues from your IP or Subnet that privilege could be revoked as well. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner or login and improve your posting. If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down (wtf?). If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your particulars..
?
My $ would say no.
Maybe BeauHD can crow and strut how he is a slashdot editor some more though, in between deleting his post history.
God I remember my first crush. It's normal to feel scared but just tell him how you feel, it'll be ok.
Anyone who shitposts on this... is a turd winkle. This is news. This is nerdy. This matters to me.
I'll throw the worst of shrubberies with plenty of typoeees at anyone who disobeys this edict.
Blow a load of steam up my ass!
Or maybe the anti-white bias in academia has just hit a peak.
Are used as a matter of simplification. There is no clean boundary, only a continuum where the classical states (solid, liquid, gas, plasma) are specific islands.
Quantum doesn't mean magical, it just means something with discrete states rather than continuous states. QM is a quantum theory that mostly applies to the very small but can scale up to objects of a few millimetres under some conditions. Actually, some aspects - such as the Schrodinger Equation - applies to planetary rings, asteroid belts and accretion disks.
The first question is whether it's useful to talk of states of matter. If it is, is it useful to use traditional ones or should we decompose phenomena into the raw properties and then compose a new set of states that reduces the need for weird overlaps and talk of mysteries beyond the ken of man?
The second question (or third, if you go with the option above) is whether something that is apparently orthogonal to the original list is a state in the original sense? The original sense is a linear continuum, not a set of sets. This new thing is apparently not on that line. If matter's state is multidimensional, our naming should reflect that.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
It's about time we found octarine! Twofold era would truly be amazed.
Well, since this "discovery" is obviously bogus nonsense, that is a good thing.
Can this be used to carefully direct a single beam of photons? I'd like a very very tiny crt tv
Bogus nonsense? Tell us that the next time you need an infintesimally small magnetometer for some project.
You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
I'm still waiting for the headline "Sports team discovers new...", or "Religion discovers new..."
I've got a couple for you:
"Sports team discovers new ... way to troll authoritarian Americans who don't understand a thing about what the flag stands for." (With thanks to the NFL)
"Religion discovers new ... way to lobotomize human intellect with nonsensical words." Hmm...that probably doesn't count, since they've been doing that for millennia. How about...
"Religion discovers new ... way to subsume an established democracy beneath fascist rhetoric, small minded bigotry, and white entitlement." Nope, can't use that one either: they're following the tried and true Nazi playbook page by page. Nothing new here either.
OK, you got me. Religion can't possibly discover anything new (although it's adherents might, once they realize what rubes they've been played for).
No scientific research is "useless". Literally all of it has application at some point, but we never really know when. That's the province of inventors as much as scientists.
Science is like assembling a huge jigsaw puzzle. You connect 2 pieces together and what do you have? Nothing. Do you even know where in the picture those 2 pieces go? Probably not.
Therefore according to you, connecting 2 pieces together on a jigsaw puzzle is useless. However if you never did that you'd never make any progress towards assembling the entire puzzle. Even popular culture and folk wisdom understands this clearly. That's where we get the philosophical phrases "A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step", and "How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time."
Your myopia is astounding. And attributing this understanding to "bias" is so wrong that it's Not Even Wrong.
The next time you need a tiny magnetometer that only works in a unique and temperamental two-story agglomeration of exotic technology, anyway.
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
Does it actually happen? Your comment assumes it does, I want confirmation.
This is the dipole model and I'm only sending a single dipole through the 'glass' (simulated), its purely mathematical. I've just tried it with a slit model, and its the material around the slit that's bending the dipole, the dipole never actually hits the slit wall, and I know that that happens in the lab, but perhaps I made a mistake with the glass geometry, hence want confirmation.