Slashdot Mirror
Cloudflare Launches a Low-Cost Domain Registrar, Which Will Also Offer Free Privacy To Customers (arstechnica.com)
Cloudflare, which is celebrating its eighth birthday has announced yet another service: an at-cost domain registrar. From a report: While Cloudflare had already been handling domain registration through the company's Enterprise Registrar service, that service was intended for some of Cloudflare's high-end customers who wanted extra levels of security for their domain names. The new domain registrar business -- called Cloudflare Registrar -- will eventually be open to anyone, and it will charge exactly what it costs for Cloudflare to register a domain. As Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince wrote in a blog post this week, "We promise to never charge you anything more than the wholesale price each TLD charges." That includes the small fee assessed by ICANN for each registration.
Prince said that he was motivated to take the company into the registrar business because of Cloudflare's own experience with registrars and by the perception that many registrars are in the business mostly to up-sell things that require no additional effort. "All the registrar does is record you as the owner of a particular domain," Prince said. "That just involves sending some commands to an API. In other words, domain registrars are charging you for being a middle-man and delivering essentially no value to justify their markup." Charging overhead for that sort of service, Prince said, "seemed as nutty to us as certificate authorities charging to run a bit of math." (Cloudflare also provides free SSL certificates.)
Prince said that he was motivated to take the company into the registrar business because of Cloudflare's own experience with registrars and by the perception that many registrars are in the business mostly to up-sell things that require no additional effort. "All the registrar does is record you as the owner of a particular domain," Prince said. "That just involves sending some commands to an API. In other words, domain registrars are charging you for being a middle-man and delivering essentially no value to justify their markup." Charging overhead for that sort of service, Prince said, "seemed as nutty to us as certificate authorities charging to run a bit of math." (Cloudflare also provides free SSL certificates.)
Do they still have the bit about terminating accounts at their sole discretion? Cloudflare got into the censorship business in 2017, can't say that I trust them in 2018.
If you don't like or trust CloudFlare, then how could you possibly like an SJW operation based in Portland, Oregon?
.de domains can be had for less than $2 a year, without bait-and-switch price hikes. The .de registry is operated as non-profit coop by network operators and hosters. The .de CC-TLD of Germany is the third largest TLD after .com and .cn.
By-pass shit like CloudFlare.
Anyone who attempts to create an internet that the US and 'Five-Eyes' nations cannot control and cannot ID and track down those using it will be destroyed, or outright killed as a last resort.
The US government and other Western governments like the UK and EU well know that the internet is one of, if not the greatest, threat to their authoritarian power and hegemony if not tightly under their control and monitoring.
Strat
Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
If they are only charging customers the registry cost plus the ICANN fee as mentioned in the article, that means they are still operating at a loss if they 1) are accepting payment methods which cost money (i.e. credit cards, paypal, etc.) or 2) providing customer support to registrar customers. I would prefer they charged more to at least break-even since presumably they will do at least one if not both of these (they already accept credit cards for their other services). I have all my domains at NameSilo, which I really like, and while they charge a bit more than Cloudflare, at least I understand that they are making money and therefore NameSilo's domain registration service is sustainable.
I have used Cloudflare for years and really like them as well, but when a business announces pricing which would result in a loss or at best - not make any money, that makes me suspicious. I am left to assume they are counting on sales from their other services to make up for this - they are a business after all - beholden to investors who at some point expect ROI.
Cloudflare is stating "we promise to never charge you anything more than the wholesale price each TLD charges" - but that is not just a promise to "never" make money on domain registrations... if they are offering support for domain registrations or offer popular payment methods it is also a promise to always lose money on that part of their business. When a company makes a promise like that (i.e. unlimited bandwidth)... it calls for additional scrutiny. I'd be careful when considering Cloudflare for your domains - they have either not really thought this one through, or are rolling our their own bait and switch scheme.
Right. Whereas Vlad the Lad thinks it's the best thing since rubber mattress covers.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
It's basically prejudice + power, both items need to present
This definition was invented by racist minority people who want to believe they aren't racist and have free reign to say whatever hateful, spiteful thing that they want.
When you buy a domain name these days for a small business, do you want to log into a separate site to manage 1) the website 2) the dns 3) the whois 4) cloudflare.
No of course not. You buy all the services from one place, and then you go on to buy the next website from them, and the next.
They can be the first to race to the bottom with domain name registration fees. Used to be you had to pay to get whois protection, now everyone has it for free. This is the good part of capitalism, the costs to "provide" this "service" are extremely low. It was never worth $10 as a service charge. Whats that for? so they can send 20% of the money to icann for me? And the rest goes to a few database edits by an automated program?
-
Fuck off. Corporations and governments should BY DEFAULT respect people's privacy. 'Monetizing' people's personal informtation, after having them click on a EULA or site agreement that deliberately obfuscates what it is they're 'collecting' from you and why, is bullshit. Sifting people's private email messages is bullshit. Databases of what people buy and where they buy it is bullshit. Selling people devices that intentionally watch and listen in on what happens in people's homes or around their persons is bullshit. It's only lazy pieces of shit like you who accept being abused in this manner who, through your complacency, apathy, and cowardice, allow these practices to continue. People need to be less shitty, less lazy, and more courageous, and stand up for the basic human right of privacy. We are not convicts in prison, we are not 2 year old children, we are not animals on a farm or in a zoo, we are not property, we are citizens of an ostensibly free country and bullshit like this should not, under LAW, be allowed, ever. Any other answer just reveals you to be part of the problem, perpetuating it through your own complacency, apathy, and cowardice. Prove me wrong, if you can; pro-tip, you can't, it's the 800 pound gorilla in the room, it's the Uncomfortable Truth, it's the thing people don't want to admit about themselves: they're lazy, and they've allowed themselves to be conquered, to have their power taken from them, for the illusions of things like 'security' and 'convenience'.
I will NEVER change my mind about this, and neither you nor any other lazy cowards like you will change my mind, EVER. YOU need to change, not me, YOU need to fight this bullshit.