Slashdot Mirror


People Tend To Cluster Into Four Distinct Personality 'Types,' Says Study (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A new study has sifted through some of the largest online data sets of personality quizzes and identified four distinct "types" therein. The new methodology used for this study -- described in detail in a new paper in Nature Human Behavior -- is rigorous and replicable, which could help move personality typing analysis out of the dubious self-help section in your local bookstore and into serious scientific journals. What's new here is the identification of four dominant clusters in the overall distribution of traits. [Paper co-author William Revelle (Northwestern University)] prefers to think of them as "lumps in the batter" and suggests that a good analogy would be how people tend to concentrate in cities in the United States. The Northwestern researchers used publicly available data from online quizzes taken by 1.5 million people around the world. That data was then plotted in accordance with the so-called Big Five basic personality traits: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. The Big Five is currently the professional standard for social psychologists who study personality. (Here's a good summary of what each of those traits means to psychologists.) They then applied their algorithms to the resulting dataset. Here are the four distinct personality clusters that the researchers ended up with:

Average: These people score high in neuroticism and extraversion, but score low in openness. It is the most typical category, with women being more likely than men to fit into it.
Reserved: This type of person is stable emotionally without being especially open or neurotic. They tend to score lower on extraversion but tend to be somewhat agreeable and conscientious.
Role Models: These people score high in every trait except neuroticism, and the likelihood that someone fits into this category increases dramatically as they age. "These are people who are dependable and open to new ideas," says Amaral. "These are good people to be in charge of things." Women are more likely than men to be role models.
Self-Centered: These people score very high in extraversion, but score low in openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Most teenage boys would fall into this category, according to Revelle, before (hopefully) maturing out of it. The number of people who fall into this category decreases dramatically with age.

27 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Average? by DatbeDank · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like this article is calling out basic bitches.

    Shame because the phenomena crosses the genders.

  2. Reliable data source by sphealey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - - - - - A new study has sifted through some of the largest online data sets of personality quizzes and identified... - - - - -

    There's a reliable data source, free from built-in bias ("INQPTJLMNOP!") and hidden assumptions ("INTROVERT!")

    1. Re:Reliable data source by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Even if most personality quizzes were answered honestly, rather than giving ridiculous answers being practically the point of taking them, the data set would still suffer a horrible selection bias in that it only evaluates the sort of people who like taking obviously nonsensical personality quizzes.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  3. humors me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >largest online data sets of personality quizzes

    LOL, no wonder there's a replication crisis in the social sciences field.

  4. Please, we've been over this. by sheramil · · Score: 2

    The four personality types are: moist and warm, warm and dry, dry and cold, and cold and moist.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism

  5. There are two types by PPH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those who divide people into two types and those who don't.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  6. slashdotters...5th type? by avandesande · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where is reserved and neurotic?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  7. Weird. I saw it the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It looks like the article is calling males Average, self-centered, or betas; it's promoting that most organizations should be run by older women.

    Look. They even bias the categories by labeling one of them "Role Models". Fuck that noise; I think extroverts are not role models; I think the world would be better served by promoting the reserved to higher positions—and you'll note that's the only category where they conveniently leave out gender.

    1. Re:Weird. I saw it the opposite by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      'Role models' are the people that have figured out the 'right' answers to personality test questions.

      Why it increases with age, people learn to lie better.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: Weird. I saw it the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Capitalism rewards a small subset of objectively good human qualities, and some objectively bad qualities. Financial success is not a good indicator of how well an individual fits into society.
      Two examples: Being close to your children helps them mature into well rounded adults, but often requires you to work less. Being self-centered and opportunistic makes you money but no friends.

    3. Re:Weird. I saw it the opposite by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Here is how it works, average people, people who don't understand what is going on but are trying to socially participate as much as possible, believing it is the right thing to do, maybe. Reserved, people who understand what is going on but only want to participate as much as is necessary because yeah, most of what is going on is utter bullshit based in empty beliefs. Role models, don't think high level role models, think low level role models, how to cook, clean and look after yourself, the value of good manners and positive social interactions, pretty much how to be a good mud monkey (not so much a role model into profound human thought and the progression of humanity). Self centred, basically bad genes, the psychopaths and the narcissists, not making them in the first place, the only sound solution, they provide nothing but chaos, all they claim to achieve can be proven to be the work of others and most of their failures are blamed upon others when they can get away with it with lies.

      Three of the four work well for human society. The fourth is just a fuck up and should be eliminated and once they are the other three will live much better together.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:Weird. I saw it the opposite by pots · · Score: 2

      It looks like the article is calling males Average, self-centered, or betas; it's promoting that most organizations should be run by older women.

      What are you reading? It specifically says, in the summary no less, that females are more likely to be average. And the word "beta" appears nowhere in any of the linked articles or the summary or anywhere except in your post. And why would it? A/B personality theory has been pretty soundly rejected, it mostly only persists in pop psychology.

  8. Misandric Much? by DatbeDank · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lot of male hating going on in this so called study. Self centered especially.

    Also women are more average and role models? So what is it? Can't have more of each unless they're 50/50.

    With all due respect, most women make terrible role models, especially for boys. They tend to be stuck in their ways and offer advice from their own feminine perspective discounting what boys really need to do in order to strike out on their own.

    Sorry mlds for the unpopular truth. I'll take a hit in karma because that's the reality of what I've seen.

    1. Re:Misandric Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, you misunderstood what the summary said. The statements "women are more likely than men to be average" and "women are more likely than men to be role models" do not contradict, because they do NOT imply "most women are average" and "most women are role models". Nor does stating that "most teenage boys are self-centered" automatically imply misandry, especially if the stats back it up.

      Second, don't confuse their definition of "role model" with your commonsense use of the term. For example, agreeableness is one of the dominant traits in their definition of "role model," and that seems intuitive since people like agreeable people. HOWEVER, agreeableness is negatively correlated with success in business and especially in leadership. If you have aspirations of being a leader or doing well in business, it would make sense for you to pick "role models" (commonsense use) who have been successful in these spheres, and hence likely would have levels of agreeableness too low to fit in their personality category.

      Third....yeah, teenage boys are self-centered. You know it's true. I will also throw in my two cents: all other things being equal, the more extroverted a person is, the more of an asshole that person tends to be (regardless of gender).

    2. Re:Misandric Much? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Teenagers are self centered, duh. Calling out boys is what makes it misandry.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Misandric Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude have you ever seen a single chick flick in your entire life. If teenage boys are simply self centred then teenage girls are frankly sadistic in comparison.

  9. Oh, for fuck's sake. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pop-psych trivia doesn't belong on /.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  10. Read the Article Yesterday by mentil · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 'Average' category was criticized by some of the authors for being 'weak', as it's the largest cluster yet not particularly descriptive. It has yet to be proven that these 4 categories actually correlate with anything important, although follow-up research is checking if Role Models have greater career success.
    Also, these are just clusters, individuals can fall outside of these combinations. One bright spot is that the clusters were named after they were found, rather than before, so they weren't trying to hammer data to fit preconceptions of personality types.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  11. I've been hearing this crap for years by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    one time at I had to go through one of these personality tests to tell me which group I fit into. I was annoying, but me and my coworkers went from pretty annoyed to pissed when we learned the company paid $2k/each for the privilege. They could have just given us that $2k as a bonus and out moral woulda shot up. This was when I made a lot less money and $2k would have been an event.

    My point is this personality crap is usually just an excuse to sell corporate seminars.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  12. I've done my own study... by WolfgangVL · · Score: 4, Funny

    And have concluded that:

    The majority of people are unsalted peanuts. This is the biggest category of people, because salt costs money.

    The second largest category is salted peanuts. This category is filled mostly with middle age humans, as they have had a few years to gather enough salt.

    The third and final category is candied peanuts. This category is 100% comprised of drug dealers and sex workers.

    There is also peanut butter, but that is an unrelated category.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  13. No they don't by aybiss · · Score: 2

    They don't.

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  14. Of course there are only four types of people by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 2

    I don't fall into any of those described categories. I guess that means I'm not a person?

  15. Re:Introverts are more self centered and neurotic by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    Demonstrably incorrect.

    Extroverts process externally, and because of this fact, are more visible doing whatever they do because: external processing is more visible and audible compared to introverts. This has the appearance of being more demonstrable, but is only emotive reaction visible to others because it's on display for all.

    It's actions that count, and both do about the same actions in terms of sympathy and empathy, e.g. "caring". Some process inside. Others do not. They both care.

    tl;dr: Extroverts can't help themselves be known, as introverts cannot help themselves be less known by listening. You can hear one more loudly than the other. Doesn't mean they don't both care, and equally.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  16. Re:Four is the magic number. by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    My grandma had watermelons, earthmelons, firemelons and airmelons. The four elemelons.

  17. Hold the press! Four is the new Twelve!!! by Mjlner · · Score: 2

    Here I was thinking that there are twelve distinct personality types! Then along came the sixteen Meyers-Briggs Personality Types.... And I was all like "whaa..." And now this... I thought there'd be more, not less!

    Twelve was wrong. Sixteen was wrong...

    But hang on a sec... What do Twelve and Sixteen have in common?
    THE FACTOR FOUR!!! Yes!!! It all makes sense now! Yes!!! I've been so blind all my life!

    And looking around, thinking about my family, friends, colleagues, relatives... Indeed, they are essentially four personalities. Yup, this explains EVERYTHING!

    --
    Lemon curry???
  18. only 1 introvert category? by tommeke100 · · Score: 2

    So there are 3 extravert categories and only 1 introvert? Being an introvert makes you automatically stable emotionally, agreeable and conscientious.
    There are only two types of psychology research: garbage and complete garbage.

  19. 10 kinds of people: ones who understand binary... by mcswell · · Score: 2

    "The Northwestern researchers used publicly available data from online quizzes taken by 1.5 million people around the world."

    There's actually a fifth kind of person: the kind that doesn't take online personality quizzes.