Slashdot Mirror


A Device That Can Pull Drinking Water From the Air Just Won the Latest XPrize (fastcompany.com)

Two years ago, XPrize, which creates challenges that pit the brightest minds against one another, announced that it would give any startup or company $1 million that can turn thin air into water. This month, it announced that the challenge has been concluded. From a report: A new device that sits inside a shipping container can use clean energy to almost instantly bring clean drinking water anywhere -- the rooftop of an apartment building in Nairobi, a disaster zone after a hurricane in Manila, a rural village in Zimbabwe -- by pulling water from the air. The design, from the Skysource/Skywater Alliance, just won $1.5 million in the Water Abundance XPrize. The competition, which launched in 2016, asked designers to build a device that could extract at least 2,000 liters of water a day from the atmosphere (enough for the daily needs of around 100 people), use clean energy, and cost no more than 2 cents a liter.

"We do a lot of first principles thinking at XPrize when we start designing these challenges," says Zenia Tata, who helped launch the prize and serves as chief impact officer of XPrize. Nearly 800 million people face water scarcity; other solutions, like desalination, are expensive. Freshwater is limited and exists in a closed system. But the atmosphere, the team realized, could be tapped as a resource. "At any given time, it holds 12 quadrillion gallons -- the number 12 with 19 zeros after it -- a very, very, big number," she says. The household needs for all 7 billion people on earth add up to only around 350 or 400 billion gallons. A handful of air-to-water devices already existed, but were fairly expensive to use. The new system, called WEDEW ("wood-to-energy deployed water") was created by combining two existing systems. One is a device called Skywater, a large box that mimics the way clouds are formed: It takes in warm air, which hits cold air and forms droplets of condensation that can be used as pure drinking water. The water is stored in a tank inside the shipping container, which can then be connected to a bottle refill station or a tap.

10 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. It's called a dehumidifier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's called a dehumidifier.

    1. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it is carbon neutral. In fact burning oil is also carbon neutral. The universe is zero-sum.

    2. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The growing plants also need water ...

      If there is sufficient groundwater to allow renewable forestry resources to grow, there is sufficient ground water for a pump ... which isn't that much work to install with the amount of equipment you can fit in a shipping container.

    3. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by mukinrestak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it depends on your political viewpoints, but he has a little something for everyone.

      He's vocally atheist, which means his mere existence offends the invisible sky wizard worshippers.

      He's especially critical of Islam, which enrages leftshits crying about muh Islamophobia.

      He's anti-Brexit, which makes many a right-winger angrily slam their keyboards in their moms' basements.

      He's anti-feminist and was involved in Gamergate, which caused many a hipster's manties to mysteriously twist.

      He debunks scientifically unsound ideas, which makes their proponents (often of a "green energy" or other "green" ilk) cry into their organic free-trade soy lattes.

    4. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it seems like most USian folks displaced by natural disaster seem to sit around and wait for someone to deliver salvation in frustration-free packaging.

      More a matter of "those types are the ones who make the news."

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Be fair: Anyone who has lived their life in the urban or suburban region of a modern industrialized country is going to be in the same situation, and for most it is the appropriate action to take. They can know with confidence that, while things are looking pretty bad right now, there's a concerted rescue effort underway and help will arrive long before they have to resort to eating the family dog.

    6. Re:It's called a dehumidifier. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hookers and Blow it is then.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Re:Some quick sums by oobayly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Water content depends on the temperature too, so you only get 30 g per m^3 at 30 deg and 1 atm. If the temperature is lower you get less. So your estimate of 20 g in the UK is most likely too high (unless it was 30 deg near you). Yesterday it was 18 deg and 64% RH at my local RAF base, which gives only 10 g/m^3.

    Anyway, take Nairobi, today it'll be 24 deg and 38% RH, which gives 9 g/m^3, in the evening it'll be 18 deg and 72% RH, which gives 11 g/m^3 (about the same which makes sense). So the volume flow through the container will need to be 200,000 m^3 per day, which is about 3,000 cycles per day. To be fair, while that sounds like a lot, 200,000 m^3 per day is only 2.3 m^3/s. To put that into perspective that's 1 m/s airflow through a 1.5 x 1.5 metre aperture.

    The other thing to look at is the power consumption - a portable "industrial" dehumidifier extracts 70 litres / day, consuming 1.35 kW - that is 0.466 kWh / litre. We'll be generous and assume this device is twice as efficient, so that gives us 466 kWh to provide 2,000 litres of water, which is just under 20 kW power consumption.

    The numbers don't sound altogether unreasonable. Unlike so of the other water out of air "solutions" - *cough* WaterSeer - they're not assuming they can do it passively, so that's a start...

  3. Re:It'll never fly by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a dehumidifier. Over time, there is stuff building up, but compared to the amount of water, it is not much. If the choice was between no water and the dehumidifier water, the choice is really simple.

    In addition, filtering the water is a very simple thing to do.

  4. Re:Waiting for Dave's rant on this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And as usual, especially for Dave Jones, both have been debunked. Seriously, apart from Batterizer I don't think Jones has ever once been right in one of his debunking rants.

    In this case they are applying the wrong test to the device. If you read TFA you can see that it needs a lot of energy to work, which they suggest supplying via a biomass generator or solar+battery. As such it's not designed to run continuously or even be particularly efficient, it's just designed to supply emergency water for a short period of time in an emergency.

    They seem to think that it's going to be deployed in a desert and run indefinitely. That was never the goal.

    Often the problem in a disaster area is lack of potable water. Fuel/energy may be more available so it makes sense to use that to create clean water. Why not clean up dirty water? Well you can but there are risks to handling dirty water, and it's easy to contaminate the containers you want to use for clean water. With biomass you can you stuff that has to be cleared from the disaster area anyway as fuel.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC