Slashdot Mirror
Evidence is Mounting That a World the Size of Neptune Could be Orbiting a Giant Planet Far, Far Away (nationalgeographic.com)
About 8,000 light-years away, a giant planet circles an aging star, marching once around its sun in a single Earth-year. But that planet, called Kepler 1625b, might not be traveling completely alone. From a report: Scientists now suspect the planet's skies are filled by an orbiting mega-moon, a stunningly large world the size of Neptune that may be the first moon spotted outside our solar system. Early hints of its existence surfaced in July 2017, when scientists tentatively announced that they'd found some evidence of an orbital companion for Kepler 1625b. But it wasn't until the Hubble Space Telescope aimed its eye at the faraway star a year ago that scientists were able to gather enough data to build the case for the so-called exomoon's presence. Now, the two scientists behind the discovery are hoping for independent confirmation of their finding to really shore up the extraordinary claim.
"I'm confident that we've done a thorough job vetting this thing, but I also anticipate there will be things other folks come up with that we might not have considered," says Columbia University's Alex Teachey, who reports the purported alien moon this week in the journal Science Advances. "Whether those other ideas are fatal to the moon hypothesis or not, that remains to be seen." For now, MIT's Sara Seager says she's reserving judgment. "Exomoons are one of the key items remaining on exoplanet researchers' wish list," Seager says. "It's exciting to see the hunt for the first exomoon continue ... and with what would be a shockingly large moon, about the size and mass of Neptune."
"I'm confident that we've done a thorough job vetting this thing, but I also anticipate there will be things other folks come up with that we might not have considered," says Columbia University's Alex Teachey, who reports the purported alien moon this week in the journal Science Advances. "Whether those other ideas are fatal to the moon hypothesis or not, that remains to be seen." For now, MIT's Sara Seager says she's reserving judgment. "Exomoons are one of the key items remaining on exoplanet researchers' wish list," Seager says. "It's exciting to see the hunt for the first exomoon continue ... and with what would be a shockingly large moon, about the size and mass of Neptune."
The fastest unmanned spacecraft achieved 0.023c. That means if we launched one today it would arrive in 34,153,732 years. Let's get to work.
That's no Moon....
Where are we going?
Planet Ten!
When?
Real soon!
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
It's a space station.
Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
The important thing here is THIS IS HOW SCIENCE IS SUPPOSED TO WORK. "Hey, we think we found this thing. We're pretty sure, but we're not going to say anything definite until it's independently confirmed by other people. Here's the data we used, here's how we got it, and here's how we used it, now please someone else check this out and see if we're right."
There is no "arrive", only "flyby"
No spacecraft we have launched so far has any way of "coming to rest" (relatively speaking) after getting up to that sort of speed.
Other than direct impact, of course.
I don't know about the journal Science Advances, but I do know that anytime I find an exoplanet with an orbital period of one year that I have forgotten to account for the orbit of Earth around the Sun.
Because PLUTO is still planet 9 and a giant mystery planet must be name “PLANET X.”
And because X means 10.
If it's bigger than Neptune, it's bigger than Uranus.
And your moon surrounds Uranus. :-D
Followed by
Media: we found a new moon!
Trump: let's go see it in person, we'll be there in three years!
Public: Trump just declared War on the New Moon!
Stock Market: How can we use this to short some Tesla stock?
China: we already have a base on this "new" moon, so stay away.
Urectum
Because PLUTO is still planet 9 and a giant mystery planet must be name “PLANET X.”
The problem with that is that if Pluto is classed as a planet then we already have planets 10, 11 and 12 and possibly more.
No bullshit, I honestly believe I may have found one while doing Project Discovery "research" in Eve Online. It was an obvious single planet orbit across all views, regular rotation, very predictable, except for a single, strong dip immediately adjacent to one of the orbits. It was either an exo-moon or a very small planet with a very long rotation. I tried to contact the researchers but got no response.
I think you meant dad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soXkFMO4ixI ?
For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.
ipfs.io
I watched that video of the eclipse on that site.
So what? It was an eclipse.
Are you implying that it wasn't real, but God, who never does anything, says anything, and is conveniently invisible, is real?
The red light of the chromosphere should not be visible in the blackness of the moon. It should only be (drowned out) in the light of the corona. But there is more, in the txt.
If it looks anything like Neptune, then it's a blue moon.
Probably a capture. But it's the density of the host planet - ten times Jupiter's - that is really interesting and being largely ignored.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
8000 lightyears away who believes this crap
a) These objects are shepherded by a large planet that we have not yet found
b) These objects weer shepherded at one time by an object (star?) that passed through the solar system
c) We're finding more objects with orbits that would support an unfound planet simply because we're looking more closely in that direction
Any to add?
If it is a gassy planet as they say, it should be called Taco Bell.
Melancholia!
I suppose this is where definitions start getting a bit muddy due to scale.
However are they certain there aren't binary planets? I mean if you can have binary stars that orbit each other around a central pivot, why not planets as well? Again didn't rtfa so I don't know how massive the planet is to it's "moon", which I assume is how this might be defined at least for orbitary (word?) purposes...