Slashdot Mirror


Cloudflare Launches a Low-Cost Domain Registrar, Which Will Also Offer Free Privacy To Customers (arstechnica.com)

Cloudflare, which is celebrating its eighth birthday has announced yet another service: an at-cost domain registrar. From a report: While Cloudflare had already been handling domain registration through the company's Enterprise Registrar service, that service was intended for some of Cloudflare's high-end customers who wanted extra levels of security for their domain names. The new domain registrar business -- called Cloudflare Registrar -- will eventually be open to anyone, and it will charge exactly what it costs for Cloudflare to register a domain. As Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince wrote in a blog post this week, "We promise to never charge you anything more than the wholesale price each TLD charges." That includes the small fee assessed by ICANN for each registration.

Prince said that he was motivated to take the company into the registrar business because of Cloudflare's own experience with registrars and by the perception that many registrars are in the business mostly to up-sell things that require no additional effort. "All the registrar does is record you as the owner of a particular domain," Prince said. "That just involves sending some commands to an API. In other words, domain registrars are charging you for being a middle-man and delivering essentially no value to justify their markup." Charging overhead for that sort of service, Prince said, "seemed as nutty to us as certificate authorities charging to run a bit of math." (Cloudflare also provides free SSL certificates.)

122 comments

  1. Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do they still have the bit about terminating accounts at their sole discretion? Cloudflare got into the censorship business in 2017, can't say that I trust them in 2018.

    1. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This.
      They banned me in 2017 without explanations. "Fraud". A website for a small minecraft server.
      Talked with their "Trust & Safety" Admin, but he was having a bad day.
      I am still banned today.

    2. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What ones don't have a bit about terminating accounts via their discretion? It's a pretty standard item in most TOS's I've seen.

    3. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always plenty of other services. Just pick up the phone.

    4. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i think you'd better look up the meaning of the word 'chivalry'.

    5. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I'm sure you'll find somewhere to host your white supremacist site.

    6. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every website has that. Why are you defending white supremacists?

    7. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing says "useful idiot of authoritarians" quite like dishonestly assuming anyone that is on the receiving end of political censorship is one of the "-ists" of the day.

      One day they'll decide that you've outlived your usefulness and then they'll come for you, too.

    8. Re:Terms of Service? by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 0

      i think you'd better look up the meaning of the word 'chivalry'.

      Considering the accusations against the president, judge Kavanaugh, numerous CEOs, etc. these days, chivalry really is at issue these days.

    9. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to like the company, but the pricing model will be good for *everyone* (except for the likes of godaddy and netsol).

      cloudfare will legitimately be the cheapest place to register domains and domain prices will drop everywhere else within a year of them rolling this out.

    10. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pick up the phone? What am I, a caveman?

    11. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe rape expansionism is the real issue? When you unilaterally declare that normal human sociosexuality is "RAAAAAPE!!!!1!!!11!!!!!" then you can't be too surprised when you start seeing that kind of fake-rape everywhere.

      But here's the really cool thing about this #MeToo fake-rape panic: it's ALREADY eating it's own supporters alive. Pause for a moment to enjoy the cosmic justice at work.

    12. Re: Terms of Service? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      normal human sociosexuality

      As defined by whom? If it was so normal, then why would so many people perceive it as abnormal? Sounds more like a creep trying to justify his own misunderstanding of the world.

    13. Re:Terms of Service? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The bit where they actually use it, I assume.

    14. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As defined by whom?"

      As defined by >10,000 years of human law.

      Most people would say YOU are a creep, intentionally misusing an old and serious word to justify a witch hunt.

      Now aren't you late for the Junior Anti-Sex Club meeting? Better hurry, or the fainting couches might be full.

    15. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's defending the Black Panthers, you redneck tool.

    16. Re:Terms of Service? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Were you a free user or paying customer?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Terms of Service? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Name one registrar that isn't.

      As Storm Front found out, the aren't any.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Terms of Service? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They banned me in 2017 without explanations. "Fraud". A website for a small minecraft server.

      That's a weird name for a minecraft server website. Was it "Fraud.com" or ".org"? :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    19. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn more history

    20. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh - do tell us more, Dr Erudite!

    21. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White supremacists were the ones banned from cloudflare, you cousin fucking moron.

    22. Re: Terms of Service? by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "As defined by >10,000 years of human law."

      Do you mean it's abnormal behavior then?

    23. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pickup the phone? Seriously grandpa? 1952 called and they want you back.

    24. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you were dumb enough to name a website 'Fraud'?
      Thats like people driving around with 'Question Authority' bumper stickers.

      Me thinks you had it coming.

    25. Re:Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your usage of the word "Chivalry" clear demonstrates you don't speak English very well do you?

    26. Re: Terms of Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to free market? If they ban you, just go somewhere else. Or if there really is a giant conspiracy to silence the pure white innocent snowflake people, start your own hosting company. Don't be a little bitch and whine to the gubermint for more regulation. Rich people and corporations should be able to do anything they want. Freeeeeeeee maaaaaaarket

  2. As long as they CEO personally likes your content! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Censorflow CEO might wake up in a bad mood and ban you though. Hard pass if you like having your website available.

  3. Yay! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was afraid I wasn't getting enough advertisements in my life. Thanks Slashdot!

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cloudflare is evil, they are harvesting the entire internet.

      Go with Gandi, or something in another country from you, and not in the US.

  4. Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat after me: It is not possible to own a domain on the current Internet.
    Say it over and over until you get it.

    1. Re:Also included: censorship. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Domain names have always been leased. When did you ever own it?

    2. Re:Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is, as long as you aren't a white supremacist or some other asshole.

    3. Re: Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie Bros have rights too

    4. Re: Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The message above was brought to you by the Committee to Reelect Donald Trump in 2020.

      Remember Democrats, whatever you do don't nominate a widely-admired candidate whose policies address the concerns of millions of ordinary Americans. There's no way that will win.

      Instead, nominate a bigoted puritanical authoritarian who is loathed by all working class Americans. Just nominate Hillary! again and she is sure to win. Please nominate Hillary! again, please....

    5. Re: Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie Bros have the right to shut the fuck up. They gave us Trump and they will do it again in 2020.

    6. Re: Also included: censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie was a garbage candidate with unrealistic policies. He is the Trump of the left, only dumber. His cult is even dumber than he is. He is not popular and never was, there is a reason nobody has heard of him after being in politics for decades. He duped a bunch of basement-dwelling morons with promises of free stuff. His only legacy will be handing Trump the 2016 election and probabflt the 2020 one too.

  5. Alternatives by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 0

    If you don't like or trust CloudFlare but the WHOIS privacy protection is important to you, the registrar Porkbun also offers free WHOIS privacy, and their rates are reasonable. I've been slowly migrating my domains there for these reasons, plus their easy DNSSEC support.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    1. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't like or trust CloudFlare, then how could you possibly like an SJW operation based in Portland, Oregon?

    2. Re:Alternatives by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      There's also DreamHost.

    3. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither Cloudflare or Porkbun accept Zcash (ZEC), BitcoinPrivate BTCP, or any other strongly cryptographic ZKP protected privacy cryptocurrency, and they don't allow signup over Tor.

      So in reality they have absolutely ZERO interest in YOU assuring YOUR OWN privacy, which is the ONLY way to be safe.

      No, these fucks are just more advocates for swiss cheese privacy.
      They'll sell you out to whoever comes asking.
      Just like all the rest in history.

      YOUR OWN PRIVACY... SEEK IT, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS.
      Lol.

    4. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porkbun sucks. I call their office of a few people to ask them why their API wasn't working. They stated that they discontinued it and won't support it. Yet, at the time they had articles on their own site about the API, along with documentation. The take away is that their business model is not a trust worthy source.

    5. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Namecheap has been pretty great for me. They say there's a small charge for their WHOIS privacy service, but in seven years and on a couple dozen domains, I've never actually had to cough up a cent for it.

    6. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Cloudflare's defense, those are shitcoins.

    7. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whois privacy is free with namecheap now https://www.namecheap.com/security/whoisguard.aspx

    8. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah dreamhost. Just the best. The best. The best people and the best service because that is how we are going to run this administration but only getting the best.

    9. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running piracy sites is illegal to begin with, which is the only reason you need to be THAT anonymous.

    10. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      namecheap's whois privacy is worthless. They will give out your information to anybody who asks for it.

    11. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not provide DNSSEC support.

    12. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You do realise that Oregon is among the whitest of the 50 states, don't you? The only one ever to hang out a "Coloreds and Others Not Like Us Not Welcome" on a statewide basis, IIRC... Go ahead, we'll wait while you go look this stuff up.

    13. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're not an American 14-year-old and you happen to live in, oh, I dunno, say, Russia, China, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, or ...?

    14. Re: Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14 year olds are too young to enter contracts, dipshit. Kids in those places don't need domains.

  6. Overheads are a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are they all working for free over there?

    There's a catch. In the cost, I mean. "At cost" is - not a business model I'd want to take to a bank.

    1. Re:Overheads are a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Cloudflare business model has always been to get more of your traffic to flow through them, for example the DDOS "protection" that entails CF having your TLS cert private key. Access to your data is undoubtedly being monetized in various ways that they won't tell anyone about, plus the odds that they're in bed with the US intel agencies are roughly 100%, so probably funding comes from that direction in the guise of gov't contracts.

    2. Re:Overheads are a thing by Shikaku · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I did my own research but you can just have fun looking at these two links and figuring it out for yourself; the highlights I noticed is that they respond to USA subpoenas, that they can but usually don't tolerate resource abuse, and follow US laws:

      https://www.cloudflare.com/tra...

      https://www.cloudflare.com/pri...

  7. Need internet 2.0 ASAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By-pass shit like CloudFlare.

    1. Re:Need internet 2.0 ASAP by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By-pass shit like CloudFlare.

      Anyone who attempts to create an internet that the US and 'Five-Eyes' nations cannot control and cannot ID and track down those using it will be destroyed, or outright killed as a last resort.

      The US government and other Western governments like the UK and EU well know that the internet is one of, if not the greatest, threat to their authoritarian power and hegemony if not tightly under their control and monitoring.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:Need internet 2.0 ASAP by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Western governments like the UK and EU well know that the internet is one of, if not the greatest, threat to their authoritarian power and hegemony

      Right. Whereas Vlad the Lad thinks it's the best thing since rubber mattress covers.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Need internet 2.0 ASAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hurrrr russia putin durrrr

    4. Re:Need internet 2.0 ASAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that you wish for a place where you can order murders with impunity

    5. Re:Need internet 2.0 ASAP by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that you wish for a place where you can order murders with impunity

      It already exists.

      It's called "government".

      I want a place where I can securely communicate with others to organize to peacefully change the government so it no longer routinely engages in things like murder, parallel construction, and warrant-less domestic surveillance to serve the political and ideological agendas of those in power.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  8. Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh really?" - Nation States

  9. About time, move away from Network Solutions by Tolvor · · Score: 1

    I just paid $39.99 for a domain renewal that I had at Network Solutions, plus $35.99 "late fee" (late by 1 day), plus $15.99 private registration.

    I was going to move to GoDaddy, but Cloudflare sounds nice.

    1. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're that braindead that you still use Network Solutions? Hopelessly stupid.

    2. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anyone seriously considering GoDaddy for any service that they offer, my suggestion to you as an alternative would be "literally anyone else." Think of that company as the McDonalds of domain registrars. They're all about volume and overselling what they offer, and customer service is an afterthought at best.

      I'm a happy Namecheap customer. Affordable, reliable, and when I needed assistance (with a transfer from some uncooperative twats) quick and competent. They're also great at sending out notifications on upcoming domain expiries if you want that sort of thing. Free WHOISGuard too, although that seems to be pretty much standard nowadays.

    3. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I urge you to try out NameSilo.com before anything else.

    4. Re: About time, move away from Network Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hover.com is nice. Slightly higher prices than NoDaddy, but lots of free like dns and privacy.

    5. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by SeriousTube · · Score: 1

      Godaddy sucks big time. Look at namecheap or ghandi, or other places but not godaddy.

    6. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Network Solutions is an unreasonably overpriced registrar with poor-quality technical support.

      GoDaddy is also overpriced for what is being offered. Especially when you look into SSL certs.

      My advice: Go with offshore, small-time DNS registrar. This raises the barrier of entry for anyone trying to file frivolous take-down lawsuits. For DNS hosting, there are several reliable free providers. I go with hurricane electric (he.net). Never had downtime due to DNS hiccups.

    7. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      You need to look up nearlyfreespeech. Just renewed one of my domains there for $13. Adding privacy took it to $16 for a year.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    8. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by nickjj · · Score: 1

      Check out https://namesilo.com./ .com domains are $8.99 all the time and it includes free private registration for life.

      It's $1 more per year than Cloudflare except it's available now and includes free email forwarding (which Cloudflare does not).

    9. Re:About time, move away from Network Solutions by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I've got no privacy paid for, but for some reason my nearlyfreespeech registered domain, in my email, shows no contact info... Other domains I registered do.

  10. Everyone loves GoDaddy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have the fewest ads, no upselling, and I can get in, buy, and get out in less than a minute. After the sale, then never send weekly emails either. Never, not once. /s

    1. Re: Everyone loves GoDaddy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have GoDaddy and it's fine. I never read email so I guess the spam hasn't been a problem.

  11. Nazi faggot shit. Cleanse your ass before prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Don Junior.

  12. Re:Read this today. Truth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black Lives Matter is a racist organization.

    Fixed that for you.

    It didn't start out that way, but like so many well intentioned grassroots movements born out of genuine concern and love (in this case, a woman wanting to stand up for the memory of her mentally ill brother who was gunned down without justification or provocation by murderous police) it's been hijcaked and turned into a tool of divisiveness and hate.

    ALL lives matter.

  13. Good. The wholesale prices are still outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .de domains can be had for less than $2 a year, without bait-and-switch price hikes. The .de registry is operated as non-profit coop by network operators and hosters. The .de CC-TLD of Germany is the third largest TLD after .com and .cn.

  14. No legitimate users of WHOIS privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that the only users of WHOIS privacy are scammers, spammers and blackhats by considerable margin.

    1. Re:No legitimate users of WHOIS privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see your data bitch.

    2. Re:No legitimate users of WHOIS privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the old "If you're not doing anything wrong, you've got nothing to hide!" angle.

      You're trotting that line of BS out in the wrong neck of the woods, pal.

    3. Re:No legitimate users of WHOIS privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that WHOIS privacy is a must in domain ownership, and I have a stack of letters from scamming registrars to prove it.

      Unless you thing is to drain scamming registrars of their money by sending out these scam letters... be my guest: don't use WHOIS privacy.

    4. Re: No legitimate users of WHOIS privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Company domain used to have open who is because "why not?". We got at least one scam email a day and one physical letter a week using info taken from the whois: fake bills, domain port-out requests, ...

      It is set to private now and there is much less of this stuff.

  15. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe one day their CEO will wake up and decide your domain shouldn't be online.

  16. If you're not the customer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloudflare....Will Also Offer Free Privacy To Customers

    If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Regardless of whether you think this offer is made in good faith, your privacy is something companies can make money by selling. And they will, eventually.

    Cloudflare isn't currently publicly traded, but it likely will be some day. And at some point, someone will invoke "the duty to the stockholders" as the justification for exploiting all company owned assets to the maximum potential. i.e. selling your information to whoever they choose. It's incredibly unlikely that their terms of service will prevent this in perpetuity, in a way that would survive a change in control or other genuinely permanent protections. What, you think they're going to be afraid to risk losing business from their "we don't make any money providing this service!" service?

    1. Re:If you're not the customer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the dumbest shit I've ever heard. Lots of companies provide free whois protection. Not everybody is out to get you, crazy.

  17. No bait and switch? No upselling? by caffeinejolt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they are only charging customers the registry cost plus the ICANN fee as mentioned in the article, that means they are still operating at a loss if they 1) are accepting payment methods which cost money (i.e. credit cards, paypal, etc.) or 2) providing customer support to registrar customers. I would prefer they charged more to at least break-even since presumably they will do at least one if not both of these (they already accept credit cards for their other services). I have all my domains at NameSilo, which I really like, and while they charge a bit more than Cloudflare, at least I understand that they are making money and therefore NameSilo's domain registration service is sustainable.

    I have used Cloudflare for years and really like them as well, but when a business announces pricing which would result in a loss or at best - not make any money, that makes me suspicious. I am left to assume they are counting on sales from their other services to make up for this - they are a business after all - beholden to investors who at some point expect ROI.

    Cloudflare is stating "we promise to never charge you anything more than the wholesale price each TLD charges" - but that is not just a promise to "never" make money on domain registrations... if they are offering support for domain registrations or offer popular payment methods it is also a promise to always lose money on that part of their business. When a company makes a promise like that (i.e. unlimited bandwidth)... it calls for additional scrutiny. I'd be careful when considering Cloudflare for your domains - they have either not really thought this one through, or are rolling our their own bait and switch scheme.

  18. "Free privacy" by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Privacy should be 'free' by default, everywhere, every time.

    1. Re:"Free privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy should be 'free' by default, everywhere, every time.

      Perhaps, and bad people shouldn't exist to be able to do bad things.

      But in both cases, that simply isn't the world we live in.
      Shy of eradicating everyone on earth except ones self, that isn't a world that is even possible.

      So we have to make the best of what we have and try to improve it as best we can, as the only other option is accepting it.

      No one else will look out for your interests nearly as well as you yourself can. You just need to accept that fact before anything can get better, instead of going on about what should and shouldn't be.

    2. Re:"Free privacy" by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Fuck off. Corporations and governments should BY DEFAULT respect people's privacy. 'Monetizing' people's personal informtation, after having them click on a EULA or site agreement that deliberately obfuscates what it is they're 'collecting' from you and why, is bullshit. Sifting people's private email messages is bullshit. Databases of what people buy and where they buy it is bullshit. Selling people devices that intentionally watch and listen in on what happens in people's homes or around their persons is bullshit. It's only lazy pieces of shit like you who accept being abused in this manner who, through your complacency, apathy, and cowardice, allow these practices to continue. People need to be less shitty, less lazy, and more courageous, and stand up for the basic human right of privacy. We are not convicts in prison, we are not 2 year old children, we are not animals on a farm or in a zoo, we are not property, we are citizens of an ostensibly free country and bullshit like this should not, under LAW, be allowed, ever. Any other answer just reveals you to be part of the problem, perpetuating it through your own complacency, apathy, and cowardice. Prove me wrong, if you can; pro-tip, you can't, it's the 800 pound gorilla in the room, it's the Uncomfortable Truth, it's the thing people don't want to admit about themselves: they're lazy, and they've allowed themselves to be conquered, to have their power taken from them, for the illusions of things like 'security' and 'convenience'.

      I will NEVER change my mind about this, and neither you nor any other lazy cowards like you will change my mind, EVER. YOU need to change, not me, YOU need to fight this bullshit.

  19. Walk Away from CoCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Software developers of the world, open your eyes! Our communities are being raped, our work pillaged.

    Detestable villains - mean spirited, bigoted, belligerent, vicious - are using underhanded tricks to force hypocritical "Codes of Conduct" on the projects we built.

    The only purpose of these CoCs is to allow so-called "Progressives" to conduct witch hunts against anyone who opposes them. Thereby they plan to steal our work for their shadowy corporate paymasters.

    You can readily tell these CoCs are not about "just being nice" - because they are ALWAYS supported by the very LEAST NICE, most aggressively mean and shamelessly bigoted people you can imagine.

    If a project to which you contribute has been raped by CoC-mongers there is a simple solution: WALK AWAY. Never contribute again. If you have a patch almost ready, count the time you spent on it as a loss and throw it away. If you see a security issue, remain silent and do nothing. IT'S NO LONGER YOUR PROJECT. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME THERE.

    If you are evaluating new software, don't even consider any projects burdened under the tyranny of a CoC. It doesn't matter if they are technically superior - just don't consider them. Never be openly political, always make up a technical reason for rejecting CoCed projects.

    Don't argue in public about the CoC. Doing so only exposes you to needless risk. You might be dis-employed, blackballed, and even set up for a #MeToo purge. Just stay far away.

    Comrades: Individually we are powerless, and easily crushed beneath the iron boot of Corporate Social Just-Us. But together in solidarity we are millions and we are strong. The Internet itself depends on our collective labor. If we stop working, the internet stops working.

    Free Software developers, save yourselves and save your communities! Just WALK AWAY from any project with a CoC. Without our labor they are nothing.

  20. Overly cynical by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    I think it's well established that any software company cannot be trusted with the words "free" and "privacy" in the same policy, let alone the same sentence.

    Cloudflare seems like the Amazon of web hosting. Lose money on paper, and continue swallowing up as much share in their market as possible until they're so big you can't refuse their services. It pains me how many web sites I visit (or used to) have all of their content flowing through Cloudflare.

    1. Re: Overly cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, at-cost domains, but they make money monetizing your traffic. (They have the private TLS keys of course.)

  21. Re:No bait and switch? No upselling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the value in you is that you now can access their cloudflare and other services directly from the management console.

    The free part is offset by the additional upswing in customers they will get who are ready to go with an existing relationship with them.

    This will hurt godaddy and it's very difficult for godaddy to do the same and debase cloudflare's business.

  22. As with anything on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are not paying for the product, YOU are the product. The fact that they are offering these registration services at cost and their other services cheap/free really makes me question their motives and what they are doing with the data they have access to as it passes though their services.

  23. Re: c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please keep using bold text, as it allows me to quickly scroll past these comments. Thanks.

  24. Re:Read this today. Truth! by omnichad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's basically prejudice + power, both items need to present

    This definition was invented by racist minority people who want to believe they aren't racist and have free reign to say whatever hateful, spiteful thing that they want.

  25. "Free" to customers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... If you give them money they give you this for "free"? What a DEAL!

  26. Re:No bait and switch? No upselling? by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you buy a domain name these days for a small business, do you want to log into a separate site to manage 1) the website 2) the dns 3) the whois 4) cloudflare.

    No of course not. You buy all the services from one place, and then you go on to buy the next website from them, and the next.

    They can be the first to race to the bottom with domain name registration fees. Used to be you had to pay to get whois protection, now everyone has it for free. This is the good part of capitalism, the costs to "provide" this "service" are extremely low. It was never worth $10 as a service charge. Whats that for? so they can send 20% of the money to icann for me? And the rest goes to a few database edits by an automated program?

    --
    -
  27. nah thx, no desire for censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't want to live in fear of saying something "wrong" that a cloudflare employee/zealot might find offensive and decide to cease service. Contrary to hosting/ddos protection getting a domain from an unwilling registrar takes weeks.

    I'd rather pay a premium to some "capitalist pig" that doesn't care about feelings and political agendas and is glad to take my money.

  28. at last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now I'm using 1and1 but the prices go higher and higher.
    I looked for alternative solutions but they're all outrageously pricey.

  29. The hackers will love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cheap domains, with privacy so they cant be tracked.. well done for thinking this one through.

  30. Re:No bait and switch? No upselling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Used to be you had to pay to get whois protection, now everyone has it for free. This is the good part of capitalism

    To be fair, they only started offering this for free when it became illegal not to do so in the EU...

  31. Let ex CIA honeypot Cloudflare control your domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all your keys for your encrypted domain traffic. How could it possibly be bad?

    In fact, every government, multinational corporation, political think-tank and financial institute should get right on this. Great idea.

  32. Re: No bait and switch? No upselling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Many companies offered it for free for years...

  33. Real quotes about gAyPK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just crap - written in crayon, fictional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine as a punchline to a joke by mmell February 17, 2017

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is fucking insane - by JazzLad April 20, 2016

    his hosts "program" is actually a broken batch file by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to be a laughingstock while consuming excessive amounts of alcohol by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your tinfoil hat by Karmashock September 09 2015

    that APK nut, I can't get him to stop talking about his piece of shit file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    APK

    P.S.=> When YOU do better than THAT by our /. registered peers, then talk (from behind your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a "so-called" WASTED life) - ok? apk

  34. Re:Read this today. Truth! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    This definition was invented by racist minority people who want to believe they aren't racist and have free reign to say whatever hateful, spiteful thing that they want.

    You mean like "free reign"?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: his FAKEname on a post impersonating me https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & altering /.er's words.

    c6gunner tried to mock me 1st https://linux.slashdot.org/com...

    So I challenge c6gunner to show he did better work than mine & he CAN'T!

    YOU DEMAND PROOF of others here? "I've yet to see you provide any evidence of that." by c6gunner on Monday March 15, 2010 @10:02PM (#31490942) ?

    So now I DEMAND IT OF YOU & YOU FAIL!

    c6gunner = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!

    * c6gunner's LYING saying I did a MacOS X one - I haven't yet & c6gunner's LYING impersonating me hosts work vs. Intel CPU issues (spectre/meltdown).

    APK

    P.S.=> You say hosts = shit here https://slashdot.org/comments.... ? /.ers & security pros SAY DIFFERENT: /.ers https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments....

    SECURITY PROS https://slashdot.org/comments....

    REAL RESULTS w/ hosts vs. threats https://slashdot.org/comments....

    EAT YOUR WORDS!

  36. c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: his FAKEname on a post impersonating me https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & altering /.er's words.

    c6gunner tried to mock me 1st https://linux.slashdot.org/com...

    So I challenge c6gunner to show he did better work than mine & he CAN'T!

    YOU DEMAND PROOF of others here? "I've yet to see you provide any evidence of that." by c6gunner on Monday March 15, 2010 @10:02PM (#31490942) ?

    So now I DEMAND IT OF YOU & YOU FAIL!

    c6gunner = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!

    * c6gunner's LYING saying I did a MacOS X one - I haven't yet & c6gunner's LYING impersonating me hosts work vs. Intel CPU issues (spectre/meltdown).

    APK

    P.S.=> You say hosts = shit here https://slashdot.org/comments.... ? /.ers & security pros SAY DIFFERENT: /.ers https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments....

    SECURITY PROS https://slashdot.org/comments....

    REAL RESULTS w/ hosts vs. threats https://slashdot.org/comments....

    EAT YOUR WORDS!

  37. Re: No bait and switch? No upselling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many != all

  38. Re:Read this today. Truth! by omnichad · · Score: 1

    No, that's a nice eggcorn. Especially if you want to add to the connotation of what you're saying, since they mean mostly the same thing but slightly different. Nobody's required to use predefined idioms here - new ones are fine.

  39. Re:Read this today. Truth! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    they mean mostly the same thing but slightly different

    No they don't. Not unless a monarch controls a country with leather straps.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. Re:Read this today. Truth! by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Both are being used metaphorically, so neither thing would literally be true.

  41. Fine words butter no parsons by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    There's using a word metaphorically and there's using the wrong word. They aren't the same thing.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Fine words butter no parsons by omnichad · · Score: 1

      What makes it the wrong word? Because it's not part of a standard issue idiom and you can't stand variations?