Slashdot Mirror
Does Eating Organic Food Help Prevent Cancer? (usatoday.com)
An anonymous reader quotes USA Today:
People who regularly eat organic food are less likely to develop cancer than those who don't, according to a new study out of France. A team of researchers studied 68,946 adult volunteers from France who provided information on how often they ate organic food, drinks and even dietary supplements. Participants were given a score, based on how often they eat organic food ranging from "most of the time" to "never" or "I don't know." During two follow-up appointments, one in 2009 and another in 2016, the researchers then tracked cancer diagnoses, the most prevalent being breast cancer. Other cancers observed included prostate cancer, skin cancer, colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphomas and lymphomas.
People who reported higher organic food scores were less likely to be diagnosed with cancer than the rest of the group. For example, those who consumed the most organic food were 25 percent less likely to have cancer, according to the research. That number grew to more than half when looking at cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
People who reported higher organic food scores were less likely to be diagnosed with cancer than the rest of the group. For example, those who consumed the most organic food were 25 percent less likely to have cancer, according to the research. That number grew to more than half when looking at cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Income level is one of the strongest determinants of health.
Generally, regular organic food purchasers will be above average income, no?
Did they control for other health-promoting or harming behaviours, which are likely to differ between organic food choosers and general population.
It could be the pesticides, but it could also be any number of other factors associated with lifestyle, unless these were carefully controlled for in the experiment.
Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
perhaps they have adjusted for 'people that eat large amounts of organic food generally being more health concious'.
TFA quotes several scientists criticising the study because it did NOT correct for other factors. So this could just be "eating organic" being correlated with eating fewer calories and less sugar and processed food. It could also just be a correlation with being more affluent, which is already known to be correlated with better health.
Studies based on surveys, like this one, should be viewed with far more skepticism than studies based on controlled experiments.
Quote from the parent comment: "Plenty of pesticides are used in organic farming..."
See, for example, The Truth About Organic Farming (Dec. 22, 2009)
Quote:
"It has been assumed for years that pesticides that occur naturally (in certain plants, for example) are somehow better for us and the environment than those that have been created by man. As more research is done into their toxicity, however, this simply isn't true, either. Many natural pesticides have been found to be as bad if not worse than synthetic ones.
"Take the example of Rotenone. Rotenone was widely used in the US as an organic pesticide for decades 3. Because it is natural in origin, occurring in the roots and stems of a small number of subtropical plants, it was considered "safe" as well as "organic". However, research has shown that rotenone is highly dangerous because it kills by attacking the mitochondria, the energy powerhouses of all living cells. Research found that exposure to rotenone caused Parkinson's Disease-like symptoms in rats 4, and killed many species, including humans. Rotenone's use as a pesticide has already been discontinued in the US as of 2005 due to health concerns, but shockingly, it's still poured into our waters every year because it is approved for fisheries management use as a piscicide [poisonous to fish] to remove unwanted fish species. The point I'm driving home here is that just because something is natural doesn't make it non-toxic or safe."
Other issues: There are other issues that are generally not explored. For example, if a food is labeled "Organic", is it actually that, or is the label not honest?
The fact is, there are many sub-issues, as I said at the end of my comment. I didn't choose the one you like.
I agree that "conventional pesticides" are often "appallingly dangerous". It is a HUGE mistake, however, to restrict the investigations to conventional pesticides, in my opinion.
This article does some exploration, imperfectly in some areas: Yes, You Are Definitely Ingesting Pesticides. Here's Why It's Not A Problem. (Aug. 18, 2017)
Organic Farmer here. While itâs true that organic farming uses Pesticides and conventional farming uses âsmore preciseâ pesticides. The actual effects of the synthetic pesticide cocktail thatâ(TM)s needed to avoid pests growing resistant to the different agents is not part of the approval process which focuses on toxicity on mammals and to a much lesser degree on water and soil organisms. Itâs also pretty much faux that synthetic pesticides just dissolve and have no effect on Wildlife. The effects on water organisms near crops is really tremendous and usually ends up in high infertility rates of frogs and other amphibious animals. Mainly due to the selective nature of fungal pesticides. Also most conventional fungicides are systemically up by the plant itself in contrast to organic pesticides you simply wash off.