Entire Broadband Industry Sues California To Stop Net Neutrality Law (arstechnica.com)
Four lobby groups representing the broadband industry today sued California to stop the state's new net neutrality law. From a report: The lawsuit was filed in US District Court for the Eastern District of California by mobile industry lobby CTIA; cable industry lobby NCTA; telco lobby USTelecom; and the American Cable Association, which represents small and mid-size cable companies. Together, these four lobby groups represent all the biggest mobile and home Internet providers in the US and hundreds of smaller ISPs
. Comcast, Charter, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile US, Sprint, Cox, Frontier, and CenturyLink are among the groups' members. "This case presents a classic example of unconstitutional state regulation," the complaint said. The California net neutrality law "was purposefully intended to countermand and undermine federal law by imposing on [broadband] the very same regulations that the Federal Communications Commission expressly repealed in its 2018 Restoring Internet Freedom Order." ISPs say the California law impermissibly regulates interstate commerce. "[I]t is impossible or impracticable for an Internet service provider ("ISP") offering BIAS to distinguish traffic that moves only within California from traffic that crosses state borders," the lobby groups' complaint said.
Kavanagh did nothing wrong, at least nobody can prove he did. Unless of course you believe that it's the seriousness of the charges, not the nature of the evidence that matters.
California is a joke... they can't get out of their own way and are focused on nothing but "resisting" at all costs, they're the state equivalent of a second year freshman feminist who can't pass a test but assures you that she's "researched" every issue from gmo foods to vaccines causing autism as she screams about corporate evil and white male privilege.
So every time a new candidate appears we just have to find someone willing to say that this particular candidate ALSO did something in the 80s that no one can verify, and eventually we end up with no Supreme Court in the US.
That system is totally not open to abuse because everyone is honest and kind.
-=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
That's the correct response to false allegations of assault... Did you expect him to be friendly and jovial while someone lies about him and his career and name hang in the balance?
And by any standard of justice, there isn't sufficient evidence for a trial... which is why he remains innocent until and unless he's proven to be guilty.
Try saying that to my FACE, you jizz-licking faggot, and see what that gets you.
..oh that's right, you're only brave on the Internet! In real life you're a fucking COWARD and hide behind your wife's skirts like the yellow-bellied pussy you are.
Say shit like that in front of real men in real life. We'll DESTROY you. You'll be on a permanent liquid diet.