Slashdot Mirror


Richard Stallman Says Linux Code Contributions Can't Be Rescinded (itwire.com)

An anonymous reader quotes iTWire: Linux developers who contribute code to the kernel cannot rescind those contributions, according to the software programmer who devised the GNU General Public Licence version 2.0, the licence under which the kernel is released. Richard Stallman, the head of the Free Software Foundation and founder of the GNU Project, told iTWire in response to queries that contributors to a GPLv2-covered program could not ask for their code to be removed. "That's because they are bound by the GPLv2 themselves. I checked this with a lawyer," said Stallman, who started the free software movement in 1984.

There have been claims made by many people, including journalists, that if any kernel developers are penalised under the new code of conduct for the kernel project -- which was put in place when Linux creator Linus Torvalds decided to take a break to fix his behavioural issues -- then they would ask for their code to be removed from the kernel... Stallman asked: "But what if they could? What would they achieve by doing so? They would cause harm to the whole free software community. The anonymous person who suggests that Linux contributors do this is urging them to [use a] set of nuclear weapons in pique over an internal matter of the development team for Linux. What a shame that would be."

Slashdot reader dmoberhaus shared an article from Motherboard with more perspetives from Eric S. Raymond and LWN.net founder Jonathan Corbet, which also traces the origins of the suggestion. "[A]n anonymous user going by the handle 'unconditionedwitness' called for developers who end up getting banned through the Code of Conduct in the future to rescind their contributions to the Linux kernel 'in a bloc' to produce the greatest effect.

"It is worth noting that the email address for unconditionedwitness pointed to redchan.it, a now defunct message board on 8chan that mostly hosted misogynistic memes, many of which were associated with gamergate."

4 of 588 comments (clear)

  1. The goose by DCFusor · · Score: 1, Troll

    You might get rid of the goose (geese) that lays the eggs, but then you get no more eggs from that goose. And wind up having to prove your BS is as good as a real meritocracy. GoodLuckWithThat, takes longer for the effect to show than some would like (slow degradation vs dead tomorrow) - but it will show.
    If all this equality stuff is true, why is your worldview so much more important or valid than mine that you have to force it on me? I detect a logical error.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:The goose by DCFusor · · Score: 1, Troll

      So, Linux would have happened without linux and a bunch of really talented people. Got it.
      There's no general availabity of smart and productive people - Ok, if you say so.
      I found that if I treated people right, my company had few issues finding and hiring these people. Just an anecdote, I'm sure it's different everywhere else.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  2. Re:Legitimate Kernel Developers Don't Want To Resc by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whether developers can or cannot legally rescind their code the new CoC is absolutely guaranteed to drive away people who believe their contributions are more important than their genitals.

    Not sure I even want to know what this means.

  3. Re:Legitimate Kernel Developers Don't Want To Resc by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0, Troll

    You didn't even read the CoC before criticising it?

    Can you perhaps read it and point to some specific issues. It's pretty short, you can just quote whole sections.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC