Slashdot Mirror


Netflix is Developing a Slate of Specials That Will Let Viewers Choose the Next Storyline in a TV Episode or Movie, Report Says (bloomberg.com)

Netflix is about to let you decide how your favorite show will end, Bloomberg reported Monday. From the report: The streaming service is developing a slate of specials that will let viewers choose the next storyline in a TV episode or movie, according to people familiar with the matter. The company expects to release the first of these projects before the end of this year, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans are still private.

Viewers will get to choose their own storylines in one episode of the upcoming season of "Black Mirror," the Emmy-winning science-fiction anthology series. The show is famous for exploring the social implications of technology, including an episode where humans jockey to receive higher ratings from their peers. The fifth season of the show is expected to be released in December.

The foray into choose-your-own-adventure programming represents a big bet on a nascent form of entertainment known as interactive TV. As Netflix expands around the world, it's looking for new ways to lure customers. By blending elements of video games with traditional television, the company could create a formula that can be applied to any number of series.

18 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Reading adventure... by sarren1901 · · Score: 2

    Turn to page 12. Turn to page 49. Turn to page 26. Turn to page 71. You are slayed by...

  2. Haven't they learned anything? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Haven't they learned anything from cases such as Boaty-McBoatface, Taylor Swifts Biggest Fan,or sending her to a school for the deaf, or sending Pitbull to Alaska

    Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Haven't they learned anything from cases such as Boaty-McBoatface, Taylor Swifts Biggest Fan,or sending her to a school for the deaf, or sending Pitbull to Alaska

      Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.

      Sounds like it's Choose Your Own Adventure style ... the storylines and branches should already be created by the writers?

    2. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by fazig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The essential problem with Boaty-McBoatface wasn't that they put it up for a vote on the internet, it was that they allowed user entries.
      Give people a pre defined list of options and let them choose from. Have contingency plans for every option they can choose.
      This principle has been working for Choose Your Own Adventure books and video games since the 80's.

    3. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by radja · · Score: 2

      Worked fine for Sharknado (a series of movies that could be called stupid... then again... I like stupid B-movies)

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    4. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Leaving the choice up to the Internet, or even just Netflix subscribers isn't going to result in the best storylines, or even the storylines that necessarily reflect what actual people want to see.

      My favorite example of this is Imgur Let's play: Top comment decides what action Luke does next

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Give people a pre defined list of options and let them choose from. Have contingency plans for every option they can choose.

      Can we have at least ONE /. story that doesn't descend into politics?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can we have at least ONE /. story that doesn't descend into politics?

      No. VI forever!

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by fazig · · Score: 2

      Ask the people who turn it into politics.

      After all the principle of letting people choose from limited options isn't inherently tied to politics and can be found in many technical fields as well.
      I immediately thought of video games as a practical application of these principles. A form of media which is based upon the premise that players have a set of pre-defined choices. Some games give more choices and others. Some games feature simulations that allow players to do a lot of things, that can also have game breaking outcomes.
      But judging from the most financially successful games, something that may interest a profit oriented organizations like Netflix, there seems to be little correlation between the number of choices and or possible outcomes of those choices and the success of the product. Story based games that play like interactive movies seem to be where a lot of money is buried in these times. And those games have rather limited choices that a player can make.
      I could also think of automatons that perform a range of functions, depending on pre-defined instructions. Think of a human interface that allows an operator to choose some of the functions. If you were to design such an automaton, you have to think about these issues beforehand. You don't always give the users free reign. Of course unless perhaps they do it on their own, for themselves, and without you having any liability over the damages they can cause with it.

    8. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I never understood why people would want to use a text editor called "six".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Haven't they learned anything? by lgw · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'd rather see a "kill a character" vote

      Worked for removing the Jason Todd Robin from the Batman comics. DC offered a poll (with a 1-900 number) in 1988 to see if that particular robin should be killed, and the result was overwhelmingly for death. He stayed dead for quite a long time, too (forever, by comic book standards, it used to be said he was one of two characters who would actually stay dead, but they eventually brought him back).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Could be disapointing for the viewer by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you are presented with 5 different ways a story ends, people would want to know how it really ends or which one is correct.

    Those "choose your adventure" books always had one real ending (killing the princess and rescue the dragon.. whatever.. there's a reason why they work well with plain vanilla fantasy) and you had to get to that ending.

    --
    bickerdyke
  4. Re:Yeah, everything old is new again. by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    Didn't someone try that sort of thing with DVDs many years ago? How'd that work out?

    Depended on which choices you made

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  5. Re:Netflix floundering by Terwin · · Score: 2

    Why doesn't Netflix go back to what was working? This internal created programing is mostly crap, can't imagine its cheaper then buying really good produced shows and movies. Amazon has basically done the same thing, spending a ton of money on internal productions. Both need to go back to being a content streamer not a production house making failed original content.

    Due to:
    1) Price gouging by content owners
    2) Content owners pulling their content and making competing services

    It is probably not only a great deal safer in the long run, but probably cheaper in both the short and long-term to make their own content
    Not to mention
    3) different constraints on streaming vs broadcast
    As this lets them make episodes that do not need to exactly match the current broadcast episode length, or even the length of previous episodes for the same series.
    (including explicit material for some series/episodes that could not be broadcast)

    Also, the opportunity cost is very different as Netflix is not constrained to 'time-slots' and they can keep things running/available even if they are only marginally popular/profitable because the cost for keeping it available on their servers is effectively zero(if it is theirs), and 'broadcast' costs scale with popularity.

  6. Re:All I can say is by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This will be more "we filmed 3 endings", I expect. People's narrative choices tend to follow the 80/20 rule, so 3 endings will get you 99% of the audience. The exception to that is love triagles (or love dodecahedrons) where you can get a more even spread. I suspect romances will be the focus if this takes off, not "choose your own adventure".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  7. Re:Bad idea by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    On the contrary, it would allow for story paths for the lowest common denominator AND story paths for the rest of us.

    Netflix is available world-wide, so the lowest common denominator story path would be zero nudity, 200% guns, 300% car chases and 400% gruesome deaths for the USA while the rest of the planet could watch something with tasteful nudity, 1000% less violence and an ending that actually makes sense.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  8. Ob futurama by cciechad · · Score: 2

    If you want Calculon to race to the laser gun battle in his hover-Ferarri, press 1. If you want Calculon to double-check his paperwork, press 2. Enter now. Confused, Fry presses "1" on his chair. Mr. Moviefone: You have pressed 2. Fry: No, I didn't! Mr. Moviefone: I'm almost positive you did.

    --
    https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom
  9. Re:All I can say is by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm reminded of the 1961 film "Mr. Sardonicus", where the producer William Castle promised two endings. Supposedly, the audience could vote to punish the villain at the end or spare him. Of course, the audience always voted to punish him. Good thing too, because Mr. Castle, being an astute observer of human nature, only actually made the "punish the villain" ending.