Slashdot Mirror
Trump Administration Prepares a Major Weakening of Mercury Emissions Rules (nytimes.com)
The Trump administration has completed a detailed legal proposal to dramatically weaken a major environmental regulation covering mercury, a toxic chemical emitted from coal-burning power plants, The New York Times reports, citing a person familiar with the matter. From the report: The proposal would not eliminate the mercury regulation entirely, but it is designed to put in place the legal justification for the Trump administration to weaken it and several other pollution rules, while setting the stage for a possible full repeal of the rule. Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist who is now the acting administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is expected in the coming days to send the proposal to the White House for approval. The move is the latest, and one of the most significant, in the Trump administration's steady march of rollbacks of Obama-era health and environmental regulations on polluting industries, particularly coal. The weakening of the mercury rule -- which the E.P.A. considers the most expensive clean air regulation ever put forth in terms of annual cost to industry -- would represent a major victory for the coal industry. Mercury is known to damage the nervous systems of children and fetuses.
cough cough... Trump owes the mafia nearly a billion, its just a debt to the Russian mafia under Putin's direction.
Environmentalism consists of a set of rules by which we can keep our modern lifestyle and reckless expansion of our population but apply "band-aids" like buying green products, driving Priuses, hampering our industry with regulation, and having turn-out-the-lights days.
Deep ecology says that we have to change how we live, and focus on the big problem, which is land overuse. If 50% of the land out there in every area was wild, we would not have pollution problems at all; nature would absorb our excess.
Instead, however, we have seven or eight billion -- who can count, they keep multiplying so quickly -- humans on Earth, most of which are below 90 IQ points. We are not growing better; we are a dying species reproducing recklessly in a last-ditch bid to save itself.
Regulations tie up industry and make it unable to compete, which then causes it to slow down and eventually die. That will not lead us to safer environmental practices, only a back-and-forth where one side writes a whole bunch of laws, and then the other side undoes them because those laws strangled jobs and communities.
A better way is just to set aside the land, end and reverse immigration, and cut our population back to the 150-200m that America can safely support.
Alternative Right.
Past a certain level if you want to reduce some contaminants the increase in cost can be exponential. So before having an opinion I would like to know is:
What is the current limit? Is it reasonable? What is the cost? What is the new limit, it's cost, it's impact?
Discussing this without knowing the specifics is an empty talk about how evil they are. We could have much more environmental friendly products if you are willing to pay 5000 for what now you pay 100 so it's important to establish a reasonable limit.
I'm sorry, the name "Trump" has been uttered, so reasonableness is not permitted. He can only be eeeeeeevil.
I've lived through this all before. Reagan "was" simultaneously a drooling idiot and an evil genius, etc. The same kind of hyperventilating, all the time.
Yeah yeah, blame Trump for everything. Here is an example of Obama-era legislation designed to destroy US industry. This company was polluting for decades and finally got their act together and actually met the tight standards. Then the administration tightened the noose again to destroy the company. There are no smelters left in the US now. Which raises the question.
Would you rather have industry here and regulate it so that it can exist under regulations, or would you rather have industry overseas completely unregulated where the effects are hundreds of times worse?
Face it, people. We export our pollution to other nations. You can't have an industrialized civilization without some amount of pollution, so why not try to keep those numbers small?
This is from the NYT, the same bunch that called the deputy AG a liar and said he was planning a coup by wearing a wire and some convoluted shit about invoking the 25th....yeah until I see confirmation from some site that isn't infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome? Honestly I wouldn't trust the NYT to tell me what the weather was outside their own office unless they could spin it to be Trump's fault.
ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
Perhaps you should actually read the article you linked to. The standard that you claimed tightened the noose was set in 2008. Under Bush.
I read the article, then the comments. I found it most interesting that while the levels of lead are higher than EPA regulations allow, they're lower than what everyone in the US was exposed to before 1995 from leaded gasoline.