Slashdot Mirror


The US Government Is Using Road Signs Showing Drivers How Fast They're Going To Capture License Plate Data (qz.com)

Zorro shares a report from Quartz: According to recently released U.S. federal contracting data, the Drug Enforcement Administration will be expanding the footprint of its nationwide surveillance network with the purchase of "multiple" trailer-mounted speed displays "to be retrofitted as mobile LPR [License Plate Reader] platforms." The DEA is buying them from RU2 Systems Inc., a private Mesa, Arizona company. How much it's spending on the signs has been redacted. Two other, apparently related contracts, show that the DEA has hired a small machine shop in California, and another in Virginia, to conceal the readers within the signs. An RU2 representative said the company providing the LPR devices themselves is a Canadian firm called Genetec.

4 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. Out west by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect they will have issues with bullet holes in the cameras in the western states.

  2. Redacted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How much it's spending on the signs has been redacted.

    That right there. That disgusts me. How dare a government hide such information from the voting public that's paying for it all.

  3. Re: Driving is a privilege, not a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No. Federal government can't contract their way around the law. The 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which is a COMPACT (Far above the power of a contract) specifically states that any power not granted to the federal government by the Constitution is reserved to the states and to the people.

    Not only is this yet another example of DRUG ENFORCEMENT trying to usurp power in violation of Title 42 and title 18 of the U.S. Code, but there are plans now currently in action that will take control back away from federal government and put it back in the hands of the states where it belongs.

  4. Re:Driving is a privilege, not a right by geggam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do realize when driving first started it was a right. Somehow the courts ruled away your rights.

    That somehow is because we let them. You only have rights as long as you protect them from the govt. usurping them

    Keep in mind the constitution strictly defines the limits of the federal govt and the 10th amendment declares this quite clearly.

    Hint... everything not prohibited by law is a right ;) We let them pass laws removing our rights

    So you dont have to google it... the 10th

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.