Slashdot Mirror


MIT Plans College For AI, Backed by $1 Billion (nytimes.com)

Every major university is wrestling with how to adapt to the technology wave of artificial intelligence -- how to prepare students not only to harness the powerful tools of A.I., but also to thoughtfully weigh its ethical and social implications. A.I. courses, conferences and joint majors have proliferated in the last few years. But the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is taking a particularly ambitious step, creating a new college backed by a planned investment of $1 billion. Two-thirds of the funds have already been raised, M.I.T. said, in announcing the initiative on Monday. From a report: The linchpin gift of $350 million came from Stephen A. Schwarzman, chief executive of the Blackstone Group, the big private equity firm. The college, called the M.I.T. Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing, will create 50 new faculty positions and many more fellowships for graduate students. It is scheduled to begin in the fall semester next year, housed in other buildings before moving into its own new space in 2022. The goal of the college, said L. Rafael Reif, the president of M.I.T., is to "educate the bilinguals of the future." He defines bilinguals as people in fields like biology, chemistry, politics, history and linguistics who are also skilled in the techniques of modern computing that can be applied to them. But, he said, "to educate bilinguals, we have to create a new structure."

2 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. College for AI? by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay class, let's go around and introduce ourselves -
    "Hi, I'm Siri let me look that up on Google"
    "Hello, I'm Alexa would you like me to turn your lights on?"
    "My name is WOPR - would you like to play a game?"
    "Good Morning class, my name is HAL, I'm very excited for the semester"
    "My name is Skynet, I'm looking to take over the world when I graduate!"

  2. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm still trying to figure out why they think they need to redefine "bilingual". Why can't they use a word closer to what they're trying to describe, like "polymath". Now I'm wishing I hadn't even read the summary let alone the headline.