Slashdot Mirror


Tech Suffers From Lack of Humanities, Says Mozilla Head (theguardian.com)

The head of the Mozilla Foundation, Mitchell Baker, is warning that companies need to diversify their hiring practices to include more people from backgrounds in philosophy and psychology if they want to tackle the problem of misinformation online. He also "warned that hiring employees who mainly come from Stem -- science, technology, engineering and maths -- will produce a new generation of technologists with the same blindspots as those who are currently in charge, a move that will 'come back to bite us,'" reports the Guardian. From the report: "Stem is a necessity, and educating more people in Stem topics clearly critical," Baker told the Guardian. "Every student of today needs some higher level of literacy across the Stem bases. "But one thing that's happened in 2018 is that we've looked at the platforms, and the thinking behind the platforms, and the lack of focus on impact or result. It crystallized for me that if we have Stem education without the humanities, or without ethics, or without understanding human behavior, then we are intentionally building the next generation of technologists who have not even the framework or the education or vocabulary to think about the relationship of Stem to society or humans or life."

"Stem is a necessity, and educating more people in Stem topics clearly critical," Baker told the Guardian. "Every student of today needs some higher level of literacy across the Stem bases. "But one thing that's happened in 2018 is that we've looked at the platforms, and the thinking behind the platforms, and the lack of focus on impact or result. It crystallized for me that if we have Stem education without the humanities, or without ethics, or without understanding human behavior, then we are intentionally building the next generation of technologists who have not even the framework or the education or vocabulary to think about the relationship of Stem to society or humans or life."

30 of 472 comments (clear)

  1. Thought most STEM workers went to college by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a CS degree. As part of that, I had to take quite a few humanities courses, do a lot of reading and research on other topics.

    Sure there are some workers from trade schools where that kind of thing is not as prevalent, but it seems like most tech workers I've run into have also been to college (and often not even for CS degrees so they have an even wider range of education). So I'm not sure if there really is the problem being claimed...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by terrycarlino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seem to recall /. covering the problems with liberal arts majors not having to take real STEM courses while STEM students are forced to take the same liberal arts courses as liberal art majors.

      Rants aside (I'm looking at you Mr. Hammer) soft sciences like psychology seem incapable of producing reproducible research. Why anyone would think they should have a bigger role in fields based on real reproducible science is beyond me.

      Ethics will continue to be a problem in a culture where right and wrong continue to be treated as relative. I've taken numerous ethics courses. None of them would admit the existence of the concept of 'wrong' behavior or explain why, other than going to jail or getting sued one should not engage in it. As long as that paradigm exists ethics will be a problem.

    2. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a CS degree. As part of that, I had to take quite a few humanities courses, do a lot of reading and research on other topics.

      The psychology that you take in CS is entrance level. It is the scientific part, about perception and groupings and such.

      There is another level when you fill an entire study with it. You can go the clinical path (two friends of mine did that) which is basically where doctors go. This part also is reasonably well understood and has a mostly sound scientific basis.

      Or you can go the humanities path and then it becomes a wild mix of dogma and bullshit. There are extensive articles around (Google is your friend) about how most of the studies don't replicate, almost none of the studies replacate outside the lab, and how deeply ethics commissions and gender studies have applied a chokehold to necessary research.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      We had to take a humanities focus area (3 courses in one 'focus area') in addition to our regular humanities coursework.

      Turns out every engineering student had run the same algorithm...best ratio. Hence the psych department had made themselves the only 'not eligible for humanities focus area' department.

      Best not to stick your dick into crazy. (psych major==crazy). But we were kids, didn't know better.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same in Europe. Successfully, I might add, if only because those gender bullshit classes are usually free credits. Tests are easy, if your answer is something along the lines of "white men are to blame" you pass.

      It's a bit like the Marxist/Leninist classes that were in the curriculum back in Soviet times. Also work in a similar way. And are about as useful as credit padding material, but little for anything else.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lack of replication is often cited as evidence that science is bunk

      Because, for replicatable studies, such so-called-science is indeed bunk. You can replicate psychological studies, and for any kind of treatments, you can have control groups, preferably blind. So that "behavioural therapy" of yours can be tested. And that it can but its proponents failed to do so is exactly why we call bullshit.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:Thought most STEM workers went to college by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 4, Informative

      > Leaving aside that many "hard" sciences have the same reproduction problem (e.g. climate science)

      Yep, all this technology we have based on "Hard Science" only works randomly. It's like magic. The same magic that "Soft Sciences" rely upon.

      Laughable.

  2. Clearly. Clearly. by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tech definitely needs more people with language skills when it comes to pasting the summary.

    Tech definitely needs more people with language skills when it comes to pasting the summary.

  3. NO WE DO NOT! by Chas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The very last thing Tech needs more of are gender studies majors.

    Please stop trying to get intersectional loon-bags jobs where they can tell people what sexist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, blahblahblahblahblah pieces of shit they are and demanding they lower hiring standards to achieve a non-existent "perfect balance" of races, sexes and flat-out leftist-only ideology.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  4. Re:Riiiight. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of those fields are critical. Psychology for one is HUGE.

    In college, psychology is a dumping ground for people that can't figure out what else to major in. The most common job for psychology majors a year after graduation is "Uber driver". I don't think these people should be our guiding lights.

    The premise of TFA is silly:
    1. STEM degrees require a lot of humanities courses.
    2. There is no objective evidence that STEM people are less ethical or empathic than humanities majors.
    3. Many of the decisions TFA talks about aren't made by the engineering department.

    That the leader of Mozilla is focusing on crap like this explains much about the state of their software.

  5. Re:Riiiight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the world needs is more "Humanities" flunkies who can't pay for their basket weaving and feminist studies degrees

    People who graduate with a 4-year humanities degree are basically just as employable and just as happy with their jobs as those with STEM degrees.

    The other thing about getting yourself a humanities degree is that you aren't as easily socially engineered as someone who spends all his time with technical stuff and doesn't learn anything about people. The biggest suckers are those who are arrogant in their ignorance. I'm looking at you Gerald.

  6. Diversity by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The head of theÂMozilla Foundation, Mitchell Baker, is warning that companies need to diversify

    And that's where I stop reading. How about we just hire qualified people for a job and leave it at that? While I despise racists, mysoginists, etc. I've gotten to the point that any time I hear "diversity" I tune out because it's going to be bullshit. I also will not work for any company that has anyone with that word in their title. If that position is needed, then there's already something really wrong. Yes, there are some assholes in the world, but why would you want to force them to hire someone they are going to not want. I've had friends who were hired because of this kind of crap. And even though they were qualified, they were miserable. I know that Billy Bob Joe Jim's Klan Sheet company would lynch me on sight if they could, so I sure as hell don't want to work for him because he was forced to hire me. Do you think most white tech geeks would feel comfortable being hired to work in the ghetto because we need more white folks there? We need more fat old white men working as servers at Hooters too. There also aren't enough Asian rappers. And damnit, where are all of the quadraplegic trapeze artists.

    1. Re:Diversity by Kagetsuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      She wasn't even supposed to have the job. She literally chased out the chosen next-in-line CEO Brendan Eich (creator of JavaScript) by getting a bunch of her SJW staff to physically keep him out of the building and threaten him. Look it up *and note how a lot of news didn't cover it at all*. There's a personal account from him floating around too.

      Here's hoping Brave development progresses to the point we can all just forget about FireFox and Mozilla at some point in the near future.

  7. Mitchell is "her" not a "him" by cullenfluffyjennings · · Score: 5, Informative

    Speaking of false news, could we at least get a few details correct. More about Mitchell at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    I expect Cowboy Neil to keep everything on Slashdot 100% true news you can use.

  8. Moving towards post-truth paradigms in hiring by blarkon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While Popper's Falsification rubric for determining what is scientific isn't particularly sophisticated, the idea that there can be a hypothetical experimental result that would disprove a hypothesis is at the core of STEM fields.

    The problem in the recent humanities fields is that the core tenants of most disciplines are constructed in such a way as to be undisprovable. The moment you're learning things where it is impossible to construct a research project to disprove those things, you've moved into the realm of ideology.

    While there's probably reasons why certain companies want their workers to unquestioningly accept whatever set of assumptions about the universe that the company wants to promote, the businesses that are ultimately successful are the ones that have workers that have functional bullshit detectors. And while science is far from perfect, the epistemological basis of science involves the eventual excision of bullshit hypotheses.

    1. Re:Moving towards post-truth paradigms in hiring by malkavian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Things like CBT, you don't evaluate as a single sample. You look at statistical bodies and meta studies of those "hard science" studies (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584580/).
      It's efficacy is shown to have significance. In other words, it's not a sure fire cure, or working in even a majority of cases, but has an effect well above a lack of intervention of simple conversation.
      So, it comes down to "It'll help some people in some circumstances". Which is fine. It's one tool in an arsenal of tools that should be tried, and discarded if it doesn't work in that case.
      Where did you get your concept of it not working by reproducing, and that it's not able to be examined or evaluated by "hard science"? Because whatever source you got it from is provably wrong.

  9. Re: Companies with money to waste by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't know where you work, but my company has people with humanities degrees who picked up technical skills after they graduated.

    Humanities majors can learn to perform well at technical skills. I see no reason why STEM majors can't do the reverse.

    To get a degree of any kind, you must learn how to think and how to self-educate. That sets you up for success across many fields.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  10. Re:Translation by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The translation is there's a balance - you don't want your engineers to be incapable of empathy or ignorant of history, in the sense of not caring about hurting people.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  11. Re:Riiiight. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not the tech people that are the problem. It's the fuckwit sociopaths in management that have forced thing to be the way they are.

    Hate to break this to you, but some of those "fuckwit sociopaths" have STEM degrees.

    You need technical skills to develop technology. And you need human skills to convey what you have developed to other humans. Including management.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  12. Dangerous and Stupid by RobinBermanseder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have degrees in both camps, Science (Physics, Computing) and Humanities (Public Policy).
    I have seen and been involved in the thought processes and the implicit value hierarchies that underlie both types of thinking.

    The utterances of Ms Baker need to be exposed and refuted immediately. They are dangerous and sociopathic.
    The attack on science by the current marxist inspired SJWs threatens us with a return to the dark ages.
    Read some history.
    Read "A Canticle for Liebowitz"
    For the love of science and our civilization, resist this.

  13. Re: Companies with money to waste by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Informative

    A great deal of modern humanities teaching is deliberately obfuscated pretentious bullshit. A person with a logical mind, especially one trained to rigorously solve technical problems, has a difficult time with such convoluted garbage.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  14. Didn't you USED to make a browser Mozilla? by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about....and this is just a thought, just spitballing here, instead of taking donations from people that actually want you to make a DECENT BROWSER and spending it on virtue signaling how woke you are, how about using it to....oh I don't know...making an actual browser people want to use instead of a really cheap shitty Chrome ripoff?

    But hey keep on blowing money to show how virtuous you are, cuz "get woke go broke" isn't a thing, that's fine because this user that actually used to hand out your browser waaay back when it was a Suite, moved on to PaleMoon. Oh and hey, my browser extensions actually work there, giving me an actual reason to use it over Chrome! Huh wadda ya know, a browser that actually has real reasons to use it over the big two instead of just being a piss poor copy of the other guy...wow, maybe you should think about that, maybe when you aren't giving money to Antifa?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  15. blind spots by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is an incomplete list of study fields with obvious blind spots:

    Psychology - around half their studies do not replicate, still cannot explain basic phenomena of daily life, increasingly infused with politics, hindered by ethics (not a bad thing, but a fact) to conduct important research

    Economics - reductionist approach to humans, has no concept of basic facts of human life (e.g. altruism), in the real world economists are as often wrong as they are right, mass blindness to black swans, has led us into the financial crisis

    Gender studies and its relatives - has taken its own subject and turned it into a mixture of politics, bullshit bingo and sanctuary for rejects. Fundamentally flawed and unscientific to the core.

    No, thanks. We don't need any of these people anywhere. Most of them are already doing enough damage as they are. "Diversity" is a bullshit term when it is enforced, because it is becoming the exact thing that it pretends to combat - exclusion. "sorry, we already have three black people, we need an asian person now". And the rallying cry of "needs more diversity" has become a synonym for "we are jealous that something in the real world actually works without us being involved".

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  16. Or just hire moral people and give them time... by OneOfMany07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My experience in the tech field is that companies constantly pressure their employees for more productivity, and that everyone can be moral. You don't need a degree in philosophy or psychology to be caring and aware of what is right/good...just as you don't need a computer science degree to program.

    Oh, and it wouldn't hurt to punish people who are immoral. Just like it would help to do the same in politics.

  17. Re:Riiiight. by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Psychologists can actually help people, though I suspect it's the thin end of the bell curve of that crowd. And killing all the lawyers never solves anything - not saying don't do it, just that we'll inevitably need a new crop of them.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  18. Re:Riiiight. by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem for those guys isn't the STEM degree - they were probably OK people when they were younger. Then they got MBAs.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  19. In other news... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cupcake bakeries need to hire more employees with degrees in astrophysics, bringing their much-needed understanding of electron degeneracy pressure in white dwarfs and pair-instability supernovae to the cupcake industry.

    Afternoon child daycare centers need to hire more trained welding technicians, who understand when to use arc or gas welders depending on the material used and the appropriate flux needed for strong joints in compressive or tensile loads in bridges, skyscrapers and submarines. This is vital for the children's well-being.

    Most importantly, symphony orchestras (whether public or privately-managed) need to get on the bandwagon (as it were) and hire more software engineers adept in low-level microcontroller coding in assembly language, supplemented with theory-oriented CS graduates who can develop better sorting algorithms for the violin section.

  20. Re:The Humanities are OVERWHELMINGLY left by Pseudonym · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The humanities are overwhelmingly liberal, as they should be. Free speech, free inquiry, and opposition to the supposed divine right of kings and popes is anathema.

    "Liberal" is only the same as "left" if you're in the Estates General. Similarly, "libertarian" is not "conservative" is not "fascist".

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  21. Re:Riiiight. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That list reads like a catalogue of personal failings

    "I have no social skills so can't see the value of even thinking about social issues.

    I have no no management skills so can't understand the need to manage projects and enterprises.

    I'm post-truth so think all politics are a waste of time."

    Of course history isn't worth studying, there is nothing we can learn from the past, right?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. Re: Companies with money to waste by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Traditional humanities majors can. Gender studies majors can't

    There's a big difference between a rational proto-science (heck, logic originated from philosophy!), quasi-science or even a sane description of something inherently non-scientific (like literature) -- and Orvellian doublethink that teaches people something contrary to obvious observation.

    The former group teaches students a way of thinking. The latter group is religion.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.