Slashdot Mirror


Cerebellum More Involved In Cognition Than Previously Believed (npr.org)

Rick Schumann writes about the findings of a new study published in the journal Neuron: A team of neuroscientists from Washington University in St. Louis, performing fMRI tests on 10 people to quantify the various connections between the cerebellum and the rest of the brain, are now being led to believe that the cerebellum actually plays a role in conscious thought, whereas previously it was believed it was only involved in sensory-motor function. What they found is that it appears that only 20 percent of the cerebellum was dedicated to physical motion, while the other 80 percent serves as an "editor" of the conscious thought process, refining and filtering thoughts in a sort of background process. This discovery may lead to changes in the way psychiatric patients are treated for disorders like schizophrenia, depression, and obsessive-compulsive behaviors.

40 comments

  1. One baby step closer to real AI? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Research like this may take us a small step closer to figuring out how a human brain actually 'thinks', leading us to being able to create real Artificial Intelligence, not the ersatz we're seeing right now. This research also serves to highlight how little we actually understand about our own brains.

    1. Re:One baby step closer to real AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One step closer to understanding why all psychiatrists end up being alcoholics.

    2. Re:One baby step closer to real AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, Beau...
      Well before your time...
      And goes RIGHT over your head...
        http://hrwiki.org/w/images/archive/d/de/20050320133126%21Cerebellumed_Cheerleader.PNG
       
        ALERT! Slashdot has been cerebellumed by BeauHD!

    3. Re:One baby step closer to real AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that.
      It is an amazing gadget, especially when creating something new.
      Lots of different thoughts flitting around and magically, something new but coherent pops out.

      I wonder if they will find any quantum mechanisms there?
      Evolution is a pretty good tool for finding useful mechanisms, after all.

    4. Re: One baby step closer to real AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you not, with the witches?

  2. Republican retard is upset, he has no brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's sad that even hippies have outwitted you by such a large margin. Republican nazi faggotism might be mitigated by marijuana, but you're too cowardly even to try it? Sad. Stick to beer-rape instead, concepts you can comprehend.

    (My condolences to your mother, the probable rape victim)

  3. Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Refining thought? OK fine. But filtering? So that even "I" don't know what my cerebellum has discarded, before "I" think it? Before "we" think it? Heaven help us all.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      It'll be fine unless someone figures out how to read the discarded speculative conclusions in a predictable fashion.

  4. It makes sense. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When *I* was in schools the known function of the cerebellum was shaping what would otherwise be ballistic movement. Say you reach out to touch a dot at arm's length; your finger traces a smooth, precise, efficient curve. Without the cerebellum you'd just fling your arm in the general direction of the dot. We were taught the crebellum was a like an enormous, high speed, nerve impulse shaping co-processor. The structure of the cerebellum is kind of like a co-processor, lots of similar looking, repeating modular units.

    The motor-only view of the cerebellum has been obsolete for 20 years or more. In any case it always seemed curious to me that such a large brain structure would be dedicated to that movement shaping function; it's not as if human gross movements are any more complex than other animals.

    Maybe the cerebellum originally evolved to shape physical movement, but evolution is the ultimate hacker; it doesn't care what things are for, it cares what can be done with them. It's a bit like building supercomputers from GPUs; it's not what GPUs used to be for, but it works.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:It makes sense. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      If you want hardware analogies, then biological brains in general seem to be more like a massive array of FPGAs, which can be reconfigured to serve new purposes.

    2. Re:It makes sense. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Do you have a car analogy? And could you perhaps convert any units of measure into Libraries of Congress?

    3. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The standard theory of the cerebellum is to model the interior and exterior world so that reaction times are not 400 ms long, but, typically, much shorter, and that the control system for *any* movement -- not just ballistic movements, of which I believe there are now thought to be exactly zero, as even saccades have a modium of in-flight feeback control -- can be made that much tighter. We see the effects during external perturbations of movements when the cerebellar model fails and the long-latency proprioceptive or visiual feedback system has to kick in.

    4. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cerebellum keeps tract of all movements during the day and transforms them into chemical information. The chemical information is known as melatonin. The reason for this is very complex and has to do with determinism.

    5. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how large the Library of Congress is compared to Wales.

    6. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a massive number of neurons in the spinal column and the speed of adjustments of professional athletes seem to indicate that some motion adaptation is being done in the spinal cord.

      From an evolution point of view, the oldest neurons controlled the gut. What is now the spinal column controlled simple motion and the brain evolved on the top of that to hook in sensors.

    7. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A praying mantis is much more agile than a human and exhibits the same 'movement shaping' behavior at sometimes much higher speeds and with more limbs. Its brain is minuscule. I'd hope the cerebellum does more than that.

    8. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think in your case he'd have to make an analogy that involves things made by Playskool.

    9. Re:It makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A brain is like a car that can go 0 to 60 in about 2.7 Libraries of Congress.

  5. Re:Marijuana use negatively affects the cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fucktards are over-represented among Anonymous Cowards. Maybe fucktardedness is a mental disorder -- much like voting for the Fanta Menace for POTUS. xD

  6. Re:"refining and filtering thoughts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True dat, Trump voters only "think" with their amygdalas.

  7. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why you get that odd feeling in the back of your head when you have strong conflicting emotions. You can feel yourself at work if you just stop and pay attention.

    Hence the phrase "Something in the back of my head is telling me..."

  8. Really rough analogy by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Really rough analogy: cerebellum is the CPU, cerebrum is the GPU. Other stuff is networking.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  9. It's the main brain's back up man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Main Brain: "I don't care Leg, dogs can't look up, isn't that right Cerebellum?"
    Cerebellum: "Uhh, yeh boss"
    Main Brain: "See, two brains! Dumb ass Leg"

  10. Aeroplanes are not made out of feathers by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Certainly understanding human cognition will help AI development. But AI will no more be a copy of a biological brain than an aeroplane is a copy of a bird.

    1. Re:Aeroplanes are not made out of feathers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the sense that understanding the bird let's you understand the fundamental mechanism, it's still going to be a big deal. I feel like we don't even have a correct foundational understanding for the brain yet. We're wandering the dark.

    2. Re:Aeroplanes are not made out of feathers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too literal and pedantic to understand what it is you're talking about.

  11. Did they use proper controls this time? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    Because without those, you can detect brain activity in a dead fish by fMRI.
    https://www.wired.com/2009/09/...

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  12. Marijuana use negatively affects the cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leftists are over-represented among pot users.

    Maybe Leftism is a mental disorder.

  13. Re:Marijuana use negatively affects the cerebellum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey faggot, your AUTISM is showing, did your keeper lose track of you? You're not supposed to play on the internet, you'll just have one of those fits you have, then they'll have to wrap you in a blanket again until you calm the fuck down.

  14. Hot Take! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The brain is increasingly linked to thinking! Scientists express astonishment!"

  15. schizophrenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's common sense...

  16. Biologists ... what else are they wrong about? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Which is fine if not for the fact that medicine draws absolute conclusions that affect you based on incomplete knowledge.
    But that's science right?
    And how much do we really know about the atmosphere and climate? And yet engineers and scientists are stepping up with "solutions".

    It's not that science is incomplete, it's that people (profiteers and politicians) will try and make you believe it is.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.