Slashdot Mirror


NASA Revives Hubble Space Telescope After Three-Week Mechanical Failure (nasa.gov)

"NASA's Hubble Space Telescope returned to normal operations late Friday, Oct. 26, and completed its first science observations on Saturday, Oct. 27 at 2:10 AM EDT," NASA reports. The observations were of the distant, star-forming galaxy DSF2237B-1-IR and were taken in infrared wavelengths with the Wide Field Camera 3 instrument. The return to conducting science comes after successfully recovering a backup gyroscope, or gyro, that had replaced a failed gyro three weeks earlier. A gyro is a device that measures the speed at which the spacecraft is turning, which is necessary to help Hubble turn and lock on to new targets. One of Hubble's gyros failed on Oct. 5, and the spacecraft's operations team activated a backup gyro the next day. However, the backup incorrectly returned rotation rates that were far in excess of the actual rates.

Last week the operations team commanded Hubble to perform numerous maneuvers, or turns, and switched the gyro between different operational modes, which successfully cleared what was believed to be blockage between components inside the gyro that produced the excessively high rate values. Next, the team monitored and tested the gyro with additional maneuvers to make sure that the gyro was stable. The team then installed additional safeguards on the spacecraft in case the excessive rate values return, although this is not anticipated...

Hubble is now back in its normal science operations mode with three fully functional gyros. Originally required to last 15 years, Hubble has now been at the forefront of scientific discovery for more than 28 years. The team expects the telescope will continue to yield amazing discoveries well into the next decade, enabling it to work alongside the James Webb Space Telescope.

12 of 25 comments (clear)

  1. Re:"It died" by davecb · · Score: 2

    Sort of like an easter card I got from a friend, "Heard your God died, hope he's feeling better soon".

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  2. Classic Tech Solution by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

    TLDR: NASA turned it off and back on.

    1. Re:Classic Tech Solution by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TLDR: NASA turned it off and back on.

      Actually, they did this while shaking it too. They did the equivalent of smacking it on the side while flipping the power switch on and off a few times. A classic tech move in the repair shop.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  3. Holy shit! by Chas · · Score: 2

    Turning it off then back on again worked!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Holy shit! by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Turning it off then back on again worked!

      They actually did more than cycling the power. They had the spacecraft in a pretty fast spin motion and cycled the power a few times. I liken it to shacking it while hitting the power button a few times.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  4. Re:"It died" by PPH · · Score: 2

    "I don't want to go on the cart."

    - Hubble

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  5. At our Best by PuddleBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Originally required to last 15 years, Hubble has now been at the forefront of scientific discovery for more than 28 years."

    If we, as a civilization, could just set aside the petty sh*t that we seem to slide into, and do more of this kind of thing (well thought out, well made instruments that expand our knowledge of the universe), maybe we could reach a point where the conditions that motivate the 'radicals' could be overcome, kids could grow up happier and we could all enjoy a world with less fear.

    --guess I'm in a mood today...--

    1. Re: At our Best by edris90 · · Score: 2

      Desperation creates and motivates radicals. Society manufactures desperation in one or more demographics in order to create a safe harbor for other demographics. You you can spread it around until it's a lesser degree of strife and annoyance spread out across demographics, aka small tribess and nomads. Or you can build Society, which requires our culture that demonizes end justifies the exploitation of the masses, I'm demonizing of certain key behaviors, to shift the labor and efforts to those manufactured criminals and low classes

  6. Re:Can't they use the stars to determine rotation? by DCFusor · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're assuming the antenna can stay pointed at earth by magic, and that the telemetry can handle a hugely increased data rate, and that no time exposure will have inter-pixel drifts during the exposure, and that fast exposures are free of shot noise because with that few photons/second, some random is going to creep in. Signal processing....you learn things.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  7. This isn't a measurement gyro by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    A gyro is a device that measures the speed at which the spacecraft is turning, which is necessary to help Hubble turn and lock on to new targets.

    Er, this is actually a positioning gyro, that is, a spinning wheel driven electrically that applies torque to the spacecraft when its rotational speed is changed. If you have a bunch of them aligned with the x/y/z axis of your craft you can point it in any direction without the use of thrusters.

    A measurement gyro is also a spinning wheel, except that you don't rotate it - it rests in a set of gimbals allowing the craft to rotate around it freely. You can read your position by zeroing the gyro when you're pointing in a known direction, then you read the positions of the gimbals to figure out where you're pointing now.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
    1. Re:This isn't a measurement gyro by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2

      Do you have a cite for that this is due to reaction wheel instead of a gyroscope? Because every single reference I find and everyone who I have talked through via industry connections thinks it's a gyro, not a reaction wheel. Most of the guys I knew who worked Hubble operations long since retired, so I can't ask them any more. We did design it, of course...

  8. Re:Can't they use the stars to determine rotation? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

    Effectively, the Fine Guidance sensor does this already. When they were on 2 gyros, it probably use the Fine Guidance sensor outputs directly. Normally, you don't want to do that, because its relatively noisy compared to the gyros, so you don't get full performance. Normally it integrates the gyro data to get an estimated position, then filters in the Fine Guidance sensor data as a correction to the estimate.

    BTW, the post above about "position gyros" (which are actually called reaction wheels - any gyroscopic effects are generally undesirable side effects, and they certainly aren't control moment gyros (gimballed reaction wheels)) is just wrong, the failure was certainly in the conventional gyro/IRU system.