Slashdot Mirror


Trump Administration Sees a 7-Degree Rise in Global Temperatures By 2100 (washingtonpost.com)

Last month, deep in a 500-page environmental impact statement, the Trump administration made a startling assumption: On its current course, the planet will warm a disastrous 7 degrees by the end of this century. From a report: A rise of 7 degrees Fahrenheit, or about 4 degrees Celsius, compared with preindustrial levels would be catastrophic, according to scientists. Many coral reefs would dissolve in increasingly acidic oceans. Parts of Manhattan and Miami would be underwater without costly coastal defenses. Extreme heat waves would routinely smother large parts of the globe. But the administration did not offer this dire forecast as part of an argument to combat climate change. Just the opposite: The analysis assumes the planet's fate is already sealed. The draft statement, issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), was written to justify President Trump's decision to freeze federal fuel efficiency standards for cars and light trucks built after 2020. While the proposal would increase greenhouse gas emissions, the impact statement says, that policy would add just a very small drop to a very big, hot bucket.

5 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. Sensible by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the EU and Asia has only increased their emissions year after year it makes sense. The EU in particular increased their carbon emissions by 1.7 percent in 2017. The problem will continue to exist until countries reduce their emissions.

  2. Re:It's cooling anyway by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Make the lie big, keep it simple, keep saying it and eventually they will believe it." - Joseph Goebbels

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. Re:science not emotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    China has 4x the number of people that the US has

  4. Re:science not emotion by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the US produces 3x as much CO2 output per person than China?

  5. Re:science not emotion by Barsteward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Currently but the USA is the biggest per capita. China is actually investing heavily in renewables and leading in the field so their output will start to decline at some point. So you can help by not buying cheap chinese goods and not being so individually wasteful with resources and bring down the per capita usage levels.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)