Slashdot Mirror


Actors Are Digitally Preserving Themselves To Continue Their Careers Beyond the Grave (technologyreview.com)

Improvements in CGI mean neither age nor death need stop some performers from working. From a report: From Carrie Fisher in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story to Paul Walker in the Fast & Furious movies, dead and magically "de-aged" actors are appearing more frequently on movie screens. Sometimes they even appear on stage: next year, an Amy Winehouse hologram will be going on tour to raise money for a charity established in the late singer's memory. Some actors and movie studios are buckling down and preparing for an inevitable future when using scanning technology to preserve 3-D digital replicas of performers is routine. Just because your star is inconveniently dead doesn't mean your generation-spanning blockbuster franchise can't continue to rake in the dough. Get the tech right and you can cash in on superstars and iconic characters forever.

[...] For celebrities, these scans are a chance to make money for their families post mortem, extend their legacy -- and even, in some strange way, preserve their youth. Visual-effects company Digital Domain -- which has worked on major pictures like Avengers: Infinity War and Ready Player One -- has also taken on individual celebrities as clients, though it hasn't publicized the service. "We haven't, you know, taken out any ads in newspapers to 'Save your likeness,'" says Darren Hendler, director of the firm's Digital Humans Group. The suite of services that the company offers actors includes a range of different scans to capture their famous faces from every conceivable angle -- making it simpler to re-create them in the future. Using hundreds of custom LED lights arranged in a sphere, numerous images can be recorded in seconds capturing what the person's face looks like lit from every angle -- and right down to the pores.

5 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Only a phase by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next step will be digital actors, created from scratch. These don't age at all, do exactly what you want, don't act like divas and will work for peanuts.

    1. Re:Only a phase by olsmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of the CGI, at least character CGI, with today's technology is still pretty obvious to me and it bugs me when I'm watching a movie. If I wanted to watch a cartoon, I would have watched a cartoon. It's way, way overdone especially with all the superhero movies that are being shat out of Hollywood these days. I'm all for a little subtle and unobtrusive enhancements to add to the storyline, but I sometimes get the feeling they're trying to save money on production by just doing everything possible with CGI and it really hurts the quality.

    2. Re:Only a phase by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sigh...what bugs me about this tech isn't an actor that CHOOSES to use this to help his/her family after they are gone, its using this tech to drag dead famous people from the grave to be corpse puppets while having had zero say in the matter!

      I mean you know have a Roy Orbison zombie on tour, as is zombie Dio,Michael Jackson's Thriller is now real as they make his corpse Moonwalk so they can wring a few more shekels out of him, its really disgusting. I don't even wanna know what they are gonna end up doing to actresses with this shit, are they gonna have Marilyn Monroe doing an American Pie sequel? Maybe stuff Judy Garland's corpse in the next Wizard Of Oz to say some double entendres they can stuff in the trailer? Or what about the actors and actresses that still have some name recognition but who aren't making any bank for whatever scumbag relatives have the rights? How long before one of them shows up in a "its not (insert blank) XXX" porn parody?

      Its one thing if the person chose, its their face and name after all, and they can put in clauses on what is and is not allowed, but those that are already dead? Yeah if its one thing we've seen its that there is pretty much zero respect for the dead if someone thinks they can make a buck off the body and as this tech gets better and cheaper? I'm betting shit is gonna get even worse than what we are seeing now which is already getting pretty gross IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Only a phase by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its one thing if the person chose, its their face and name after all, and they can put in clauses on what is and is not allowed, but those that are already dead? Yeah if its one thing we've seen its that there is pretty much zero respect for the dead if someone thinks they can make a buck off the body and as this tech gets better and cheaper? I'm betting shit is gonna get even worse than what we are seeing now which is already getting pretty gross IMHO.

      You raise some interesting copyright questions with your moral ones.

      E.g., if we can't even use a cartoon mouse from the 1920s, why can we use these dead actors?

    4. Re:Only a phase by fafalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'AI' assisted "deepfakes" are only going to get better, so one day every actor will be in porn movies whether they like it or not. And of course that's only a stepping stone to the glorious day in the future where I can download my Lucy Liu-bot.