Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google Launches Third-Gen Chromecast With 60fps Video, Multiroom Audio Support (variety.com)

Posted by msmash on from the about-time dept.

Alongside the new Pixel smartphones, and the Pixel Slate laptop-tablet hybrid, Google on Tuesday also announced a new version of its Chromecast streaming adapter, the third generation of the company's streaming device, which supports playback video at higher frame rates and can also stream multiroom audio. From a report: The new device goes on sale Tuesday in the U.S., Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Great Britain, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore and Sweden. Stateside, the new Chromecast once again costs $35 -- the same as its predecessor. [...] The bigger changes are on the inside: The new Chromecast is 15% faster than the previous model, which allows it to stream 1080p HD video with a rate of up to 60 frames per second (fps). "Everything becomes much smoother," said Google Home product manager Chris Chan during a recent interview with Variety. He specifically cited the growth of 60fps content on YouTube as one of the reasons Google added the new feature.

39 comments

  1. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they can track what I watch in ultra smooth 60fps. I'm sure when they leak that it'll be pure awesome.

    1. Re:Yay by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Cops have all the best drugs, and Google has all the best porn!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  2. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they can track all that I watch in ultra smooth 60FPS and leak it. I'm sure they'll hide it from the public for a number of years.

    Screw Google.

    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow first AND second posts. well done!

  3. AV1 support by enriquevagu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since AV1 has been standardized six months ago and there are no HW decoders available yet, it will not support the flagship new royalty-free video codec from Google. Somewhat odd they have not delayed the launch some few months; 15% faster is an incremental improvement.

    1. Re:AV1 support by llamalad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must be new here... Why sell one significantly upgraded product when you can sell two incremental upgrades instead?

    2. Re:AV1 support by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can add it with software later. The hardware accelerated part of AV1 could be implemented as shaders on the GPU.

      Glad to see 60fps support. Hopefully it's got full frame rate switching for 24 and 25 FPS too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:AV1 support by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be just an automatic firmware upgrade to support any new protocol? In other words, the hardware should already be ready for it, it's just a question of updating the software.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:AV1 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would not be "some few months". It'd probably be closer to a year or two, considering all of the validation and work that's required when rolling out a product like this.

      Fully expect to see AV1 ship as part of an ultra refresh or a late 2019 CC3 refresh

    5. Re:AV1 support by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      The counterpoint is that IMO Google is basically giving away the Chromecasts to keep peoples' eyeballs on their content through Youtube and other services. I mean how profitable can it possibly be to sell one for $35, after build, packaging, transport, and letting retail take a piece? Like maybe $5? Instead of making $5 twice, why not delay a few months and then release the ChromeCast Pro Two - Revenge of the AVI codec and charge $50 for it? That way instead of 2 x $5, you make 1 x $20 !

      So I really don't think selling these things twice is a motivator here.

    6. Re:AV1 support by Trongy · · Score: 1

      The Chromecast is first and foremost an inexpensive device. My guess is that new silicon with AV1 support would not meet the Chromecast price-point for a few years.

      There was no Chromecast Ultra replacement announced today - presumably the eventual replacement will have AV1 support.

    7. Re:AV1 support by llamalad · · Score: 1

      And what about the folks whose success and bonuses are measured by units shipped? :-)

  4. Not much of an upgrade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No remote? I'd rather get a Roku then!

    1. Re:Not much of an upgrade. by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Chromecast supports HDMI CEC. AKA use your TV remote dumbass.

    2. Re: Not much of an upgrade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ... buy a brand new and more expensive TV just so that you can use the remote control with the cheap piece of crap and barely usable spyware device from Google.

  5. Why should anyone trust it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security of consumers personal data is at best an afterthought in this organization, all the way up the chain. Their priorities are commie liberal politics and advertising. Stay away.

  6. Quite the opposite by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    No remote?

    You don't need a remote, since any electronic device is monitored by Google at this point. Just type "volume up" in a search bar, or tap out "play cat videos on YouTube" on the door of your connected fridge in morse code. The GoogleMind will receive your desires and act on them, often desires you didn't even know you had until Google meets them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GoogleMind will receive your desires and act on them, often desires you didn't even know you had until Google meets them.

      I guess that explains my RealDoll delivery this afternoon, but GoogleMind seriously under-estimated my obsession with big breasts.

    2. Re:Quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use your TV's remote: Chromecast TV Remote Support and What is CEC

    3. Re:Quite the opposite by williamyf · · Score: 1

      I guess that explains my RealDoll delivery this afternoon, but GoogleMind seriously udder-estimated my obsession with big breasts.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    4. Re:Quite the opposite by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Bah! The Googlemind offers a very limited selection of live goat porn and will never actually select it for you, no matter how much you might wish it to do so. The Bingmind, on the other hand, has found its one true calling and will deliver up whatever nastiness you can imagine and probably quite a few you haven't, as well. Bing has already won the porn search wars before google was even aware they were being fought, and has therefore won the internet as well. Sorry Google, better luck next time.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Quite the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The built in support for remotes is shithouse. it is random as to whether it will work and if it does it is usually a very limited set of options. I bought my Chromecast for that supposed support, my chromecast now sits attached to the back room TV unused as once I found how poorly it worked I went and bought a device that actually works.

  7. 60fps? What about 23.976fps? by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

    I'd be really happy if it did 23.976fps so I could watch movies on Netflix without having to suffer judder from the pulldown.

    1. Re: 60fps? What about 23.976fps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switch the firmware on your TV to PAL mode.

    2. Re:60fps? What about 23.976fps? by djbckr · · Score: 1

      It *supports* 60fps. It also *plays* all the other frame rates.

  8. Need a WAN connection to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so jam it up your Jimmy janga.

    1. Re:Need a WAN connection to work? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Heard at work: "Hey Jimmy, come here. We got a job for you."

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  9. Reliability (lack of) by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2

    We use our Chromecast a lot (using it right now) but ooh boy is it unreliable! You can start a show, and 2 minutes later the app has lost the Chromecast so you can't pause or rewind etc. Then a few minutes later it's there again. Then it's not there but "local device" is, and sometimes you can connect to that, sometimes you can't. It's really frustrating.

    1. Re: Reliability (lack of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same issue. Is yours by any chance a 1st gen unit? Ours is and I've heard some people say newer versions work better but I don't really care enough to spend the money to upgrade what (mostly) already works

    2. Re: Reliability (lack of) by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2

      Yes, first gen, and I feel the same -- tempted to upgrade, but it works enough that we just put up with the flakiness.

    3. Re:Reliability (lack of) by schweini · · Score: 2

      Make sure your phone isn't configured to once in a while disconnect from wifi and check if 3G/4G is better. Many phones do this in order to ignore shitty or saturated wifi internet connections. Once the wifi is disabled, the phone can't see the chromecast anymore and problems arise.

    4. Re: Reliability (lack of) by gravewax · · Score: 1

      I have a newer gen, same exact problem so no it aint better on newer versions, I have almost stopped using mine completely now as it is so god damn annoying.

    5. Re:Reliability (lack of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a shot in the dark, next time this happens shout down the hallway to whoever just put something in the microwave or picked up the cordless phone to knock it off for a few minutes.

    6. Re: Reliability (lack of) by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      I've had zero problems since putting a WAP within two feet of a 2nd gen Chromecast, but did have some of this before with a weak signal.

      --

      jh

    7. Re:Reliability (lack of) by thepigwanker · · Score: 1

      My wife has a WiFi-only (Google Pixel C) tablet whose apps drop the connection to the Chromecast regularly. I recently moved my WAP so that it resides in the same room and have not seen an improvement.

    8. Re: Reliability (lack of) by gravewax · · Score: 1

      I have strong wifi signal throughout my house, The AP is in the next room. Nothing else has wifi problems and the chromecast when playing doesn't disconnect or stop playing just the damn controls for it become intermittent. basically makes the device useless unless you intend to never use pause etc which with my wife is not an option as toilet breaks or plot explanations at some point are an almost certainty. I switched to using a Fetch TV device in one room and a generic android pvr in another room, they work perfectly and both have remote controls which is definitely a better setup.

    9. Re: Reliability (lack of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is nothing but a fake myth posted in Facebook memes by idiots

    10. Re: Reliability (lack of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is NOT a myth. both our microwave and our clothes dryer interfere severely with wifi when in use.

  10. Google Home product manager Chris Chan by dillee1 · · Score: 1

    I never know that infamous creator of sonichu has become a google employee.