Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Is Reviving the Chronological Timeline (engadget.com)

In a series of tweets, Twitter announced it will be bringing back the purely chronological timeline in the coming weeks. Currently, the timeline is set up to deliver tweets that people "might have missed" or things supposedly "liked" by people they follow, but some have complained that it misses tweets. Engadget reports: A change that's in place now, is Twitter's "Show the best Tweets first" setting. Starting today, if a user has it turned off it will also eliminate the "In case you missed it" roundups and suggested tweets from people you don't follow. It sounds like exactly the change people have been looking for, and even pursued by setting up filters on their own like the one found at RealTwitter.com.

35 comments

  1. Kavanaugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    The rapist's timeline is to be on review, for all the world to see!

    1. Re:Kavanaugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      LOCK THE RAPIST UP! Which one? THE PRESIDENT OR HIS SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, BOTH RAPIST RACISTS? Wait, I'm NOT making this up? Wow, that's kind of a series of new lows. Trump is a traitor also, wow. Lots of wow.

  2. Twitter can suck my dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Fuck twitter. Twitter is a bunch of N1GGER lovers.

  3. Good. by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good. Algorithmic timelines are shit.

    1. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I kind of like when cynical incompetence shoot their feet.

    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You should see creimer's timeline; absolutely out of this space! I ain't surprised that he's got chased by an alien mob and Bob Bigelow at some alien con that he is supposed to have attended.

      Anyway, his current timeline is bragging on /. about providing video material to pedophiles and sex tourists!

      You don't believe me? See his own very recent slashdot posts linked below:

      creimer wrote:
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Have you seen creimer's children band video [youtu.be]? Holy shit! That video got hundreds

      and:
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      No. Thanks to YOU for calling me a pedophile. It has become my best performing video in th

      and:
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Thanks to your Pedobear buddies, I got 25 hours of watch time in three days and coming in

      So basically creimer, you are bragging about providing video material to pedophiles and se

      Poor Chris, sad, very sad...

      How long will it be before you do the right thing and take that video off line?

       

  4. Feature was horrible by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most egregious aspect of the "tweets you might have missed" section was that almost always it was TWEETS I HAD ALREADY SEEN!!!!

    I might have even left on that feature, if it simply removed any tweet I had already loaded from the server. Having a bunch of tweets I had already seen first masked the newer tweets I might actually have wanted to see.

    I have no faith that Twitter can get anything right so I turned that checkmark right off. Just show me a simple timeline Twitter, if you can handle it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Feature was horrible by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The most egregious aspect of the "tweets you might have missed" section was that almost always it was TWEETS I HAD ALREADY SEEN!!!!

      I've seen the following more than once:

      (Tweet about x)

      Tweets you might have missed:

      (The exact same dammed tweet!)

      The problem isn't the "Tweets you might have missed" as much as the function is implemented so badly.

    2. Re:Feature was horrible by antdude · · Score: 1

      Huh? I didn't know you could disable it. I guess I will go find it!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  5. Twitter fucking sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Use Mastodan if you really must microblog your life, but really if you just wanna talk shit, go on irc with a vpn. Corporate social media is hazardous to your health.

  6. Superliar Kendall increments the Lie-o-meter by 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    YOU HAVE NO JOB YOU SPEND ALL DAY LYING ON SLASHDOT WHO PAYS FOR FAGGOT SHIT LIKE THAT A: NOBODY

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  7. Re:Twitter Is Great by BeauHD+(4) · · Score: -1

    Hay guys, I tested out the Feed and here is as follows. It works!

    Beau Hamilton @BeauHD Sep 14
    My first name and last two initials flipped to make it sound more techy. When I first started making tech videos, everyone thought I was copying @MKBHD. I certainly got some inspiration from him, but there’s more to it than just “high definition.”

    Beau Hamilton @BeauHD Sep 14
    Prior to "BeauHD," it was "HowToAndMore" because I was obsessed with making how-to videos for them views (not many people were making tutorials at the time.) The "More" opened the door for other content... But in the end, it's not a very personal handle so I changed it.

    Beau Hamilton @BeauHD Sep 14
    I also realized that I actually really liked technology and consumer electronics in particular. So I started making product reviews... and the rest was history.

    Everything. In Order. Yay.

    xXx...::-=][xXxBeauHDxXx][=-xXx::...
    [S e n i o r /\/\/\ e d i t o R]

  8. (f)Elon Musk wont be helped by that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Look out (f)Elon, your mouth is gonna cost you a cool 20 million for repeatedly defaming that British child rescuer, you fucking dope smoking retard!

  9. use search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    just use http://realtwitter.com

  10. Huh? by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    Huh, I feel like an idiot right now, arn’t timlenes chronolgicsl or invese chronological by the nature of tjem beeing timelines?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do we have a doctor in the room?

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good god, man, you're slipping out of the timeline!

    3. Re:Huh? by Spamalope · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not when they're Animal Farm (TM) timelines where some times are more equal than others.

      Given that it's twitter, I'd suspect it's influenced by ad impression traction (engagement/clickbaity-ness), paid promotion and politics. If the feed is curated by them, the opportunity to 'fully monetize' the situation or use it for political advocacy without outright appearing to do that is greatly improved - and they can gradually increase it as users get used to it as long as they get traction at first. I wonder if they'll really turn it off, or only split the difference so it's less bad than the current option but leaning the direction they want.

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who?

    5. Re:Huh? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Huh, I feel like an idiot right now, arn’t timlenes chronolgicsl or invese chronological by the nature of tjem beeing timelines?

      You'd think, huh?

      But timelines that aren't really chronological are in fact the special sauce that these glorified micro-blogging platforms (Facebook, Twitter) have brought to the table.

  11. so timelines are going to be timelines now ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is there some other kind of timeline?

    1. Re: so timelines are going to be timelines now ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      In made up unicorn liberal land there is yes. In the magic land where a 36 year old nefarious claim of groping can be construed as rape. This wacky world we now live in.

  12. *face palm* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Could you idiots and trolls ever shut up for even one minute. You're an angry demonratloser and tour pharma cut has affected ou. Oh wait...sorry youre all rich..sure l. We get it. You believe in open borders and "illegals first".

    Enjoy the tailored blue tweets you see when you log in but don't forget mine are red and I don't give a crap how rodents like you think. Bring November

  13. *face palm* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Ok. So a 36 year old erroneous and Ill timed accusation about what may be considered groping is now rape..

    Go back to the nursery sjw loser. You are a long way out of your depth.

  14. Use tweetdeck.twitter.com by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    This shit don't reach that :D

    1. Re:Use tweetdeck.twitter.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so sure about that. I added a column consisting of a user's tweets.It was in fact missing a few tweets that appeared on the user's timeline.

    2. Re:Use tweetdeck.twitter.com by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I think it doesn't happens (maybe yet...) It's why third party clients are needed (personally, I use the https://play.google.com/store/... on the phone, and https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/ on the Desktop [at least, for now])

  15. Wow - and they’re doing it right by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I just logged into Twitter to uncheck this new setting because OF COURSE I WOULD... and they actually have it already unchecked by default!

    You get a rare “Kudos!” From me today, Twitter.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  16. Twitter is a dumpster fire by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    Maybe people who have been using Twitter from the start have managed to follow the changes to how things are presented. For those of us who just occasionally click a link that lands us in the service, it's simply a mess. Tweets seems to be vaguely chronological, but only vaguely. There's simply no obvious way to know what has been selected for your viewing pleasure, and what has been omitted. And this doesn't even get into the whole question of censorship.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Twitter is a dumpster fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world is crying out for a Usenet for tweets.

  17. First slashdotting? by everyplace · · Score: 1

    Pretty excited that http://realtwitter.com/ gets the shout-out in this post (see this tweet for background information). Also excited that Twitter decided to implement this functionality for real.

  18. Fuck Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should any of us care about some dumb social media site for brain-damaged teenage girls and homos?

    Ah, right their advertising dollars. "Follow Slashdot on Twitter - because having our own web site sux!"

  19. It was reported.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was reported that autism was the reason for the change.

  20. See this less often by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    I always click on see this less often, yet it's always there regardless. It trained me to stop going there. Maybe I'll be less annoyed with future visits.

  21. Lack of feature is now a feature? by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

    This is how it always should have worked. It would have still worked this way if not for bone-headed design ideas. Its not so much trying to improve as it is walking back a bunch of terrible ideas.

    The sad part is other sites like Facebook don't even give you this option. Who the hell is designing these social media sites? I hate hate hate hate this "you'll do things our way and you'll like it" mentality. Give me options. Give me choice. Give me freedom.

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-