Slashdot Mirror


Microplastics Found In Human Stools For the First Time (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times: In a pilot study with a small sample size, researchers looked for microplastics in stool samples of eight people from Finland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom and Austria. To their surprise, every single sample tested positive for the presence of a variety of microplastics (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source). In a pilot study with a small sample size, researchers looked for microplastics in stool samples of eight people from Finland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom and Austria. To their surprise, every single sample tested positive for the presence of a variety of microplastics.

The new paper, which was presented Monday at a gastroenterology conference in Vienna, could provide support for marine biologists who have long warned of the dangers posed by microplastics in our oceans. But the paper suggests that microplastics are entering our bodies through other means, as well. To conduct the study, they selected volunteers from each country who kept food diaries for a week and provided stool samples. Dr. Philipp Schwabl, a researcher at the Medical University of Vienna who led the study, and his colleagues analyzed the samples with a spectrometer. Up to nine different kinds of plastics were detected, ranging in size from .002 to .02 inches. The most common plastics detected were polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate -- both major components of plastic bottles and caps.

4 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. It is High Fructose Corn Syrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is caused by High Fructose Corn Syrup consumption and obeisity does correlate directly to that:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup

    See the graph showing the sharp rise in total corn based sugars in the 1980's and 1990s, in the *USA*.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup#/media/File:US_Sweetener_consumption,_1966_to_2013.svg

    Your idea of "unsupported by evidence" is laughable.
    HFCS is pure calories in carbohydrate form. The exact thing needed to get fat.
    HFCS's consumption rise corresponding to people getting super fat.

    Whereever HFCS consumption increase, so the people became fat.

    1. Re:It is High Fructose Corn Syrup by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is caused by High Fructose Corn Syrup consumption and obeisity does correlate directly to that

      Correlation is not causation. HFCS consumption went up in America along with obesity. But many other countries also became obese, some worse than America, and they did NOT consume much HFCS, because they have no corn lobby pushing it.

      Dietary surveys of Americans show a weak correlation between HFCS and obesity. Many people that avoid it got fat. Many people drinking several sodas per day stayed skinny. Some sodas are made with cane sugar, and people that drink those get fat at the same rate as people that drink HFCS soda.

      There is plenty of evidence that all types of sugar are bad for you in excess. There is not much evidence that HFCS is worse than other sugars.

      Animal studies are inconclusive. Some show a correlation of HFCS with weight gain, but most do not.

      NIH: Lack of evidence that HFCS causes obesity

      List of countries by BMI. America is 17th.

  2. Re:Coca Cola in plastic vs glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in the industry. All aluminum and steel cans have an internal coating. Some types are more visible but they all have it.

  3. Re:Coca Cola in plastic vs glass by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most probably it has to do with the different source of sugar. Coca Cola tastes different in every country regardless of which bottle you get it in. As for beer it could very likely be the case that the beer in the can is fresher. Glass bottles are not ideal for beer in the way they are stored and exposed to light. Beer is sensitive to light which is why many beers use as dark of a glass as possible. In cans beer is kept fully airtight, light tight, and nitrogen blanketed. I always ask this question during brewery tours and the answer is always the same: cans are better for the beer, but our customers think it's cheap which is why we ship it in bottles instead.

    Now just remember this tibbit next time you're drinking a Corona. Maybe it's not a bad beer that is only remotely palatable when combined with lemon, but rather it just went off on account of ignoring hundreds of years of experience of exposing beer to light in clear glass bottles :-)