Slashdot Mirror
Tesla Faces FBI Probe Over Model 3 Production Numbers (cnbc.com)
A new report from The Wall Street Journal says the FBI is reviewing Tesla's Model 3 production numbers as part of an ongoing criminal probe into whether the company misled investors. "Federal agents are reviewing Tesla's stated Model 3 numbers dating back to early 2017, the Journal reports, citing unnamed sources," CNBC reports. From the report: Tesla had previously said it provided documents to the Department of Justice regarding CEO Elon Musk's controversial take-private tweet -- a blunder that ultimately cost Tesla and Musk a combined $40 million in fraud settlement fees. Now Tesla says it also provided information to the Department of Justice regarding Musk's public statements regarding production numbers of its Model 3 sedan. Tesla says the company has not received "a subpoena, a request for testimony, or any other formal process," but the Journal reported Friday that former Tesla employees have received subpoenas and requests for testimony.
Musk didn't cut any corners. He simply used "border-radius: 8px".
#DeleteFacebook
Your parent never said government has no business asserting power over individuals, so your reply is a logical fallacy known as a "straw man".
Next, it's possible for 2 individuals to agree that the contract which binds their behavior will be arbitrated and enforced by the government, making such arbitration and enforcement by the government a perfectly voluntary interaction.
However, as an aside, one can see that the government need not play a special role here either; why should this one particular organization ("government") be the arbitrator? The individuals in question could agree to another arbitrator. Well, this point is just too much for most of you NPCs to grasp, so let's not go there.
Has there ever been a company which has had to endure as much media sponsored market manipulation as Tesla?
Two days ago the news headline was:
"Tesla reports surprise profit, stock surges. Tesla reported its third-ever profit in its eight years as a public company. This exceeded average analyst expectations of losses of 15 cents per share on revenue of $6.32 billion."
Today more speculative drama chipping away at its integrity and success.
Did that "stock surge" burn someone? Did someone think "oh dear, I was wrong, I should have gotten in earlier" or are the shorties still dreaming they can topple it?