Slashdot Mirror


Bloodhound's 1,000 MPH Car Project Needs Money (theguardian.com)

AmiMoJo quotes the Guardian: Plans to build a British jet-powered car to speed at more than 1,000mph through the desert have hit quicksand, after the company behind the Bloodhound project entered administration. The dream of an ultra-fast car to break the land speed record led to the creation of Bloodhound Programme Ltd in 2007, with the idea of also engaging schools and students in engineering. Bloodhound has already built and tested a viable racing car to speeds of 200mph, but the project is in debt and needs to find £25m or face being wound up... Bloodhound said its programme had been a catalyst for research and development, as well as helping interest schoolchildren worldwide in science and engineering, with an associated educational campaign reaching more than 2 million children...

The planned car is a combination of jet, F1 car and spaceship that would cover the length of four and a half football pitches in a second.

45 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it doesn't.

    I'm trying to figure out how to burn money less efficiently, aside from straight up burning it.

    1. Re:Nope. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, this seems like a silly way to burn money. The best way of "engaging schools and students in engineering" is to involve them in solving real world problems that will benefit many people. This isn't doing that.

    2. Re:Nope. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The best way of "engaging schools and students in engineering" is to involve them in solving real world problems that will benefit many people. This isn't doing that.

      Sure it is. With a fleet of these cars I can finally open up a home delivery taco business. Without this car, the taco shells always get soggy by the time they arrive.

    3. Re:Nope. by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. What is the point of this? to go faster, so someone can try to go faster yet?

      How about they try solving some real-world problems instead?

      25 million pounds could go a long way addressing some of the real-world issues brits face (if they have a hard time figuring out what to do instead, just send it to the N.H.S.. i'm sure they can do somethign better then burn it up on a runway).

  2. impressive by fattmatt · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Bloodhound has already built and tested a viable racing car to speeds of 200mph"

    I think a couple rich guys in my neighborhood bought cars capable speeds of 200mph, with factory warranties.

    1. Re:impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the lead designer and project manager are the same people that worked on ThrustSSC and currently hold the land-speed record. I think they have some knowledge in this field.

    2. Re:impressive by fattmatt · · Score: 1

      Wow.

    3. Re:impressive by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      No, actually I wasn’t aware of that - thank you. Adding that particular bit of information might’ve made for a more useful summary than stating that they had a functional car which could exceed 200 mph... which does not exactly put them in an exclusive club.

      Now that I’ve read the article*, though, I’m somewhat surprised that the passing of 50+ years has not resulted in more impressive speed gains (the now-21-year-old record is 763mph). I guess it does point out the engineering difficulty of this.

      * I’ll turn in my geek card later

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:impressive by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

      " I think they have some knowledge in this field."

      Apparently they don't have any knowledge on how to fund their own project (or how you fund first, research later), something most PHD students learn right at the beginning of their studies.

    5. Re:impressive by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      Yes, but were they jet powered?

  3. A horizontal rocket? by thebes · · Score: 1

    How is the goal anything different than an existing rocket with wheels on its side?

    1. Re:A horizontal rocket? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is the goal anything different than an existing rocket with wheels on its side?

      It stays on the ground. That is the hard part. It is easy to make a rocket go fast. It is hard to control it.

      At 1000 mph, even a small amount of airflow under the car body will lift it off the ground, and in a fraction of a second you are completely airborne. Energy goes up as the square of velocity, so at 1000 mph, you have a hundred times as much energy as at 100 mph. The result is some spectacular crashes.

    2. Re: A horizontal rocket? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Still, rockets on wheels are a done deal, over 500 MPH decades ago, so why bother going to 1000? It's a useless means of land transport

    3. Re:A horizontal rocket? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. I like motorsports and I like speed records, but I could never get excited about those things... it's just a rocket with wheels. Not a car.

      SR-70 Blackbird has wheels, it can roll on the ground very well, but I wouldn't call it a car. A car is propelled by drive wheels. If your vehicle is jet propelled and the wheels don't do anything except get dragged along, it's not a car.

    4. Re:A horizontal rocket? by KixWooder · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Have you seen a picture of the thing? It's an F15 without wings.

      --
      I hate fat people.
  4. Re:JetF1Spaceship by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    High probability of crashing?

  5. 4 and a half football pitches per second by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    What does that translate to in either m/s, f/s or NFL fields per second.

    The summary is confusing with multiple different numeric systems. MPH, Football Pitches, Pounds...

    1. Re:4 and a half football pitches per second by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      What does that translate to in either m/s, f/s or NFL fields per second.

      . . . and instead of football pitches, I'd like to see it baseball pitches . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:4 and a half football pitches per second by isj · · Score: 1

      Your comment is confusing. Could you please rephrase it in terms of libraries of congress per furlong?

    3. Re:4 and a half football pitches per second by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Your comment is confusing. Could you please rephrase it in terms of libraries of congress per furlong?

      A Beowolf Cluster of Hot Grits of course.

    4. Re: 4 and a half football pitches per second by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      1,000MPH, like it says in big, black letters at the top of the fucking page.

    5. Re: 4 and a half football pitches per second by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Whooosh!

    6. Re:4 and a half football pitches per second by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Hot grits without Natalie Portman? Blasphemy!

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  6. Aren't we past this silly non-sense? by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a huge jet turbine with wheels attached. Big fat hairy deal.
    I'm sure that was cool sometime in the early sixties or something, but come on, seriously?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Aren't we past this silly non-sense? by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a jet and a rocket. The jet isn't fast enough.

    2. Re: Aren't we past this silly non-sense? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      This is a study of boundary layers, nothing more.

  7. Meh by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    If it's not driven by the wheels it's just a low flying aeroplane.

    P.S. A story about a financially infeasible car - where's Rei?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re: Meh by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Probably out pulling wild lateral G's and laying strips in his "financially-unfeasible" car.

    2. Re: Meh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Why the scare quotes, you prick?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. I’m having trouble parsing this story by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could someone rephrase it in terms of a car analogy?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: I’m having trouble parsing this story by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      It's like a car, but without purpose or good fuel economy. Instead of having an engine with pistons in cylinders, the whole vehicle is like a piston without a cylinder being pushed from the underside.

    2. Re:I’m having trouble parsing this story by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Could someone rephrase it in terms of a car analogy?

      Elon Musk is taking preorders on the next generation Tesla Roadster, with a peak speed of at least 1000mph.

      He promises delivery next summer.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re: I’m having trouble parsing this story by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      So... not a physics major?

    4. Re: I’m having trouble parsing this story by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes I did major in physics and worked in the field for years.

      my description of this pointless project is accurate. there is zero need for a mach 1.5 rocket on wheels on this planet. there is need for advances in rocket propulsion in aerodynamic and ballistic flight, however. money should be spent on that, not this farce. good thing it's getting shut down.

  9. Re: Not from me please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You must be one of those people who think money disappears when it gets spent.
    That if it gets spent on something like this, it can never be spent on something different.

    Here's a clue: that money goes to engineers and other staff to design and build the thing. They are then capable of spending that money themselves on anything they want, less the amount that goes back to the government as taxes.

  10. Stop! Hide this from Elon. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    This is a dastardly trick by the short sellter to provoke a reaction from Elon!

    Anytime now he is going to tween Tesla Model FU that will go 2000 mph and it will cost 20,000 $ and it will ship in 2020, reservation 2000$ starts tomorrow. "This is the next level of digital, not 1s and 0s, but 2s and 0s, because we are twice as good. 2000 mph, 20,000$ price, 2020 shipping, 2000 for preorder... See ? All 2s and 0s!"

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  11. Supersonic by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    1000 mph is supersonic speed, which means they will have some extra engineering to tackle

    1. Re: Supersonic by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      But only because those 'extra MPH' are supersonic, right??

    2. Re: Supersonic by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Well, it really adds extra engineering problems

  12. If it can't steer with wheels or follow a road, by Snufu · · Score: 1

    than it is not a car. It is a broken jet plane that can't takeoff.

  13. Or Do Something Practical? by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    There is so much room for improvement in the daily automobile. I doubt that a 1,000mph would add anything to our world.

    Not only would they building a car with limited usefulness, it's calibrated in US-CU and not Metric.
    It's all about being infatuated with an idea, a number.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re: Or Do Something Practical? by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      I've heard about "daily bowel movements" but I'm unfamiliar with "daily automobiles."

      Sounds painful... are they full-scale??

  14. railgun by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    base it on a railgun
    good for 5000 mile an hour
    why stop at 1000

    --
    Go well
    1. Re: railgun by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      "Haiku for retards?"

  15. Re: If it can't steer with wheels or follow a road by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    They're just trying to develop extremely-high stall speeds, so as to take advantage of the longest runways.