Slashdot Mirror


The Story of Starlite, the 'Blast Proof' Material (bbc.com)

OpenSourceAllTheWay writes: The BBC has posted an interesting video series on "Starlite," a white paste developed in the 1970s and 1980s by British hairdresser Maurice Ward that could completely insulate any object it coated, like a raw egg or a piece of cardboard, against extreme heat sources -- even acetylene torches, nuclear blasts and lasers capable of heating an object to 10,000 degrees Celsius. Anything Starlite paste was smeared on could withstand extreme heat exposure without the coated object melting or combusting or heating at all in the process. The heat-proof paste got a lot of attention around the world when it was demonstrated on the BBC's Tomorrow's World TV program in 1990. Ward was an eccentric inventor -- not a classically trained scientist -- who came up with the formula for Starlite by experimenting wildly with different substances. He got the initial idea for Starlite when he was burning garbage in his backyard one day and one particular piece of garbage simply would not burn at all. Ward thought that Starlite would be worth billions when commercialized. He let NASA and other scientists test Starlite -- it did work as advertised -- but never allowed anyone to retain a sample of the substance, fearing that it could be reverse engineered. Starlite never was commercialized properly, and Ward died in 2011 without making the millions or billions he had imagined he would. Sadly, Ward took the chemical formula for Starlite to his grave with him. To this day, nobody knows the exact chemical composition of Starlite, or how one might go about recreating the substance.

1 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Walk Away from Corporate Social Just-Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I mean... mostly the code of conduct is about including people who aren't just shiddy entitled dudes. I think the world is gonna be juuuust fine without your contribution. Please take your ball and bat and go home, work on your shiddy little projects.

    Anyone who is offended by a code of conduct simply is a selfish narcissist and probably not bright enough to realize it takes a community to create truly great software. The community and as a result, projects, will be healthier without them 'contributing.'