Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo Switch Cloud Save Data Disappears If You Cancel Subscription (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Nintendo Switch game save data stored in the cloud is only available "as long as you have an active Nintendo Switch Online membership." If you eventually cancel the $20/year subscription, Nintendo is "unable to guarantee that cloud save data will be retained after an extended period of time from when your membership is ended." That wrinkle in Nintendo's plan was not included in the details of yesterday's Nintendo Direct presentation, but it can be found digging through the FAQs and customer support pages on Nintendo's website this morning. On the plus side, Nintendo clarified that you will be able to transfer cloud-based saves between Switch systems just by signing in with your Nintendo account on as many consoles as you want. But Nintendo also said it will continue not allowing local backups of save data to an SD card or other outside storage. UPDATE: It's worth noting that cloud saves on PlayStation systems remain accessible for six months after you cancel a paid PlayStation Plus account, while cloud saves on Xbox Live are offered for free in perpetuity.

71 comments

  1. Yeah, and? by Desler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would any expect Nintendo (or any company) to continue to store your data when you stopped paying for the service?

    1. Re:Yeah, and? by sanf780 · · Score: 1

      The question I have is: how about the competition? Does Sony or Microsoft keep your cloud saves (that you need to pay for)? If they are not, then this article is FUD.

    2. Re: Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There isnâ(TM)t an expectation that they would. The problem is blocking you from storing it locally on an SD card. Thatâ(TM)s just a greedy prick move.

    3. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone here know why it's call "the cloud?" Anyone..?

      Look up in the sky. See a cloud formation, right? Tomorrow,
      look for the same cloud formation. No sane person expects
      the clouds (in the sky) to retain a "configuration", so why is
      anyone surprised when this happens to a "computer cloud?"

      CAP === 'batches"

    4. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The rub here is that Nintendo disallows local storage, something that Sony and Microsoft both allow. This changes cloud storage from what it should be used for, i.e. one of multiple backup options that is handy when it is available, into "the basket in which all my eggs are stored." And you're renting the basket.

    5. Re:Yeah, and? by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      If they are not, then this article is FUD.

      No it's not. Just because all the bad actors act the same doesn't make the bad behavior any better. They all still suck.

      I still have saved games from 15 years ago on my hard drive, and sometimes I still play those old games from time to time. And I don't have to pay someone in perpetuity for them. This article is yet another reminder of who owns your data when you store them on someone else's machine.

    6. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft doesn't require a paid subscription for cloud saves, no idea about Sony.

    7. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard practice in MMOs is to not delete anything. Stop subscribing for 5 years and come back it'll be just as you left it.

    8. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In college, I played EverQuest. Get off my lawn sonny, it was our World of Warcraft, and we walked uphill both ways in the snow to play it, and we liked it!

      Anyway.. back to my point. In college, I played EverQuest for a little while, then stopped because I actually wanted to pass my classes.

      Like any MMO, the character details were saved on Sony's servers.

      Almost a decade later, I got an e-mail from Sony saying that my old EverQuest account and characters were available if I wanted to return to Norrath.

      Nintendo are FOOLS to delete that data.
      If you put a player back to square zero, they have lots of equal choices of where to start from scratch.
      Keeping the data means the player will be comparing their time/money investment in your service, to square zero on other services.

    9. Re:Yeah, and? by Ormy · · Score: 1

      Rare insightful AC. Mod up.

    10. Re:Yeah, and? by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      I think it is game dependent.
      For example, I have cloud saves of Dragon's Crown from my PS Vita. Used the PSN cloud to transfer to another Vita several years after. And never payed a dime to Sony as I never had a network subscription.
      (In addition to the local saves copied onto my PC's hard disk)

       

    11. Re:Yeah, and? by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      Why would Nintendo expect customers to pay for cloud storage when it is not transferable to local?

      Seems like there's dummies enough to go around.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    12. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... and what parent AC says is a key reason why nobody should be storing things in the cloud, except as a backup to local storage.

      You play with fire, eventually you get burninated.

    13. Re:Yeah, and? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It seems Nintendo didn't say they would delete the data, merely that there was no guarantee they wouldn't. The difference between those two clauses is huge.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most AC posts are insightful, since we can post without fear of being banned by other users for posting our honest thoughts and opinions. (Whiplash has it wrong, users here can ban other users via karma if they do not like what they have to say.)

      I registered once. I got banned from posting for 24 hours BY OTHER USERS. So I will not register here. I am sure I am not the only one. Been here since the beginning.

    15. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sign up for Dropbox.

      You store data in it, including collaborations.

      You want to cancel your account.

      Dropbox: "We will delete your data after you cancel"
      --Ok, that is completely expected

      Dropbox: " ... And also we won't let you get a local copy of it, sorry. If you stop paying your data is just GONE."
      --Ok, that is not expected.

    16. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This changes cloud storage from what it should be used for, i.e. one of multiple backup options that is handy when it is available, into "the basket in which all my eggs are stored." And you're renting the basket.

      Now that is just not true. It is a second basket (the first being the console itself).

      Don't get me wrong, its still a shitty arrangement. But no need to make up lies when the truth is damning all on its own.

    17. Re: Yeah, and? by JeremyEthridge7 · · Score: 1

      The reason they disallow saved on as cards is because they is how you can install homebrew on the Wii and Wii u. Thy want to keep switch locked as long as possible.

    18. Re: Yeah, and? by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

      Once again producers cripple the product for their entire paying customer base in order to fight off copyright infr8ngers that never would've bought the product in the first place. I really expected better from Nintendo.

    19. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      save games could be mined. To better map the player.

    20. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dropbox: " ... And also we won't let you get a local copy of it, sorry. If you stop paying your data is just GONE." --Ok, that is not expected.

      This is your brain on drugs.

    21. Re:Yeah, and? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Interestingly Microsoft only does this on the Xbox One, I pulled out my 360 recently thinking I could backup the saved games on the console and despite updates you cannot push them w/o Gold .

    22. Re:Yeah, and? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      The question I have is: how about the competition? Does Sony or Microsoft keep your cloud saves (that you need to pay for)? If they are not, then this article is FUD.

      As the update mentions, Sony keeps them for 6 months, Microsoft apparently keeps them forever.

      But more important is the fact that Nintendo doesn't allow you to backup your saves to local storage. The PlayStation 4 at the very least does -- you can take saves from local storage and/or the cloud, and write them to any suitably formatted USB device (and back to a PS4, naturally). So with Nintendo, you're stuck either using their service, or losing your saves altogether.

      Yaz

    23. Re: Yeah, and? by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1

      Yeah fine, can't expect it, but, why can't you make a local backup of that data? I don't think it would be an issue if people could store it themselves. The inability to do so is what makes it nefarious. Assuming I'm reading the policy correctly. I sure hope I'm not.

    24. Re:Yeah, and? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Why would any expect Nintendo (or any company) to continue to store your data when you stopped paying for the service?

      Because other popular services, such as Steam and GOG, already do this for us for free? GOG Galaxy supports cloud saves for literally every single game in their entire library. For Steam, developers have to explicitly add support for cloud saves. In either case, however, the user never pays a cent beyond the original purchase price for the game, and the saves are kept in perpetuity, so far as I know.

      The fact that Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo haven't yet baked the cost of storing cloud saves into the cost of the hardware or software is something that I hope they'll rethink with the next generation. It's 2018 and storage is cheap. Being stingy about keeping cloud saves at this point comes across as arbitrary penny-pinching that degrades the user experience significantly.

    25. Re:Yeah, and? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The rub here is that Nintendo disallows local storage

      Not quite. Nintendo disallows *external* or *removable* storage. Cloud save is only a backup of the saves on the device. Once you let your subscription lapse you will still have all your save games.

      Just don't send your Switch in for repair. This is actually the same as it has been since the original Wii with saves tied to the device.

    26. Re: Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is false, you can't store save data on the console. Did you even read?

    27. Re: Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the Homebrew Channel on my Wii and I never have used it to play copied games. I only use it for two purposes. The first is to play indie homebrew games. Most of them are fucking awful piles of trash, but "Pissed!" is awesome. The second purpose is to rip games I own so I can test their compatibility side-by-side in emulators, as well as to keep a more reliable digital backup that isn't prone to scratches and wear.

    28. Re:Yeah, and? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Why would any expect Nintendo (or any company) to continue to store your data when you stopped paying for the service?

      Why would Nintendo (or any company) expect me to resubscribe after they deleted my data?

    29. Re:Yeah, and? by Ormy · · Score: 1

      Most of YOUR comments might be insightful (but because you posted AC I have no idea which future posts belong to you), but looking at _all_ AC comments, the vast majority of them are trash by trolls. A significant proportion are just apk and his impersonators trolling each other. Another significant fraction are trump-related (when the submission is not even political), and most of the rest are random racist outburts.

  2. This is the same with PS+ Subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this news?

  3. insight comment below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok

  4. So in other words.. by CptLoRes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are holding your save data hostage for money.

    1. Re:So in other words.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart. It will keep people paying. Good business practice.

      Oh you may not think so, but nobody cares.

    2. Re:So in other words.. by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 1

      Not quite. You still have your save data on your Switch, completely accessible offline. Once you play your games after your online subscription expires, the online copies will be outdated anyways.

      And if you don't pay for online long enough, then they aren't holding onto a copy of your save data any longer, so it's not held hostage for money for very long.

      I do wonder how long it takes before they delete saves. Are we talking two weeks, or six months?

      Would be nice to have an offline backup to SD card option.

    3. Re: So in other words.. by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1
      Smart. It will keep people paying. Good business practice. Oh you may not think so, but nobody cares.

      Yeah, they spend millions upon millions of dollars for PR and marketing because nobodofy cares what you think. Companies fire employees at the mere suggestion that they may have masturbated while thinking of a woman, and they cowtow to the Twitter outrage machine cause they is so swaggeringly cool that they don't care what anybody thinks. Awwww yeah, baby, shit , motherfuckers better recognize, fool, Nintendo don't take no shit from nobody ya heard? They do what they want and man my balls are so big right now I'm going to go get my Anonymous Coward on and tell people how it is yeah yeah! Fuck you people and uour opinion, nobody cares!

      Oh man I so did it! I so told them what was up. I wish my girl could have seen me. Fuck it, I'm takin the laptop to Wendy's so she can see.

      A pimp gotta do what a pimp gotta do.

    4. Re:So in other words.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart, in the sense that mugging or burglary is smart. It gets you more money at other people's expense, and getting more money is what you want.

      You can say that is a good business practice too, but that does nothing to address any actual criticism of the practice.

    5. Re: So in other words.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you couldn't store save data on switch?

  5. Cloud for standby/backup only! by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    Memorise that mantra. Cloud infrastructure should never be used as a first resort. The savings are illusory.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    1. Re:Cloud for standby/backup only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more... encrypted backup only.

      Don't store cleartext in the cloud. Even if it is something you don't care if anyone else sees, you should still encrypt so it is less clear what the "important" data is.

    2. Re:Cloud for standby/backup only! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Cloud" has so many meanings that it's not clear which one you are talking about.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Cloud for standby/backup only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cloud for standby/backup only!

      This would be Insightful for articles other than the Nintendo Switch, but this article is about the Nintendo Switch. There is no mechanism within the Nintendo Switch OS which allows you to backup your saves on external media. The Cloud is not only the first resort for backup, it is the only resort.

      Again, to be abundantly clear: The only way to perform backups of your save files on a non-rooted Nintendo Switch device is to use the subscription cloud backup.

      I'm sure a lot of non-Switch owners (most people commenting on this Slashdot article, it seems) would say it's terrible. But hey, wanna know what's more terrible? I am nearly 100% certain that I will buy ANOTHER Switch once Animal Crossing is released in 2019, knowing full well that the device is competely locked-down like that. (There's no way I'd be able to share it with my partner anymore when AC is released, so I'll definitely need a second Switch in this household.) Nintendo will absolutely get away with the cloud subscription lock-in, because they have products and experiences that can't be matched by their competitors.

    4. Re:Cloud for standby/backup only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am nearly 100% certain that I will buy ANOTHER Switch once Animal Crossing is released in 2019, knowing full well that the device is competely locked-down like that.

      What's wrong with all your other copies of Animal Crossing? You want to start over from scratch without losing your old town? Just backup your...oh...right. Seriously, though, I'd imagine you already have a couple of 2DSs or DSs and can play Animal Crossing that way. Use hacking tools to backup any old towns you have and then blank them if you do want to start over. There's even a way now to play most DS games on the 2DS/3DS without a flash cart (Animal Crossing: Wild World is listed as Green) if you want to dump all your games on one system without having to drag all the game carts around.

      Obviously in the end you'll do whatever you want, but I really do hope you reconsider. This is yet another example of Nintendo's abusive behavior, locking out a legitimate use cases for really no reason except out of control issues. The whole "products and experiences" thing is also the same logic used to justify Apple's controlling behavior.

      Maybe you don't realize it, but making excuses for the other party in an abusive, controlling relationship is very bad. It removes the ability to have a healthy perspective on what is actually acceptable or not. Often times, it's easier to pretend you like the abuse and you're definitely making choices you really want to avoid admitting you're a victim. I hope for your sake you really are a masochist and it really is your choice.

  6. Well in that case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the orange buffoon doesn't have any saved games because his sub is going to get canceled while he's in prison. Special thanks go to out to Manafort for doing the right thing by flipping.

    Tough break, Trumpanzees: you voted for a lifelong conman who sold you out to Putin.

  7. Expectation to NOT delete data? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I'm getting the idea that the author of this little article has been brainwashed into the idea that companies are *supposed* to save your data, after you ask them to delete it. That's pretty sad.

    Delete my account, delete my data, please. That's what's supposed to happen in the first place.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Expectation to NOT delete data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delete my account, delete my data, please. That's what's supposed to happen in the first place.

      The point of "cloud storage" is to provide a backup of your saves in case you want to transfer those saves to another device with the same account, restore an old save, transfer to a new device for whatever reason, etc. The point is, it's precisely meant to be a backup and simply wiping the second the account ends just sounds like a horrible backup program policy.

      Yes, if you *ask* to have it deleted, that's one thing. If the data is more about their profiling you and not about you keeping your own data, yes make it opt out of it automatically being deleted. It's pretty stupid, though, to delete all the data because a customer lapsed in making a monthly payment on time. Or, at least is if you want to be considered at all reliable.

    2. Re: Expectation to NOT delete data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking idiot. We are talking about saved data from games. Not your porn habits.

  8. Remember to boycott Smash Brothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hit them where it hurts.

  9. Lol @ Nazi faggot pretending to be able to read! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't read, so pretending you ever subscribed to the NYT or any other accredited journal is like pretending Trump isn't going to die in Federal prison a traitor. Good luck with that traitor faggots lol. Too fucking cute.

  10. There is one - PS4 Plus does NOT delete by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why would any expect Nintendo (or any company) to continue to store your data

    Because it's a BACKUP SERVICE. And the way to really make money is to make people pay for retrieval, and to actually have the backups...

    I have to say I am *really* happy with Sony precisely because they did this. I had a PS Plus subscription I let lapse accidentally as the CC I didn't realize I had been using had the number changed. So I'm 80+ hours into Horizon Zero dawn when a system update totally borks the drive, non-recoverable, full reset only option. I had been lax with the direct backups so it didn't even have the game on it, so I went to PS Plus - and found the account expired! But out of desperation I re-signed up and all of my stored saves were there - I was very lucky and ended up just losing a few days of play.

    Now maybe after a year or something, sure, delete the data. But there should be a decent amount of time where people who just made dumb mistakes with auto-pay can restore what they have, and the amount of goodwill a company earns from something like that is incalculable (for some odd reason mentally I give Sony more credit for keeping my saves than having an update fry the filesystem in the first place).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:There is one - PS4 Plus does NOT delete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a BACKUP SERVICE.

      No, it's not. This is data they won't even allow you to have a local copy of in the first place. That's something completely different.

    2. Re:There is one - PS4 Plus does NOT delete by shess · · Score: 1

      Why would any expect Nintendo (or any company) to continue to store your data

      Because it's a BACKUP SERVICE. And the way to really make money is to make people pay for retrieval, and to actually have the backups...

      I have to say I am *really* happy with Sony precisely because they did this. I had a PS Plus subscription I let lapse accidentally as the CC I didn't realize I had been using had the number changed.

      Ha! I had to resort to purchasing prepaid cards from the local supermarket to fund my Playstation account, because they couldn't charge my cards or PayPal. Customer service wanted to know if I was sure I had entered my credit-card information correctly (sure thing, dumbass, I've never used a credit card before, thanks for the tip!). So I think this is a mixed bag, they might intend to do one thing, but then in technical terms they might do an entirely not-what-you-wanted thing.

      Now maybe after a year or something, sure, delete the data. But there should be a decent amount of time where people who just made dumb mistakes with auto-pay can restore what they have, and the amount of goodwill a company earns from something like that is incalculable (for some odd reason mentally I give Sony more credit for keeping my saves than having an update fry the filesystem in the first place).

      We're talking metadata, here. They could save all the data for all the people for all time and it probably won't add up to a terabyte of data. The biggest reason to delete old data is simply book-keeping - if someone dials back in after ten years unpaid, it's not a question of whether you can still restore their data, it's a question of whether you even want to deal with them, because the upside is really limited.

      Certainly not a week or two weeks, I've been on camping trips longer than that. I'd say a year is a minimum, but honestly I'd go with 18 months or even two years. Why? Why not.

      There's also a super-crazy notion ... maybe just keep the damned things as long as you can successfully connect and use the system they were saved from. That way you don't have to make multiple subtle support decisions.

  11. Just Say No to gaymez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont gayme. problem solved. bitz saved. bandwidth saved. time saved. internet fagz nulled. win-win.

    1. Re: Just Say No to gaymez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this... are you an adult?

  12. No it is not by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I can verify that after I restored a lapsed PS Plus subscription, I still had all my save data.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Reasons like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's reasons like this I have finally given up on Nintendo and my last console from them will be the wii u.

    There is always something. Like the fact on the wii purchased games weren't bound to the console.

    That combined with the fact that all their games are mostly sequels or are third party titles available on pc anyway, screw them.

  14. No local save, no thanks by fox171171 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find the thing people are ignoring, and yet is the most important thing, is:

    But Nintendo also said it will continue not allowing local backups of save data to an SD card or other outside storage.

    I see no reason to ever own such a device. After hearing that, I wouldn't use a Nintendo Switch if someone gave me one.

    1. Re:No local save, no thanks by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There IS local save. There is no backup of local saves other than to the cloud. This is also been the case for 12 years now. People losing save data when sending their Wiis into repair has been common for a long time.

      After hearing that, I wouldn't use a Nintendo Switch if someone gave me one.

      That's a lot of talk right there. I'm going to call you out for virtue signalling.

    2. Re:No local save, no thanks by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      There IS local save. There is no backup of local saves other than to the cloud. This is also been the case for 12 years now. People losing save data when sending their Wiis into repair has been common for a long time.

      After hearing that, I wouldn't use a Nintendo Switch if someone gave me one.

      That's a lot of talk right there. I'm going to call you out for virtue signalling.

      I misunderstood, thinking there was no local save options at all. I most certainly would not pay a subscription to save games. Not allowing local backup sucks, but is not as bad as I had interpreted.

    3. Re:No local save, no thanks by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I most certainly would not pay a subscription to save games.

      Agreed, that opinion I would completely stand behind.

  15. Re:Remember to boycott Smash Brothers by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Smash isn't the sort of game I would ever want to play in the first place. I am holding on and waiting for the new Animal Crossing to come out on Switch.

  16. Re:Lol @ Nazi faggot pretending to be able to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to respond with a pithy comeback, but I'm unable to read your witty prose.

  17. ajhahahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As more details come out about Nintendo's online program it reeks of amateurs trying to build an online service. Sad really.

  18. could you imagine paying for steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online content these days are gimmicks to get people to use your platform. They're a value add; not a product you bolt onto the console because you still lack a functioning online service. Paying for online is like paying to walk into Walmart, no thanks.

  19. This reads morelike a CYA by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Nintendo obviously aren't willing to hold on to data for longer than it remains profitable. If someone decides to take a break for a few years then it may make sense to delete all information about them. At the very least, Nintendo wants to make sure it has this option.

    Cost of storage and the bad PR means they probably won't. I feel those who do lose their data are in first world problems territory though.

  20. Nintendo are notoriously backwards with this stuff by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    They're utterly terrible. What keeps them going is really well polished and fun games that appeal to kids and family.

    The switch is apparently a pretty great indie console and transcends the home / portable functionality really well but by god their online services have always been incredibly mind blowingly backwards. The voice chat I believe requires the use of a cell phone or some incredibly complicated cabling mess for example.

    Never every buy a Nintendo console, with the expectation of even 1/3 of the features of the other 2.

    Worst part (like many modern, locked down devices [Apple!]) is that the potential of the device is wasted, due to poor restrictions. It has a display, speakers, wifi, inputs, storage etc - but how many of the great things possible are allowed?
    Frustrating to enounter arbitrary limitations, something Nintendo excel at.

  21. Re: Remember to boycott Smash Brothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea because you are a flaming fucking faggot LOL.

  22. Re:Nintendo are notoriously backwards with this st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, the only thing of value that Nintendo puts out anymore is their first-party games. They've been complete fuck-ups at making competitive console hardware since the N64. I'm not sure whether to call the SNES or the GBA their last greatest system, but in any case both of those are discontinued. The Wii Remote was probably the most innovative thing they've made since, but I've got more praise for that controller than I do for the console it was connected to.

    I've decided that their games, while fun, are worth missing out on if it means not dealing with the headache that is dealing with Nintendo's bullshit when it comes to console design and online services. I wish they would give up on the hardware business and start making Mario and Zelda games available on Steam. They'd probably make a lot more money doing that instead of their current business model of bullying money out of those who want to save, translate or preserve their legally purchased video games.