Slashdot Mirror


Ex-NSA Employee Gets 5 Years In Prison For Taking Home Top Secret Files (cnet.com)

Former NSA employee Nghia Hoang Pho, 64, was sentenced to five and a half years in prison for taking top secret U.S. defense files to his home. Pho pleaded guilty in December to willful retention of national defense information, the U.S. Justice Department said in a statement. The maximum sentence for this crime is 10 years, but prosecutors were recommending a sentence of eight years. CNET reports: Pho, a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from Vietnam, worked in the NSA's Tailored Access Group, the agency's team that focuses on tools that can directly hack surveillance targets. Between 2010 and March 2015, Pho took home paper and digital copies of U.S. government documents and writings that contained national defense information on them, the Justice Department said. Pho reportedly had antivirus software from Kaspersky Lab on his home computer network and the software scooped up the top secret information as part of its virus scanning process. Kaspersky has acknowledged that its software lifted hacking tools from a home computer in 2014 but said it wasn't part of an intentional effort to steal information from the NSA. Pho said in court he took the materials home so he could put in more work to earn a promotion, according to CBS Baltimore.

174 comments

  1. Extra work by datavirtue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In this case it looks like bringing work home did in fact affect his work life balance.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    1. Re:Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vietcoMs are still at it

    2. Re:Extra work by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Only place where bringing home work with you would mess that more would be if you're OB/GYN....

      --
      bickerdyke
    3. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of that work brings itself home for you.

      Gyno exams are fun to watch. I go with my wife to hers (male).

    4. Re: Extra work by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "I go with my wife to hers (male)."

      So. Much. Confusion.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheâ(TM)s a girl (male).

    6. Re: Extra work by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "Sheâ(TM)s a girl (male)."

      She. The wife, or the Gyno?

      And of course the other question...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go with my wife (that is female) to her gyno ( that is male) and watch him examine her. It's hot seeing her have to disrobe and expose her breasts and genitals to him, then watch as he examines her breasts, opens her with the speculum and then puts his fingers in her vagina and rectum.

    8. Re: Extra work by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Clarity.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    9. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same thing. I guess now you know why your wife has so many OB-GYN appointments.

    10. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are swingers so that's not really a problem... she's convinced several of her female friends to get nude for me. They think it's funny and aren't modest. No touching for those, but still nice seeing them sans clothing.

    11. Re:Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only place where bringing home work with you would mess that more would be if you're OB/GYN....

      Or executioner.

    12. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are swingers so that's not really a problem... she's convinced several of her female friends to get nude for me. They think it's funny and aren't modest. No touching for those, but still nice seeing them sans clothing.

      So why get married if you don't want monogamy?

    13. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's more to marriage than sex. Are you really that stupid?

    14. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage isn't about love or sex. It's about religion and insecurity.

    15. Re: Extra work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people say dumb things online

  2. One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...another rule for Hilary.

    1. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Elite status has it's perks.

      Seriously, this IS the same kind of thing, putting classified information on unclassified computers. I don't know if Hillary actually was the one who copied the classified stuff down, but it was on her unclassified E-mail system and apparently she sent and received such information.

      I suppose the "ignorance" defense, "I didn't know it was classified" is worth something, but if this guy gets 8 years, shouldn't those responsible for the classified information on Clinton's E-mail server be held accountable in some way? A strongly worded letter in the employment file, retraining on procedures or something? Yet nothing happened.

      Yes, it sure looks like a double standard. Unless he can get a reduced sentence by claiming that he never intended to put classified data at risk... Apparently James Comey wasn't doing this investigation.

    2. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ignorance defense wasn't worth shit, as the documents found had the classification markings still on them. There's no chance you become Secretary of State without being able to recognize a classification marking, and receive training on the proper care and handling of documents with those markings.

      This is completely a double standard.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [One rule for the rank and file... ] ...another rule for Hilary.

      History will judge Hillary and Bill and those who conspired with them, and it will not be kind.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    4. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      History judges no one and no thing.

      People, you and I for instance, consider history and make our own judgments. But the judgment of true justice is lacking in this example. No real consequences suffered, and the claim that this cost someone their opportunity to gain an office of the highest responsibility is even made betrays a misunderstanding of just how deep the betrayal was.

      No, there is yet no justice in this 'matter'. And as such, it only encourages future abuses and betrayals. Even if somehow there is a reckoning, it is so delayed it will be seen as none at all.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even ignoring that, she should have been brought up on obstruction of justice charges for "losing" all those files that would be needed to assess the situation. She also likely violated the law with regards to public records as those records should have been screen to verify that there weren't any public records involved. While many of those emails were classified at the time, there were others that won't and classified documents frequently get declassified in the future when they're no longer deemed sensitive.

      Of all the promises that Trump has broken, the failure to put Hillary in prison is probably the one that bothers me the most. If somebody as reckless as her is completely let off the hook, how can you credibly claim that any of these cases should be prosecuted?

    6. Re: One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elite status does have its perks. General Petraeus gave binders full of compartmentalized classified military secrets - basically some of the most protected information there is - and handed them over to his mistress. Technically, she had a security clearance, but itâ(TM)s basically meaningless since she wasnâ(TM)t specifically cleared for that information. What he did was far, far worse than what Clinton (or Colin Powell, or many other cabinet-level officials) did, and presumably worse than what the guy in this story did (it sounds a bit like theyâ(TM)re hitting this guy so hard partly because they think heâ(TM)s a spy, but cant actually prove it). So, what did Petraeus get? A single misdemeanor charge and probation. Trump has considered this guy for Secretary of State and other cabinet positions even. He definitely doesnâ(TM)t have people chant âoelock him upâ about Petraeus or Powell at his rallies.

      Do I think what was going on with Clintonâ(TM)s email server is bad? Yes. Government business should not be done on private email servers, or using any unsecured email systems. No gmail or hotmail, or yahoo! or AOL, etc. Official government statements, including orders to the military definitely shouldnâ(TM)t becoming through Twitter. But that doesnâ(TM)t stop any of these people from doing it. There doesnâ(TM)t seem to be anyone actually empowered to. Seriously, who were the he people who were supposed to run the official Secretary of State email server? Shouldnâ(TM)t someone have said, right from the start to Powell and Clinton: I see youâ(TM)re not using the official email server, Iâ(TM)m afraid government policy doesnâ(TM)t allow that. Seriously, they had to have been using .gov domains, thereâ(TM)s no way they could have done that without someone setting up the mix record. Someone should have been able to pull that record.

      So, clearly, the reason Clinton was doing it was because she was allowed to do it, and pretty much everyone was doing it or something like it and, at the time, no one cared. So, when this suddenly became a big deal, they couldnâ(TM)t prosecute her because her obvious defense was selective prosecution. In order to prosecute her, they would suddenly need to prosecute hundreds of other people, or she would have eaten them alive in court. The FBI couldnâ(TM)t actually say this directly of course, because itâ(TM)s embarrassing, so all they could really do was issue a fairly weak statement that she did something wrong, but itâ(TM)s the sort of thing that would be handled administratively rather than being prosecutable.

      Basically, it was de Jurem illegal, but de facto legal. Itâ(TM)s kind of like how if you or I took goods without paying, we would end up arrested but for Trump, itâ(TM)s a civil court matter that he can win just by having more lawyers (sure, the party he robbed would probably win in court, and win legal fees as well, but that could be twenty years down the road, and they would only get enough to âoemake them wholeâ for that specific transaction, not for the twenty years of lost opportunity cost and the fact that their business went under in the mean time.

      So, yes, elite status has its perks. Trump is a prime example of this, which is what makes his âoelock her upâ chants so disengenuous and hypocritical. Thatâ(TM)s one of the things that sickens any objective observer of Trump and his cronies. Others include his dishonesty, racism, vanity, low intelligence, functional illeteracy, his temerity to believe heâ(TM)s in any way qualified for his job, his casual cruelty, superficiality, and, quite frankly, insanity.

    7. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). If Hillary goes down, the DNC dumps it's dirt, then the RNC dumps it's dirt.

      Why isn't Cheney is prison? Same answer.

      Think of it as a reboot of American politics. We can hope.

      If you don't get this, you don't get the internal R stress. Why Sessions is there, just to start.

      Also expect Trump's behavior to change if the DNC ever gets actual dirt on him.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      To some extent, yes, there is a double standard. But consequences matter, too.

      If you're texting while driving and a cop sees you, you get a ticket. If you're texting while driving and you run over a kid, you go to prison.

      If you mishandle sensitive documents and your boss finds out, you get a reprimand. If you mishandle sensitive documents and they end up in Russia, you go to prison.

      Is it fair? Not really, since the same negligence on your part can have vastly different punishments. But it is human nature, and the alternative can be draconian punishments for victimless 'crimes', like US drug laws.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    9. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't go to prison for "texting" you go to prison for manslaughter.

      And you can safely assume the contents of any unsecured server are in the hands of every foreign agency with a passing interest. This is why the laws exist in the first place, and why there is a 0 tolerance policy in place.

      What a fucking dimwit you are.

    10. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mishandle sensitive documents and your boss finds out, you get a reprimand. If you mishandle sensitive documents and they end up in Russia, you go to prison.

      Where I work, if I mishandle sensitive documents and my boss finds out, I likely will go to prison too. We're talking about a workplace with double-locked vaults and Faraday cages where the work is done.

    11. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the completely over-the-top misconduct and abandonment of respect for law by Democrats and the news (particularly with their attempt to destroy Kavanaugh with last-minute accusations of rape, without any evidence or corroborating witnesses and with an open rejection of any notion of a presumption of innocence) is going to end up enabling any sort of abuse they'd care to bring up: Leftists are destroying what is left of their credibility, yet as the "opposition", if and when they bring up the very real abuses which Republicans have been caught up in, the problems then becomes easily trivialized as just another attempt to smear right-wingers.

      The conspiracy theorist in me wants to assume that the left is simply being goaded into taking increasingly extreme and absurd stances, possibly with influence by GOP plants.

    12. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Both parties have large groups of 'dumb as rocks' partisans.

      They can and are 'weaponized' by the other side. The left is just mid tantrum.

      At the top, they know the 'other side' has them by the short and curlies. But they also know the 'other side' is a show and is in fact them.

      I still have hope the 'moron chanters' will trigger 'the big dump', if not, there is always the 'moron thumpers'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of how the R's shout Benghazi and Uranium-1 without a shred of evidence that anything unlawful ever occurred.

    14. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the usual but Clinton, you got nothing, It will be kind compared to the way history will view traitor Trump.

    15. Re: One rule for the rank and file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real people, U.S. citizens died at Benghazi.

      Please explain why they are dead, who was responsible for making sure they did not die and what those responsible people did or did not do that resulted in dead Americans.

    16. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      The ignorance defense wasn't worth shit, as the documents found had the classification markings still on them.

      And even if they weren't the talking point was still deliberate misdirection. If Hillary, say, emailed the ambassador to Saudi Arabia about the war on Yemen, that conversation was inherently classified. It didn't have to wait for a state department flunky to mark it as such.

      If the CIA manages to do a snatch-and-grab on Snowden, I hope he has the chutzpah to argue "it was ok to leak those documents because they weren't marked classified" in his defense.

    17. Re:One rule for the rank and file... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Nah, the Kavanaugh thing is completely about filibustering, even though they can't actually filibuster. They want to throw as much FUD as they can on it, and pray that the public raises a stink and wants the FBI involved, so it can draw out until after the November election, and hopefully into the next Congress that hopefully has a different political division. They figure that with some luck, they take back the Senate in November and delay this thing into January, which means that seat on the bench stays empty until 2020, when they hope they can obstruct their way to a Democrat president too.

      I guess the flaw in their strategy is that they aren't nearly as good at obstruction as the Republicans of the last decade are, and they shot themselves in their own ass cheek when they used the so-called nuclear option to limit filibuster. Kinda screwed themselves on that one.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  3. alll because by SirSmiley · · Score: 1

    he had kapersky on his computer and when that got out they traced it back to him..hey at least NSA doesnt do ageism..he was in his 60s and still working and going for a promotion

    1. Re: alll because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weirdly the DoD used to give copies of Kaspersky to all employees for home use... wonder what they knew or why

  4. Scooped Up Information cough cough by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basically the kaspersky anti-virus tool picked up on hacking software by it's coding signature. Strings of code, designed to hack other computers, it is recognisable when you do scans, especially when you do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ie sound likes, looks like, hacking code.

    Now as it turns out when you scan for virusy like code, whether it is the tool to apply the code or the applied code itself, well, it's going to contain the same hacking code, be identified and been contained and a copy sent back for further analysis if you allow it. SO the twisty swervy version of that, ohh ahh, the Russians stole information (no the sent a copy of the code, containing hacking heuristics for further analysis, as the user agreed to when they installed the product).

    The main reason the US government wants to ban kaspersky, it is the intention of the US government to back door all security software and obviously they will not be able to do that to a Russian program. Still not as bad as the wobbly told be the fellow claiming he took it home to do extra work on it, that near retirement, it was taken home to fund retirement in various non legal ways.

    I will at least take the fellows recommendation for the use of Kaspersky software, why because clearly the NSA hates it, makes life all together too difficult for them. They much prefer software with individually identified security upgrades so they know exactly the user getting the security upgrade, to ensure they get a downgrade instead, instead of a lock and wide open back door but I suppose it's still better to allow those third grade anal retentive tech types to hack your computer to spy on nothing rather than have them kicking your front and back doors down, accidentally repeatedly shooting you and stealing your computers.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also don't "need" a condom. But it is still a very good idea to use one.

      And regardless if you practice safe internet browsing, if one of the sites you access has been hacked to deliver malware in some form or another, having an AV product (a good one) lessens your risk, and helps lower the time window to knowing you have been compromised from a 0 day attack.

      Your methodology, you find out about it when after 3 weeks of your computer acting up, to finally install something to scan it, and it is full of stuff.
         

    2. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as safe internet browsing. Even top, well know sites get hacked via malicious actors sneaking "bad things" in via an ad, or background script.

      Every top tier, high end, "well trusted" website has literally dozens to *hundreds* of snippets of ajax running, and that's without any ads even loading. And you can't view many of these sites with javascript off...

      So, unless you're advocating "not really browsing many websites", you're NOT safe. At all.

    3. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      You also don't "need" a condom. But it is still a very good idea to use one.

      In this case the condom is the safe browsing and the antivirus software is aids medication.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    4. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuck are you saying.

      btw you donâ(TM)t need any antivirus software if you practice safe internet browsing

      rtb61 is a professional troll. You’ve been warned.

    5. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It literally sends them copies of all software not found in their database. All bespoke apps, all apps in development, sent to Kaspersky. And as a consequence it sent them NSA's software, alogn with lots of others.

      Gee why would the USA advise against this software?..

      It's a difficult thing to understand..... a Russian company snooping on everyones software is *good* no????.

    6. Re:Scooped Up Information cough cough by mysidia · · Score: 1

      is the intention of the US government to back door all security software and obviously they will not be able to do that to a Russian program.

      What Kaspersky should do is engage in Information Sharing with other non-US-based non-EU-based Antivirus companies and publicize that to ensure they can all detect the backdoors, and then "Ban Kaspersky" won't be a means to that end anymore.

    7. Re:Scooped Up Information cough cough by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Basically the kaspersky anti-virus tool picked up on hacking software by it's coding signature.

      Actually, some antivirus programs like kaspersky double as a RAT. From what I've read, when it detects files from a state-sponsored APT (in this case the NSA) it will open a line of communications and send a notification back to HQ. At that time they simply told the antivirus to send back all the files in the same directory. This is how they got a hold of all the tools.

      The primary use of heuristic analysis in file scanning is to identify new versions/variants of an existing virus as it commonly generates false positives.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    8. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't know the difference. It just sends ALL unknown software to Moscow, exploit and bespoke. It use to send our nightly builds to Moscow, until I spotted it on the firewall and deleted their crap.

    9. Re:Scooped Up Information cough cough by Megol · · Score: 1

      Proof? Talk is cheap.

    10. Re:Scooped Up Information cough cough by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      Kaspersky is in the pocket of the Russian government. Just as US tech companies' are in the US's pocket. Kaspersky is not better. It's just owned by a different political power.

    11. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also don't "need" a condom. But it is still a very good idea to use one.

      And regardless if you practice safe internet browsing, if one of the sites you access has been hacked to deliver malware in some form or another, having an AV product (a good one) lessens your risk, and helps lower the time window to knowing you have been compromised from a 0 day attack.

      Your methodology, you find out about it when after 3 weeks of your computer acting up, to finally install something to scan it, and it is full of stuff.

       

      Ah, another Satisfied Microsoft Customer!

      I guess I could install something like ClamAV on my Linux box. If I were running something like an e-mail server it could be useful to use it to scan attachments to protect any Windows-using clients. But since I don't run an e-mail server I have no use for it. I prefer real security, not unverfiable clean-up.

      The ONLY truly safe thing to do after a compromise is to securely wipe the storage and reinstall from known good media. Antivirus "cleanups" can verify that you removed one known thing. They do not verify that there are no unknown things on a system that has been proven to be compromised.

    12. Re: Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as safe internet browsing. Even top, well know sites get hacked via malicious actors sneaking "bad things" in via an ad, or background script.

      Every top tier, high end, "well trusted" website has literally dozens to *hundreds* of snippets of ajax running, and that's without any ads even loading. And you can't view many of these sites with javascript off...

      So, unless you're advocating "not really browsing many websites", you're NOT safe. At all.

      Completely perfectly safe forever amen? No, there is no such thing.

      But on Linux you can be reasonably safe by running your browser as a separate user that is used for nothing else, has permissions for nothing but tightly firewalled networking and only its own files, and using a sandbox like firejail with seccomp. For additional security you can use things like ACLs, AppArmor, and SELinux using an open-source browser compiled via a hardened toolchain with stack-smashing protection, ASLR, and capabilities. You can also do all of the above in a VM environment. Once you set all of this up, it just works, can be integrated easily into your desktop environment, and provides a configuration that's easily backed up or copied (on *nix, everything is a file -- try transferring all settings/files in Windows sometime without doing a full 100% backup).

      Not exactly sure how far you can take this in Windows but you can likely use at least a few of these. The point is, you're not helpless and a reasonable level is achievable. You just can't be a drooling idiot user and expect this to be entirely someone else's problem. You have to find good tools and use them.

    13. Re:Scooped Up Information cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cough cough !

      So the only way to send work to a colleague in some overseas is to install Kaspersky ? Sending bitcoins is not sending work and red phones are for pledges.

      Will Pho retire wealthy or will he retire in prison like his colleague ?

  5. Missing facts by mseeger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There IMHO some important facts missing in the description:

    a) He did not have a Office license, so he downloaded a key generator.

    b) The Kaspersky software would not let him run that generator because it considered it harmful

    c) He disabled Kaspersky, ran the key generator and got his PC infected

    d) He re-enabled Kaspersky, the software detected an infection and began looking for malicious files

    e) The software found the NSA written malware and did exactly what it was supposed to do: it was configured to upload new suspicious files to Kaspersky.

    f) The upload server was under surveillance by the Israeli secret service.

    1. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why bother running an antivirus if you're just going to disable it to run malicious software in spite of its warnings
      Is NSA really this incompetent that they'd hire a guy like this or is it just a psy-op

    2. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't there more news about F when that company is getting heavy rap for having ties with russia? So russia is bad but the other one isnt?

    3. Re:Missing facts by houghi · · Score: 1

      Either you work for the redundency department of redunccy, or you are serious about your second question in which case the answer is yes.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, "How to Know if a Career in Intelligence is Not for You"

    5. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because f wasn't the Israelis, it was the Russian FSB who has free access to everything that Kaspersky saw who promptly DL'ed everything and redistributed it through their "Guccifer 2.0" front blaming the NSA for leaking it.

      The Israeli involvement is that they penetrated Kaspersky and saw the FSB doing it.

      The Israelis didn't redistribute the NSA code to the public.

      The NSA didn't redistribute the NSA code to the public.

      The FSB redistributed the NSA code to the public.

    6. Re: Missing facts by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Why bother running an antivirus if you're just going to disable it to run malicious software in spite of its warnings

      Because a lot of the time the antivirus will "warn" you about software which poses no risk. I've had port scanner and such flagged as "hacking tools" and prevented from running. If you're certain that the software you're about to run doesn't actually pose a risk then it makes sense to temporarily disable the antivirus (or put in an exception rule if possible).

    7. Re: Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a difference between a program you got from the official source that you know for sure is legitimate being flagged as a virus and a keygen obtained from a free file upload service link on some crummy piracy site being flagged as a virus, you dimwit

    8. Re:Missing facts by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      You're 100% correct. Some people do infect the keygens with trojans but the legit copies of "Microsoft Toolkit" always get flagged as hacking software.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Missing facts by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Funny. Back in the day I used to run a simple machine in my lab just to use dodgy software. It suffered, as if you can call Windows ME anything else but suffering, so much that it often took hours to boot, more hours to deliver a usable cursor, and days to clean out and recover. Not a record, a client delivered us a Windows ME machine that took 6 hours to boot - we did that just to see. It was unfortunate. Just plugging your ME machine into your Internet router is, was, and always has been spectacularly bad practice. Not good for any machine, but this was when you could clock the time for an unprotected Linux box to be compromised in the tens of minutes. Today, would one last double-digit seconds?

      Oh, and running a keygen to pirate software, and using pirated software, is probably sufficient to cost him the security clearance needed to keep his job. At the least for incompetence.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    10. Re: Missing facts by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      And then there are the PDF converters.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    11. Re: Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you always use a disposable VM to run your key generators

    12. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what youre saying but if I 'were' to be using kaspersky I wouldnt want either country to have infilitrated that software.

    13. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those additional steps matter to the charge of "willful retention of classified national defense information"..

    14. Re: Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kaspersky scans software. If it doesn't have a match, it sends the software to Kaspersky. So every bespoke app is compromised, every security software, every firewall,.... all sent during development to Kaspersky.

      If you work for a company you should be fired. But you sound like a Russian troll not a developer.

    15. Re:Missing facts by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      This is fascinating if true. Why would the NSA of all places allow anything to be uploaded to Kaspersky or anyone outside their network without manual sign off? Do their Windows 10 boxes all send telemetry back to Microsoft?

    16. Re: Missing facts by Megol · · Score: 1

      Proof? Lots of claims but no one ever produces shit for proof.

    17. Re:Missing facts by azcoyote · · Score: 1

      The NSA didn't; he brought the code home, and it was his home PC that leaked it.

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    18. Re: Missing facts by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      A lot of the keygens and cracks are released by reputable groups and can be obtained through official channels, you dipshit. KMSPico gets flagged as dangerous regardless of whether or not it's actually doing anything harmful.

      If I don't trust the source I'll run it in a VM instead, then scan the VM afterwards to see if the antivirus picks up a problem. 95%+ of the time there are no issues; it's just flagging the keygen itself as malicious.

    19. Re:Missing facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) He did not have a Office license, so he downloaded a key generator.

      Lordy.

      Keygens tend to be riddled with viruses, and MS Office ones are easily some of the worst.

    20. Re:Missing facts by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      If you are a business owner, letting an employee run a keygen on company hardware is a literal nightmare.

      The potential liability is bankrupting.

    21. Re:Missing facts by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      if true, he's more of an idiot than i suspected...but then he did work for the gubmnt...

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
  6. Promotion by mentil · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pho said in court he took the materials home so he could put in more work to earn a promotion

    He went from an NSA employee to a convicted felon. That's a promotion in status in my eyes.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re: Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, promote all shitty smelly parasites hindu-chimps for routinely trafficking U.S. secrets out the country on shitty âoefamilyâ trips to shitty smelly jungles of monkeystan.

      Nah most Hindus I ever met were decent hardworking folks. Don't screw with them and they won't bother you. Even where they lived in large numbers you never had to worry about ending up in the "wrong neighborhood" and fearing for your safety.

      I definitely can't say the same for níggers. I mean I want to but my real-world experience and that of many others just can't be denied. It can only be down-modded and ignored but never refuted. Refuted by people who would, themselves, be the first to engage in "white flight" should they ever suffer the massive violent crime and fear that comes from having a lot of blacks move in to their area.

  7. just a lucky break then by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Kaspersky has acknowledged that its software lifted hacking tools from a home computer in 2014 but said it wasn't part of an intentional effort to steal information from the NSA

    just a lucky break for the Russians then....

  8. "earn a promotion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Pho said in court he took the materials home so he could put in more work to earn a promotion" likely story - communist bastard!

    1. Re:"earn a promotion" by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Communism is for other people. Stupid git.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  9. Don't work at home. Sleep at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yah. Perverse work morale.

    I do feel sorry for this guy. OTOH, I hope he learns the lesson: If you kill yourself at work, your boss won't give a shit. If you don't kill yourself at work, (s)he won't, eiter. What to do?

    Kill your boss, of course.

    1. Re:Don't work at home. Sleep at work. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The government discourages working more than 40 hours a week. It is illegal for the government to accept charity, not sure if this guy was a contractor but working more than your allotment is not allowed.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Don't work at home. Sleep at work. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The government discourages working and also discourages 'attending' for more than 40 hours a week.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, look its the but Hillary brigade, still so butt hurt, especially after the disaster Trump is becoming. The rest of the world just laughed in his face at the UN. Sad.
    And funny, very very funny.

  11. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, look its the but Hillary brigade, still so butt hurt, especially after the disaster Trump is becoming. The rest of the world just laughed in his face at the UN. Sad.
    And funny, very very funny.

    The UN? Isn't that the place that puts countries like Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan on its "Human Rights Council"?

    Getting laughed at by such a clown gathering is a badge of honor.

  12. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kristian Saucier took pictures of a sub to show his kids. Jail time.

    Nghia Hoang Pho took documents home to work on. Jail time.

    More classified documents keep coming to light that Hillary had on a non-secure server. No Jail time.

    Did I miss anyone?

    The rest of the world just laughed in his face at the UN

    Sure they did buttercup.

  13. Lesson learned by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    NEVER TAKE WORK HOME!

    And nobody was interested if his name is pronounced Fa?

    The lack of any apparent controls at the NSA regarding removing classified information should cause some serious investigations of the agency and it's processes.

    1. Re: Lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, we should just build a wall around all the foreign nationals and make them pay for it. Trump will sign an executive order banning all squinty eyed people, and mandate that they like it. China, Vietnam, same thing.

    2. Re:Lesson learned by Bert64 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Are you advocating that classified information should only be held by native americans? Because everyone else is descended from naturalized immigrants at some point...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re: Lesson learned by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Europeans who colonized the Americas by ship were no more "naturalized immigrants" than the Asians who colonized it by walking over the Bering Strait. Don't let your racist tendencies cloud your view of history.

    4. Re:Lesson learned by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Curious Can the NOFORN classification be overridden by higher classifications? Hmmm...

      I forget, does higher classification explicitly also enforce lower classifications? I think NOFORN is distinct from and parallel to Confidential, Restricted, and Secret. After that it gets more granular I think.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re:Lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, Mr. Spencer, you can shut the fuck up now.

    6. Re:Lesson learned by mi · · Score: 1

      NEVER TAKE WORK HOME!

      And honestly pay for the software you want to use... Seriously, for all the abundance of comments here, no one mentioned the inherent dishonesty of his trying to crack Microsoft Office — and getting burned by the "free" tool he used to do it...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Lesson learned by mi · · Score: 1

      only be held by native americans?

      He is advocating for the requirement to be "American by birth" — as a presidential candidates must be, for example — rather than by naturalization.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    8. Re:Lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy was caught easily, and yet Crooked Hilary got away without being charged!!

      'M I right? 'Nuff said.

    9. Re:Lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nobody was interested if his name is pronounced Fa?

      His aunt is Auntie-Fa.

  14. Should of claimed Hillary Clinton status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should of claimed Hillary Clinton status, nuff said.

  15. How curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that No Reasonable Prosecutor Would Bring That Case?

  16. Comey said as much by mpercy · · Score: 4, Informative

    "There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

    "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

    1. Re: Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still trying to defeat Hillary Clinton?
      Meanwhile Trump told Russia then names of the agents in Moscow mentioned in the pee tapes and they were arrested and have since disappeared. Ironically including a spy the USA had in Kaspersky, and even the maid at the hotel who confirmed the piss soaked mattress has disapeared.
      Then he held a meeting in Helsinki with Putin, which he refused to have his staff present (people he chose) and refused to explain to the GOP or his generals or his staff what he'd agreed to, but apparently (not disputed by Trump and reported by Russian media) it included a joint Syrian force under Russian control... i.e. US troops under Russian generals.

      But hey...Comey said that she had emails in an insecue way... which just confirms you think Comey is credible and not political.

    2. Re: Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump agreed to put US troops under Russian command to fight Russian defined enemies in Syria. You think butt cream will fix that shafting?

    3. Re: Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooh deep collusion and conspiracy! WTF would a piss stained mattress in a hotel even prove? Would you somehow tie the piss to these supposed piss tapes Trump had? Do you realize how stupid this dumb ass made up shit sounds? Trump hired two women to piss on a bed that Obama may have slept on to prove what? That he can sleep in a piss stained bed that Obama may have slept in? Who the hell does this and why would we believe it off of some bull shit paper written by a professional bull shit artist. Good thing they got rid of that mattress though because that proved the whole thing!

    4. Re: Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would you prefer.

      A - Someone who gives our shit away to enemies because they used a non secure server

      or

      B - Someone who pisses on our enemies?

    5. Re:Comey said as much by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm glad someone mentioned Hillary. She did the same thing as this convicted felon, but faced no consequences. (Even a trial that ended "not guilty" would have been better than nothing.)

      Two justices exist in this world: Us and them. Us get punished and Them rarely do, even when they break the same laws.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Comey said as much by dublin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Worse yet, there wasn't even a real investigation. Just preemptive exoneration before she had even been "interviewed" (The quotes around interview are justified in that when an interview finally was done, she was not under oath, as is normal practice in cases involving Top Secret/SCI information...)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    7. Re:Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the double standard with Hilary is total garbage, but are you really glad that someone mentioned her? I'm kinda sick of hearing about her; she didn't become prez and never will. I would have been surprised if she wasn't mentioned since the right wouldn't shut up about her after the election.

    8. Re: Comey said as much by losfromla · · Score: 0

      false equivalency. drumpf fellates our enemies. That is who you choose, daily. You daily chose a cocksucker cuck.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    9. Re: Comey said as much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      losfromla: You're obviously mentally ill. GET HELP

  17. Re:Diversity Hires FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in the case of Asians.

    Slant eyes, Epicanthic fold, yellow skin == work yourself to death genius. More productivity than white people.

    Prejudice works both ways.

  18. Slanted view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTF did an ex-enemy slantt get that hi-sevcurity job? Like hiring Juuu-Kommiz after WW2 into the State Department. What Rawlsian Trotsky Congress-critter pimped him in? When Sotero-esque civil-servant got the blojob for passing him thru ?? WTF .....

    1. Re:Slanted view by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      Lots of Vietnamese were on our side, so much so that in order to avoid 'retraining camps' or simply being killed, they left their country any way they could.

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    2. Re:Slanted view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, next you'll be telling us that NASA was filled with ex-Nazi rocket scientists! As fucking if!!

  19. His mistake is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not being a General mishandling document to his mistress. Being a peon, a plebeian, is hard. Fair!

    Hint: google Petraeus.

    1. Re:His mistake is by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Not being a General mishandling document to his mistress. Being a peon, a plebeian, is hard. Fair!

      Hint: google Petraeus.

      Totally different! In this case it looks like someone stupidly broke security for the purposes of doing legitimate work at home, with no intention of letting anyone else see the information, while Petraeus intentionally gave classified info to someone who wasn't supposed to have it.

      Of course the Director of the CIA intentionally giving classified info to someone else should be charged with a misdemeanor, while a lower level employee taking work home deserves jail time! We need to send a broad message to the masses! Agency directors can be easily told "don't do this" by a simple meeting - there are so few of them. Low level employees only learn when one of their own is thrown into "the big house" on national news.

    2. Re:His mistake is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding was Petreus shared info with a woman who had security clearance to see it. His issue was it was on a non-classified system (Didn't someone else do that)

      We also have Comey releasing classified info to the NYT.
      John Brenen leaked classified info to CNN.
      Clapper leaked classified into to CNN, and got a job there.
      Clinton's classified email ended up on a pedofile's laptop.
      Page and Strokz of FBI had a leaking program for releasing classified info to multiple newspapers.

      None of them were charged, but Petraeus was. Petraeus was the only one of that list critical of Obama if you are attempting to figure out the difference.

    3. Re:His mistake is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding was Petreus shared info with a woman who had security clearance to see it.

      Having the clearance means jack shit. If there's wasn't a legitimate need-to-know, whether she had a clearance doesn't matter.

  20. Should have got a job with the DNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then they'd totally cover the whole thing up because, goddamnit, it's her turn to Pokemon GO! to the polls!

  21. Agree with you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Furthermore, having had a family member in tech, I can tell you that this happened frequently on all but the most hush hush projects. It was tacitly allowed by management so long as your code was never leaked. But as soon as a leak happened, it was the hardworking employee, not the manager who got fired, while making the manager's productivity numbers look much better than they were within actual working hours.

    Having said that, I would be curious to know what Pho's salary was that he didn't have an Office license, didn't have a company laptop to work off, and was allowed both into and out of the office with either removable media or his personal computer. Honestly while this guy might deserve those 5 years, I think a couple other members of staff deserve a shot to the head instead, after a very public and very humiliating trial and followup walk of shame.

    1. Re:Agree with you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this a tech news site. Shouldn't the headline be Convicted felon did not have an Office license; gets five years for using Kaspersky, or something

    2. Re:Agree with you. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      True. A reasonably competent review should have resulted in several lateral arabesques.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  22. Wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have put them in the basement.

  23. Isn't this literally what Hillary Clinton did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall something about Hillary Clinton having a private server full of classified and top secret stuff. One that got hacked even.

    Wonder why she didn't face charges.

    1. Re:Isn't this literally what Hillary Clinton did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You remember wrong, citizen. All you saw was the light from Venus reflecting off a weather balloon.

    2. Re:Isn't this literally what Hillary Clinton did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powerful people with sympathetic friends in the right places tend not to face consequences.
      Consequences are for little people.

  24. Clinton by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1, Troll

    and yet Hilary Clinton gets nothing for her doing the same. Wakeup people, we have two different sets of laws, one for us, the little people, and one for our Lords and Ladies. Just like insider trading is illegal for you and I, but our elected officials are only requested to let us know when they do it!

    --
    "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
  25. Re:The message is: by LazarusQLong · · Score: 2

    were you not aware that ALL countries do this?

    --
    "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
  26. Re:Clinton-Lock her up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lock her up!

    Such a double standard. And there is some evidence that the Chinese were receiving copies of her e-mails in real time.

    She also had top secret information in her home on an unsecured computer.

    Is her security clearance revoked?

  27. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by stealth_finger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The UN? Isn't that the place that puts countries like Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan on its "Human Rights Council"?

    Getting laughed at by such a clown gathering is a badge of honor.

    How to justify all the world's leaders laughing at your leader. If it's such a clown gathering why would he even show up? I guess I just answered my own question.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  28. the best and the brightest at the NSA by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    b) The Kaspersky software would not let him run that generator because it considered it harmful

    c) He disabled Kaspersky, ran the key generator and got his PC infected

    I'm glad to see that the NSA is hiring "the best and the brightest" when it comes to computer security!

  29. Scooped Up Linux, cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awful lot of words just to say...use Linux.

  30. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't vote for Trump, but I like him more and more.

  31. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    If it's such a clown gathering why would he even show up?

    The UN may be a disreputable organization composed of mostly disreputable nations, but like it or not, we have to deal with the rest of the world, unpleasant as that may be.

  32. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump being a disaster doesn't change the fact that Hillary got off scot-free for this.

  33. Re:The message is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sooner the world starts looking at America the same way they look at you, like an enemy, the better.

    The world already does, people like you are just too naive to recognize it.

    Keep mutually beneficial trade going, but cut all other ties of dependency.

    Good advice. And that includes being selective about who the US lets immigrate.

  34. The best and the brightest at Piratebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, he should have downloaded a cracked copy of Office from piratebay like everyone else. The only place one can trust.

  35. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "If it's such a clown gathering why would he even show up?"

    Ah, but the worldwide audience. That's why.

    No, not the privileged, the righteous, the ones who know better than you and the rest of the 43%. Sadly, many of those who needed to hear his address won;t be able to, for their leaders will not permit it.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  36. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Actually, you missed Huma and Anthony. And Lois, Loretta, Eric, Sally, John (Longface), Samantha, and Barack.

    I'm certain I missed several.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  37. Re:The message is: by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Not ALL countries do this.

    Just the ones who can.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  38. How about Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Hillary's prison term? She took home and disseminated 1000s of sensitive documents. Little guy - you go to jail. Clintion - you run for president

  39. To think that this could have been avoided... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To think that this could have been avoided had he just stored the sensitive information on a toilet-server... oh and be a member of the political elite.

  40. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree, Hillary got off scot free... I don't agree that Trump is a disaster, but let's not quibble about that as it has nothing to do with this idea that there is a double standard at play.

    IF this guy got 8 years and a felony conviction, Hillary should have at least been reprimanded and her security clearance pulled. But as it is, crickets.... Comey got her off the hook, and he did it for political reasons, outside the standard processes of the Justice department none-the-less. Hillary getting off is a huge con game and I don't think we've actually found out how deep and depraved it goes yet. This whole episode is centered around the last election and it smells of a cover-up with illegal use of wire tapping for political purposes and letting one party's candidate skate on serious issues. The stench has permeated the DNC, the Clinton Campaign, The Clinton Foundation, The DOJ and the intelligence services and we've only scratched the surface finding the rotting fish.

  41. Re:But... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Well, he can always get a pardon from Trump. He just have to become a rapist first, Trump only pardons rapists.

    Trump Pardons:

    Dwight and Steven Hammond - Both where convicted of Arson.

    Alice Marie Johnson - non-violent drug offenses.

    Dinesh D'Souza - Campaign finance violations.

    Jack Johnson - posthumous, Mann Act Violations

    Lewis "Scooter" Libby - Lying to the FBI.

    Kristian Saucier - For taking photos of classified equipment.

    Sholom Rubashkin - Bank Fraud, commuted sentence, conviction remains.

    Joe Arpaio - Civil rights violations, as Sherriff.

    I'm not seeing even one rapist here.. Did I miss somebody?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  42. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

    I agree on many of your points, but Hillary did not get off scot free. She didn't get the job of POTUS. If there were no bathroom server scandal, I think she would have won a few more states and the election.

  43. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    If it's such a clown gathering why would he even show up?

    The UN may be a disreputable organization composed of mostly disreputable nations, but like it or not, we have to deal with the rest of the world, unpleasant as that may be.

    Yeah, it's just now the rest of the world is laughing at you.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  44. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    I'm sure they didn't need to hear him brag about how great he is and how america is awesome thanks to him and him alone. All those people who don't have access to the internet or a tv don't really give a shit about how great trump thinks he is.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  45. Re:Clinton-Lock her up! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    And what the Chinese didn't get from Hillary's e-mails, Dianne Feinstein made sure and passed along via her spy-as-driver...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  46. Re:The message is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, it has only ever been suspected AND proven that America does it. And not just recently, but for decades. They are by far the worst of whatever sick bunch they are in. Everything OP wrote makes sense.

  47. Piracy learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Home of, "down with copyright" and "you all making too much so I shouldn't pay you". What kind of dishonesty could arise from that?

  48. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's just now the rest of the world is laughing at you.

    "Now"? You are a bit unfamiliar with history, it seems. Politicians and intellectuals in the rest of the world have been laughing at the US since it was founded. It's not something Americans care about or should care about. Ordinary people (like myself) have voted with our feet.

  49. Please Put Trump On the Side For This Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that Hillary got away with much more shows the 2 different types of justice we have in this country.

  50. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being POTUS is a privilege and a duty--not something she was "owed" just for showing up. Not getting the job hardly seems like a penalty.

  51. and what does this get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say you set up a private email server at your home to get classified government emails and other material. What kind of sentence is that going to get you?

  52. This is sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. He KNEW you do not take classified items out of SCIF rooms . In addition, he KNEW that Kaspersky anti-virus was absolutely sending data back to Russia, so he was NOT supposed to use that.

    Chances are, that he simply did what he said. Problem is, that he knew it was criminal to do that.

  53. Re: HOT PISS ALL OVER YOUR FACE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know you cant stop thinkong about Donalds old flacid cock ans his drlicious warm piss. Yould give anything to drink from that cock, even everyone else's freedom.

    COCKSUCKER.

  54. Re:Too bad his name wasn't Clinton by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Do you know how much money her handlers spent?

    How much do you figure each of the other, possibly electable, Ds took to bow out?

    How much do you figure each of the other Rs took to bow out or get 'put out' (to get her chosen opponent)?

    She wasn't 'owed the job', but her owners had fucking well paid for it. You know they are PISSED.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  55. Re: Sarah Palin loved Yahoomail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So mich she had three accounts, but when they got "hacked" by using the account recovery questions all of a sudden she only had one and it was thise ebil democrats!!

    Nuke America. Its the only way to be sure.

  56. Re:Diversity Hires FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check your asian privilege.

  57. Last refuge of your delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    History will judge you all a cuntry of pussygrabbin morans.

  58. Pedantic Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOFORN is NOT a classification, it is a CAVEAT, and as such it can be used to modify classification categories, NOFORN is normally only used with Secret and Top Secret.

    The Classification categories are:
    Unclassified
    Confidential
    Secret
    Top Secret

    Other markings are considered CAVEATs.

    1. Re:Pedantic Point by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I saw it on Confidential and Restricted. I did not have TS clearance.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Pedantic Point by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      And yes, I entirely ignore Unclassified...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  59. Re:Clinton-Lock her up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, look its a conga line of lying right wing assholes. No convictions, no credible evidence, just the ranting of nutjobs. The low IQ of the right writ large.
    Can you show us on this doll where Hillary hurt you princesses?
    Anything to distract from the Trump disaster eh?
    Enjoy your mid term thrashing children.